Outbreak of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in a Regional Burn Center.

Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing problem in hospitals worldwide; however, the prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in our region is low. Burn patients are vulnerable to infection because of the loss of the protective skin barrier, thus burn centers prioritize infection prevention and control (IP&C). This report describes a CPE outbreak in a regional burn center. In a period of 2.5 months, four nosocomial cases of CPE were identified, three containing the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) gene and one Verona integrin-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase (VIM) gene. The first two cases were identified while there was no CPE patient source on the unit. CPE KPC gene was then isolated in sink drains of three rooms. In addition to rigorous IP&C practices already in place, we implemented additional outbreak measures including restricting admissions to patients with complex burns or burns ≥10% TBSA, admitting patients to other in-patient units, and not permitting elective admissions. We began cohorting patients using nursing team separation for CPE-positive and -negative patients and geographical separation on the unit. Despite aggressive IP&C measures already in place, hospital-acquired CPE colonization/infection occurred. Given that CPE contaminated sinks of the same enzyme were identified, we believe hospital sink drains may the source. This highlights the importance of sink design and engineering solutions to prevent the formation of biofilm and reduce splashing. CPE infections are associated with poor outcomes in patients and significant health system costs due to a longer length of stay and additional institutional resources.

Standardisation of perioperative urinary catheter use to reduce postsurgical urinary tract infection: an interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of healthcare-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) has been the focus of a national effort, yet appropriate indications for insertion and removal of urinary catheters (UC) among surgical patients remain poorly defined. METHODS: We developed and implemented a standardised approach to perioperative UC use to reduce postsurgical UTI including standard criteria for catheter insertion, training of staff to insert UC using sterile technique and standardised removal in the operating room and surgical unit using a nurse-initiated medical directive. We performed an interrupted time series analysis up to 2 years following intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who developed postsurgical UTI within 30 days as measured by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). Process measures included monthly UC insertions, removals in the operating room and UC days per patient-days on surgical units. RESULTS: At baseline, 22.5% of patients were catheterised for surgery, none were removed in the operating room and catheter-days per patient-days were 17.4% on surgical units. Following implementation of intervention, monthly catheter removal in the operating room immediately increased (range 12.2%-30.0%) while monthly UC insertion decreased more slowly before being sustained below baseline for 12 months (range 8.4%-15.6%). Monthly catheter-days per patient-days decreased to 8.3% immediately following intervention with a sustained shift below the mean in the final 8 months. Postsurgical UTI decreased from 2.5% (95% CI 2.0-3.1%) to 1.4% (95% CI 1.1-1.9; p=0.002) during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Standardised perioperative UC practices resulted in measurable improvement in postsurgical UTI. These appropriateness criteria for perioperative UC use among a broad range of surgical services could inform best practices for hospitals participating in ACS NSQIP.