Colchicine: the good, the bad, the ugly and how to minimize the risks.

Colchicine has an important role in managing various conditions, including gout, familial Mediterranean fever, amyloidosis, Behçet's syndrome, recurrent pericarditis and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. The adverse effect profile of colchicine is well understood. However, due to its narrow therapeutic index, colchicine has been associated with overdose and fatalities. When ingested in toxic amounts, the mainstay of management is supportive care. Strategies to minimize the risk of colchicine poisoning can focus on three broad causes: unauthorized access, intentional overdose and inappropriate dosing. Culturally safe and appropriate education about storage and appropriate use of colchicine is essential to minimize the risk of overdose.

Relationship Between Adalimumab Concentrations, Antidrug Antibodies, and Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of patient characteristics and disease activity on adalimumab (ADA) concentrations; to assess the relationships between ADA concentrations, the presence of antidrug antibodies (ADAb), and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); and to determine the association between cytokine concentrations and ADA concentrations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of people with RA receiving ADA for at least 4 weeks was undertaken. Disease activity was assessed by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), with responders defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2. Serum and plasma were obtained for ADA concentrations and ADAb, and a panel of cytokines were obtained for a subgroup. ADA concentrations were compared between demographic and clinical subgroups using ANOVA. The independent associations between clinical and demographic features were analyzed using a general linear model. Variables significantly associated with ADA concentrations from the univariate analyses were entered into multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 156 participants, 69.2% were female and the mean age was 57.4 (SD 12.7) years. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher C-reactive protein (P < 0.001) and higher weight (P < 0.004) were independently associated with lower ADA concentrations. ADA concentrations were higher in those with DAS28 ≤ 3.2 compared to those with DAS28 > 3.2 (median 10.8 [IQR 6.4-20.8] mg/L vs 7.1 [IQR 1.5-12.6] mg/L, P < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between interleukin 6 (IL-6) and ADA concentrations (r = -0.04, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: ADA concentration correlates negatively with markers of inflammatory disease activity in RA, including IL-6. ADA concentration in the range 5 to 7 mg/L over the dose interval are associated with better disease control.

Evaluation of the Homogenous Mobility Shift Assay for Infliximab and Adalimumab Anti-drug Antibody Detection in the Clinical Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Detecting antidrug antibodies (ADAs) against infliximab or adalimumab is useful for therapeutic drug monitoring. Various ADA detection methods exist, and antibody titer is an output in some algorithms. Homogenous mobility shift assay (HMSA) measures relative ADA concentration and determines drug-ADA complex size in vitro. However, the relevance of complex size determination in drug monitoring remains unclear. Hence, the association between complex size, ADA concentration, and sample detectable neutralizing activity was evaluated. METHODS: Sera from infliximab-treated and adalimumab-treated patients who tested positive for ADA in the National Screening Service were analyzed using 3 ADA assays. HMSA determined the relative ADA concentrations and complex sizes, competitive ligand-binding assay evaluated the sample neutralizing capacity, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detected immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 ADA. RESULTS: Most ADA-positive samples (>80%) formed drug-ADA dimer complexes, whereas 17% had dimer and multimer complexes, and 3% had multimeric complexes. Multimer presence had 100% positive predictive value for detectable neutralizing activity. ADA concentration and detectable neutralizing activity were moderately correlated (r = 0.65) in adalimumab-treated patients and strongly correlated (r = 0.81) in infliximab-treated patients. In adalimumab-treated patients, multimer presence was a stronger predictor of neutralizing activity than ADA concentration was, but not in infliximab-treated patients. However, in infliximab-treated patient samples, multimer presence revealed a distinct subset with high ADA concentrations, neutralizing activity, and IgG4 ADA. CONCLUSIONS: Multimers detected using HMSA had a strong positive predictive value for competitive ligand-binding assay detectable neutralizing activity. Multimeric IgG4-containing ADA-drug complexes revealed a distinct subset of infliximab-treated patient samples, whose clinical relevance merits further investigation.

Best Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Position Statement from the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research. METHODS: The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement. RESULTS: Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory.

Immediate effect of caffeine on sympathetic nerve activity: why coffee is safe? A single-centre crossover study.

