Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults 55 years and older: a twenty-year experience.

The nonoperative management of splenic injury secondary to blunt trauma in older patients remains controversial. We have reviewed our experience from January 1978 to December 1997 with selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults 55 years and older. Criteria for nonoperative management included hemodynamic stability with any transient hypotension corrected using less than 2,000 cm3 crystalloid infusion, a negative abdominal physical examination ruling out associated injuries, and a blood transfusion requirement of no more than 2 units attributable to the splenic injury. During the study period, 18 patients over age 55 with radiographic confirmation of a splenic injury met the above criteria for nonoperative management. Their mean age was 72 years (range 56-86), and 13 of the 18 were female (72%). The mean Injury Severity Score was 15 (range 4-29), with the mechanism of injury equally divided between automobile crashes (9) and falls (9). During a similar time period, 15 patients 55 years or older with splenic injury composed an operative group; these patients did not differ with respect to age (mean 68 years), sex (60% female), or mechanism of injury. CT scans of 8 patients managed nonoperatively were available and graded using the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma classification, with a mean score of 2.3 (range 2-3). Eight of the 18 nonsurgical patients received blood transfusions. None of the 18 patients who met the criteria for nonoperative management "failed" the protocol, and none were taken to the operating room for abdominal exploration. Two patients (11%) died of associated thoracic injuries after lengthy hospital stays, one at 10 days and one at 24 days. We conclude from our data that nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in patients age 55 years and older is indicated provided they are hemodynamically stable, do not require significant blood transfusion, and have no other associated abdominal injuries.

Prosecution and conviction of the injured intoxicated driver.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported low conviction rates for drunk drivers injured in motor vehicle crashes and transported to the hospital. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this rate during a recent period and to investigate the variables that predict alcohol-related convictions for injured drunk drivers admitted to our hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records from January 1991 through May 1997 identified 71 patients who were legally intoxicated drivers injured in motor vehicle crashes. Court records, police reports, and driving records were also obtained. RESULTS: Overall, 51% of the drunk drivers were convicted of alcohol-related offenses and 32% escaped without any conviction. Blood alcohol level and a police officer's estimation of whether the driver had been drinking were significant predictors of an alcohol-related conviction. Age, Injury Severity Score, a police officer's estimation of injury, and the number of people or cars involved in the crash were not significantly associated with legal outcome. CONCLUSION: Although this study shows an important increase in alcohol-related conviction rates, responsibility for further progress will depend on the medical community, law enforcement agencies, and the judicial system working together.