Rheumatic disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer-clinical aspects and relationship with tumour response: a single-centre prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and type of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as well as the correlation with tumour response. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective observational study including all cancer patients receiving ICIs. The occurrence of irAEs and tumour response was assessed on a regular basis. Patients who experienced musculoskeletal symptoms were referred to the department of rheumatology for clinical evaluation and management. RESULTS: From September 2015 to May 2017, 524 patients received ICIs and 35 were referred to the department of rheumatology (6.6%). All but one of the rheumatic irAEs occurred with anti-programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/PD-1 ligand 1(PD-L1) antibodies, with a median exposure time of 70 days. There were two distinct clinical presentations: (1) inflammatory arthritis (3.8%) mimicking either rheumatoid arthritis (n=7), polymyalgia rheumatica (n=11) or psoriatic arthritis (n=2) and (2) non-inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions (2.8%; n=15). One patient with rheumatoid arthritis was anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positive. Nineteen patients required glucocorticoids, and methotrexate was started in two patients. Non-inflammatory disorders were managed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and/or physiotherapy. ICI treatment was pursued in all but one patient. Patients with rheumatic irAEs had a higher tumour response rate compared with patients without irAEs (85.7% vs 35.3%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Since ICIs are used with increasing frequency, knowledge of rheumatic irAEs and their management is of major interest. All patients were responsive either to low-to-moderate doses of prednisone or symptomatic therapies and did not require ICI discontinuation. Furthermore, tumour response was significantly higher in patients who experienced rheumatic irAEs.

Immunogenicity of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis patients: lessons for clinical practice.

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) develop in up to a third of patients treated with biologic agents, with such immunogenicity being one of the main reasons for the loss of efficacy observed in an important proportion of patients treated with such agents. The appearance of ADAbs has consequences in terms of efficacy and tolerance of the biodrug: the development of ADAbs is associated with a poorer clinical response and with an increased risk of adverse effects. Formation of ADAbs has been observed with all biologic DMARDs, but anti-TNF agent mAbs appear to be the largest contributors, independent of humanization of the antibody. ADAb identification is technically difficult and not standardized, partly explaining important variations between published studies. A variety of factors can influence the risk of ADAb appearance, some of which are linked to the treatment strategy, such as the combination with synthetic DMARDs or the rhythm of administration of the biodrug, whereas other factors are dependent on the patient, such as the level of inflammation at onset or body weight. The detection of these antibodies and/or the dosage of the biologic agent itself could have consequences for the bedside practice of clinicians and should be well understood. This review of the literature proposes an overview of the data published on the subject to help clinicians manage the biodrugs according to these new concepts.

[Pharmacological management of inflammatory rheumatic conditions]. / Prise en charge thérapeutique de l'inflammation d'origine rhumatismale.

Inflammatory rheumatic disorders are related to different pathophysiological mechanisms and, hence, their therapeutic management varies according to the underlying disease. Crystal-induced arthritis is characterized by its almost specific responsiveness to colchicine. Regarding ankylosing spondylitis, non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and TNF blockers are the cornerstones of pharmacological intervention whereas oral corticosteroids at conventional doses are of little value, if any. Conversely, corticosteroids are the drug of choice to treat polymyalgia rheumatica. Furthermore, low-dose corticosteroids were shown to be more effective than NSAIDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the main goal being to achieve remission, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, either synthetic, especially methotrexate, and/or biologic, such as TNF inhibitors, have a major role in the management of RA. Finally, enhanced understanding of molecular pathogenesis of inflammatory disorders may help to find out how to best target available drugs to right individuals in the future.

Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology on pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To establish recommendations for pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis specific to France. METHODS: On behalf of the French Society of Rheumatology (SFR), a bibliography group analyzed the literature on the efficacy and safety of each pharmacological treatment for knee osteoarthritis. This group joined a multidisciplinary working group to draw up recommendations. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence level were assigned to each recommendation. A review committee gave its level of agreement. RESULTS: Five general principles were established: 1) need to combine pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, 2) personalization of treatment, 3) symptomatic and/or functional aim of pharmacological treatments, 4) need to regularly re-assess the treatments and 5) discussion about arthroplasty if medical treatment fails. Six recommendations involved oral treatments: 1) paracetamol should not necessarily be prescribed systematically and/or continuously, 2) NSAIDs, possibly as first-line, 3) weak opioids, 4) strong opioids, 5) symptomatic slow-acting drugs of osteoarthritis, and 6) duloxetine (off-label use). Two recommendations involved topical agents (NSAIDs and capsaicin<1%). Three recommendations involved intra-articular treatments: corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections that can be proposed to patients. The experts did not draw a conclusion about the benefits of platelet-rich plasma injections. CONCLUSION: These are the first recommendations of the SFR on the pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Safety of the nonselective NSAID nabumetone : focus on gastrointestinal tolerability.

