Serum uric acid to eGFR ratio correlates with adverse outcomes in elderly hospitalized for acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Serum uric acid (SUA) is a known biomarker of severity in acute heart failure (AHF), reflecting the intricate interplay between cardiovascular and metabolic dysfunction. Since SUA can increase in response to worsening kidney function, and subjects with AHF often have cardiorenal syndrome or are on diuretic therapy, we tested whether the ratio of SUA to eGFR might provide prognostic value in elderly hospitalized for AHF. METHODS: The BOTERO-AHF Study (BOlogna study of Therapies, Epidemiology and Radiodiagnostic Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure patients) included 293 patients admitted for AHF who were consecutively enrolled from January 2020 onwards. We compared the baseline characteristics of participants who had a composite outcome (CO) (n = 203) of death or re-hospitalization for AHF within 12 months from discharge to those without CO (n = 90), and we assessed the prognostic impact of SUA/eGFR for 12-months CO. RESULTS: SUA/eGFR was significantly higher in participants who experienced a CO within 12 months from discharge for AHF, compared to those who did not experience any CO (17.8 (16.6) vs. 13.7 (12.1) mg/dl/ml/min*100, p = 0.008). SUA/eGFR, and not SUA alone, was associated with an increase in the rate of CO (unadjusted HR 1.011, CI 95% 1.004-1.019, p = 0.003). This association lost significance in participants under treatment with xanthine oxidase inhibitors but remained significant after adjustment for multiple confounders. CONCLUSION: The SUA/ eGFR ratio provides prognostic value in elderly patients hospitalized for AHF. Future studies may clarify if SUA/eGFR and XOI may represent novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for subgroups of patients with AHF.

Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing repetition during follow-up of clinically stable patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a recognized tool for prognostic stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Given the lack of data currently available, the aim of this study was to test the prognostic value of repeating CPET during the follow-up of patients with DCM. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study, analyzed DCM patients who consecutively performed two echocardiographies and CPETs during clinical stability. The study end-point was a composite of death from all causes, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias or hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: 216 DCM patients were enrolled (52 years, 78% male, NYHA I-II 82%, LVEF 32%, 94% on ACE inhibitors/ARNI, 95% on beta-blockers). The interval between CPETs was 15 months. During a median follow-up of 38 months from the second CPET, 102 (47%) patients experienced the study end-point. Among them, there was stability of echocardiographic values but a significant worsening of functional capacity. Among the 173 patients (80%) who did not show echocardiographic left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), the 1-year prevalence of the study-end point was higher in patients who worsened vs patients who maintained stable their functional capacity at CPET (38 vs. 15% respectively, p-value: 0.001). These results were consistent also when excluding life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias from the composite end-point. CONCLUSION: In clinically stable DCM patients with important depression of LVEF, the repetition of combined echocardiography and CPET might be recommended. When LVRR fails, 1-year repetition of CPET could identify higher-risk patients.