The use of long-acting Aripiprazole in a multi-center, prospective, uncontrolled, open-label, cohort study in Germany: a report on global assessment of functioning and the WHO wellbeing index.

BACKGROUND: In this non-interventional study, the functionality and well-being of patients with schizophrenia with aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) was evaluated under real-life conditions in a naturalistic population. METHODS: This non-interventional, prospective, multicenter 6-month study included 242 predominantly symptomatically stable patients (mean age 43.1 ± 15.1 years, 55% male) who switched their treatment to AOM after 9.7 (± 22.3) months of oral treatment. Outcome parameters included functionality (Global Assessment of Functioning, GAF), patient's wellbeing (WHO-5 Well-Being Index, WHO-5), and both patient's and clinician's assessment of efficacy and tolerability of AOM. Treatment emergent adverse events (TRAE) were also recorded. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean GAF score was 47.0 (±13.9), indicating that patients experienced serious impairment in functioning. A continuous increase to 60.2 (±17.0) during treatment was found, with a robust and significant increase already after 4 weeks. At study start, patients reported diminished wellbeing, with a mean score of 10.6 (±5.6) on the WHO-5 scale. During treatment, patient wellbeing increased continuously with strong and significant improvements even after 4 weeks and an overall improvement of 4.8 (±6.9) over the course of 6 months with an endpoint of 15.4 (±5.5). Stratification of these results showed that more pronounced effects were achieved in younger patients ≤35 years (p<0.05 for GAF). The effectiveness and tolerability of AOM was rated good/very good by most patients (89.2 and 93.7%) and physicians (91.4 and 96.8%). Only few TRAEs occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a significant positive effect after initiation of AOM treatment in predominantly stable patients with schizophrenia on their functioning and wellbeing, which was even more pronounced in patients aged ≤35 years, thereby supporting previous randomized controlled findings under routine conditions in clinical practice.

The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is associated with a shift in the secondary sex ratio.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the association between assisted reproductive technologies and human sex ratio as a proportion of male offspring at birth. DESIGN: A total of 59,628 singleton deliveries resulting from IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) or ovulation induction from 101 IVF clinics in Germany, that had been documented in a national German IVF registry, were analysed. Sex ratio after assisted reproductive technology was also compared with the sex ratio reported in the birth records of the German Federal Statistical Office. RESULTS: The sex ratio was 50.0% (95% CI 49.5% to 50.5%) for ICSI, 52.2% (95% CI 51.5% to 52.9%) for IVF, 52.2% (95% CI 50.9% to 53.5%) for IUI or ovulation induction and 51.3% in the national birth records, respectively. Significant differences existed across the three treatment groups (P = 6.86 × 10-7) as well as in pairwise comparisons between ICSI versus IVF (P = 6.88 × 10-7) and ICSI versus IUI or ovulation induction (P = 0.003). No difference existed between the groups IUI or ovulation induction versus IVF. Same results were also present after stratification by maternal age: IVF versus ICSI (P = 6.433 × 10-7), ICSI versus IUI or ovulation induction (P = 0.003), and IVF versus IUI or ovulation induction (non-significant). Compared with the national birth records, ICSI is associated with a lower sex ratio compared with the reference group (P < 0.001), whereas IVF is associated with a higher sex ratio (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ICSI is associated with an equal proportion of sexes at birth, which is not the case for IVF, IUI or ovulation induction, or natural conception. This phenomenon is not influenced by maternal age.

Effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly in schizophrenia patients pretreated with oral aripiprazole: a 6-month, real-life non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the treatment of schizophrenia patients with aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) was evaluated under real-life conditions in a naturalistic setting. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study included 242 patients (age = 43.1 ± 15.1 years, 55.0% male) who were monitored during 6 months of AOM treatment. Endpoints included measurements of psychopathology (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, BPRS) and severity of illness scales (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, CGI-S, and -Improvement, CGI-I). Furthermore, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean BPRS total score was 54.1 ± 15.6, the mean CGI-S was 4.8 ± 0.8 and the most frequent illness category was 'markedly ill' (41.7%). Patients had been pretreated with oral aripiprazole for a mean duration of 9.7 months (SD: 22.3) and 87.9% were deemed by their clinician as "clinically stable" and for a mean of 5.9 months. The difference in global BPRS after 6 months was - 13.8 (SD: 16.0; 95% CI: [- 15.9; - 11.7]; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with high CGI-S scores decreased and the proportion of patients with low scores increased significantly (p < 0.001, respectively). BPRS scores improved numerically especially well in younger patients ≤35 years, CGI-S scores decreased significantly more in this population. TRAEs were rare, with low incidences of extrapyramidal symptoms (2.9%) or weight increase (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with AOM showed satisfying effectiveness in outpatients with further improvement of psychopathology after oral aripiprazole treatment for a considerable duration and even after having achieved clinically judged "stability". Our findings indicate a robust therapeutic effect of AOM and substantiate previous results from randomized controlled trials under real-world routine conditions.

