CamPype: an open-source workflow for automated bacterial whole-genome sequencing analysis focused on Campylobacter.

BACKGROUND: The rapid expansion of Whole-Genome Sequencing has revolutionized the fields of clinical and food microbiology. However, its implementation as a routine laboratory technique remains challenging due to the growth of data at a faster rate than can be effectively analyzed and critical gaps in bioinformatics knowledge. RESULTS: To address both issues, CamPype was developed as a new bioinformatics workflow for the genomics analysis of sequencing data of bacteria, especially Campylobacter, which is the main cause of gastroenteritis worldwide making a negative impact on the economy of the public health systems. CamPype allows fully customization of stages to run and tools to use, including read quality control filtering, read contamination, reads extension and assembly, bacterial typing, genome annotation, searching for antibiotic resistance genes, virulence genes and plasmids, pangenome construction and identification of nucleotide variants. All results are processed and resumed in an interactive HTML report for best data visualization and interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal user intervention of CamPype makes of this workflow an attractive resource for microbiology laboratories with no expertise in bioinformatics as a first line method for bacterial typing and epidemiological analyses, that would help to reduce the costs of disease outbreaks, or for comparative genomic analyses. CamPype is publicly available at https://github.com/JoseBarbero/CamPype .

Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification.

Recognizing transcription start sites is key to gene identification. Several approaches have been employed in related problems such as detecting translation initiation sites or promoters, many of the most recent ones based on machine learning. Deep learning methods have been proven to be exceptionally effective for this task, but their use in transcription start site identification has not yet been explored in depth. Also, the very few existing works do not compare their methods to support vector machines (SVMs), the most established technique in this area of study, nor provide the curated dataset used in the study. The reduced amount of published papers in this specific problem could be explained by this lack of datasets. Given that both support vector machines and deep neural networks have been applied in related problems with remarkable results, we compared their performance in transcription start site predictions, concluding that SVMs are computationally much slower, and deep learning methods, specially long short-term memory neural networks (LSTMs), are best suited to work with sequences than SVMs. For such a purpose, we used the reference human genome GRCh38. Additionally, we studied two different aspects related to data processing: the proper way to generate training examples and the imbalanced nature of the data. Furthermore, the generalization performance of the models studied was also tested using the mouse genome, where the LSTM neural network stood out from the rest of the algorithms. To sum up, this article provides an analysis of the best architecture choices in transcription start site identification, as well as a method to generate transcription start site datasets including negative instances on any species available in Ensembl. We found that deep learning methods are better suited than SVMs to solve this problem, being more efficient and better adapted to long sequences and large amounts of data. We also create a transcription start site (TSS) dataset large enough to be used in deep learning experiments.