RESUMO
STUDY QUESTION: Do genetic variations in the testosterone pathway genes modify the effect of treatment on the levels of testosterone and LH in long-term testicular cancer (TC) survivors (TCSs)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Variations in LH receptor (LHR) and in 5α-reductase II (SRD5A2) genes may modify the effect of TC treatment on testosterone levels, whereas genetic variations in the androgen receptor (AR) may modify the effect on LH levels. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: TCSs experience variable degrees of long-term reduction in gonadal function after treatment. This variability can in part be explained by treatment intensity, but may also be due to individual variations in genes involved in the function and metabolism of reproductive hormones. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cross-sectional study on testosterone and LH levels in 637 Norwegian TCSs in relation to genetic variants and TC treatment. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The single nucleotide polymorphisms LHR Asn291Ser (rs12470652) and Ser312Asn (rs2293275), as well as SRD5A2 Ala49Thr (rs9282858) and Val89Leu (rs523349) were analyzed by allele-specific PCR. The insertion polymorphism LHR InsLQ (rs4539842) was analyzed by sequencing. The numbers of AR CAG and GGN repeats were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Blood samples were collected 5-21 years after diagnosis (median 11 years) and serum total testosterone and LH were analyzed by commercial immunoassays. The TCSs were divided into four groups according to their treatment; surgery only, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with ≤850 or >850 mg of cisplatin. Polymorphisms presenting P < 0.1 for the interaction term with treatment in an initial two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were investigated further in two consecutive one-way ANCOVA analyses to elucidate the interaction between treatment and genotype. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For the whole group of TCSs, there were no significant differences between the hormone levels in homozygotes for the wild type and carriers of at least one polymorphic allele for the investigated polymorphisms. Three of the polymorphisms showed signs of interaction with treatment, i.e. LHR InsLQ, SRD5A2 A49T and the AR CAG repeat. Follow-up analyses revealed three situations where only one of the genotypes of the polymorphism where associated with significantly different hormone levels after surgery compared with after additional cytotoxic treatment: For LHR InsLQ, only the wild-type allele was associated with lower testosterone levels after cisplatin > 850 mg compared with after surgery (24% lower, P < 0.001). For SRD5A2 A49T, testosterone levels were lower after radiotherapy compared with after surgery, but only for the heterozygotes for the polymorphism (39% lower, P = 0.001). In comparison, the testosterone levels were just slightly lower after radiotherapy (6% lower, P = 0.039) or cisplatin ≤ 850 mg (7% lower, P = 0.041), compared with surgery, independent of genotypes. For AR CAG, only the reference length of CAG = 21-22 had significantly higher LH levels after cisplatin ≤ 850 mg compared with after surgery (70% higher, P < 0.001). Independent of genotypes, however, LH levels after cisplatin ≤ 850 mg were only 26% higher than after surgery (P = 0.005). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Unadjusted P-values are presented. For analysis involving genotypes, the level of statistical significance was adjusted for the total number of polymorphisms tested, n = 7, i.e. to P < 0.007 (0.5/7). The rather weak associations indicate that additional polymorphisms are involved in the modulation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: To our knowledge, this is the first study supporting the notion that polymorphisms may explain at least some of the inter-individual differences in endocrine response to TC treatment. Our findings suggest that individuals with certain genotypes may be more vulnerable to certain treatments. Knowledge on genetic predisposition concerning treatment-related endocrine gonadotoxicity to different treatment regimens may help tailoring TC therapy when possible. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Research Council of Norway (Grant No. 160619). There were no competing interests.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Testosterona/sangue , Estudos Transversais , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Receptores do LH/genética , SobreviventesRESUMO
STUDY QUESTION: Is there an association between testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) and genetic polymorphisms in AKT1, PTEN and the 8q24 locus? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our findings suggest that genetic variation in PTEN may influence the risk of TGCT. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There is strong evidence that genetic variation influences the risk of TGCT. The oncogene, AKT1, the tumor suppressor gene, PTEN and the chromosome 8q24 locus play important roles in cancer development in general. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We have conducted a population-based Norwegian-Swedish case-parent study, based on cases diagnosed in 1990-2008, including 831 triads (TGCT case and both parents), 474 dyads (TGCT case and one parent) and 712 singletons (only the TGCT case). In addition we expanded the study to include 3922 unrelated male controls from the TwinGene project. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We genotyped 26 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in AKT1, PTEN and the 8q24 locus. First, triads and dyads were included in a likelihood-based association test. To increase the statistical power, case singletons and controls from the TwinGene project were included in a single test for association. We examined if the allelic effect on TGCT risk differed by histological subgroup, country of origin or parent of origin. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with Bonferroni correction (P bonf) for multiple testing. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In the case-parent analyses, none of the 26 SNPs were significantly associated with TGCT. Of the 23 SNPs investigated in the combined study, one SNP in PTEN (rs11202586) remained associated with TGCT risk after adjusting for multiple testing (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.06-1.28, P bonf = 0.040). We found no difference in risk according to histological subgroup, parent of origin or between countries. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our study is strengthened by the population-based design and large sample size, which gives high power to detect risk alleles. The reported association was not highly significant, and although it was based on an a priori hypothesis of this tumor suppressor gene being implicated in the etiology of TGCT, replication studies, as well as functional studies of this polymorphism, are warranted. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: We report, to our knowledge, a novel association between TGCT and a marker in the tumor suppressor gene PTEN. Previous studies have linked PTEN to TGCT etiology, and there is also a link between PTEN and KITLG, which contains TGCT susceptibility loci revealed through recent genome-wide studies.
