Recurrent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration after Discontinuation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors Managed in a Treat-and-Extend Regimen.

PURPOSE: To investigate the recurrence rate of active macular neovascularization in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously followed up in a treat-and-extend (TE) regimen in which treatment had been stopped because of disease stability. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred five patients with nAMD previously followed up in a TE regimen treated with aflibercept injections. METHODS: All patients with a dry macula on 3 consecutive visits 12 weeks apart were eligible to participate in the study. Patients were examined at baseline and then monitored for disease recurrence 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months after the last injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients with recurrent disease within 12 months after the last injection. Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the time of recurrence and after resumed therapy. RESULTS: Evidence of recurrent nAMD was seen in 54 of 102 patients (52.9%) after 12 months of follow-up. The mean time to recurrence after the last injection was 6.7 ± 2.2 months. The BCVA decreased from 71.7 ± 10.0 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at baseline to 68.1 ± 11.1 ETDRS letters at the recurrence (P = 0.12). After treatment resumed, BCVA increased to 71.4 ± 10.0 ETDRS letters (P = not significant compared with baseline). Patients with a pigment epithelial detachment (PED) at baseline showed a 74% (14/19) recurrence rate compared with 48% (40/83) in patients without a PED (P < 0.05). Only 22 of 54 patients (40.7%) with recurrent disease showed symptoms of visual loss or metamorphopsia. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent nAMD is common in previously stable patients for whom anti-VEGF injections have been suspended. It is difficult to predict which patients will experience a recurrence, and most of these patients do not show symptoms in the early stages of reactivation. Long-term follow-up is important, and early detection of recurrent disease can improve the chances for maintained visual function.

Clinical impact of the worldwide shortage of verteporfin (Visudyne®) on ophthalmic care.

INTRODUCTION: Since July 2021, a worldwide shortage of verteporfin (Visudyne®) occurred: an essential medicine required for photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT with verteporfin has a broad range of indications in ophthalmology, including chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and choroidal haemangioma. For these disorders, PDT is either the first-choice treatment or regarded as a major treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to key opinion leaders in the field of medical retina throughout the world, to assess the role of PDT in their country and the effects of the shortage of verteporfin. In addition, information on the application of alternative treatments during shortage of verteporfin was obtained, to further assess the impact of the shortage. RESULTS: Our questionnaire indicated that the shortage of verteporfin had a major impact on ophthalmic care worldwide and was regarded to be a serious problem by most of our respondents. However, even though there is ample evidence to support the use of PDT in several chorioretinal diseases, we found notable differences in its use in normal patient care throughout the world. Various alternative management strategies were noted during the verteporfin shortage, including lowering the dose of verteporfin per patient, the use of alternative treatment strategies and the use of a centralized system for allocating the remaining ampoules of verteporfin in some countries. CONCLUSION: The shortage of verteporfin has had a large effect on the care of ophthalmic patients across the world and may have resulted in significant and irreversible vision loss. Mitigation strategies should be developed in consultation with all stakeholders to avoid future medication shortages of verteporfin and other unique ophthalmic medications. These strategies may include mandatory stock keeping, compulsory licensing to an alternative manufacturer or incentivizing the development of competition, for example through novel public-private partnerships.