Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 139
Filtrar
1.
Endoscopy ; 55(5): 458-468, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36241197

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common neoplasm in Western countries. Prioritizing access to colonoscopy appears of critical relevance. Alarm features are considered to increase the likelihood of CRC. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of alarm features for CRC diagnosis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of alarm features (rectal bleeding, anemia, change in bowel habit, and weight loss) for CRC, published up to September 2021. Colonoscopy was required as the reference diagnostic test. Diagnostic accuracy measures were pooled by a bivariate mixed-effects regression model. The number needed to scope (NNS; i. e. the number of patients who need to undergo colonoscopy to diagnose one CRC) according to each alarm feature was calculated. RESULTS: 31 studies with 45 100 patients (mean age 31-88 years; men 36 %-63 %) were included. The prevalence of CRC ranged from 0.2 % to 22 %. Sensitivity was suboptimal, ranging from 12.4 % for weight loss to 49 % for rectal bleeding, whereas specificity ranged from 69.8 % for rectal bleeding to 91.9 % for weight loss. Taken individually, rectal bleeding and anemia would be the only practical alarm features mandating colonoscopy (NNS 5.3 and 6.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: When considered independently, alarm features have variable accuracy for CRC, given the high heterogeneity of study populations reflected by wide variability in CRC prevalence. Rectal bleeding and anemia are the most practical to select patients for colonoscopy. Integration of alarm features in a comprehensive evaluation of patients should be considered.


Assuntos
Anemia , Neoplasias Colorretais , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Reto , Colonoscopia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Anemia/etiologia , Redução de Peso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer
2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 57(2): 111-126, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36598803

RESUMO

Helicobacter pylori remains a major health problem worldwide, causing considerable morbidity and mortality due to peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. The burden of disease falls disproportionally on less well-resourced populations. As with most infectious diseases, the largest impact on reducing this burden comes from improvement in socioeconomic status, which interrupts transmission. This has been observed in many regions of the world, but the prevalence of infection remains high in many regions where improvements in living standards are slow to occur. Meanwhile, the optimal clinical management and treatment pathways remain unsettled and are evolving with changing antimicrobial resistance patterns. Despite decades of research and clinical practice, major challenges remain. The quest for the most effective, safe, and simple therapy remains the major issue for clinicians. The search for an effective vaccine appears to be elusive still. Clinical guidelines do not infrequently proffer discordant advice. A major challenge for guidelines is for relevance across a variety of populations with a varying spectrum of disease, antimicrobial resistance rates, and vastly different resources. As local factors are central to determining the impact and management strategies for H. pylori infection, it is important that pathways are based on the best available local knowledge rather than solely extrapolating from guidelines formulated in other regions, which may be less applicable. To this end, this revision of the World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO) H. pylori guideline uses a "Cascades" approach that seeks to summarize the principles of management and offer advice for pragmatic, relevant and achievable diagnostic and treatment pathways based on established key treatment principles and using local knowledge and available resources to guide regional practice.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Gastroenterologia , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica , Humanos , Úlcera Péptica/tratamento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica/etiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
3.
Ultraschall Med ; 44(3): e139-e147, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34758491

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The role of liver stiffness (LS) on ultrasound elastography in the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is still unclear. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether LS can predict the recurrence of HCC after RFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, and abstracts of international conference proceedings were searched up to June 30, 2020. Cohort studies were included if they assessed the association between LS values measured by ultrasound elastography before RFA and HCC recurrence. RESULTS: 9 studies including 1373 patients with HCC treated by RFA, 643 of whom developed HCC recurrence, were identified. The mean value of LS before RFA was significantly higher in patients who developed HCC recurrence than in those who did not (weighted mean difference=11.98 kPa, 95%CI: 7.60-16.35, I2=63.8%). There was a significant positive association between LS value and HCC recurrence both at univariate (unadjusted HR=1.03, 95%CI: 1.00-1.07, I2=72.7%) and multivariate analysis (adjusted HR=1.03, 95%CI: 1.02-1.04, I2=0). Patients with LS value ≥13-14 kPa or >1.5 m/s have a higher risk of both HCC recurrence (unadjusted HR=2.18, 95%CI: 1.46-3.25, I2=49.7%; adjusted HR=2.41, 95%CI: 1.53-3.79, I2=0) and overall mortality (adjusted HR=4.38; 95%CI: 2.33-8.25, I2=0) in comparison with those with LS below these cutoffs. CONCLUSION: Liver ultrasound elastography appears to be a reliable tool to predict HCC recurrence and overall survival after RFA. This technique may be useful for the management of patients with HCC treated by RFA.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Ablação por Cateter , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade/métodos , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Helicobacter ; 27(1): e12862, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34766392