Assuntos
Cromossomos Humanos Par 8/genética , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/genética , PTEN Fosfo-Hidrolase/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/genética , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Estudos de Associação Genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , Razão de Chances , SuéciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) is the most common cancer in young men, and an imbalance between the estrogen and androgen levels in utero is hypothesized to influence TGCT risk. Thus, polymorphisms in genes involved in the action of sex hormones may contribute to variability in an individual's susceptibility to TGCT. METHODS: We conducted a Norwegian-Swedish case-parent study. A total of 105 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 20 sex hormone pathway genes were genotyped using Sequenom MassArray iPLEX Gold, in 831 complete triads and 474 dyads. To increase the statistical power, the analysis was expanded to include 712 case singletons and 3922 Swedish controls, thus including triads, dyads and the case-control samples in a single test for association. Analysis for allelic associations was performed with the UNPHASED program, using a likelihood-based association test for nuclear families with missing data, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. False discovery rate (FDR) was used to adjust for multiple testing. RESULTS: Five genetic variants across the ESR2 gene [encoding estrogen receptor beta (ERß)] were statistically significantly associated with the risk of TGCT. In the case-parent analysis, the markers rs12434245 and rs10137185 were associated with a reduced risk of TGCT (OR = 0.66 and 0.72, respectively; both FDRs <5%), whereas rs2978381 and rs12435857 were associated with an increased risk of TGCT (OR = 1.21 and 1.19, respectively; both FDRs <5%). In the combined case-parent/case-control analysis, rs12435857 and rs10146204 were associated with an increased risk of TGCT (OR = 1.15 and 1.13, respectively; both FDRs <5%), whereas rs10137185 was associated with a reduced risk of TGCT (OR = 0.79, FDR <5%). In addition, we found that three genetic variants in CYP19A1 (encoding aromatase) were statistically significantly associated with the risk of TGCT in the case-parent analysis. The T alleles of the rs2414099, rs8025374 and rs3751592 SNPs were associated with an increased risk of TGCT (OR = 1.30, 1.30 and 1.21, respectively; all FDRs <5%). We found no statistically significant differences in allelic effect estimates between parental inherited genetic variation in the sex hormone pathways and TGCT risk in the offspring, and no evidence of heterogeneity between seminomas and non-seminomas, or between the Norwegian and the Swedish population, in any of the SNPs examined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide support for ERß and aromatase being implicated in the aetiology of TGCT. Exploring the functional role of the TGCT risk-associated SNPs will further elucidate the biological mechanisms involved.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/genética , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Aromatase/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Receptor beta de Estrogênio/genética , Feminino , Marcadores Genéticos , Genótipo , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Razão de Chances , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Medição de Risco , SuéciaRESUMO
Imbalance between the oestrogen and androgen levels in utero is hypothesized to influence testicular cancer (TC) risk. Thus, variation in genes involved in the action of sex hormones may contribute to variability of an individual's susceptibility to TC. Mutations in testosterone pathway genes may alter the level of testosterone in vivo and hypothetically the risk of developing TC. Luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR), 5α-reductase II (SRD5A2) and androgen receptor (AR) are key elements in androgen action. A case-control study comprising 651 TC cases and 313 controls in a Norwegian population was conducted for investigation of polymorphisms in the LHR, SRD5A and AR genes and their possible association with TC. A statistical significant difference was observed in patients being heterozygous for the LHR Asn312Ser polymorphism when comparing genotypes between all TC cases and controls (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.48-0.89, p(adj) = 0.049). No statistically significant difference between the histological subtypes seminoma and non-seminoma was observed. Our results may suggest a possible association between genetic variation in the LHR gene and the risk of developing TC.
