Mortality, sepsis, and organ failure in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis vary by type of infection.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Infection is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in cirrhosis, but presumably, not all infections carry the same risk of mortality. We compared outcomes of different sites of infection in a nationally representative sample of inpatients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database for patients with cirrhosis from 2011 to 2014. Cirrhosis and infection diagnoses were identified by previously used algorithms of ICD-9 codes. The following infections were compared: urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, cellulitis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included sepsis, any organ failure, multiple organ failures, and 30-day readmission. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and included a priori covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1 798 830 weighted index admissions were identified. Infection was present in 29.2% overall-including UTI (13.7%), pneumonia (8.9%), cellulitis (5.2%), CDI (2.8%), and SBP (2.0%). Mortality was significantly higher in pneumonia (19.6%), SBP (18.6%), and CDI (17.4%) compared with cellulitis (7.6%) and UTI (11.8%). Sepsis, any, and multiple organ failures were most commonly seen in pneumonia, SBP, and CDI. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that pneumonia had the highest associated mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.73, confidence interval [CI] 2.68-2.80) and multiple organ failures (OR 3.59, CI 3.50-3.68). Significantly increased 30-day readmission was seen only with SBP (24.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of inpatients with cirrhosis vary significantly depending on the type of infection. The severity and epidemiology of infection in cirrhosis appears to be shifting with pneumonia, not SBP, having the highest prevalence of multiple organ failures and inpatient mortality.

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus increases risk of infection in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is common in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with increased risk of infection. AIM: To analyze the impact of uncontrolled DM on infection and mortality among inpatients with advanced cirrhosis. METHODS: This study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2014. We defined advanced cirrhosis using a validated ICD-9-CM algorithm requiring a diagnosis of cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension or decompensation. The primary outcome was bacterial infection. Secondary outcomes included inpatient mortality stratified by elderly age (age≥70). Multivariable logistic regression analyzed outcomes. RESULTS: 906,559 (29.2%) patients had DM and 109,694 (12.1%) were uncontrolled. Patients who had uncontrolled DM were younger, had less ascites, but more encephalopathy. Bacterial infection prevalence was more common in uncontrolled DM (34.2% vs. 28.4%, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.29-1.37, p<0.001). Although uncontrolled DM was not associated with mortality, when stratified by age, elderly patients with uncontrolled DM had a significantly higher risk of inpatient mortality (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.46-1.81). CONCLUSIONS: Uncontrolled DM is associated with increased risk of infection, and when combined with elderly age is associated with increased risk of inpatient mortality. Glycemic control is a modifiable target to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Vaccination in the Elderly and IBD.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Significant gaps in knowledge and utilization of vaccinations exist among practitioners providing care for patients with IBD. This review is intended to update the reader on best practices for vaccination within the IBD population with a specific focus on the elderly. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in IBD therapeutics have recently increased the number of immunosuppressive therapies available to practitioners. Differences in mechanisms of action of these medications have led to differential implications pertaining to vaccination strategies. Additionally, new vaccines, including the recombinant zoster vaccine, have recently become available for the use in the IBD population. Given the prominent role the IBD provider plays in the management of patients with IBD, a clear understanding of best practices is essential. This review provides a framework for the integration of optimal vaccination strategies for practitioners caring for adult and elderly patients with IBD.