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Information on the management of Helicobacter (H.) pylori infection by gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows are scarce. We aimed to assess practice of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows and their adherence to guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows attending the National Congress of Digestive Diseases - FISMAD were invited to fill-in an on-line questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions on the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection. RESULTS: A total of 279 gastroenterologists and 61 gastroenterology fellows participated to the study. The 13 C-urea breath test was the most preferred method among gastroenterologists and fellows for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection (40.4% and 57.6%, respectively) and the confirmation of eradication (61.3% and 70%, respectively). Sequential therapy was the most preferred first-line treatment of H. pylori for both gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows (31.8% and 44%, respectively), followed by bismuth quadruple therapy (31% and 27.6%, respectively) and clarithromycin triple therapy (26.8% and 22.4%, respectively). Only 30% of gastroenterologists and 38.5% of fellows used the clarithromycin triple therapy for the recommended duration of 14 days. Bismuth quadruple therapy was the most preferred second-line therapy for both gastroenterologists and fellows. The majority of gastroenterologists and fellows would prefer an empirical therapy at third line (72.6% and 62.5%, respectively) and a susceptibility-guided therapy at fourth line (46.7% and 71.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Practices of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows are in line with guidelines' recommendations, apart for the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection. Targeted educational interventions to improve adherence to guidelines are needed.


Assuntos
Gastroenterologistas , Gastroenterologia , Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Dig Dis ; 40(4): 517-525, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34515093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic surveillance in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) is crucial due to a genetically based high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to compare the adenoma detection rate (ADR) between high-resolution white light endoscopy (WLE) alone and WLE plus dye chromoendoscopy (CE) in a cohort of LS patients. METHODS: In a context of real-world data, we retrospectively enrolled 50 LS patients who had non-randomly undergone WLE versus CE surveillance examinations from 2007 to 2019. The 2 groups were compared at baseline (BL) in terms of the rate of patients with lesions and the number of lesions, and at follow-up (FU), to evaluate a possible enhanced detection rate. Longitudinal analysis of the effect of the endoscopy type on the main outcomes was performed by generalized linear mixed models. RESULTS: Forty-two patients had undergone at least one diagnostic colonoscopy. At BL and at FU analysis, we found no significant differences in detection rates and clinical-pathological features between WLE and CE groups. At the longitudinal analysis, an increase in the endoscopy rank (i.e., the position of each colonoscopy for all the colonoscopies that a patient had undergone) was associated with an increase in polyp detection rate (p = 0.006) and ADR (p = 0.005), while a trend toward significance (p = 0.069) was found for endoscopy type (CE vs. WLE) in the detection of serrated lesions. CONCLUSIONS: CE is not superior to high-resolution WLE in increasing the ADR. Even under standard WLE, an active and careful endoscopic surveillance of LS patients can prevent CRC.


