Long-Term Follow-Up of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Solid Cancer.

We wanted to determine whether allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may result in long-term survival in patients with solid cancer. HSCT was performed in 61 patients with solid cancer: metastatic renal carcinoma (n = 22), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 17), colon carcinoma (n = 15), prostate cancer (n = 3), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 3), or breast cancer (n = 1). Liver transplantation was performed for tumor debulking in 18 patients. Median age was 56 years (range, 28 to 77). Donors were either HLA-identical siblings (n = 29) or unrelated (n = 32). Conditioning was nonmyeloablative (n = 23), reduced (n = 36), or myeloablative (n = 2). Graft failure occurred in 13 patients (21%). The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of grades II to IV was 47%, and that of chronic GVHD was 32%. Treatment-related mortality was 21%. At 5 years cancer-related mortality was 63%. Currently, 6 patients are alive, 2 with renal cell carcinoma, 1 with cholangiocarcinoma, and 3 with pancreatic carcinoma. Eight-year survival was 12%. Risk factors for mortality were nonmyeloablative conditioning (HR, 2.95; P < .001), absence of chronic GVHD (HR, 3.57; P < .001), acute GVHD of grades II to IV (HR, 2.90; P = .002), and HLA-identical transplant (HR, 5.00; P = .03). With none of these risk factors, survival at 6 years was 50% (n = 6). Long-term survival can be achieved in some patients with solid cancer after HSCT.

Risk of tumorigenicity in mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies--bridging scientific observations and regulatory viewpoints.

In the past decade, the therapeutic value of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has been studied in various indications, thereby taking advantage of their immunosuppressive properties. Easy procurement from bone marrow, adipose tissue or other sources and conventional in vitro expansion culture have made their clinical use attractive. Bridging the gap between current scientific knowledge and regulatory prospects on the transformation potential and possible tumorigenicity of MSCs, the Cell Products Working Party and the Committee for Advanced Therapies organized a meeting with leading European experts in the field of MSCs. This meeting elucidated the risk of potential tumorigenicity related to MSC-based therapies from two angles: the scientific perspective and the regulatory point of view. The conclusions of this meeting, including the current regulatory thinking on quality, nonclinical and clinical aspects for MSCs, are presented in this review, leading to a clearer way forward for the development of such products.

Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in metastatic colorectal cancer as a novel adoptive cell therapy approach. The European group for blood and marrow transplantation experience.

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) allowed the existence of an allogeneic cell-mediated antitumor effect in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to be explored. We report on 39 patients with progressing mCRC treated with different RIC regimens in a multicenter clinical trial of the European Bone Marrow Transplantation Group. Disease status at transplant was progressive disease (PD) in 31 patients (80%), stable disease (SD) in 6 (15%), and partial response (PR) in 2 (5%). All patients engrafted (median donor T cell chimerism of 90% at day +60). Transplant-related morbidities were limited. Grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) occurred in 14 patients (35%) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) in 9 patients (23%). Transplant-related mortality occurred in 4 patients (10%). The best tumor responses were: 1 complete response (CR) (2%), 7 PR (18 %), and 10 SD (26%), giving an overall disease control in 18 of 39 patients (46%). Allogeneic HCT after RIC is feasible; the collected results compared favorably in terms of tumor response with those observed using conventional approaches beyond second-line therapies. The study of an allogeneic cell based therapy in less advanced patients is warranted.

Transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells: an emerging treatment modality for solid tumors.

Allogeneic transplantation of hematopoietic cells from an HLA-compatible donor has been used to treat hematologic malignancies. Allogeneic transplantation not only replaces the marrow affected by the disease, but exerts an immune graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect mediated by donor lymphocytes. The development of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens before allogeneic transplantation has allowed this therapy to be used in elderly and disabled patients. An allogeneic GVT effect is observed in a proportion of patients with renal, breast, colorectal, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer treated with allogeneic transplantation. In general, the tumor response is associated with the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Further improvements will depend on the identification of the antigen targets of GVT, and on reduction of the toxicity of the procedure. Targeted therapies may complement the immune effect of allogeneic transplantation. We present updated results from the literature and data recently placed on file at the European Bone Marrow Transplantation Solid Tumors Working Party.

A comparison between low intensity and reduced intensity conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Following different types of conditioning, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation produces a graft-versus-tumor effect in patients with solid tumors. We performed a non-randomized study comparing low intensity conditioning with reduced intensity conditioning after stem cell transplantation to demonstrate the graft-versus-tumor effect. DESIGN AND METHODS: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was performed in 48 patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (n=17), colo-rectal cancer (n=15), non-metastatic advanced primary liver cancer after orthotopic liver transplantation (n=11), and other solid tumors (n=5). Tumor response was determined based on the international response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST). RESULTS: No significant difference in the incidence of graft rejection was found between the low intensity conditioning and reduced intensity conditioning groups. Engraftment occurred earlier in the low intensity conditioning group than in the reduced intensity conditioning group (median 0 vs. 16 days, respectively; p<0.001). Complete donor chimerism in B cells occurred earlier after low intensity conditioning than after reduced intensity conditioning (median 28 vs. 97 days, respectively; p<0.001). No significant difference in the incidence of tumor response was found between groups receiving the different types of the conditioning. The most favorable tumor response rate was found in patients who received donor lymphocyte infusions and developed chronic graft-versus-host disease (75% vs. 34%, p=0.003). The best graft-versus-tumor effect was demonstrated in patients with advanced primary liver cancer who had previously undergone liver transplantation (p=0.018). Patients receiving reduced intensity conditioning had a tendency to better overall survival compared to the low intensity conditioning group (30% vs. 17%, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant cell therapy with donor lymphocyte infusion may augment the graft-versus-tumor effect of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Patients with limited tumor load are indicated for allogeneic stem cell transplantation and reduced intensity conditioning may be favorable compared to low intensity conditioning.

Unrelated versus related allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning.

BACKGROUND: The use of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has increased over the past five years. PATIENTS: In this study, involving 137 patients, we compared the outcome after RIC in patients receiving grafts from matched unrelated donors (MUD; n=74) and sibling donors (n=63). The MUD and sibling groups were comparable regarding diagnosis, including solid tumors and hematological malignancies, and conditioning regimens. RESULTS: Engraftment was successful in most patients (88%), with no significant difference between MUD and sibling transplants. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was more common in the MUD group (65%) than in the sibling group (46%) (P=0.04). No difference in severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was found between the groups. However, the incidence of chronic GVHD was higher after sibling transplants. This was probably due to higher donor age in this group, since this was the only significant risk factor for chronic GVHD in multivariate analysis. The incidence of transplant related mortality (TRM) was significantly higher after MUD transplantation (40%) than after sibling transplantation (16%) (P<0.01). Because relapse/disease progression was more common after sibling transplantation, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Using unrelated donors after RIC is feasible, but it resulted in more CMV infection and increased transplant-related mortality. Survival was comparable to that of sibling transplants.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for inherited disorders: experience in a single center.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a possible cure for many inherited disorders. METHODS: We report 20 years of experience in 71 patients. The disorders include 7 immunodeficiencies, 21 hematological disorders, 13 histiocytic disorders, 9 mucopolysaccharoidoses, 7 metachromatic leukodystrophies (MLD), 3 adrenoleukodystrophies (ALD), 2 adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), 6 patients with Gaucher's disease, 1 Sandhoff's disease, and 2 patients with aspartylglucosaminuria. Their median age was 4 (0-39) years. The donors were 29 HLA-identical related, 27 matched unrelated (MUD) and 15 HLA mismatches. RESULTS: In recipients of HLA-identical sibling grafts, none developed acute GVHD grades II-IV as against 22% in all others. The overall cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 17%. The 5-year survival rates were 93%, 84%, and 46% in recipients of grafts from HLA-identical siblings, MUD and HLA-mismatches, respectively. The overall 10-year survival rate was 69%. All of the surviving patients with immunodeficiencies and hemoglobinopathies are well. Four patients with Hurler's disease are also well, apart from skeletal problems. Five patients with Gaucher's disease are between 14 and 22 years after the transplant. Two infants with MLD deteriorated, a girl with the juvenile form has stable disease and one woman with the adult form has improved. Among four survivors with ALD/AMN, three are well and one has dementia. Two patients with aspartylglucosaminuria have stable disease. CONCLUSION: In patients with inborn errors of metabolism, ASCT gives a high survival rate using HLA-matched donors. Beneficial effects are seen in those who are transplanted early.

Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of therapy-resistant graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have immunomodulatory effects. The aim was to study the effect of MSC infusion on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS: We gave MSC to eight patients with steroid-refractory grades III-IV GVHD and one who had extensive chronic GVHD. The MSC dose was median 1.0 (range 0.7 to 9)x10(6)/kg. No acute side-effects occurred after the MSC infusions. Six patients were treated once and three patients twice. Two patients received MSC from HLA-identical siblings, six from haplo-identical family donors and four from unrelated mismatched donors. RESULTS: Acute GVHD disappeared completely in six of eight patients. One of these developed cytomegalovirus gastroenteritis. Complete resolution was seen in gut (6), liver (1) and skin (1). Two died soon after MSC treatment with no obvious response. One of them had MSC donor DNA in the colon and a lymph node. Five patients are still alive between 2 months and 3 years after the transplantation. Their survival rate was significantly better than that of 16 patients with steroid-resistant biopsy-proven gastrointestinal GVHD, not treated with MSC during the same period (P = 0.03). One patient treated for extensive chronic GVHD showed a transient response in the liver, but not in the skin and he died of Epstein-Barr virus lymphoma. CONCLUSION: MSC is a very promising treatment for severe steroid-resistant acute GVHD.

The role of HLA mismatch, splenectomy and recipient Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity as risk factors in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) following allogeneic hematopioetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a fulminant disease with high mortality. The objective of this study was to determine risk factors in PTLD following HSCT in order to identify high-risk patients for surveillance, prophylaxis and treatment. DESIGN AND METHODS: Five hundred and fifty-three HSCT patients transplanted at Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge between 1996 and 2004 were investigated retrospectively and 14 cases of PTLD were identified. Diseased patients were evaluated concerning transplantation procedure, PTLD diagnosis, treatment and outcome. Factors significant in univariate analysis were included in logistic regression multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of PTLD was 2.5% and the median onset of PTLD was 78 days post-transplantation. Only two PTLD patients survived. The most common therapy was anti-B-lymphocyte antibodies. Statistical analysis showed HLA mismatch (p < 0.001), mismatch in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology (p < 0.001) and splenectomy (p = 0.006) to be risk factors associated with PTLD. Indeed, among 387 patients with no risk factors only one developed PTLD (0.26%). Patients with one risk factor had a probability of developing PTLD of 8.2% and those with two risk factors, a probability of 35.7%. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We propose a strategy for dealing with PTLD. Patients without risk factors need not be monitored routinely. HSCT patients with one or more risk factors should be monitored weekly by polymerase chain reaction of EBV DNA, and for patients with two or more risk factors EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes should be held in readiness before initiating the transplantation procedure.

Risk factors for the development of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease remains an important complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We studied viral load kinetics and correlated the viral load and other transplant factors with the development of CMV disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 162 consecutive patients who were CMV seropositive or had CMV seropositive donors. Quantification of CMV DNA was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: CMV DNA detected was detected in 105 of the 162 patients. The mean peak viral loads were similar at first and subsequent reactivations. The serologic status of the donors and recipients prior to SCT significantly influenced the viral load. The cumulative incidence of CMV disease was 1.8% at 100 days and 6.3% at 365 days after SCT. The peak viral load were higher in patients who developed CMV disease than in patients without CMV disease (log10 3.5; SE +/- 0.26/200,000 cells vs. log10 2.7; SE +/- 0.09/200,000 cells; p=0.02). However, in multivariate analysis, only acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV and a graft from a CMV-negative donor to a CMV-positive patient were significant risk factors for CMV disease. In patients who required more than one course of pre-emptive therapy, acute GVHD and the rate of decrease in viral load during first pre-emptive therapy were significant risk factors for subsequent development of CMV disease. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in viral load during pre-emptive therapy is an important factor for later development of CMV disease.

The incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis and BK-viruria in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients according to intensity of the conditioning regimen.

The influence of BK-viruria, donor background, and conditioning on the development of hemorrhagic cystitis was examined in 90 allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplant patients, of whom 15 developed hemorrhagic cystitis. Thirty-two patients had related and 58 had unrelated donors, while 44 received full, and 46 received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). BK-viruria was more common in patients with hemorrhagic cystitis than in those without (p<0.01), and hemorrhagic cystitis was less common in patients with related donors than in those with unrelated donors (p=0.02). Finally, hemorrhagic cystitis and BK-viruria were less common in patients receiving RIC, rather than full conditioning (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively).

