RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Brazilian Cohort of Asthma São Paulo (BRASASP) had a well-characterized severe asthmatic in Brazil, with 12 years of follow-up under standard treatment. METHODS: Sequential assessment of patients with uncontrolled asthma from BRASASP cohort was carried out with 12 years of follow-up, performing exams and comparing with previous measurements. RESULTS: 50 from the 60 initial patients were reevaluated. Twelve years later, FEV1 and the FEV1/FVC ratio have significantly decreased, with a rate of loss of lung function of 11.8 and 14%, respectively, and worsening in small airway parameters such as RV/TLC. BMI, The Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores haven't changed. However, exacerbations decreased by 56%. Mean daily inhaled corticosteroid use was similar over time, but daily oral corticosteroid use decreased, in addition to a significant reduction in induced sputum eosinophilic and neutrophilic profile and serum IgE. Rhinitis, sinusitis, and GERD were the main comorbidities. In quality of life according to respiratory questionnaire SGRQ, total score showed a huge improvement (62% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: There was significant decrease in FEV1 and FEV1/FVC. Data of pulmonary functional small airway characteristics show globally affected airways. Although higher doses of medications, patients were still uncontrolled, but with reduction of exacerbations, daily use of oral corticosteroid, less eosinophils and neutrophils in induced sputum and lower levels of IgE. Improvement in quality of life in 62% of patients.
Assuntos
Asma , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Seguimentos , Brasil , Pulmão , Eosinófilos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina ERESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) is a simple, repeatable, and self-reporting health status questionnaire for bronchiectasis. This study aims to cross-culturally adapt the BHQ into Brazilian Portuguese and evaluate its measurement properties. METHODS: The participants answered the Saint George...s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale for dyspnea. The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ-Brazil) was used at baseline (test) and after 14 days (retest). The psychometric analyses included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity: factorial validity, convergent validity, and discriminative validity, agreement, and ceiling and floor effects. RESULTS: The BHQ-Brazil demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach...s alpha...=...0.92) and substantial reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient...=...0.86; 95%CI: 0.79...0.90). The exploratory factorial analysis was considered suitable. All items presented a factorial load >0.40. The convergent validity of the BHQ-Brazil with mMRC was moderate (r...=......0.53, p...<...0.001), while concurrent validity with the SGRQ was strong (symptoms: r...=......0.72, activities: r...=......0.60, impact: r...=......0.60, total score: r...=......0.75, all p...<...0.001). The standard error of measurement was 4.81 points. The discriminative validity demonstrated that individuals with more pulmonary exacerbations, colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, worst dyspnea, and a higher number of affected lung lobes presented the lowest quality of life. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The BHQ-Brazil presents adequate measurement properties to evaluate the impact of bronchiectasis on health-related quality of life, and can be used in clinical and research settings.
Assuntos
Bronquiectasia , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Brasil , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Portugal , Inquéritos e Questionários , Bronquiectasia/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although the FACED score has demonstrated a great prognostic capacity in bronchiectasis, it does not include the number or severity of exacerbations as a separate variable, which is important in the natural history of these patients. OBJECTIVE: Construction and external validation of a new index, the E-FACED, to evaluate the predictive capacity of exacerbations and mortality. METHODS: The new score was constructed on the basis of the complete cohort for the construction of the original FACED score, while the external validation was undertaken with six cohorts from three countries (Brazil, Argentina, and Chile). The main outcome was the number of annual exacerbations/hospitalizations, with all-cause and respiratory-related deaths as the secondary outcomes. A statistical evaluation comprised the relative weight and ideal cut-off point for the number or severity of the exacerbations and was incorporated into the FACED score (E-FACED). The results obtained after the application of FACED and E-FACED were compared in both the cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1,470 patients with bronchiectasis (819 from the construction cohorts and 651 from the external validation cohorts) were followed up for 5 years after diagnosis. The best cut-off point was at least two exacerbations in the previous year (two additional points), meaning that the E-FACED has nine points of growing severity. E-FACED presented an excellent prognostic capacity for exacerbations (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.82 for at least two exacerbations in 1 year and 0.87 for at least one hospitalization in 1 year) that was statistically better than that of the FACED score (0.72 and 0.78, P<0.05, respectively). The predictive capacities for all-cause and respiratory mortality were 0.87 and 0.86, respectively, with both being similar to those of the FACED. CONCLUSION: E-FACED score significantly increases the FACED capacity to predict future yearly exacerbations while maintaining the score's simplicity and prognostic capacity for death.
Assuntos
Bronquiectasia/diagnóstico , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Argentina , Brasil , Bronquiectasia/mortalidade , Bronquiectasia/fisiopatologia , Bronquiectasia/terapia , Causas de Morte , Chile , Progressão da Doença , Dispneia/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pulmão/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Infecções por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
In the present study, we investigated in rats the effect of third ventricle injections of 1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine (mCPP), a 5-HT(2) receptor agonist, on water intake induced by three different physiological stimuli: fluid deprivation, acute salt load and hypovolemia. Injections of mCPP in the doses of 80 and 160 nmol/rat were able to decrease water intake in all three conditions studied. Third ventricle injections of mCPP (160 nmol/rat) were no longer able to diminish water intake in the groups of rats pretreated with central injections of an equimolar amount of (+)-cis-4,5,7a,8,9,10,11,11a-octahydro-7H-10-methylindolo[1,7-bc][2,6]-naphthyridine (SDZ SER 082), a selective 5-HT(2B/2C) antagonist. The central administration of mCPP (160 nmol/rat) was not able to modify the intake of a 0.1% saccharin solution. It is suggested that the central activation of a 5-HT(2B/2C) component is able to impair the drive for water intake induced by the physiological stimuli represented by fluid deprivation, acute salt load and hypovolemia. This effect seems not to be consequent on a general nonspecific central nervous system depression or on a locomotor deficit, because saccharin intake is not affected by third ventricle injections of mCPP.