Frequency and risk factors for malnutrition in children undergoing general anaesthesia in a French university hospital: A cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is often underdiagnosed in hospitalised children, although it is associated with postoperative complications, longer hospital lengths of stay and increased healthcare-related costs. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the frequency of, and identify factors associated with, malnutrition in children undergoing anaesthesia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. SETTING: Paediatric anaesthesia department at the University Children's Hospital, Bordeaux, France. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 985 patients aged less than 18 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anthropometric measurements, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification score and the Pediatric Nutritional Risk Score (PNRS) recorded at the pre-anaesthesia evaluation. RESULTS: When assessed as a Waterlow index less than 80%, malnutrition was present in 7.6% children. This increased to 8.1% of children assessed by clinical signs and to 11% of children when defined by a BMI less than the third percentile. In a univariate analysis, children with a BMI less than the third percentile were more often born prematurely (22.4 vs 10.4%; P = 0.0008), were small for gestational age at birth (18.4 vs 4.5%; P < 0.0001), were admitted from the emergency department (12.0 vs 5.6%; P = 0.02), had a high American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < 0.0001), or had a high Pediatric Nutritional Risk Score (P < 0.0001). Presence (P = 0.01) and type (P = 0.002) of chronic disease were also associated with malnutrition. In the multivariate analysis, a premature birth, a lower birth weight and a higher Pediatric Nutritional Risk Score were significantly associated with a higher odds of malnutrition when defined by BMI. CONCLUSION: All children should be screened routinely for malnutrition or the risk of malnutrition at the pre-anaesthesia visit, allowing a programme of preoperative and/or postoperative nutritional support to be initiated. We suggest that as well as weight and height, BMI and a pediatric nutritional risk score such as PNRS should be recorded routinely at the pre-anaesthesia visit.

The analgesic properties of scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine after intracranial tumoral resection.

BACKGROUND: The issue of postoperative pain after neurosurgery is controversial. It has been reported as mild to moderate and its treatment may be inadequate. Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics has provided transient benefit after craniotomy, but its effect on chronic pain has not been evaluated. Accordingly, we designed the present study to test the hypothesis that ropivacaine infiltration of the scalp reduces acute and persistent postoperative pain after intracranial tumor resection. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-blinded study. Inclusion criteria were intracranial tumor resection, age > or = 18 or < or = 80 yr, and ability to understand and use a visual analog scale (VAS). Exclusion criteria were history of craniotomy, chronic drug abuse, and neurologic disorders. All eligible patients were randomly included in Group I (infiltration) or C (control). Postoperative analgesia was IV acetaminophen combined with nalbuphine. At the end of the surgery, Group I received an infiltration of the surgical site with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75%. Acute pain was evaluated hourly by VAS during the first 24 h. The analgesic effect of ropivacaine was evaluated based on total consumption of nalbuphine and VAS scores. The incidence of persistent pain and neuropathic pain was assessed at the 2-mo postoperative evaluation. We used the Student's t-test to compare total nalbuphine consumption, repeated measures analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni t-test for VAS score and the Fisher's exact test for chronic and neuropathic pain. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled, 25 in Group I and 27 in Group C. Demographic and intraoperative data were similar between groups. Group I showed a nonsignificant trend toward reduced nalbuphine consumption during the first postoperative day, 11.2 +/- 9.2 mg vs 16.6 +/- 11.0 mg for Group C (mean +/- SD, P = 0.054). VAS scores were significantly higher in Group C. Two months after surgery, persistent pain was significantly lower in Group I, 2/24 (8%) vs 14/25 (56%), P = 0.0003. One patient (4.1%) in Group I versus six (25%) patients in Group C (P = 0.04) experienced neuropathic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Because pain is moderate after intracranial tumor resection, there is limited interest in scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine in the acute postoperative period. Nevertheless, these infiltrations may be relevant for the rehabilitation of neurosurgical patients and their quality of life by limiting the development of persistent pain and particularly neuropathic pain.