PURPOSES: Habitual coffee drinking is ubiquitous and generally considered to be safe despite its transient hypertensive effect. Our purpose was to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the hypertensive response. METHODS: In a single-centre crossover study, medical caregivers were studied after consumption of standard coffee (espresso), water and decaffeinated coffee (decaff) given in random order at least 1 month apart. Plasma caffeine levels, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total peripheral resistance and muscle sympathetic activity were recorded. Baroreflex activity was assessed using burst incidence and RR interval changes to spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations. RESULTS: A total of 16 subjects (mean [± standard error] age 34.4 ± 2 years; 44% female) were recruited to the study. Three agents were studied in ten subjects, and two agents were studied in six subjects. Over a 120-min period following the consumption of standard coffee, mean (± SE) plasma caffeine levels increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 21.0 ± 4 µmol/L and arterial pressure increased to 103 ± 1 mmHg compared to water (101 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.066) and decaff (100 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.016). Peripheral resistance in the same period following coffee increased to 120 ± 4% of the baseline level compared to water (107 ± 4; p = 0.01) and decaff (109 ± 4; p = 0.02). Heart rate was lower after both coffee and decaff consumption: 62 ± 1 bpm compared to water (64 bpm; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Cardio-vagal baroreflex activity remained stable after coffee, but sympathetic activity decreased, with burst frequency of 96 ± 3% versus water (106 ± 3%; p = 0.04) and decaff (112 ± 3%; p = 0.001) despite a fall in baroreflex activity from - 2.2 ± 0.1 to - 1.8 ± 0.1 bursts/100 beats/mmHg, compared to water (p = 0.009) and decaff (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The hypertensive response to coffee is secondary to peripheral vasoconstriction but this is not mediated by increased sympathetic nerve activity. These results may explain why habitual coffee drinking is safe.

Changes in inpatient medicine prescribing during COVID-19 lockdown.

BACKGROUND: New Zealand went into lockdown March 2020 successfully eliminating the circulation of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus. During lockdown there were reduced rates of respiratory infections and hospital admission numbers were low. At the time, rumours of benefit and harm of medicines for COVID-19 were widespread in the lay and medical media. AIM: To describe changes in inpatient prescribing in an acute general medicine service during the New Zealand COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. METHODS: Rates of prescribing of medicines during the 33 days of lockdown were compared with a 33-day control period before lockdown. Prescriptions, patients and bed days were calculated from the hospital patient administration and electronic prescribing and administration systems. RESULTS: In the general medicine service, acute admissions were 20% lower during lockdown (from 1216 pre-lockdown to 974). There was a small decrease in the rate of prescriptions per patient (10.1 vs 10.4, P = 0.01) during lockdown, and the average length of stay was shorter (3.2 vs 3.6 days). Nebulised administration decreased by 75% (1.3% vs 5.3% of admissions) but unexpectedly there was no change in the prescribing rates of antibacterial medicines, e.g. amoxicillin (26% vs 26%). There were no changes in rates of prescribing of medicines being rumoured to potentially improve (e.g. hydroxychloroquine) or worsen (e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) COVID-19 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Acute medical admissions decreased 20% during lockdown for COVID-19, with a proportional decrease in prescriptions. Reduced rates of respiratory tract infections did not lead to decreased prescribing of antibacterial medicines. Rumour-based prescribing did not eventuate.

Four-year review of New Zealand laboratory infliximab and adalimumab concentration results indicating potential for improved dosing.

A review of laboratory results across New Zealand for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) over 4 years was completed. Of 6591 results, the median serum concentration for infliximab was 5.7 mg/L and for adalimumab was 5.5 mg/L. Subtherapeutic drug concentrations (<7 mg/L) were measured in 54% of samples. Drug concentrations <2 mg/L were measured in 23% of samples, with ADAs detected in 51% of these. The high number of samples with subtherapeutic drug concentrations and common ADA detection is consistent with failing therapy but could also suggest that standard dosing is frequently too low for patients. These results reinforce the value of antitumour necrosis factor drug TDM in making decisions to adjust dosing or switch agents in patients taking infliximab and adalimumab.

