Response of nitrate leaching to no-tillage is dependent on soil, climate, and management factors: A global meta-analysis.

No tillage (NT) has been proposed as a practice to reduce the adverse effects of tillage on contaminant (e.g., sediment and nutrient) losses to waterways. Nonetheless, previous reports on impacts of NT on nitrate ( NO 3 - ) leaching are inconsistent. A global meta-analysis was conducted to test the hypothesis that the response of NO 3 - leaching under NT, relative to tillage, is associated with tillage type (inversion vs non-inversion tillage), soil properties (e.g., soil organic carbon [SOC]), climate factors (i.e., water input), and management practices (e.g., NT duration and nitrogen fertilizer inputs). Overall, compared with all forms of tillage combined, NT had 4% and 14% greater area-scaled and yield-scaled NO 3 - leaching losses, respectively. The NO 3 - leaching under NT tended to be 7% greater than that of inversion tillage but comparable to non-inversion tillage. Greater NO 3 - leaching under NT, compared with inversion tillage, was most evident under short-duration NT (<5 years), where water inputs were low (<2 mm day-1 ), in medium texture and low SOC (<1%) soils, and at both higher (>200 kg ha-1 ) and lower (0-100 kg ha-1 ) rates of nitrogen addition. Of these, SOC was the most important factor affecting the risk of NO3 - leaching under NT compared with inversion tillage. Globally, on average, the greater amount of NO3 - leached under NT, compared with inversion tillage, was mainly attributed to corresponding increases in drainage. The percentage of global cropping land with lower risk of NO3 - leaching under NT, relative to inversion tillage, increased with NT duration from 3 years (31%) to 15 years (54%). This study highlighted that the benefits of NT adoption for mitigating NO 3 - leaching are most likely in long-term NT cropping systems on high-SOC soils.

Full inversion tillage during pasture renewal to increase soil carbon storage: New Zealand as a case study.

As soils under permanent pasture and grasslands have large topsoil carbon (C) stocks, the scope to sequester additional C may be limited. However, because C in pasture/grassland soils declines with depth, there may be potential to sequester additional C in the subsoil. Data from 247 continuous pasture sites in New Zealand (representing five major soil Orders and ~80% of the grassland area) showed that, on average, the 0.15-0.30 m layer contained 25-34 t ha-1 less C than the top 0.15 m. High-production grazed pastures require periodic renewal (re-seeding) every 7-14 years to maintain productivity. Our objective was to assess whether a one-time pasture renewal, involving full inversion tillage (FIT) to a depth of 0.30 m, has potential to increase C storage by burying C-rich topsoil and bringing low-C subsoil to the surface where C inputs from pasture production are greatest. Data from the 247 pasture sites were used to model changes in C stocks following FIT pasture renewal by predicting (1) the C accumulation in the new 0-0.15 m layer and (2) the decomposition of buried-C in the new 0.15-0.30 m layer. In the 20 years following FIT pasture renewal, soil C was predicted to increase by an average of 7.3-10.3 (Sedimentary soils) and 9.6-12.7 t C ha-1 (Allophanic soils), depending on the assumptions applied. Adoption of FIT for pasture renewal across all suitable soils (2.0-2.6 M ha) in New Zealand was predicted to sequester ~20-36 Mt C, sufficient to offset 9.6-17.5% of the country's cumulative greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture over 20 years at the current rate of emissions. Given that grasslands account for ~70% of global agricultural land, FIT renewal of pastures or grassland could offer a significant opportunity to sequester soil C and offset greenhouse gas emissions.

Soil carbon sequestration potential of permanent pasture and continuous cropping soils in New Zealand.