Assuntos
Adenoma , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose , Neoplasias Colorretais , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/patologia , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/patologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 37(8): 1507-1516, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35614860

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) is the main predisposing factor for Barrett's esophagus (BE). A more precise estimate of the association of GER symptoms with the risk of BE would be important to prioritize endoscopic screening. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine this issue. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMBASE Classic were searched to identify cross-sectional studies that reported the prevalence of BE based on presence of GER symptoms. The prevalence of BE was compared according to presence or absence of GER symptoms using an odds ratio (OR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Specificity and sensitivity of GER symptoms for predicting BE was calculated. RESULTS: Of 10,463 citations evaluated, 19 studies reported the prevalence of BE in 43,017 subjects. The pooled OR among individuals with weekly GER symptoms compared with those without was 1.67 (95% CI 1.30-2.15) for endoscopically suspected BE, and 2.42 (95% CI 1.59-3.68) for histologically confirmed BE. No significant association was found between weekly GER symptoms and the presence of short segment BE (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.86-1.97), whereas a strong association was present with long segment BE, with an OR of 6.30 (95% CI 2.26-17.61). CONCLUSIONS: Gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms are associated with an increased odds of BE, with a further increase when weekly symptoms are present. Overall, GER symptoms showed low sensitivity and specificity for predicting BE; however, a strong association was found between weekly GER symptoms and long segment BE, but not short segment BE, suggesting that it may be worth considering screening individuals with weekly GER symptoms to rule out long segment BE.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett , Esofagite Péptica , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esôfago de Barrett/epidemiologia , Esôfago de Barrett/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Humanos , Razão de Chances
7.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 19(7): 1410-1417.e9, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32898707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a sudden, dramatic impact on healthcare. In Italy, since the beginning of the pandemic, colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs have been forcefully suspended. We aimed to evaluate whether screening procedure delays can affect the outcomes of CRC screening. METHODS: We built a procedural model considering delays in the time to colonoscopy and estimating the effect on mortality due to up-stage migration of patients. The number of expected CRC cases was computed by using the data of the Italian screened population. Estimates of the effects of delay to colonoscopy on CRC stage, and of stage on mortality were assessed by a meta-analytic approach. RESULTS: With a delay of 0-3 months, 74% of CRC is expected to be stage I-II, while with a delay of 4-6 months there would be a 2%-increase for stage I-II and a concomitant decrease for stage III-IV (P = .068). Compared to baseline (0-3 months), moderate (7-12 months) and long (> 12 months) delays would lead to a significant increase in advanced CRC (from 26% to 29% and 33%, respectively; P = .008 and P < .001, respectively). We estimated a significant increase in the total number of deaths (+12.0%) when moving from a 0-3-months to a >12-month delay (P = .005), and a significant change in mortality distribution by stage when comparing the baseline with the >12-months (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Screening delays beyond 4-6 months would significantly increase advanced CRC cases, and also mortality if lasting beyond 12 months. Our data highlight the need to reorganize efforts against high-impact diseases such as CRC, considering possible future waves of SARS-CoV-2 or other pandemics.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorretais , Diagnóstico Tardio , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Idoso , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Humanos , Itália , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pandemias
8.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 19(2): 339-348.e7, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200083

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hospitalization is associated with inadequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy. We aimed to identify factors associated to inadequate colon cleansing among inpatients, and to derive and validate a model to identify inpatients with inadequate cleansing. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study at 12 hospitals in Italy. Consecutive adult inpatients scheduled for colonoscopy for any indication were enrolled from February through May 2019 (derivation cohort, n = 1016) and from June through August 2019 (validation cohort, n = 508). Inadequate cleansing was defined as Boston bowel preparation scale scores below 2 in any colon segment. We performed multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with inadequate cleansing. RESULTS: In the combined cohorts, 1032 patients (68%) had adequate colon cleansing. Physicians' meetings to optimize bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.65), written and oral instructions to patients (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36-0.65), admission to gastroenterology unit (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.98), split-dose regimens (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.20-0.35), a 1-liter polyethylene glycol-based bowel purge (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.65), and 75% or more intake of bowel preparation (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.15) significantly reduced odds of inadequate colon cleansing. Alternatively, bedridden status (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.55-2.98), constipation (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.55-3.0), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.18-2.20), use of anti-psychotic drugs (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.62-6.56), and 7 or more days of hospitalization (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04) increased risk of inadequate colon cleansing. We developed a model to identify patients with inadequate cleaning using data from patients in the derivation cohort and tested it in the validation cohort. Calibration values were P = .218 for the discrimination cohort and P = .232 for the validation cohort. Discrimination values were c-statistic, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74-0.81) for the discrimination cohort and c-statistic, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.78) for the validation cohort. We developed app for use by clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective observational study, we identified setting-, patient- and preparation-related factors that affect colon cleansing among inpatients. We derived and validated a model to identify patients with inadequate preparation and developed an app for clinicians. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT03925506.