Although effective in the treatment of pain associated with rheumatic conditions such as osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, long-term use of NSAIDs is primarily limited by their association with upper gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Adverse effects range from dyspepsia and abdominal pain to ulceration and bleeding. GI damage elicited by NSAIDs arises as the result of biochemically induced topical irritant effects and by topical and systemic pharmacological suppression of gastroprotective prostaglandins. Variation in the physicochemical properties and pharmacological profiles among the individual NSAIDs translate into inter-agent differences regarding propensity to cause adverse GI effects. Nabumetone is a nonselective NSAID that offers distinct advantages over other agents in this class with regard to GI tolerability. Its non-acidic nature and pro-drug formulation, together with the lack of biliary secretion of its active metabolite, 6-methoxy-2-naphthylacetic acid, are thought to contribute to the improved GI tolerability of this drug. In head-to-head trials with other NSAIDs, nabumetone has demonstrated significant benefits regarding the incidence of GI events and more serious perforations, ulcers and bleeds (PUBs). Pooled data from eight postmarketing, randomized, controlled trials demonstrated a lower cumulative frequency of PUBs with nabumetone (0.03%; 95% CI 0.0, 0.08) versus comparator NSAIDs (1.4%; 95% CI 0.5, 2.4). Large-scale database studies also indicate that risk of serious GI complications is lower with nabumetone than comparator NSAIDs. Limited comparative data suggest that nabumetone offers a GI tolerability profile similar to that of cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective NSAIDs (coxibs). Although adverse cardiovascular outcomes appear to be a class effect of the coxibs, conventional NSAIDs may also have the potential for causing atherothrombotic complications. However, based on available data, nabumetone does not appear to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Finally, there is no particular concern about the nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic potential of nabumetone. Nonetheless, the potential for adverse drug reactions remains, and hence nabumetone, as with any NSAID, should be used at the lowest dose, which is effective for each patient, and for the shortest time necessary to control symptoms.

Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in real-life: The weight of patient acceptance.

OBJECTIVE: To explore acceptance and retention rate of biosimilar CT-P13 after switching from originator infliximab (OI) in patients with various rheumatic diseases. METHODS: Patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) under OI were proposed to switch to CT-P13 at the same regimen. A prospective cohort of infliximab-naïve patients beginning CT-P13 and a retrospective cohort of patients treated with OI were used as controls. The primary outcome was to evaluate the retention rate of CT-P13. Secondary outcomes were the switch acceptance rate, reasons of failure and safety. RESULTS: Switch was proposed to 100 patients and accepted by 89 of them (63 AS, 12 PsA and 14 RA). After a median follow-up of 33 weeks, 72% of patients were still treated with CT-P13. This retention rate was significantly lower than the one found in our retrospective and prospective control cohorts: 88% and 90% respectively (P-value=0.0002). Within patients who asked to be reswitched to OI, 13/25 (52%) presented clinical disease activity, one developed serum sickness and 11 (44%) presented no objective activity. A subanalysis excluding these 11 patients abrogated difference in retention rates between the 3 cohorts (P-value=0.453). After reswitching to OI, patients without objective disease activity claimed to recover original efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Retention rate was lower after switching from OI to CT-P13 compared to our control cohorts. However, this difference faded after excluding patients without objective clinical activity, suggesting a reluctance of patients to the switch and a negative perception of the biosimilar.