Understanding soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration is important to develop strategies to increase the SOC stock and, thereby, offset some of the increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Although the capacity of soils to store SOC in a stable form is commonly attributed to the fine (clay + fine silt) fraction, the properties of the fine fraction that determine the SOC stabilization capacity are poorly known. The aim of this study was to develop an improved model to estimate the SOC stabilization capacity of Allophanic (Andisols) and non-Allophanic topsoils (0-15 cm) and, as a case study, to apply the model to predict the sequestration potential of pastoral soils across New Zealand. A quantile (90th) regression model, based on the specific surface area and extractable aluminium (pyrophosphate) content of soils, provided the best prediction of the upper limit of fine fraction carbon (FFC) (i.e. the stabilization capacity), but with different coefficients for Allophanic and non-Allophanic soils. The carbon (C) saturation deficit was estimated as the difference between the stabilization capacity of individual soils and their current C concentration. For long-term pastures, the mean saturation deficit of Allophanic soils (20.3 mg C g-1 ) was greater than that of non-Allophanic soils (16.3 mg C g-1 ). The saturation deficit of cropped soils was 1.14-1.89 times that of pasture soils. The sequestration potential of pasture soils ranged from 10 t C ha-1 (Ultic soils) to 42 t C ha-1 (Melanic soils). Although meeting the estimated national soil C sequestration potential (124 Mt C) is unrealistic, improved management practices targeted to those soils with the greatest sequestration potential could contribute significantly to off-setting New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions. As the first national-scale estimate of SOC sequestration potential that encompasses both Allophanic and non-Allophanic soils, this serves as an informative case study for the international community.

Nitrate leaching losses during pasture renewal - Effects of treading, urine, forages and tillage.

Pasture renewal is a key component of intensive temperate grassland farming. This practice is performed to improve pasture yields, but it may increase nitrate (NO3-) leaching losses, which can impact on water quality. Farmers face many choices when renewing pasture, however, there is limited information to guide decisions to reduce leaching losses. An experiment was established to study how different management practices and grazing affect biomass production and NO3- leaching during pasture renewal on a heavy soil. Long-term pasture was either re-sown into ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in autumn (GG) or into forage rape (Brassica napus) followed by ryegrass in spring (GCG). Rape was established following ploughing or direct-drilling. Grazing was simulated in winter, whereby split plots ±urine (600 kg N ha-1) and ±treading were established. Nitrate concentrations at 1 m depth were measured with suction cups and drainage predicted using a crop model. Estimated NO3- leaching losses at 1 m depth ranged from 16 to 38 kg N ha-1, with little difference between GCG and GG. However, the risk of future leaching was much greater below GCG plots. At the end of the study, soil NO3- between 0.6 and 1 m ranged from 28 to 130 kg N ha-1 in GCG plots and 1-28 kg N ha-1 in the GG plots. Timing of leaching differed between renewal systems, reflecting the differences in plant N uptake and fallow period. Overall, there was no difference in dry matter production between the two systems. Treading resulted in greater compaction, especially in tilled plots and reduced NO3- leaching by c. 40% - this can be attributed to increased denitrification. Our study demonstrates the complex nature of management and environmental factors and their interaction during pasture renewal. We show that management practices affect the risk and timing of N leaching. Practical implications for farmers are discussed.

Bacterial and fungal communities respond differently to varying tillage depth in agricultural soils.

In arable cropping systems, reduced or conservation tillage practices are linked with improved soil quality, C retention and higher microbial biomass, but most long-term studies rarely focus on depths greater than 15 cm nor allow comparison of microbial community responses to agricultural practices. We investigated microbial community structure in a long-term field trial (12-years, Lincoln, New Zealand) established in a silt-loam soil over four depth ranges down to 30 cm. Our objectives were to investigate the degree of homogenisation of soil biological and chemical properties with depth, and to determine the main drivers of microbial community response to tillage. We hypothesised that soil microbiological responses would depend on tillage depth, observed by a homogenisation of microbial community composition within the tilled zone. Tillage treatments were mouldboard plough and disc harrow, impacting soil to ∼20 and ∼10 cm depth, respectively. These treatments were compared to a no-tillage treatment and two control treatments, both permanent pasture and permanent fallow. Bacterial and fungal communities collected from the site were not impacted by the spatial location of sampling across the study area but were affected by physicochemical changes associated with tillage induced soil homogenisation and plant presence. Tillage treatment effects on both species richness and composition were more evident for bacterial communities than fungal communities, and were greater at depths <15 cm. Homogenisation of soil and changing land management appears to redistribute both microbiota and nutrients deeper in the soil profile while consequences for soil biogeochemical functioning remain poorly understood.