Assuntos
Catárticos , Colonoscopia , Adulto , Colo , Constipação Intestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico
9.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(2): 289-295, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009050

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological studies assessing relative risk and incidence rate of esophageal cancer in patients with achalasia are scarce. We performed a long-term prospective cohort study to evaluate the risk of both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in these patients. METHODS: Between 1973 and 2018, patients with primary achalasia were followed by the same protocol including upper endoscopy with esophageal biopsies. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the relative risk of esophageal cancer in patients with achalasia compared with the sex- and age-matched general population. RESULTS: A cohort of 566 patients with achalasia (46% men, mean age at diagnosis: 48.1 years) was followed for a mean of 15.5 years since the diagnosis of achalasia. Overall, 20 patients (15 men) developed esophageal cancer: 15 squamous cell carcinoma and 5 adenocarcinoma. The risk of esophageal cancer was significantly greater than the general population (SIR 104.2, 95% CI 63.7-161), and this for both squamous cell carcinoma (SIR 126.9, 95% CI 71.0-209.3) and adenocarcinoma (SIR 110.2, 95% CI 35.8-257.2). The excess risk was higher in men than women. Annual incidence rate of esophageal cancer was only 0.24% and was higher for squamous cell carcinoma (0.18%) than adenocarcinoma (0.06%). DISCUSSION: Patients with achalasia have an excess risk of developing both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus; however, this prospective cohort study confirms that the annual incidence of esophageal cancer is rather low. These findings may have implications for endoscopic surveillance of patients with achalasia.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Acalasia Esofágica/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Dilatação , Acalasia Esofágica/terapia , Feminino , Miotomia de Heller , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nifedipino/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Fatores Sexuais
10.
J Viral Hepat ; 28(5): 764-770, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33586276

RESUMO

Global eradication of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is hindered by infection persistence among high-prevalence ethnic groups with insufficient access to care. Educational interventions to raise awareness on HCV have led to identification of submerged HCV cases. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based platform to assess and raise the awareness of HCV among Pakistani people living in northern Italy. We created a website in Italian and Urdu language (https://survey-hcv6.webnode.it), and shared it to Pakistani people in Emilia-Romagna through Facebook groups. Participants had to fill a 15-item questionnaire on HCV infection, then watch a video on HCV, and respond to the questionnaire again. McNemar's chi-square and negative binomial multivariable regression analysis yielding incidence rate ratio (IRR) were applied. 339 subjects from 600 (57%) participated and filled the baseline questionnaire. The knowledge on HCV infection was scanty. For instance, 32% were not aware of HCV, 42% only knew that HCV infection may be long term, and only 14% knew the access to DAA treatment is provided by the Health Service. Independent predictors of worse knowledge on HCV were male gender (IRR 1.19), low instruction level (IRR 1.26), Urdu language preference (IRR 1.22), past use of intravenous drugs (1.2) and no previous HCV testing (IRR 1.36). The educational video significantly improved the knowledge on HCV among 67 subjects who refilled the questionnaire, as 97% were later aware of HCV, 99% of the long-term duration of HCV infection and 93% of the access to DAAs provided by Italian Health Service. We found a modest level of knowledge on HCV infection among Pakistani people in northern Italy, identifying predictors of worse awareness. We provided a multimedia platform which significantly improved the knowledge on HCV infection. Consequently, this approach might translate into an improved linkage to care.


Assuntos
Hepacivirus , Hepatite C , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Etnicidade , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Internet , Itália , Masculino , Multimídia , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Prevalência
11.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(9): 2888-2896, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32984930

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known on practice patterns of endoscopists for the management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) over the last decade. AIMS: Our aim was to assess practice patterns of endoscopists for the diagnosis, surveillance and treatment of BE. METHODS: All members of the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) were invited to participate to a questionnaire-based survey. The questionnaire included questions on demographic and professional characteristics, and on diagnosis and management strategies for BE. RESULTS: Of the 883 SIED members, 259 (31.1%) completed the questionnaire. Of these, 73% were males, 42.9% had > 50 years of age and 68.7% practiced in community hospitals. The majority (82.9%) of participants stated to use the Prague classification; however 34.5% did not use the top of gastric folds to identify the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ); only 51.4% used advanced endoscopy imaging routinely. Almost all respondents practiced endoscopic surveillance for non-dysplastic BE, but 43.7% performed eradication in selected cases and 30% practiced surveillance every 1-2 years. The majority of endoscopists managed low-grade dysplasia with surveillance (79.1%) and high-grade dysplasia with ablation (77.1%). Attending a training course on BE in the previous 5 years was significantly associated with the use of the Prague classification (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.9-12.1), the top of gastric folds as landmark for the GEJ (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.27-4.74) and advanced imaging endoscopic techniques (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.53-7.29). CONCLUSIONS: Practice patterns for management of BE among endoscopists are variable. Attending training courses on BE improves adherence to guidelines.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/terapia , Educação/métodos , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Esôfago de Barrett/epidemiologia , Indicadores de Doenças Crônicas , Currículo , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/educação , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sociedades Médicas
12.
Gastroenterology ; 156(5): 1309-1323.e3, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30553914

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Outcomes of endoscopic surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) vary with the incidence and timing of CRC detection at anastomoses or non-anastomoses in the colorectum. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the incidence of CRCs identified during surveillance colonoscopies of patients who have already undergone surgery for this cancer. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials through January 1, 2018 to identify studies investigating rates of CRCs at anastomoses or other locations in the colorectum after curative surgery for primary CRC. We collected data from published randomized controlled, prospective, and retrospective cohort studies. Data were analyzed by multivariate meta-analytic models. RESULTS: From 2373 citations, we selected 27 studies with data on 15,803 index CRCs for analysis (89% of patients with stage I-III CRC). Overall, 296 CRCs at non-anastomotic locations were reported over time periods of more than 16 years (cumulative incidence, 2.2% of CRCs; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-2.9%). The risk of CRC at a non-anastomotic location was significantly reduced more than 36 months after resection compared with before this time point (odds ratio for non-anastomotic CRCs at 36-48 months vs 6-12 months after surgery, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-0.98; P = .031); 53.7% of all non-anastomotic CRCs were detected within 36 months of surgery. One hundred and fifty-eight CRCs were detected at anastomoses (cumulative incidence of 2.7%; 95% CI, 1.9%-3.9%). The risk of CRCs at anastomoses was significantly lower 24 months after resection than before (odds ratio for CRCs at anastomoses at 25-36 months after surgery vs 6-12 months, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.98; P = .036); 90.8% of all CRCs at anastomoses were detected within 36 months of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After surgery for CRC, the highest risk of CRCs at anastomoses and at other locations in the colorectum is highest during 36 months after surgery-risk decreases thereafter. Patients who have undergone CRC resection should be evaluated by colonoscopy more closely during this time period. Longer intervals may be considered thereafter.