Effectiveness and safety of anakinra in gout patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease or kidney transplantation: A multicentre, retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Interleukin (IL)-1ß blocking is effective for the treatment of gout flares and is recommended in patients with contraindications to the standard of care, such as stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, efficacy and safety data regarding these agents are lacking in this population. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anakinra for the treatment of gout flares in patients with stage 4-5 CKD or renal transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective study encompassing 3 academic centres included consecutive patients with stage 4-5 CKD or kidney transplantation who received anakinra for the treatment of acute gouty arthritis and completed at least one follow-up visit. Efficacy, occurrence of infection, and renal function variations were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 31 included patients (24 men, mean age 72±11 years), 25 were non-transplant subjects with stage 4-5 CKD (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, MDRD formula (eGFR) 22.7±6.5mL/min/1.73m2), and six had undergone kidney transplantation (mean eGFR 41.5±22.8mL/min/1.73m2). Median gout duration was 3.5 years, and the mean serum urate (SUA) level was 8.7mg/dL. Twenty-one (68%) patients had tophi, and 21 had gout arthropathy. Anakinra was efficacious in all patients (final VAS 10 and CRP level 10mg/L). Ten patients (32%) were anakinra dependent (i.e., required prolonged treatment with anakinra). A serious infection was recorded in only one patient, occurring 3 months after starting anakinra. No significant variation in renal function was observed. CONCLUSION: Anakinra may be a safe therapeutic option for gout patients with advanced CKD. Further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm our results.

Drug-induced musculoskeletal disorders.

Drug-induced musculoskeletal disorders represent a broad clinical spectrum, from asymptomatic biological abnormalities to severe and even life-threatening diseases. Since an increasing number of drugs have been implicated in inducing rheumatic symptoms and/or syndromes, this review is not meant to be exhaustive, bearing in mind that the development of any musculoskeletal disorder should be considered as possibly related to a medication. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the more frequent drug-induced musculoskeletal disorders. These include: (i) arthralgias and arthropathies, including chondropathies and inflammatory arthritis; (ii) connective tissue diseases, especially lupus-like syndromes; (iii) periarticular disorders, including tendinopathies, enthesopathies and frozen shoulder; (iii) bone diseases, such as osteoporosis, osteomalacia and osteonecrosis; and (iv) myopathies. Although virtually all drug classes may induce musculoskeletal disorders, a significant part of them are related to corticosteroids, vaccines, antibacterials and lipid-lowering agents. Knowledge of drug-induced musculoskeletal disorders avoids carrying out unnecessary investigations, and allows optimal management of the patients, i.e. early discontinuation of the offending agent, adequate treatment monitoring and/or intervention with appropriate preventive actions.

Emergency department visits caused by adverse drug events: results of a French survey.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a substantial cause of hospital admissions. However, little is known about the incidence, preventability and severity of ADEs resulting in emergency department visits. To address this issue, we conducted a prospective survey in emergency departments of French public hospitals. METHODS: This study was performed over two periods of 1 week each, one in June 1999 and one in December 1999, in emergency departments of five university hospitals and five general hospitals throughout France. All patients aged>or=15 years presenting with medical complaints were included in the study. Trauma patients, those with gynaecological conditions and those with alcohol intoxication or intentional drug poisoning were excluded from the study. Each patient was assessed by two local emergency physicians to determine whether the visit was the result of an ADE. All medical records were subsequently validated by an independent group of medical lecturers in iatrogenic disorders. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1937 patients consulting, 1562 were taking at least one drug during the previous week and were included for analysis; 328 (21%; 95% CI 19, 23) of these patients consulted an emergency physician because of an ADE. Patients with ADEs were older than those without (mean age 63.5 vs 54.8 years; p<0.0001). Furthermore, ADE patients were more likely to have a higher severity presentation than the non-ADE group (p=0.019). The number of drug exposures was significantly higher in patients with an ADE than in those without (mean number of medications 5.17 vs 3.82; p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, only age and the number of medications taken were significantly associated with adverse events. In total, 410 drugs were incriminated in the occurrence of 328 ADEs. The most frequently incriminated drug classes were: (i) psychotropic agents (n=84; 20.5%); (ii) diuretics (n=48; 11.7%), anticoagulants (n=38; 9.3%) and other cardiovascular drugs (n=63; 15.4%); and (iii) analgesics, including NSAIDs (n=57; 13.9%). Preventability could be assessed in 280 of the 328 cases. In 106 cases (37.9%), the ADE was judged to be preventable. CONCLUSION: ADEs leading to emergency department visits are frequent, and many are preventable, confirming that there is a need to develop prevention strategies.

[Not Available]. / Admissions des sujets âgés aux Services d'Accueil des Urgences pour effets indésirables médicamenteux.

AIMS: To investigate the characteristics of adverse drug events (ADE) causing emergency medical admissions in the elderly. METHODS: Data were obtained from two prospective cross sectional studies with similar experimental design which were carried out in seven French emergency departments in 1999 and 2003. The proportion of ADE leading to admission, their severity and preventability were assessed in patients aged ≥70 (group A) and compared to those of patients <70years (group B). RESULTS: Out of a total of 2907 patients, 1158 (39.8%) were ≥70years of age. Among these, 17.1% were admitted as a result of an ADE vs. 13.2% in group B (p=0.004). ADE appeared to be more severe in group A than in group B. The part of preventable ADE did not significantly differ between the two groups (48.9% vs. 43.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: ADE are a common preventable cause of unplanned admissions, especially in the elderly.

[Admissions of elderly to French emergency departments related to adverse drug events]. / Admissions des sujets âgés aux Services d'Accueil des Urgences pour effets indésirables médicamenteux.

AIMS: To investigate the characteristics of adverse drug events (ADE) causing emergency medical admissions in the elderly. METHODS: Data were obtained from two prospective cross sectional studies with similar experimental design which were carried out in seven French emergency departments in 1999 and 2003. The proportion of ADE leading to admission, their severity and preventability were assessed in patients aged > or =70 (group A) and compared to those of patients < 70 years (group B). RESULTS: Out of a total of 2907 patients, 1158 (39.8%) were > or =70 years of age. Among these, 17.1% were admitted as a result of an ADE vs. 13.2% in group B (p = 0.004). ADE appeared to be more severe in group A than in group B. The part of preventable ADE did not significantly differ between the two groups (48.9% vs. 43.7%, respectively). CONCLUSION: ADE are a common preventable cause of unplanned admissions, especially in the elderly.

[Prescription of aspirin in recent acute painful disorders: results of a survey among French general practitioners]. / Prescription d'aspirine dans les douleurs aiguës récentes: résultats d'une enquête en médecine générale.

AIMS: To analyse recent acute painful conditions for which general practitioners (GPs) would prescribe aspirin. METHODS: Prospective observational study investigating GPs' prescription of aspirin to adult patients with acute pain of < or =5 days of duration. Pain intensity was graded on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) prior to and at the 48th hour of aspirin therapy. RESULTS: 4765 patients (53.9% males), aged 42.6 +/- 14.7 years, with recent acute pain (2.2 +/- 1.2 days) were enrolled. Aspirin was prescribed at a mean daily dose of 3g, for musculoskeletal pain (40.8%), headaches and/or migraine (30.7%), ENT pain (23.2%) or dental pain (9.5%), some patients having complained of different types of pain. Pain relief was assessable in 3793 patients (79.6%). In this population, pain intensity was reduced by 65% within 48 hours, from 63.5 +/- 16.7 mm to 22.2 +/- 17.1 mm on the VAS. The rate of responders (decrease > or =75 % on VAS) was 39.6%; however it varied markedly across the different painful disorders. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests that GPs may prescribe aspirin for acute pain states similar to those for which they prescribe over-the-counter non aspirin non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Nerve Growth Factor Antagonists: Is the Future of Monoclonal Antibodies Becoming Clearer?

