The influence of obesity and consequent insulin resistance on coronary risk factors in medically treated patients with coronary disease.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity promotes the development and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD), in part, through its association with hyperlipidemia, hypertension, clotting abnormalities and insulin resistance. We assessed whether these relationships persist in patients with established CHD treated with evidence-based preventive pharmacologic therapies. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 74 adults with CHD and a body mass index (BMI) of >27 kg m(-2) (mean 32+/-4). The mean age of subjects was 64+/-9 years (range 44-84 years). MEASUREMENTS: Obesity measures included weight, BMI, waist, fat mass, intra-abdominal fat and subcutaneous fat. Risk factor measures included insulin sensitivity, fasting insulin level, lipid profiles, blood pressure, C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and platelet reactivity. Medication use included aspirin (99%), statin (84%), beta-blocker (71%), ACE inhibitor or blocker (37%) and clopidogrel (28%). RESULTS: There was no direct relationship between obesity parameters and risk factor measures of lipid concentrations, blood pressure, clotting abnormalities or platelet reactivity except for a modest relationship between visceral fat and hs-CRP (r=0.30, P=0.02). However, increased BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, total abdominal fat and abdominal subcutaneous fat all correlated with insulin sensitivity (r-values -0.30 to -0.45, P-values 0.01 to <0.001) and insulin concentrations. Insulin sensitivity, in turn, was the best predictor of PAI-1, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, cholesterol/HDL levels (all P<0.01) and platelet reactivity (R=0.34, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Use of preventive pharmacologic therapies obviated the expected relationship between adiposity and CHD risk factors. However, a residual effect of insulin resistance is left untreated. Total adiposity and central adiposity were strong predictors of insulin sensitivity, which in turn predicted cardiac risk factors such as lipid concentrations, PAI-1 and platelet reactivity. Thus, while evidence-based pharmacologic treatments may diminish the statistical relationship between obesity and many cardiac risk factors, adiposity negatively impacts CHD risk by reducing tissue insulin sensitivity.

Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have 2- to 6-fold increase in the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to non-DM subjects. Epidemiological data show that DM is synergic with other conventional risk factors. Total plasma homocysteine (tHcy) is an emerging CVD risk factor. We reviewed the literature to explore the relation between tHcy and CVD in patients with DM. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE database for articles on homocysteine, DM and CVD published from January 1991 to October 2000. RESULTS: The mean plasma tHcy level is usually low or normal in DM patients, except when nephropathy is present. Levels in that case tend to be higher than in non-DM patients. An independent association with tHcy and CVD was shown in retrospective studies, for DM patients. Prospective studies showed an association between elevated tHcy and all cause mortality in DM patients. In general, the association between elevated levels of tHcy and the outcome was stronger than in non-DM individuals, for all types of study. DISCUSSION: To date, there are no prospective work that specifically examined the relationship between levels of tHcy and the presence of CVD in the DM population. Nor are there studies to show that treating elevated tHcy results in a reduction of CVD events. Such studies are ongoing. Nevertheless, since hyperhomocysteinemia is potentially reversible with vitamin therapy, interaction of DM with high levels tHcy on the risk of CVD may have consequences with regard to management of primary and secondary prevention in DM patients who are at particularly high risk of CVD events.

Comparison of fasting and postprandial plasma lipoproteins in subjects with and without coronary heart disease.

Plasma lipoprotein levels, including remnant-like particle (RLP) cholesterol and RLP triglycerides, were assessed in fasting (12 hours) and postprandial (PP) (4 hours after a fat-rich meal) states in 88 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and 88 controls. All lipoproteins were assessed by direct methods. We hypothesized that patients with CHD would have greater percent increases in their triglyceride levels, RLP cholesterol, and RLP triglycerides, in response to a fat-rich meal. In the fasting state, triglycerides, RLP cholesterol, RLP triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were all significantly higher in cases versus controls by 51%, 35%, 39%, and 40%, respectively. These levels were 57%, 37%, 64%, and 37% higher in the PP state, respectively. Mean high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol values were 27% lower in cases in both the fasting and PP states. After eating, triglycerides, RLP cholesterol, and RLP triglycerides increased 64%, 71%, and 290% in controls, respectively, whereas in cases these levels increased by 71%, 94%, and 340%, respectively (all p <0.0001). Percent increases in the PP state were not significantly different in cases versus controls. Following the fat-rich meal, LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased by 5% and 4% in controls, and by 7% and 6% in patients, with no significant difference in percent changes between groups. Fasting values correlated very highly with PP values for all parameters (all p <0.0001). Our data indicate that although patients with CHD have higher fasting and PP levels of triglycerides, RLP cholesterol, and RLP triglycerides than controls, the response (percent increase) to a fat-rich meal is comparable in both groups. Thus, a feeding challenge is not essential for assessment of these lipoproteins. Moreover, it is not necessary to obtain a fasting sample to assess direct LDL and HDL cholesterol.