Assuntos
Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/patologia , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 91(6): 1234-1241.e4, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006546

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) is the criterion standard for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. Several studies assessed the role of repeat EUS-FNA (rEUS-FNA) after an inconclusive examination. Our aim was to evaluate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of rEUS-FNA after a nondiagnostic result. METHODS: We conducted systematic research on electronic databases (Medline, PubMed, EMBASE) and a meta-analysis to obtain pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate area under the curve. Subgroup analysis was used to assess the role of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). RESULTS: Twelve studies (505 patients) were included. Sensitivity was 77% (66%-86%), specificity 98% (78%-100%), and positive and negative predictive values 99% (98%-100%) and 61 (60%-63%), respectively. At 73% of disease prevalence (pretest probability), positive rEUS-FNA increased the disease probability to 99%, whereas a negative result decreased the disease probability to 39%. The sensitivity was 83% (64%-93%) and specificity 98% (80%-100%) when ROSE was available and 65% (57%-73%) and 94% (31%-100%) when not available. The number needed to diagnose was 1.2 (1.1-2.3) and 1.7 (1.4-8.3) in ROSE-positive and ROSE-negative cases, respectively. The number of correctly diagnosed cases increased from 6 (1-7) to 8 (4-9) of 10 patients without and with ROSE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study objectively substantiated the added value of rEUS-FNA for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses in cases of a previous nondiagnostic or inconclusive result. Moreover, our data suggested that ROSE may be beneficial in this setting, because it increased the proportion of definitive diagnoses.


Assuntos
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico , Humanos , Pâncreas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC
14.
Endoscopy ; 52(3): 220-226, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31858510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with prior colon cancer have increased risk of metachronous colorectal neoplasms; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is indicated. Current recommendations are not risk-stratified. We investigated predictive factors for colorectal neoplasms to build a model to spare colonoscopies for low-risk patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study including patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer in 2001 - 2008 (derivation cohort) and 2009 - 2013 (validation cohort). A predictive model for neoplasm occurrence at second surveillance colonoscopy was developed and validated. RESULTS: 421 and 203 patients were included in derivation and validation cohort, respectively. At second surveillance colonoscopy, 112 (26.6 %) and 55 (27.1 %) patients had metachronous neoplasms in derivation and validation groups; three cancers were detected in the latter. History of left-sided colon cancer (OR 1.64, 95 %CI 1.02 - 2.64), ≥ 1 advanced adenoma at index colonoscopy (OR 1.90, 95 %CI 1.05 - 3.43), and ≥ 1 adenoma at first surveillance colonoscopy (OR 2.06, 95 %CI 1.29 - 3.27) were independently predictive of metachronous colorectal neoplasms at second surveillance colonoscopy. For patients without such risk factors, diagnostic accuracy parameters were: 89.3 % (95 %CI 82.0 %-94.3 %) and 78.2 % (95 %CI 65.0 %-88.2 %) sensitivity, and 28.5 % (95 %CI 23.5 %-33.9 %) and 33.8 % (95 %CI 26.2 %-42.0 %) specificity in derivation and validation group, respectively. No cancer would be missed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior left-sided colon cancer or ≥ 1 advanced adenoma at index colonoscopy or ≥ 1 adenoma at first surveillance colonoscopy had a significantly higher risk of neoplasms at second surveillance colonoscopy; patients without such factors had much lower risk and could safely skip the second surveillance colonoscopy. A prospective, multicenter validation study is needed.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Neoplasias do Colo/epidemiologia , Colonoscopia , Humanos , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
15.
Helicobacter ; 25(4): e12694, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32314519