Although there is an unmet need for pain medications that are both effective and safe, virtually no novel analgesics have been approved over the past two decades. In view of both experimental and clinical evidence of a major role for nerve growth factor (NGF) in the generation and maintenance of a wide range of pain states, the clinical development of humanised anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibodies (anti-NGF mAbs) aroused particular interest. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) placed a clinical hold on anti-NGF mAb clinical studies in late 2010, first because of reports of serious joint-related adverse events, and afterwards because of sympathetic nervous system safety concerns. The development programmes of tanezumab and fasinumab resumed after the FDA lifted its hold in March 2015, whereas other anti-NGF mAbs were dropped by their sponsors. This article provides an updated review on the analgesic efficacy and safety of anti-NGF agents based on data from fully published studies and public information from websites, and discusses the possible future role of these agents in managing chronic pain. The efficacy of anti-NGF mAbs was highly variable depending on the chronic pain condition studied. The most consistent and convincing results were obtained in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee and/or hip. Conversely, studies in non-specific lower back pain and peripheral neuropathic pain generated mixed results. Finally, there was no conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of anti-NGF mAbs in cancer pain and urological chronic pelvic pain syndromes. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across anti-NGF mAbs, thus being suggestive of 'class-specific effects'. Although most patients tolerated anti-NGF agents well, neurosensory symptoms occurred frequently, and some patients developed new or worsened peripheral neuropathies. However, the most problematic safety issue was rapidly destructive arthropathies, leading to joint replacement surgery. To date, the aetiologies of joint-related side effects and their pathophysiology have not been clearly elucidated. However, some risk factors have been identified, such as higher doses of anti-NGF mAbs and longer drug exposure, concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and pre-existing subchondral insufficiency fractures. Taken together, the present data suggest that low-dose anti-NGF mABs may exhibit a favourable risk-benefit ratio in selected patients with certain chronic pain conditions, especially symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: although the outcome for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ra) has improved in the past decades, adequate disease control cannot be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients. new drugs with a novel mechanism of action, may represent a valuable addition to the current armamentarium. Areas covered: This review focuses on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of baricitinib. Furthermore, the article summarizes and comments the drug's efficacy and safety profile in RA patients. Expert opinion: Baricitinib is an oral targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) that mainly inhibits JAK1 and JAK2. Baricitinib monotherapy, or in combination with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, has demonstrated its efficacy while having an acceptable safety profile in early active RA naive to DMARDs, and active RA with an inadequate response to csDMARDs and/or biologic (b)DMARDs. The future place of baricitinib in the management of RA patients will depend on several factors. However, baricitinib offer few advantages: oral administration, rapidity of action, efficacy in monotherapy and over adalimumab in one study and non-immunization. However, pending further safety data, current practice would be to start a bDMARD when the treatment target is not achieved with csDMARDs. Availability of additional long-term safety data may influence prescribing decisions.

Guidelines for the use of antidepressants in painful rheumatic conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Antidepressants are widely used to treat painful chronic rheumatic conditions but, contrary to neuropathic conditions, little is known about their true analgesic properties and value in these situations. Our group, which focuses on pain in rheumatology, aimed to develop recommendations for the use of antidepressants in rheumatology, based on evidence-based review of published data and expert opinion. METHOD: We identified relevant drugs and conditions and searched Medline, Embase and Pascal (1966-2003) for relevant publications in a number of European languages. We scored each study for quality, and used an expert consensus approach to formulate recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 77 studies and 12 meta-analyses and literature review on the use of antidepressant to treat painful rheumatological conditions. Forty-nine of these clinical studies were considered valid and were used to develop the recommendations. When evidence was lacking we based recommendations on our clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations for the treatment of painful rheumatological conditions with antidepressants were developed using evidence-based and expert consensus approaches and are the first of their kind in this field. Our review of the literature highlights the need for further, well-designed clinical studies of the use of antidepressants to treat painful rheumatological conditions.

Acetaminophen or NSAIDs for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Although non-pharmacological interventions are the cornerstone of osteoarthritis management, analgesics are an important component of treatment during the symptomatic periods of the disease. In this respect, current practice guidelines advocate the use of a simple analgesic, acetaminophen, or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), given either systemically or topically as first-line or second-line drug therapies. The present paper aims first to assess the evidence for the efficacy and safety of these medications. Given the increasing importance of patient involvement in decision-making, the following key practical issue regarding acetaminophen and NSAIDs will then be addressed: 'which drug do patients prefer?' Regarding NSAIDs, a further question concerns the place for non-selective agents and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors (coxibs) in the light of new warnings and contraindications concerning coxibs in patients with increased risk of cardiovascular thrombotic events.

Molecular lipophilicity determination of a huperzine series by HPLC: comparison of C18 and IAM stationary phases.

Two hydrophobic parameters (logkw-C18 and logkw-IAM, respectively) of a huperzine A series were extrapolated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using both C18 and immobilised artificial membrane (IAM) columns. A mathematical correlation between C18 and IAM hydrophobic parameters was completed, suggesting a similar behaviour on both columns. This behaviour was principally led by hydrophobic forces. The theoretical lipophilicity (logP) of each compound was computed using Pallas software and compared to experimental values, showing a similar lipophilic behaviour. Finally, the huperzine logkw-IAM and logkw-C18 values were correlated with the relative bound percentage of huperzine in human serum albumin, confirming that hydrophobic forces are predominant in the huperzine-HSA binding mechanism.