Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ; 28: 100328, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35990771

RESUMO

Background: Tuberculous Lymphadenitis (TBLN) is the commonest form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Definitive diagnosis of TBLN is difficult due to the low efficacy of the routine diagnostic techniques as compared to culture. Objective: To determine whether prior bleach concentration can improve the detection of acid-fast bacilli when compared with conventional Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining by using culture as the gold standard. Methods: Cross-sectional study was conducted from March 01, 2015 to May 30, 2015. The study subjects were clinically suspected TBLN patients. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was performed. Two different smears were prepared directly from the first needle pass for cytology and ZN staining. The remaining aspirate was used for the modified bleach concentration. The second needle pass aspirate was transferred into a sterile container containing sterile normal saline. The sediment was inoculated on the Lowenstein Jensen (LJ) medium. Measurement parameters for reliability and validity were used to analyze the results. Result: A total of 93 participants were included in the study. Fifty-six out of the 93 (60.2 %) cases were positive for mycobacterium tuberculosis complex on LJ culture. The detection rates of direct ZN staining and modified bleach method were 20.4 % and 44.1 %, respectively. 73.1 % of the cases showed cytomorphological features consistent with TBLN by cytologic examination. The sensitivities of direct ZN staining and modified bleach method and cytomorphology were 32.0 %, 67.8 %, and 92.8 %, respectively. Conclusion: Implementation of bleach concentration increases the detection rate of AFB over the direct ZN method. The bleach method can also be easily performed and provide a safe working environment by reducing infections.

2.
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect ; 11(1): 7, 2021 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33644821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ocular infections are a serious public health problem in Ethiopia with increased incidence of morbidity and blindness. Empirical therapy with topical ophthalmic broad spectrum antibiotic formulations is also a prevailing practice. The aim of this study was to determine the bacterial causes of external ocular infections (EOIs), antimicrobial resistance and its associated risk factors among patients at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A hospital based cross - sectional study was conducted from 1 February to 30 April 2019. Patients with EOIs were consecutively included from 1 February to 30 April, 2019. Data were collected using structured questionnaire by face-to-face interview and complemented with patient card review. Conjunctival, eyelid margin and lacrimal sac swabs were collected aseptically. Bacterial species were identified using standard bacteriological techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Binary logistic regression analysis was calculated to identify the factors associated with EOIs. P.value (p) < < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients took part in the study and majority of them were males (64.7%). The median age of study participants was 59.5 years. Overall, 208(57.8%) (95%CI = 52.6- - 62.8%) of patients had culture confirmed bacterial EOIs. The proportion of culture confirmed EOIs was 60.4% among conjunctivitis cases and 55.8% among blepharitis. Ocular trauma (P < < 0.001), ocular disease (P < < 0.001) and having eye allergy (P = 0.027) were significantly associated with EOIs. The most frequent isolates were S. aureus (37%), K. pneumoniae (13.5%), Proteus(7.2%) spp., S. pneumoniae (4.3%), Citrobacter spp. (3.4%) and P. aeruginosa (2.9%). Gram positive isolates were resistant to penicillin in 87% and ampicillin in 86.2%. Gram negative isolates were resistant to ampicillin (87.5%). P.aeruginosa isolates (85.3%) were resistant to piperacillin and 50% were resistant to tobramycin. Overall, 45.2% of the isolates were multi-drug resistant. The percentage of multi-drug resistance was 80% among Enterobacter isolates and 64.3% among K. pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial external ocular infections linked with multi-drug resistance and resistance to penicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline and piperacillin are high. Therefore, empirical treatment of eye infections in the study area needs to be monitored by regular antimicrobial-susceptibility testing of isolates.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa