RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Dosing errors can cause significant harm in paediatric healthcare settings. Our objective was to investigate the effects of paediatric dose range checking (DRC) clinical decision support (CDS) software on overdosing-related outcomes. METHODS: A before-after study and a semistructured survey of prescribers was conducted across inpatient wards (excluding intensive care) in a regional children's hospital. DRC CDS software linked to a paediatric drug formulary was integrated into an existing electronic prescribing system. The main outcome measures were; the proportion of prescriptions with overdosing errors; overdosing-related clinical incidents; severity of clinical incidents; and acceptability of the intervention. RESULTS: The prescription overdosing error rate did not change significantly following the introduction of DRC CDS software: in the preintervention period 12/847 (1.4%) prescriptions resulted in prescription errors and in the postintervention period there were 9/684 (1.3%) prescription overdosing errors (n=21, Pearson χ2 value=0.028, p=0.868). However, there was a significant trend towards a reduction in the severity of harm associated with reported overdosing incidents (n=60, Mann-Whitney U value=301.0, p=0.012). Prescribers reported that the intervention was beneficial and they were also able to identify factors that may have contributed to the persistence of overdosing errors. CONCLUSION: DRC CDS software did not reduce the incidence of prescription overdosing errors in a paediatric hospital setting but the level of harm associated with the overdosing errors may have been reduced. Use of the software seemed to be safe and it was perceived to be beneficial by prescribers.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Erros de Medicação , Criança , Hospitais , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , SoftwareRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Despite medical advances, life-changing articular damage may still occur in patients with JIA. We report a cohort with destructive arthropathy of the ankle treated by surgical arthrodiastasis. METHODS: Eight patients (nine ankles) received arthrodiastasis by means of an Ilizarov frame between 2009 and 2013. Patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures were collated prospectively, with retrospective analysis of demographics, disease and pre-surgical treatment. RESULTS: Pre-surgery, all patients received IA CS (mean 0.8 injections/year) and MTX (mean diagnosis to treatment 3.8 years; two of eight started within 3 months). Seven of eight patients received biologic drugs. Pain scores improved by 56 and 29% (P < 0.005) at 6 and 12 months post-frame removal. American Academy Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale, Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire-Child and Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire-Parent scores improved by 171, 62 and 80%, respectively (P < 0.005) at 12 months post-frame removal. Patients remained satisfied with surgical treatment for a mean of 13.3 months. There was transient pin site infection in three patients, and all patients had radiological improvement in joint space. CONCLUSION: Arthrodiastasis with an Ilizarov frame is a safe, well-tolerated technique that should be considered as a short-term joint-preserving procedure to improve pain and function when damage has occurred. Delays to systemic medical treatment in this cohort would be considered out-with standard modern practice but, although less prevalent, destructive ankle arthropathy continues to occur in JIA, and we believe this study to be relevant. The ankle is particularly susceptible to damage and, even if localized, should be treated early and aggressively with DMARDs and rapid progression to biologic therapies. LEVELOF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Assuntos
3-Iodobenzilguanidina , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Neuroblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/terapia , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Endócrinos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuroblastoma/terapia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Radioterapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Among preterm infants, high concentrations of inflammatory mediators in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are associated with poor outcome. Previous studies have not indicated whether CSF concentrations of inflammatory mediators are associated with important confounders such as gestational age. AIMS: To examine associations between CSF concentrations of inflammatory mediators and gestational age, maternal features suggestive of inflammation, characteristics of the CSF sample or the presence of a systemic inflammatory response. STUDY DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Aliquots of CSF obtained during routine investigation of potential sepsis among infants born before 35 weeks gestation were assayed for 17 mediators of inflammation using a fluorescent multi-bead analyser. Other information was collected from routine clinical records. RESULTS: 39 infants were assessed. CSF levels of mediators of inflammation were not correlated with gestational age. CSF red blood cell counts were correlated with CSF concentrations of IL-6, GM-CSF and IL-17 (each p<0.003). CSF lactate was correlated with CSF concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-6, GM-CSF, G-CSF, IFN-gamma and MIP-1beta. CSF concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-6, G-CSF, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma were higher in infants with a raised CRP within 24 h of delivery (each p<0.003). CONCLUSIONS: CSF concentrations of inflammatory mediators most probably reflect inflammatory pathologies and are not influenced by gestational age. They may also, however, reflect contamination with blood or systemic inflammation. CSF concentrations of inflammatory mediators may not provide a specific indicator of CNS inflammation.