Intensive hands-on microsurgery course provides a solid foundation for performing clinical microvascular surgery.

PURPOSE: Microvascular surgery requires highly specialized and individualized training; most surgical residency training programs are not equipped with microsurgery teaching expertise and/or facilities. The aim of this manuscript was to describe the methodology and clinical effectiveness of an international microsurgery course, currently taught year-round in eight countries. METHODS: In the 5-day microsurgery course trainees perform arterial and venous end-to-end, end-to-side, one-way-up, and continuous suture anastomoses and vein graft techniques in live animals, supported by video demonstrations and hands-on guidance by a full-time instructor. To assess and monitor each trainee's progress, the course's effectiveness is evaluated using "in-course" evaluations, and participant satisfaction and clinical relevance are assessed using a "post-course" survey. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2017, more than 600 trainees participated in the microsurgery course. "In-course" evaluations of patency rates revealed 80.3% (arterial) and 39% (venous) performed in end-to-end, 82.7% in end-to-side, 72.6% in continuous suture, and 89.5% (arterial) and 62.5% (venous) one-way-up anastomoses, and 58.1% in vein graft technique. "Post-course" survey results indicated that participants considered the most important components of the microcourse to be "practicing on live animals", followed by "the presence of a full-time instructor". In addition, almost all respondents indicated that they were more confident performing clinical microsurgery cases after completing the course. CONCLUSIONS: Microvascular surgery requires highly specialized and individualized training to achieve the competences required to perform and master the delicate fine motor skills necessary to successfully handle and anastomose very small and delicate microvascular structures. The ever-expanding clinical applications of microvascular procedures has led to an increased demand for training opportunities. By teaching time-tested basic motor skills that form the foundation of microsurgical technique this international microsurgery-teaching course is helping to meet this demand.

Guidelines for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients

To provide healthcare professionals with comprehensive multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients, both during the prehospital phase and after admission to a Trauma Centre. A consensus committee of 21 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e., pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of the quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Few recommendations remained non-graded. The committee addressed eleven questions relevant to the patient suffering severe limb trauma: 1) What are the key findings derived from medical history and clinical examination which lead to the patient's prompt referral to a Level 1 or Level 2 Trauma Centre? 2) What are the medical devices that must be implemented in the prehospital setting to reduce blood loss? 3) Which are the clinical findings prompting the performance of injected X-ray examinations? 4) What are the ideal timing and modalities for performing fracture fixation? 5) What are the clinical and operative findings which steer the surgical approach in case of vascular compromise and/or major musculoskeletal attrition? 6) How to best prevent infection? 7) How to best prevent thromboembolic complications? 8) What is the best strategy to precociously detect and treat limb compartment syndrome? 9) How to best and precociously detect post-traumatic rhabdomyolysis and prevent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury? 10) What is the best strategy to reduce the incidence of fat emboli syndrome and post-traumatic systemic inflammatory response? 11) What is the best therapeutic strategy to treat acute trauma-induced pain? Every question was formulated in a PICO (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology. The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 3 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations. There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for severe limb trauma patients.