A nationwide survey on therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents for inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in inflammatory bowel disease may increase treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness, and reduce the risk of loss of response. AIMS: To assess the current use of anti-TNF agent TDM, including trough concentration and anti-drug antibodies, among gastroenterology practitioners in New Zealand. METHODS: A web-based survey was delivered to gastroenterologists and advanced trainees in New Zealand, identified by the New Zealand Society of Gastroenterology. RESULTS: The response rate was 36% (48/134). Adalimumab was the most common initial anti-TNF agent used (78%, infliximab 22%). Ninety-three percent of those who completed the survey used TDM, mainly in cases of non-response or loss or response. Most respondents (93% and 83% for adalimumab and infliximab, respectively) measured trough concentrations within 24 h prior to the next administration. In patients in clinical remission but with endoscopic inflammation on anti-TNF agents, 72% would measure drug concentrations. In the presence of anti-drug antibodies, 45% would add an immunomodulator in patients with active disease and 47% would add an immunomodulator in patients in remission. With low trough concentrations, 77% would make no changes if the patient was in remission, and 75% would increase the dose in case of active disease. CONCLUSION: TDM was routinely used among inflammatory bowel disease gastroenterology clinicians who responded to this survey. However, interpretation of results and decision-making is variable, suggesting more guidance is required.

A 1 g dose of intravenous iron is sufficient to treat iron deficiency anaemia.

One hundred and ninety-four patient episodes were audited for response to a standardised 1 g intravenous iron infusion for medical outpatients with iron deficiency anaemia. Patients received either ferric carboxymaltose or iron polymaltose. At 5-7 weeks after infusion, mean increase in Hb was 26.7 g/L and ferritin was 161 mcg/L, and only one patient had Hb <100 g/L. This reassures that 1 g dose of intravenous iron is sufficient for most patients, with benefits for treatment costs and patient convenience.

Clinical decision support in a hospital electronic prescribing system informed by local data: experience at a tertiary New Zealand centre.

BACKGROUND: An electronic prescribing and administration (ePA) system has been progressively rolled out to Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB, Christchurch, New Zealand) public hospitals since 2014, and is currently used for around 1300 tertiary beds. ePA data can be used to monitor user behaviour, and to evaluate and inform the local customisation of clinical decision support (CDS) tools within the ePA system. AIMS: To describe retrospectively illustrative vignettes of CDHB ePA analyses that have been used for CDS. METHODS: Alerts were developed according to a set of common principles agreed upon by the CDHB CDS Working Group. Alerts were informed and evaluated by extracting and parsing data for various time periods during 2016 to 2018 from the CDHB ePA database. RESULTS: There was a median of 74 000 prescriptions a month. After examining 525 spironolactone prescriptions, the high dose alert threshold was set at 100 mg with an expected alert burden of 3%. The presence of a ceftriaxone shortage prescribing alert for 1 week was associated with a prescribing rate that was lower than 95% of the preceding 52 weeks. Following review of 367 fentanyl patch alerts, revision of the alert led to false positives falling from 43% to 3% (P < 0.0001). At the point of firing, 6% of antithrombotic drug interactions alerts led to immediate changes in prescriptions (94% overridden), and a further 22% were changed within 30 min after the alert. CONCLUSIONS: Local data extracts from ePA systems can inform iterative configuration of the software and monitor user behaviour.

