Medical Physics Leadership Academy Journal Club (Leadership Club) program: Two-year review in building a community of leaders.

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine began the Medical Physics Leadership Academy Journal Club in the fall of 2020. The initiative was launched to provide a forum for medical physicists to learn about leadership topics using published material, discuss and reflect on the material, and consider incorporating the discussed skills into their professional practice. This report presents the framework for the MPLA Journal Club program, describes the lessons learned over the last 2 years, summarizes the data collected from attendees, and highlights the roadmap for the program moving forward.

A Health System's Response to the Ongoing Global Shortage of Iodinated Contrast Media.

A production facility shutdown related to containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global shortage of iodinated contrast media. This article describes the strategies implemented at one large U.S. health system to maintain care continuity during the ongoing shortage. The strategies have included attempts to procure additional stock, repackage existing stock for use in larger numbers of patients, use noncontrast CT or alternative imaging modalities in place of contrast-enhanced CT, and collaborate with specialties outside of radiology to participate in conservation efforts. In addition, individual CT protocols underwent tailored modifications to use dual-energy technique and/or lower tube voltages, to allow lower contrast media doses with maintained visualization of tissue enhancement. The experiences during this period provide insights to facilitate long-term reductions in contrast media doses and ongoing CT protocol optimization after supplies return to normal levels. Critical throughout the efforts to mitigate the impact of the shortage have been system-level action, operational flexibility, and close communication by the health system's radiologists, technologists, physicists, pharmacists, and ordering providers.

Pediatric craniosynostosis computed tomography: an institutional experience in reducing radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality.

BACKGROUND: Children with craniosynostosis may undergo multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations for diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up, resulting in cumulative radiation exposure. OBJECTIVE: To reduce the risks associated with radiation exposure, we evaluated the compliance, radiation dose reduction and clinical image quality of a lower-dose CT protocol for pediatric craniosynostosis implemented at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The standard of care at our institution was modified to replace pediatric head CT protocols with a lower-dose CT protocol utilizing 100 kV, 5 mAs and iterative reconstruction. Study-ordered, protocol-utilized and radiation-dose indices were collected for studies performed with routine pediatric brain protocols (n=22) and with the lower-dose CT protocol (n=135). Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated image quality in a subset (n=50) of the lower-dose CT studies by scoring visualization of cranial structures, confidence of diagnosis and the need for more radiation dose. RESULTS: During the 30-month period, the lower-dose CT protocol had high compliance, with 2/137 studies performed with routine brain protocols. With the lower-dose CT protocol, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) was 1.1 mGy for all patients (0-9 years old) and effective dose ranged from 0.06 to 0.22 mSv, comparable to a 4-view skull radiography examination. CTDIvol was reduced by 98% and effective dose was reduced up to 67-fold. Confidence in diagnosing craniosynostosis was high and more radiation dose was considered unnecessary in all studies (n=50) by both radiologists. CONCLUSION: Replacing the routine pediatric brain CT protocol with a lower-dose CT craniosynostosis protocol substantially reduced radiation exposure without compromising image quality or diagnostic confidence.

The helically-acquired CTDIvol as an alternative to traditional methodology.

PURPOSE: Most clinical computed tomography (CT) protocols use helical scanning; however, the traditional method for CTDIvol measurement replaces the helical protocol with an axial scan, which is not easily accomplished on many scanners and may lead to unmatched collimation settings and bowtie filters. This study assesses whether CTDIvol can be accurately measured with a helical scan and determines the impact of pitch, collimation width, and excess scan length. METHODS: CTDIvol was measured for 95 helical protocols on 31 CT scanners from all major manufacturers. CTDIvol was measured axially, then again helically, with the scan range set to the active area of the pencil chamber seen on the localizer image. CTDIvol measurements using each method were compared to each other and to the scanner-displayed CTDIvol . To test the impact of scan length, the study was repeated on four scanners, with the scan range set to the phantom borders seen on the localizer. RESULTS: It was not possible to match the collimation width between the axial and helical modes for 12 of the 95 protocols tested. For helical and axial protocols with matched collimation, the difference between the two methods averaged below 1 mGy with a correlation of R2  = 0.99. The difference between the methods was not statistically significant (P = 0.81). The traditional method produced four measurements that differed from the displayed CTDIvol by >20%; no helical measurements did. The accuracy of the helical CTDIvol was independent of protocol pitch (R2  = 0.0) or collimation (R2  = 0.0). Extending the scan range to the phantom borders increased the measured CTDIvol by 2.1%-9.7%. CONCLUSION: There was excellent agreement between the two measurement methods and to the displayed CTDIvol , without protocol or vendor dependence. The helical CTDIvol measurement can be accomplished more easily than the axial method on many scanners and is reasonable to use for QC purposes.