An examination of the emerging field of community paramedicine: a national cross-sectional survey of community paramedics.

BACKGROUND: Community Paramedicine is an evolving community-based model that expands paramedic roles from emergency and transport care to a focus on non-emergent and preventive health services tailored to local community needs. Though community paramedicine is a growing field and acceptance is gradually increasing, there is limited information on community paramedics (CPs) perceptions of their expanded roles. The study's aim is to assess CPs' perceptions about their training, roles, role clarity, role readiness, role satisfaction, professional identity, interprofessional collaboration, and the future of the community paramedicine care model. METHODS: Using the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians-mobile integrated health (NAEMT-MIH) listserv, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in July/August 2020 using a 43-item web-based questionnaire. Thirty-nine questions evaluated CPs' training, roles, role clarity, role readiness, role satisfaction, professional identity, interprofessional collaboration, and program/work characteristics. Four open-ended questions examined perceptions of the future of community paramedicine care models and challenges/opportunities encountered during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was analyzed using Spearman's correlation, Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Open-ended questions were analyzed using qualitative content analyses. RESULTS: Responses from fifty-seven CPs were analyzed. Most (80%) completed didactic and/or clinical training. Nearly all respondents (96.5%) performed health assessments; only 38.6% administered vaccines. Overall, participants were neutral about their role readiness with a mean score of 3.3/5.0. The mean role clarity was 15.5 (range 4-29; higher scores = higher clarity), professional identity was 46.8 (range 30-55; higher scores = higher identity), role satisfaction was 4.4/5 with 5 = very satisfied, and interprofessional collaboration was 9.5/10 (10 = very important). Role clarity training (rho = 0.4, p = 0.0013) and higher interprofessional collaboration (rho = 0.4, p = 0.0015) were found to be significantly associated with the enhancement of professional identity. Respondents who completed training showed higher role satisfaction compared to those who did not (p = 0.0114). COVID-19 challenges included keeping up with emerging policies/procedures, CPs' well-being, and inadequate funding to meet service needs; opportunities identified included service delivery expansion and CPs meeting community needs in a flexible manner. Respondents reported that sustainable payment models, expanding services, and geographic reach were important to the future of community paramedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Interprofessional collaboration is important to fulfill CPs roles. Role clarity and readiness could be improved, which aligns with the emerging nature of community paramedicine. The future of the community paramedicine care model is dependent on funding and expanding reach of services.

Perceived discrimination in the community pharmacy: A cross-sectional, national survey of adults.

BACKGROUND: Discrimination experiences have been documented in various health care settings; little is known about discrimination experiences in the community pharmacy setting. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) describe perceived everyday discrimination, including racial discrimination, in community pharmacies, (2) examine factors associated with perceived everyday discrimination, (3) examine the relationship between perceived racial discrimination and delays in picking up prescriptions, and (4) examine the relationship between perceived racial discrimination and forgoing prescriptions. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2021 with a U.S. Qualtrics research panel. The 9-item Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) was used to assess perceived discrimination (range 9-45, higher scores indicate higher perceived discrimination). One question asked whether respondents perceived racial discrimination. Two questions asked whether respondents delayed or forwent getting a prescription(s) in the past year. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. A generalized linear model examined factors associated with perceived discrimination; logistic regression examined the relationships between perceived racial discrimination and delays in getting or forgoing prescription(s). RESULTS: Participants (n = 578) were 40.2 (±16.5) years old. Most were white (55.5%), 24.4% were black, and 29.4% were Hispanic or Latino. The mean EDS score was 16.5 (±8.8); 18.7% perceived racial discrimination. Overall, 36.3% and 33.0% reported a delay in getting and forgoing their prescriptions, respectively. Age (P < 0.0001), sexual identity or orientation (P = 0.010), ethnicity (P = 0.049), annual income (P = 0.012), and prescription insurance (P = 0.008) were associated with perceived discrimination. Those with perceived racial discrimination had significantly higher odds of a delay in getting their prescription(s) than those without perceived racial discrimination (odds ratio 2.6 [95% CI 1.3-5.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Study findings elucidate discrimination experiences in the community pharmacy and the impact of racial discrimination on individuals' decision in obtaining their medications in a timely manner. Community pharmacy staff need to recognize their implicit biases and obtain training on best practices that promote equitable treatment of diverse patients.

"Without my medication, I'm a wreck": Photo-elicitation to explore medication use among people experiencing homelessness.

BACKGROUND: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) live with a high burden of chronic illness, functional and cognitive impairments, and serious mental illness. Many PEH are prescribed complex medication regimens to manage symptoms and improve health and functioning. However, medication use within the context of homelessness is complicated, and adherence is often suboptimal. OBJECTIVE: To document medication use within the context of homelessness and explore experiences of medication use among people experiencing homelessness (PEH). METHODS: This study used mixed methods including photo-elicitation interviews. Participants were given a digital camera and asked to take pictures of people, places, things, and situations that represented every day medication use. Participants were also asked to write down reasons for taking the pictures. After two weeks, participants returned the camera and notes. At a subsequent interview, the photographs and notes were reviewed and discussed. Demographic and health-related information was also collected for each participant. An interpretive description approach was used for qualitative data analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics in order to describe the sample. RESULTS: Seven PEH completed this study. Mean age was 45 years (SD = 11.3) and length of homelessness was 6.1 years (SD = 11.3). All reported multiple chronic conditions (≥2) and reported taking 6.6 (SD = 2.6) medications. Participants reported medication adherence barriers with mean score of 37 (SD = 5.5) on the ASK-12, a 12-item scale with a range of 12-60 (higher scores indicate more barriers). Qualitative analysis identified four categories: medication-related burdens, medication-related beliefs, connectedness, and stigmatizing encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Medication use among PEH is complex and cannot be considered separately from daily life or from struggles to meet basic needs. Multi-level interventions are needed to optimize medication use among PEH, and healthcare professionals including community pharmacists should reinforce beliefs that medication-related benefits outweigh the burdens and then tailor services to the context of homelessness.