Infliximab and adalimumab concentrations and anti-drug antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease control using New Zealand assays.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is now recommended in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, assay types and drug concentration thresholds are still debated. AIM: To correlate inflammatory bowel disease activity in a New Zealand cohort with trough concentrations of infliximab and adalimumab, and ADA using locally developed competitive-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to establish threshold concentrations. METHODS: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) from Christchurch and Dunedin on anti-TNF drugs >12 weeks were enrolled. Trough blood samples were assayed for drug and ADA concentrations. Other data included quality of life, blood count, C-reactive protein, albumin, renal function and disease activity indices. RESULTS: Of 103 patients, 53 were on infliximab (36 CD, 15 UC and 2 unclassified) and 50 adalimumab (48 CD and 2 UC). Median (range) infliximab and adalimumab concentrations were 10.5 (0-41) and 9.61 mg/L (0-30). CD remission, Crohn Disease Activity Index <150, correlated with infliximab and adalimumab concentration in CD (infliximab, P = 0.03; adalimumab, P = 0.04), with too few UC patients for analysis. Receiver operator curve analysis suggested a threshold value of 5.1 mg/L for distinguishing active disease from remission for infliximab and 7.3 mg/L for adalimumab in CD. Of 13 patients with infliximab <2 mg/L, 10 were ADA positive by homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA), including five with neutralising antibodies using ELISA. Of six with adalimumab <2 mg/L, three were ADA positive using HMSA, including one with neutralising antibodies. CONCLUSION: Using the New Zealand ELISA assay, threshold concentrations of 5 mg/L for infliximab and 7 mg/L for adalimumab are suggested to aid dosing decisions, consistent with results internationally. Both neutralising (ELISA) and non-neutralising ADA (HMSA) are associated with low drug concentrations.

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial of High- Versus Low-Dose Weekly Folic Acid in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether reducing the dose of supplemental folic acid used in conjunction with methotrexate (MTX) therapy in people with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improved disease control and/or increased MTX-related adverse effects. METHODS: A randomized double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing 5 mg/wk and 0.8 mg/wk folic acid was undertaken. Rheumatoid arthritis patients on MTX for 3 months or more at a stable dose for 1 month or more were recruited. All participants had DAS28 of 3.2 or greater or required a change in therapy determined by the treating clinician. Disease activity, full blood count, liver function tests, red blood cell (RBC) folate, and RBC MTX polyglutamates were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, 16, and 24 along with reports of adverse events. RESULTS: Forty participants were recruited. The mean (SD) change in RBC folate between week 0 and 24 was +87.9 (57.4) nmol/L in the high-dose group and -113.3 (65.7) nmol/L in the low-dose group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the change in DAS28 between the high- and low-dose groups at 24 weeks (-0.13 [95% confidence interval, -0.69 to 0.43] vs -0.25 [-0.87 to 0.37], respectively [p = 0.78]). There was no significant difference in MTX-related adverse effects between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in RBC folate secondary to reduction in folic acid dose was not associated with a change in RA disease activity or MTX-related adverse effects. The prevention of MTX-related adverse effects remains the primary reason for coprescribing folic acid with MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR12610000739011).

How to prevent allopurinol hypersensitivity reactions?

Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) is a severe and sometimes life-threatening adverse drug reaction. Although AHS is rare, the number of patients with gout requiring allopurinol is high, and there are sufficient overall cases of AHS to warrant consideration of preventive measures. Most cases occur within 8-9 weeks of commencing allopurinol, and good patient education at initiation may lead to rapid drug cessation at onset of symptoms. Pretreatment testing for HLA-B*5801 and avoidance of allopurinol when positive reduces the risk of AHS and is cost-effective in some ethnic groups. A low starting allopurinol dose may reduce AHS risk, but the relationship between maintenance dose and AHS is more controversial. Chronic kidney disease increases AHS risk, but slowly increasing the allopurinol dose in chronic kidney disease has not been associated with AHS. Alternative newer treatments are available for patients at risk of AHS, but similar adverse reactions can also occur with these.

Can we predict inadequate response to allopurinol dose escalation? Analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Objectives: To determine factors that predict inadequate serum urate (SU) lowering response in a randomized controlled trial of allopurinol dose escalation (DE) in gout. Methods: Participants undergoing allopurinol DE were classified as: complete response (CR)-reached target SU at month 9 and 12 of the DE phase or if still dose escalating at month 9 reached target SU by month 12; partial response (PR)-reached target at some stage but not fulfilling criteria for CR; or inadequate response (IR)-did not reach target SU at any time. Results: IR was uncommon, occurring in 13/150 (8.7%), compared with 82 (54.7%) CR, and 55 (36.6%) PR. Mean (s.e.m.) SU was higher at the end of the 12-month DE in IR compared with both CR and PR groups; 7.6 (0.31) vs 5.01 (0.06) and 5.97 (0.17) mg/dl respectively (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, compete responders tended to be older, be receiving less allopurinol, have longer gout duration and were more likely to be New Zealand (NZ) European ethnicity, compared with IR+PR. Using multi-variate logistic regression analysis, only longer duration of gout and NZ European ethnicity remained significant independent predictors of CR. Baseline SU ⩾ 8 mg/dl had a sensitivity of 69.2% and specificity of 85.1% in predicting IR. The odds ratio for an IR if baseline SU was ⩾8 mg/dl was 11.7 (95% CI 3.3, 41.2). Conclusion: A minority of people with gout never reach target SU when allopurinol dose is increased in a treat-to-target manner. Approximately one-third of those with SU ⩾ 8mg/dl despite allopurinol ⩾300mg/d have an IR to DE. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trails Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au, ACTRN12611000845932.