Correction to: Effectiveness of aripiprazole once-monthly in schizophrenia patients pretreated with oral aripiprazole: a 6-month, real-life non-interventional study.

Following publication of the original article.

Efficacy and tolerability of linaclotide in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in a real­world setting - results from a German noninterventional study.

BACKGROUND: Linaclotide is a minimally absorbed peptide guanylate cyclase-C agonist approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of linaclotide in IBS-C in routine clinical practice in Germany. METHODS: This was a 52-week, noninterventional study of linaclotide in patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderate to severe IBS-C. Severity of abdominal pain and bloating and frequency of bowel movements were assessed over 5 study visits. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 375 patients; the mean observation duration was 4.4 months. Linaclotide marketing was halted during the study period for economic reasons, accounting for low patient numbers and short observation duration. Linaclotide significantly reduced mean (standard deviation [SD]) scores between treatment start (visit 1) and study end (visit 5) for abdominal pain intensity (visit 1: 4.87 [2.63] vs. visit 5: 2.40 [2.20], p < 0.0001), mean [SD] bloating intensity (visit 1: 5.30 [2.70] vs. visit 5: 2.86 [2.34], p < 0.0001), and increased mean [SD] bowel movement frequency (visit 1: 2.71 [1.80] vs. 4.38 [1.86], p < 0.0001). Diarrhea, occurring in 5.1 % of patients, was the most common adverse event. CONCLUSION: Linaclotide is effective in improving the major symptoms of IBS-C and demonstrates a favorable safety profile in the real-world environment of routine clinical practice. DRKS (www.drks.de/): DRKS00005088.

Multicentre, non-interventional study of the efficacy and tolerability of linaclotide in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in primary, secondary and tertiary centres: the Alpine study.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of linaclotide, a minimally absorbed guanylate cyclase-C agonist, in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) in routine clinical practice. SETTING: A multicentre, non-interventional study conducted between December 2013 and November 2015 across 31 primary, secondary and tertiary centres in Austria and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled 138 patients aged ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe IBS-C. Treatment decision was at the physician's discretion. Patients with known hypersensitivity to the study drug or suspected mechanical obstruction were excluded. The mean age of participants was 50 years, and >75% of the patients were women. 128 patients completed the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected at weeks 0 and 4 in Austria and weeks 0, 4 and 16 in Switzerland. The primary effectiveness endpoints included severity of abdominal pain and bloating (11-point numerical rating scale [0=no pain/bloating to 10=worst possible pain/bloating]), frequency of bowel movements and physicians' global effectiveness of linaclotide. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Following a 4-week treatment period, the mean intensity score of abdominal pain was reduced from 5.8 at baseline to 2.7, while the bloating intensity score was reduced from 5.8 at baseline to 3.1e (both indices p<0.001). The frequency of mean weekly bowel movements increased from 2.1 at baseline to 4.5 at week 4 (p<0.001). Global effectiveness and tolerability of linaclotide were assessed by the treating physicians as 'good' or 'excellent' in >70% of patients. In total, 31 AEs were reported in 22 patients, the most common being diarrhoea, reported by 6 (7%) and 8 (15.4%) patients in Austria and Switzerland, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBS-C receiving linaclotide experienced effective treatment of moderate-to-severe symptoms in routine clinical practice. Linaclotide was safe and well tolerated and no new safety concerns were raised, supporting results from previous clinical trials.

Relationships among symptoms, bother, and treatment satisfaction in overactive bladder patients.

AIMS: We have studied the association between various symptoms, bother, and patient treatment satisfaction in overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Episodes of urgency, incontinence, daytime frequency and nocturia and responses to the patient perception of bladder condition scale, the urgency perception scale, and visual analog scales of limitations in daily life and of treatment satisfaction were evaluated in 3,824 OAB patients at baseline and during 9 months treatment with tolterodine ER (4 mg q.d.) in an open-label, observational study. Relationships amongst number of symptoms/ 24 hr and scales were explored. Treatment satisfaction was correlated with improvements in symptoms and scales. RESULTS: At baseline, the number of episodes of the four OAB symptoms correlated only poorly with each other and with the two bother-related scales, while the two scales assessing bother correlated much stronger with each other. Factor analysis identified four components which described "bother," "incontinence," "urgency/frequency," and "nocturia" and in combination explained 81.9% of the total variance. The component "bother" had the strongest individual effect accounting for 42.1% of the total variance. While improvements of symptoms and bother were seen with tolterodine treatment, patient treatment satisfaction correlated strongest with improvements of the two bother-related scales. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the counting of episodes of OAB symptoms only insufficiently describes the afflicted patients. Patient bother is the strongest individual component but only poorly explained by episodes of the four symptoms defining OAB. Alterations of bother may better reflect patient-relevant outcomes in OAB treatment than alterations in the number of symptom episodes.

Oscillococcinum in patients with influenza-like syndromes

A controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Oscillococcinum in the treatment of patients with influenza-like syndromes. 188 patients received the test drug and 184 patients were assigned to the placebo. Data were recorded by the participating physicians at the beginning of the treatment, after 48 hours and after 7-10 days. During the...(AU)