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bismuth quadruple (BQT) and non-bismuth quadruple (N-BQT) therapies are the recommended first-line treatments for Helicobacter (H.) pylori infection. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of BQT and N-BQT in clinical practice in an area with high clarithromycin resistance, choosing the regimen on the basis of previous exposure to clarithromycin. METHODS: A total of 404 consecutive H pylori-positive, naïve patients were enrolled. A total of 203 patients without previous exposure to clarithromycin received N-BQT, 100 patients for 10 days and 103 for 14 days, whereas 201 with previous exposure to clarithromycin received 10-day BQT. Efficacy and treatment-related adverse events were assessed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 88.2% for N-BQT and 91.5% for BQT (P = .26); per-protocol analysis eradication rates were 91.2% and 95.8% for N-BQT and BQT, respectively (P = .07). Eradication rates were significantly higher with 14-day than 10-day CT (P < .003). Almost all patients had a good compliance with both N-BQT (95.6%) and BQT (95%). Adverse events occurred in 24.1% and 26.9% (P = .53) of patients in the N-BQT and BQT group, respectively. In conclusion, clarithromycin-containing non-bismuth or bismuth quadruple therapy, based on the knowledge of previous clarithromycin exposure, is effective and safe even in an area of high prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant H pylori strains.


Assuntos
Antiácidos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Claritromicina/farmacologia , Esquema de Medicação , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 35(9): 1495-1502, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32181516

RESUMO

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, and mortality rates are still high. Primary preventive strategies, aimed to reduce risk factors and promote protective ones, will lead to a decrease in GC incidence. Helicobacter pylori infection is a well-established carcinogen for GC, and its eradication is recommended as the best strategy for the primary prevention. However, the role of other factors such as lifestyle, diet, and drug use is still under debate in GC carcinogenesis. Unfortunately, most patients with GC are diagnosed at late stages when treatment is often ineffective. Neoplastic transformation of the gastric mucosa is a multistep process, and appropriate diagnosis and management of preneoplastic conditions can reduce GC-related mortality. Several screening strategies in relation to GC incidence have been proposed in order to detect neoplastic lesions at early stages. The efficacy of screening strategies in reducing GC mortality needs to be confirmed. This review provides an overview of current international guidelines and recent literature on primary and secondary prevention strategies for GC.


Assuntos
Prevenção Primária , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/prevenção & controle , Aciltransferases/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Dieta , Endoscopia , Exercício Físico , Gastrite/complicações , Gastrite/tratamento farmacológico , Gastrite/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Programas de Rastreamento , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/prevenção & controle , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/diagnóstico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia
17.
Dig Dis Sci ; 64(3): 863-874, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30334112

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: "Real-life" data of retention rate and persistence of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease are still limited. AIMS: To analyze retention rate, persistence, and safety of adalimumab in a 9-year real-life cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients. METHODS: In this observational, retrospective single-center study, all adult patients treated with adalimumab as the first- and second-line biological treatment for steroid-dependent or refractory inflammatory bowel disease between March 2008 and March 2017 were included. Primary outcomes were persistence, retention rate, and adverse events; the secondary outcome was the identification of predictors of withdrawal. RESULTS: Ninety-six out of 181 patients (53%) withdrew their first course of adalimumab. The retention rate was 47% and 46.9% in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients, respectively; median persistence was 26 and 24 months in CD and UC patients, respectively. The cumulative probability of treatment persistence was 80.2%, 54.5%, and 29.6% and 69.6%, 40.4%, and 21.5% in CD and UC patients, respectively. The incidence rate of any adverse event was 12.5/100 patients-year; severe adverse events were 1.7/100 patients-year. The Cox regression revealed that CD patients with baseline disease duration > 72 months have a higher likelihood for withdrawal due to failure and/or adverse events (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1-2.62, p = 0.04); no predictors of discontinuation were found in UC. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab showed a great persistence in the first 12 months of therapy and excellent safety profile. Early treatment of CD patients could increase efficacy and reduce the adverse event rate.