The impact of diuretic use and ABCG2 genotype on the predictive performance of a published allopurinol dosing tool.

AIM: This research aims to evaluate the predictive performance of a published allopurinol dosing tool. METHODS: Allopurinol dose predictions were compared to the actual dose required to achieve serum urate (SU) <0.36 mmol l-1 using mean prediction error. The influence of patient factors on dose predictions was explored using multilinear regression. RESULTS: Allopurinol doses were overpredicted by the dosing tool; however, this was minimal in patients without diuretic therapy (MPE 63 mg day-1 , 95% CI 40-87) compared to those receiving diuretics (MPE 295 mg day-1 , 95% CI 260-330, P < 0.0001). ABCG2 genotype (rs2231142, G>T) had an important impact on the dose predictions (MPE 201, 107, 15 mg day-1 for GG, GT and TT, respectively, P < 0.0001). Diuretic use and ABCG2 genotype explained 53% of the variability in prediction error (R2  = 0.53, P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The dosing tool produced acceptable maintenance dose predictions for patients not taking diuretics. Inclusion of ABCG2 genotype and a revised adjustment for diuretics would further improve the performance of the dosing tool.

Allopurinol dose escalation to achieve serum urate below 6 mg/dL: an open-label extension study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term safety and efficacy of allopurinol dose escalation (DE) to achieve target serum urate (SU) in gout. METHODS: People, including those with chronic kidney disease, who completed the first 12 months of a randomised controlled trial continued into a 12-month extension study. Participants randomised to continue current dose for the first 12 months began allopurinol DE at month 12 if SU was ≥6 mg/dL (control/DE). Immediate DE participants who achieved target SU maintained allopurinol dose (DE/DE). The primary endpoints were reduction in SU and adverse events (AEs) at month 24. RESULTS: The mean (SE) change in SU from month 12 to 24 was -1.1 (0.2) mg/dL in control/DE and 0.1 (0.2) mg/dL in DE/DE group (p<0.001). There was a significant reduction in the percentage of individuals having a gout flare in the month prior to months 12 and 24 compared with baseline in both groups and in mean tophus size over 24 months, but no difference between randomised groups. There were similar numbers of AEs and serious adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of people with gout tolerate higher than creatinine clearance-based allopurinol dose and achieve and maintain target SU. Slow allopurinol DE may be appropriate in clinical practice even in those with kidney impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000845932.

A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation to achieve target serum urate in people with gout.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation using a treat-to-target serum urate (SU) approach. METHODS: A randomised, controlled, parallel-group, comparative clinical trial was undertaken. People with gout receiving at least creatinine clearance (CrCL)-based allopurinol dose for ≥1 month and SU ≥6 mg/dL were recruited. Participants were randomised to continue current dose (control) or allopurinol dose escalation for 12 months. In the dose escalation group, allopurinol was increased monthly until SU was <6 mg/dL. The primary endpoints were reduction in SU and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: 183 participants (93 control, 90 dose escalation) were recruited. At baseline, mean (SD) urate was 7.15 (1.6) mg/dL and allopurinol dose 269 mg/day. 52% had CrCL<60 mL/min. Mean changes in SU at the final visit were -0.34 mg/dL in the control group and -1.5 mg/dL in the dose escalation group (p<0.001) with a mean difference of 1.2 mg/dL (95% CI 0.67 to 1.5, p<0.001). At month 12, 32% of controls and 69% in the dose escalation had SU <6 mg/dL. There were 43 serious AEs in 25 controls and 35 events in 22 dose escalation participants. Only one was considered probably related to allopurinol. Five control and five dose escalation participants died; none was considered allopurinol related. Mild elevations in LFTs were common in both groups, a few moderate increases in gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) were noted. There was no difference in renal function changes between randomised groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher than CrCL-based doses of allopurinol can effectively lower SU to treatment target in most people with gout. Allopurinol dose escalation is well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR12611000845932; Results.