A comparison of nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Nonmyeloablative (NM) conditioning and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) are increasingly used for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Such regimens have not been compared. METHODS: The primary endpoint was graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Secondary endpoints included transfusions, engraftment, and transplant-related mortality (TRM). NM conditioning (n=24) consisted of fludarabine and 2-Gy total-body irradiation followed by immunosuppression with cyclosporine A (CsA) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The RIC (n=34) protocol consisted of fludarabine combined with busulfan or cyclophosphamide, antithymocyte globulin, and posttransplant immunosuppression CsA plus methotrexate. Diagnoses included hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Donors were 34 human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings and 24 unrelated donors. Chimerism was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction of minisatellites. RESULTS: Graft failure occurred in 6 of 24 in the NM group and in 1 of 34 in the RIC group, which was a significant difference (odds ratio [OR], 22.6; P=0.02). The NM group also had less leukopenia and required fewer erythrocyte and platelet transfusions than the RIC group. The time to and proportion of CD3, CD19, and CD45 donor chimerism were similar in both groups. The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute GVHD was higher in the NM group (59% vs. 12%; OR, 26.9; P<0.001), but we found no difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (41% vs. 61%). TRM was 42% in the NM group and 20% in the RIC patients (relative hazard, 11.6; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: NM conditioning with posttransplant immunosuppression using CsA and MMF resulted in less leukopenia and fewer transfusions, but resulted in more cases of graft failure, acute GVHD, and TRM than in RIC patients.

Liver transplantation followed by adjuvant nonmyeloablative hemopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced primary liver cancer in humans.

BACKGROUND: Tumor recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with advanced primary liver cancer is common. To achieve an adjuvant graft-versus-tumor effect, the authors investigated whether transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PSCT) after OLT can induce sustained complete donor chimerism. METHODS: Five patients with advanced primary liver cancer were included in the trial. None of the patients had signs of extrahepatic tumor before OLT. However, overall, the extent of surgery, as judged by morphologic examination of the explanted liver, was considered inadequate. A nonmyeloablative preparative regimen of fludarabine combined with total-body irradiation or cyclophosphamide preceded the allogeneic PSCT, which was then performed 16 to 135 days after OLT with human leukocyte antigen-matched donors. Mixed chimerism was monitored weekly by polymerase chain reaction of variable number tandem repeats after PSCT. RESULTS: In two patients, no engraftment of donor cells was seen, whereas one rejected the cells 2 months after PSCT. In two of the patients, a stable mixed donor chimerism was established. A mild transient graft-versus-host reaction was also noted in two patients. Three of the patients died of progressive disease 7 to 9 months after OLT. The other two are presently alive without recurrence at a follow-up of 26 and 10 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that PSCT after OLT is feasible, with low transplant-related morbidity. The rate of nonengraftment or rejection of the transplanted stem cells in this group of patients was three of five. An augmented pretreatment to prevent donor T-cell rejection seems to be necessary in this setting.

Clinical tolerance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a study of influencing factors.

BACKGROUND: Clinical tolerance, defined as discontinuation of immunosuppression without immunological events, is often achieved after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, unlike after organ transplantation. However, this phenomenon has rarely been studied. METHODS: Between September 1977 and December 1997, we evaluated 354 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients who had had more than 1 year of relapse-free survival, regarding time to discontinuation of immunosuppression. Factors such as patient age, donor age, donor sex, immunosuppressive protocols, cell dose, and graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were studied. RESULTS: Patients who did not develop GVHD had discontinued immunosuppression according to the protocols, within 1 year for malignant diseases and within 2 years for nonmalignant diseases. Patients given methotrexate as a single drug were off immunosuppression faster than those given cyclosporine alone (P=0.05). Children (<18 years) discontinued immunosuppression faster than adults (P=0.05). Low donor age was of greater importance than low recipient age for early discontinuation (P=0.003). Male recipients of stem cells from immunized female donors needed a longer time to discontinuation (P<0.001). Patients without acute GVHD had a shorter time to discontinuation than patients with any grade of GVHD (P=0.02). Thirteen months after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 54% of HLA-identical sibling marrow recipients and 36% of unrelated marrow recipients with malignant disease had discontinued immunosuppression (P=0.002). Twenty-five months after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the corresponding figures were 69% and 75% in the two groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In multivariate analysis, high donor age, immunized female donor to male recipient, and grades II-IV acute GVHD were significantly associated with a longer time to clinical tolerance.

Indium-111-labelled donor-lymphocyte infusion by way of hepatic artery and radio-frequency ablation against liver metastases of renal and colon carcinoma after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic solid cancer, antitumor effects occur after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT). However, this treatment is not as effective in the liver as against pulmonary and lymph-node metastases. To intensify the effect of donor-lymphocyte infusions (DLI) against liver metastases, intra-arterial (IA) cell injection by way of the hepatic artery (HA) can be used. METHODS: To trace infused cells, three patients with colorectal, three with renal, and one with breast carcinoma were treated with Indium-111 (111-In)-oxinate-labeled lymphocytes. Four patients received the DLI IA, all after radio-frequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases. Three patients with other metastases received 111-In DLI intravenously (IV). One of them had RFA before SCT. RESULTS: Localization of the IA 111-In DLI activity on scintigrams homed to the liver. After IA injection, the liver to sternum ratio of radioactivity was higher compared with IV injection. Cells (CD3+, 19+, and 56+) of donor origin in biopsies of liver metastasis in two patients treated with IA injection increased to 80% to 100%. Two of four patients treated using the IA DLI showed stable size and number of liver metastases for 5 and 21 months, respectively. Both are alive 18 and 34 months after SCT. Two of three patients receiving DLI IV are doing well, with a stable metastatic disease or still without metastases 21 and 20 months after cell infusions (26 and 34 months after SCT), respectively. Three patients died because of progressive disease. CONCLUSION: When infused by way of the HA, 111-In-labeled lymphocytes home to the liver and its metastases. The liver metastasis infiltrating cells of donor origin increased. DLI by way of the HA combined with RFA may be used to treat liver metastases after SCT.

Cytokine expression in tumors treated with donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

AIMS: Risk factors for disease relapse are remaining tumor or leukemic cells or mixed chimerism (MC) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after stem cell transplantation can contribute to complete donor chimerism and graft-versus-tumor/leukemia effect. We evaluate cytokine secretion at the single-cell level using ELISpot in relation to DLI effect on disease response. PATIENTS & METHODS: Blood samples were collected from four patients with solid tumors and four with hematological malignancies before DLI, and 1 and 3 weeks after DLI. Tumor response was evaluated according to the international Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) method. Indications for DLI were stable disease or MC and/or progressive disease in solid tumors, and molecular or early relapse, or MC in hematological malignancies. ELISpot was performed for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13 cytokines. RESULTS: Depending on the disease response, patients were divided into two groups: responders and nonresponders. Responders were patients who achieved partial response (one renal cell cancer) or stable disease (one prostate cancer) or clinical remission (two acute myeloid leukemia). Patients who relapsed, progressed or rejected the graft were the nonresponders. DLI rescued the renal cell cancer patient, who has partial response, and two acute myeloid leukemia patients, who are in clinical remission. Patients who responded tended to have a higher expression of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-12 and IL-10 than those who did not respond. CONCLUSIONS: DLI can act when the patients' mononuclear cells have normal or increased capacity to produce TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-12 and IL-10. Assessment of these cytokines may be useful to predict those patients who will respond to DLI therapy.

Current immunotherapy for solid tumors.

Explorative knowledge of cellular and molecular mechanisms of immune function and regulation has provided optimism in developing cancer immunotherapy. However, three decades of experimental and clinical investigations to offer powerful immunotherapeutic strategies against solid tumors, with the possible exception of monoclonal antibody-targeted therapies, have not succeeded in significantly prolonging patient survival. Nonspecific immune approaches, including cytokine-based therapies and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, have so far produced consistent, although limited, results. In this review, we present the developments of cell transfer-based strategies that, in preclinical studies, have demonstrated potential efficacy, but have only established tumor regression in limited numbers of patients. The key to success demands creative combinations of tumor antigens, adjuvance, gene modification and various administration strategies in the development of cell-based therapies together with other cancer-treatment principles, often in a stepwise 'space-rocket-type' approach. Combined efforts of several scientific disciplines, such as tumor biology and immunology, as well as cell and gene research in transplantation, will open new venues. New regulation for clinical trials with advanced therapy medicine products to ensure patient safety will be highlighted.