Assuntos
Predisposição Genética para Doença , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Testosterona/metabolismo , 3-Oxo-5-alfa-Esteroide 4-Desidrogenase/genética , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Mutação , Noruega , Polimorfismo Genético , Receptores Androgênicos/genética , Receptores do LH/genéticaRESUMO
Testicular cancer (TC) incidence is increasing worldwide, but the aetiology remains largely unknown. An unbalanced level of oestrogens and androgens in utero is hypothesized to influence TC risk. Polymorphisms in genes encoding cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes involved in metabolism of reproductive hormones, such as CYP1A1, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7, may contribute to variability of an individual's susceptibility to TC. The aim of this case-control study was to investigate possible associations between different CYP genotypes and TC, as well as histological type of TC. The study comprised 652 TC cases and 199 controls of Norwegian Caucasian origin. Genotyping of the CYP1A1*2A (MspI), CYP1A1*2C (I462V), CYP1A1*4 (T461N), CYP3A5*3C (A6986G) and CYP3A7*2 (T409R) polymorphisms was performed using TaqMan allelic discrimination or sequencing. The CYP1A1*2A allele was associated with 44% reduced risk of TC with each polymorphic allele [odds ratio (OR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.40-0.78, p(trend) = 0.001], whereas the CYP1A1*2C allele was associated with 56% reduced risk of TC with each polymorphic allele (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.25-0.75, p(trend) = 0.003). The decreased risk per allele was significant for seminomas (OR = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.31-0.70, p(trend) < 0.001 and OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.14-0.66, p(trend) = 0.002, respectively), but only borderline significant for non-seminomas (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.45-0.95, p(trend) = 0.027 and OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.30-1.01, p(trend) = 0.052, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of the CYP3A5*3C and CYP3A7*2 polymorphic alleles between TC cases and controls. This study suggests that polymorphisms in the CYP1A1 gene may contribute to variability of individual susceptibility to TC.
Assuntos
Hidrocarboneto de Aril Hidroxilases/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP1A1/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Alelos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , Seminoma/genéticaRESUMO
A growing number of estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) splice variants are reported. Several of these have been discovered in testis, but with few exceptions little is known about their cellular localization. The aim of this study was to identify and elucidate the mRNA expression pattern of the different ER beta splice variants in human testicular cells. Northern analysis was performed on whole testis and fractions enriched in germ cells from untreated men and from estrogen-treated men undergoing sex change surgery. Probes were constructed in order to systematically screen for and identify various ER beta splice variants. Several ER beta bands were observed in the human testis, in which splice variants constituted the major part of total ER beta transcripts. Interestingly, only two ER beta wild-type transcripts were detected. These seem to be virtually absent from the haploid germ cells and are probably mainly located in somatic cells and/or primary spermatocytes. Several novel ER beta deletion variants were found in high levels in the haploid germ cell fractions and were nearly absent in testicular cells from the estrogen-treated men. The cell-dependent distribution raises the question whether splice variants may have specific functions in spermatogenesis, and whether the differential splicing of ER beta is regulated in a cell-specific manner.
Assuntos
Processamento Alternativo/genética , Receptor beta de Estrogênio/genética , Espermatogênese/fisiologia , Testículo/citologia , Testículo/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Células Cultivadas , Estrogênios/farmacologia , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , RNA Mensageiro/análise , RNA Mensageiro/genética , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Deleção de Sequência/genética , TransexualidadeRESUMO
The origin of testicular germ cell cancer (TGCC) is believed to be carcinoma in situ cells developed in utero. Clinically, TGCCs are divided into two major histological groups, seminomas and non-seminomas, where the latter group includes non-seminomatous TGCCs with seminomatous components (mixed S/NS TGCC). Recent studies, however, have suggested that non-seminomas and mixed S/NS TGCCs could have certain differences in aetiology, and in this study the TGCCs were divided into three, rather than the conventional two histological groups. A large case-control study was undertaken on data on all live-born boys registered in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway during the period 1967-1998 (n=961 396). Among these were 1087 TGCC cases registered in the Cancer Registry of Norway until February 2004. We found several risk factors for TGCC, including low parity, low gestational age, epilepsy and retained placenta. Several of the variables studied seemed to be risk factors for specific histological groups, e.g. parity 0 vs. 2 and low gestational age being associated with increased risk of non-seminomas, but not of mixed S/NS TGCC, and low maternal age being associated with increased risk of mixed S/NS TGCC, but not of non-seminomatous TGCC. Therefore, our results might suggest that non-seminomas and mixed S/NS TGCCs have partially different risk factors, whose associations may be obscured by combining these two histological groups. The histological groups were not significantly different, however. Most of our findings on risk factors for TGCC are in agreement with at least some previous studies. An unexplainable exception is low birth weight being associated with reduced risk of TGCC in our study.