Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Eixos temáticos
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Oncol ; 25(1): 276-82, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24356639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New targeted agents may cause acute cardiac events. The purpose of our study was to investigate the incidence and the prognostic significance of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2008 and September 2011, the records of 1166 consecutive patients with advanced cancer treated in the Phase I Clinic who underwent echocardiography were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Most of the patients were White (78%), and the most common tumor types were colorectal cancer and melanoma. Of 1166 patients, 177 (15.2%) patients had an LVEF of <50%. No difference in overall survival (OS) between patients with LVEF ≥ 50% and patients with LVEF < 50% was seen (median OS 7.4 versus 7.0 months, P = 0.84). Patients with LVEF ≤ 35% had shorter survival compared with those with LVEF between 35% and 50% (median 4.2 versus 8.0 months; P = 0.005). In multivariate analysis of patients with LVEF < 50%, independent factors predicting longer survival were LVEF > 35%, ≤2 prior systemic therapies, ≤2 metastatic sites, and normal lactate dehydrogenase and albumin levels. CONCLUSION: Echocardiography would improve patient selection for enrollment in phase I clinical trials. These data suggest that it is safe to treat patients with LVEF between 35% and 50%.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Volume Sistólico , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 88(5): 534-40, 2001 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11524064

RESUMO

Early surgical intervention improves the outcome of patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) secondary to flail leaflet. Current criteria for the diagnosis of flail leaflet require a detailed definition of mitral valve anatomy, which is often challenging by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and, occasionally, even by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We studied 57 patients (mean age 63 +/- 15 years) with anatomically confirmed flail mitral leaflet and a control group of 57 patients (mean age 68 +/-14 years) with at least moderate MR but no flail leaflet. In patients with flail mitral leaflet, the mean angle formed by the axis of the MR jet and the plane of the mitral annulus was 33 +/- 11 degrees and 29 +/- 16 degrees when measured with TTE and TEE, respectively. In controls the mean angle was 66 +/- 16 degrees and 66 +/- 17 degrees by TTE and TEE, respectively (p <0.0001). Based on receiver- operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff jet angle value for diagnosing flail mitral leaflet was 45 degrees with TTE (sensitivity 88%, specificity 88%), and 47 degrees by TEE (sensitivity 88%, specificity 88%). MR jet angles < or =45 degrees were also correctly identified by visual assessment of TTE images in >90% of cases, with good interobserver agreement (k = 0.76). Thus, quantitative analysis of MR jet eccentricity by color flow Doppler is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing flail mitral leaflet.


Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores/métodos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalos de Confiança , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/anatomia & histologia , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Probabilidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 80(5): 586-94, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24122036

RESUMO

It is not uncommon for anesthesiologists to encounter cancer patients who have received chemotherapy agents known to cause cardiovascular toxicities such as heart failure, systemic hypertension and thromboembolic events. Anthracyclines have been for several decades the most studied agents because of their known cardiovascular effects and relatively high incidence of heart failure. However, cancer patients are currently treated with newer chemotherapeutics such as imatinib, sunitinib, trastuzumab and bevacizumab that are also responsible of causing cardiovascular toxicities. The type of cardiotoxicity associated with these newer agents (type II cardiotoxicity) appears to be different in terms of pathogenesis to that caused by anthracyclines (type I cardiotoxicity). Thus, anesthesiologist needs to be aware of the clinical features of each type of cardiac toxicity. This review will summarize the current clinical evidence on cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapeutic agents and will try to shed light on the current information regarding the perioperative management of patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiovascular toxicity.


Assuntos
Antraciclinas/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa