Hedgehog induction of murine vasculogenesis is mediated by Foxf1 and Bmp4.

The first vasculature of the developing vertebrate embryo forms by assembly of endothelial cells into simple tubes from clusters of mesodermal angioblasts. Maturation of this vasculature involves remodeling, pruning and investment with mural cells. Hedgehog proteins are part of the instructive endodermal signal that triggers the assembly of the first primitive vessels in the mesoderm. We used a combination of genetic and in vitro culture methods to investigate the role of hedgehogs and their targets in murine extraembryonic vasculogenesis. We show that Bmps, in particular Bmp4, are crucial for vascular tube formation, that Bmp4 expression in extraembryonic tissues requires the forkhead transcription factor Foxf1 and that the role of hedgehog proteins in this process is to activate Foxf1 expression in the mesoderm. We show in the allantois that genetic disruption of hedgehog signaling (Smo(-/-)) has no effect on Foxf1 expression, and neither Bmp4 expression nor vasculogenesis are disturbed. By contrast, targeted inactivation of Foxf1 leads to loss of allantoic Bmp4 and vasculature. In vitro, the avascular Foxf1(-/-) phenotype can be rescued by exogenous Bmp4, and vasculogenesis in wild-type tissue can be blocked by the Bmp antagonist noggin. Hedgehogs are required for activation of Foxf1, Bmp4 expression and vasculogenesis in the yolk sac. However, vasculogenesis in Smo(-/-) yolk sacs can be rescued by exogenous Bmp4, consistent with the notion that the role of hedgehog signaling in primary vascular tube formation is as an activator of Bmp4, via Foxf1.

Temporal ChIP-on-chip reveals Biniou as a universal regulator of the visceral muscle transcriptional network.

Smooth muscle plays a prominent role in many fundamental processes and diseases, yet our understanding of the transcriptional network regulating its development is very limited. The FoxF transcription factors are essential for visceral smooth muscle development in diverse species, although their direct regulatory role remains elusive. We present a transcriptional map of Biniou (a FoxF transcription factor) and Bagpipe (an Nkx factor) activity, as a first step to deciphering the developmental program regulating Drosophila visceral muscle development. A time course of chromatin immunoprecipitatation followed by microarray analysis (ChIP-on-chip) experiments and expression profiling of mutant embryos reveal a dynamic map of in vivo bound enhancers and direct target genes. While Biniou is broadly expressed, it regulates enhancers driving temporally and spatially restricted expression. In vivo reporter assays indicate that the timing of Biniou binding is a key trigger for the time span of enhancer activity. Although bagpipe and biniou mutants phenocopy each other, their regulatory potential is quite different. This network architecture was not apparent from genetic studies, and highlights Biniou as a universal regulator in all visceral muscle, regardless of its developmental origin or subsequent function. The regulatory connection of a number of Biniou target genes is conserved in mice, suggesting an ancient wiring of this developmental program.

Foxf1 and Foxf2 control murine gut development by limiting mesenchymal Wnt signaling and promoting extracellular matrix production.

Development of the vertebrate gut is controlled by paracrine crosstalk between the endodermal epithelium and the associated splanchnic mesoderm. In the adult, the same types of signals control epithelial proliferation and survival, which account for the importance of the stroma in colon carcinoma progression. Here, we show that targeting murine Foxf1 and Foxf2, encoding forkhead transcription factors, has pleiotropic effects on intestinal paracrine signaling. Inactivation of both Foxf2 alleles, or one allele each of Foxf1 and Foxf2, cause a range of defects, including megacolon, colorectal muscle hypoplasia and agangliosis. Foxf expression in the splanchnic mesoderm is activated by Indian and sonic hedgehog secreted by the epithelium. In Foxf mutants, mesenchymal expression of Bmp4 is reduced, whereas Wnt5a expression is increased. Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway -- with nuclear localization of beta-catenin in epithelial cells -- is associated with over-proliferation and resistance to apoptosis. Extracellular matrix, particularly collagens, is severely reduced in Foxf mutant intestine, which causes epithelial depolarization and tissue disintegration. Thus, Foxf proteins are mesenchymal factors that control epithelial proliferation and survival, and link hedgehog to Bmp and Wnt signaling.

Differences in the embryonic expression patterns of mouse Foxf1 and -2 match their distinct mutant phenotypes.

Murine genes encoding the forkhead transcription factors Foxf1 and -2 are both expressed in derivatives of the splanchnic mesoderm, i.e., the mesenchyme of organs derived from the primitive gut. In addition, Foxf2 is also expressed in limbs and the central nervous system. Targeted mutagenesis of Foxf1 and -2 suggests that Foxf1 is the more important of the two mammalian FoxF genes with early embryonic lethality of null embryos and a haploinsufficiency phenotype affecting foregut-derived organs. In contrast, the only reported defect in Foxf2 null embryos is cleft palate. To investigate if the differences in mutant phenotype can be attributed to nonoverlapping expression patterns or if distinct functions of the encoded proteins have to be inferred, we analyzed the early embryonic expression of Foxf2 and compared it with that of the better investigated Foxf1. We find that in the early embryo, Foxf1 is completely dominating-in terms of expression-in extraembryonic and lateral plate mesoderm, consistent with the malformations and early lethality of Foxf1 null mutants. Along the developing gut, Foxf1 is highly expressed throughout, whereas Foxf2 expression is concentrated to the posterior part-fitting the foregut haploinsufficiency phenotypes of Foxf1 mutants. Foxf2, on the other hand, is more prominent than Foxf1 in mesenchyme around the oral cavity, as would be predicted from the cleft palate phenotype. The differences in expression pattern also highlight areas where defects should be sought for in the Foxf2 mutant, for example limbs, the posterior gut, genitalia, and derivatives of the neural crest mesenchyme.