Individualising the dose of allopurinol in patients with gout.

AIMS: The aims of the study were to: 1) determine if a plasma oxypurinol concentration-response relationship or an allopurinol dose-response relationship best predicts the dose requirements of allopurinol in the treatment of gout; and 2) to construct a nomogram for calculating the optimum maintenance dose of allopurinol to achieve target serum urate (SU) concentrations. METHODS: A nonlinear regression analysis was used to examine the plasma oxypurinol concentration- and allopurinol dose-response relationships with serum urate. In 81 patients (205 samples), creatinine clearance (CLCR ), concomitant diuretic use and SU concentrations before (UP ) and during (UT ) treatment were monitored across a range of allopurinol doses (D, 50-700 mg daily). Plasma concentrations of oxypurinol (C) were measured in 47 patients (98 samples). Models (n = 47 patients) and predictions from each relationship were compared using F-tests, r2 values and paired t-tests. The best model was used to construct a nomogram. RESULTS: The final plasma oxypurinol concentration-response relationship (UT = UP - C*(UP - UR )/(ID50 + C), r2  = 0.64) and allopurinol dose-response relationship (UT = UP - D* (UP - UR )/(ID50 + D), r2  = 0.60) did not include CLCR or diuretic use as covariates. There was no difference (P = 0.87) between the predicted SU concentrations derived from the oxypurinol concentration- and allopurinol dose-response relationships. The nomogram constructed using the allopurinol dose-response relationship for all recruited patients (n = 81 patients) required pretreatment SU as the predictor of allopurinol maintenance dose. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma oxypurinol concentrations, CLCR and diuretic status are not required to predict the maintenance dose of allopurinol. Using the nomogram, the maintenance dose of allopurinol estimated to reach target concentrations can be predicted from UP .

A population pharmacokinetic model to predict oxypurinol exposure in patients on haemodialysis.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to characterise the population pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol in patients receiving haemodialysis and to compare oxypurinol exposure in dialysis and non-dialysis patients. METHODS: Oxypurinol plasma concentrations from 6 gout people receiving haemodialysis and 19 people with gout not receiving dialysis were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model in NONMEM. Deterministic simulations were used to predict the steady-state area under the oxypurinol plasma concentration time curve over 1 week (AUC7days). RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of oxypurinol were best described by a one-compartment model with a separate parameter for dialytic clearance. Allopurinol 100 mg daily produced an AUC7days of 279 µmol/L h in dialysis patients, a value 50-75 % lower than the AUC7days predicted for patients with normal renal function taking 200 to 400 mg daily (427-855 µmol/L h). Dosing pre-dialysis resulted in about a 25-35 % reduction in exposure compared to post-dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Oxypurinol is efficiently removed by dialysis. The population dialytic and total (non-dialytic) clearance of oxypurinol were found to be 8.23 and 1.23 L/h, standardised to a fat-free mass of 70 kg and creatinine clearance of 6 L/h, respectively. Our results suggest that if the combination of low-dose allopurinol and haemodialysis does not result in sustained urate lowering below treatment targets (serum urate ≤0.36 mmol/L), then allopurinol doses may be increased to optimise oxypurinol exposure.

Deterministic identifiability of population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Identifiability is an important component of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model development. Structural identifiability is concerned with the uniqueness of the model parameters for a set of perfect input-output data and deterministic identifiability with the precision of parameter estimation given imperfect input-output data. We introduce two subcategories of deterministic identifiability, external and internal, and consider factors that distinguish between these forms. We define external deterministic identifiability as a function of externally controllable variables, i.e., the design, and internal deterministic identifiability as a function of the model and its parameter values. The concepts are explored using three common PK and PKPD models, and verified for their precision for the selected set of parameter values under optimal design.