Assuntos
Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/imunologia , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico , Doença de Crohn/imunologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
18.
Ultraschall Med ; 40(5): 646-654, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895586

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess whether ultrasound elastography can have a diagnostic role in detecting fibrotic bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE via the PubMed, Ovid Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases, and abstracts of international conference proceedings were searched up to March 31, 2018. Studies were included if they assessed the performance of abdominal ultrasound elastography in detecting fibrotic bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease using histology or the need for surgery after medical treatment as a reference standard. The quality of the studies was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. RESULTS: 6 studies including a total of 217 patients with Crohn's disease and 231 bowel segments, of which 76 were bowel segments with fibrotic stricture, were selected. Three studies used strain ratio and three studies used strain value as parameters of bowel stiffness. Both the pooled standardized mean strain ratio and the pooled standardized mean strain value were higher in bowel segments with fibrotic strictures than in those without fibrotic strictures with a standardized mean difference of 0.85 (95 % confidence level [CI]: 0 to 1.71; p = 0.05) and 1.0 (95 % CI: -0.11 to 2.10; p = 0.08), respectively. There was a high heterogeneity between studies. All studies were at "high risk" or "unclear risk" of bias. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound elastography could be able to detect fibrotic bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease. Well-designed high quality diagnostic studies with a large sample size are needed.


Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade , Obstrução Intestinal , Constrição Patológica , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagem , Fibrose , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem
19.
Gut ; 67(3): 430-440, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232473

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are common in the community, but there has been no definitive systematic review and meta-analysis of data from all studies to estimate their global prevalence, or potential risk factors for them. DESIGN: Medline, Embase and Embase Classic were searched (until September 2016) to identify population-based studies that reported the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in adults (≥15 years); gastro-oesophageal reflux was defined using symptom-based criteria or questionnaires. The prevalence was extracted for all studies, and according to the criteria used to define it. Pooled prevalence, according to study location and certain other characteristics, OR and 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 14 132 citations evaluated, 102 reported the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms in 108 separate study populations, containing 460 984 subjects. Prevalence varied according to country (from 2.5% in China to 51.2% in Greece) and criteria used to define gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms. When only studies using a weekly frequency of heart burn or regurgitation to define presence were considered, pooled prevalence was 13.3% (95% CI 12.0% to 14.6%). Prevalence was higher in subjects ≥50 years (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.54), smokers (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.52), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)/aspirin users (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.88) and obese individuals (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.06). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms varied strikingly among countries, even when similar definitions were used to define their presence. Prevalence was significantly higher in subjects ≥50 years, smokers, NSAID users and obese individuals, although these associations were modest.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Escolaridade , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Classe Social
20.
Gut ; 67(8): 1464-1474, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29208675

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) aims to achieve en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas which might be indicated in cases with superficial submucosal invasive cancers (SMIC), but the procedure is time consuming and complex. The prevalence of such cancers is not known but may determine the clinical necessity for ESD as opposed to the commonly used piecemeal mucosal resection (endoscopic mucosal resection) of colorectal adenomas. The main aim was to assess the prevalence of SMIC SM1 (ie, invasion ≤1000 µm or less than one-third of the submucosa) on colorectal lesions removed by ESD. DESIGN: A literature review was conducted using electronic databases (up to March 2017) for colorectal ESD series reporting the histology of the dissected lesions. RESULTS: 51 studies with data on 11 260 colorectal dissected lesions were included. Most resected lesions (82.2%; 95% CI 78.8% to 85.3%) were adenomas (low- and high-grade dysplasia, 26.8% and 55.4%, respectively). Overall, 15.7% were submucosal cancers, but only slightly more than half (8.0%; 95% CI 6.1% to 10.3%) had an infiltration depth of ≤1000 µm, providing a number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one surgery of 12.5. Estimating an oncologically curative (R0; G1/2; L0/V0) resection rate of 75.3% (95% CI 52.2% to 89.4%) for malignant lesions, the prevalence of curative resection lowered to 6% (95% CI 4.2% to 7.2%) with an NNT of 16.7. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of SMIC SM1 in lesions selected for ESD as well as the even lower rate of curative resection limits the clinical applicability of endoscopic en bloc resection. This calls for caution over an indiscriminate use of this technique in the resection of colorectal neoplasia.


Assuntos
Adenoma/patologia , Adenoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Invasividade Neoplásica , Prevalência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa