Hypertension and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This review aimed to investigate the prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular (CV) complications in various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (IAD). RECENT FINDINGS: Despite recent improvements in the management of IAD, patients with IAD still have an increased CV mortality and CV complications, mostly related to CV risk factors such as hypertension and inflammation. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE libraries for controlled studies involving hypertension and CV complications in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Sjogren's syndrome (SS), or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) between January 2000 and March 2022. We extracted data on the prevalence of hypertension and CV complications. Then, random-effects meta-analyses and exploratory multivariate meta-regression were performed to explore factors related to the prevalence of hypertension. Of 2726 studies screened, 122 were selected for the meta-analysis. The prevalence of hypertension was higher among patients with IAD than controls, with an overall unadjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] of 1.67 [1.58-1.76] and an adjusted OR of 1.36 [1.24-1.50]. All diseases were found to be associated with increased risk of hypertension: SLE, adjusted OR 3.40 [1.93-6.00]; psoriasis, OR 1.32 [1.16-1.51]; PsA, OR 1.49 [1.15-1.94]; RA, OR 1.28 [1.04-1.58]; SS, OR 2.02 [1.19-3.44]. Age and female sex were significantly associated with hypertension in patients with IAD. The risk of CV complications was increased: ischemic heart disease, adjusted OR 1.38 [1.21-1.57]; cerebrovascular disease, OR 1.37 [1.03-1.81]; heart failure, OR 1.28 [1.05-1.55]; atherosclerotic plaques presence, OR 2.46 [1.84-3.29]. The prevalence of hypertension and CV complications is higher among patients with IAD. Screening and management of hypertension appears to be of paramount importance in these patients.

Rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil combination in patients with interstitial lung disease (EVER-ILD): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern proposes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as one of the first-step therapies while rituximab is used as rescue therapy. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind, two-parallel group, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02990286), patients with connective tissue disease-associated ILD or idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (with or without autoimmune features) and a NSIP pattern (defined on NSIP pathological pattern or on integration of clinicobiological data and a NSIP-like high-resolution computed tomography pattern) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rituximab (1000 mg) or placebo on day 1 and day 15 in addition to MMF (2 g daily) for 6 months. The primary end-point was the change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline to 6 months analysed by a linear mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) up to 6 months and safety. FINDINGS: Between January 2017 and January 2019, 122 randomised patients received at least one dose of rituximab (n=63) or placebo (n=59). The least-squares mean change from baseline to 6 months in FVC (% predicted) was +1.60 (se 1.13) in the rituximab+MMF group and -2.01 (se 1.17) in the placebo+MMF group (between-group difference 3.60, 95% CI 0.41-6.80; p=0.0273). PFS was better in the rituximab+MMF group (crude hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.96; p=0.03). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 (41%) patients of the rituximab+MMF group and in 23 (39%) of the placebo+MMF group. Nine infections were reported in the rituximab+MMF group (five bacterial infections, three viral infections, one other) and four bacterial infections in the placebo+MMF group. INTERPRETATION: Combination of rituximab and MMF was superior to MMF alone in patients with ILD and a NSIP pattern. The use of this combination must take into consideration the risk of viral infection.

Is CD25 blockade optimal in kidney transplant patients treated with basiliximab? A target-mediated drug disposition model.

AIMS: Basiliximab, an anti-CD25 chimeric monoclonal antibody, is approved in prevention of acute kidney transplant rejection. This study aims at investigating target-mediated pharmacokinetics of basiliximab. METHODS: Data from the IDEALE study, where 16 kidney transplant patients were treated with 2 40- or 80-mg basiliximab injections, were reanalysed. Basiliximab pharmacokinetics was described using a population 2-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model with the quasi-steady-state approximation. RESULTS: Volume of distribution was significantly higher in males (P = .029). Estimated baseline target antigen (CD25) level was lower is patients cotreated with cyclosporine (P = .026). CONCLUSION: This analysis allows the first description of the target-mediated nonlinear elimination of basiliximab. Our results suggest that cyclosporine cotreatment is associated with decreased target level and that an optimized dosing regimen may improve basiliximab effects.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-D Immunoglobulins versus Intravenous Immunoglobulins for Immune Thrombocytopenia in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and anti-D immunoglobulin (anti-D) in pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, including all randomized controlled trials that have assessed the efficacy and safety of anti-D and IVIG in children with ITP. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Primary outcomes were the proportion of children achieving platelet count responses as defined in each study and bleeding response. Other safety outcomes included infusion reactions and hemolysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 558 children were included. Anti-D was significantly inferior to IVIG at increasing platelet counts, both for thresholds of >20 × 109/L at 24-72 hours (response rate ratio for anti-D vs IVIG: 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.94) and >50 × 109/L at 24-72 hours (response rate ratio for anti-D vs IVIG: 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92). Bleeding response was assessed in 4 studies, but some heterogeneity in reporting leads to unclear conclusion. General symptoms after anti-D infusion were less frequent than after IVIG (Peto OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62). Hemolysis was more frequent after anti-D. The overall quality of the studies was low. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with anti-D, IVIG led to a better response in terms of platelet count and may be preferred as a first-line treatment of ITP in children with acute hemorrhagic symptoms. However, the clinical significance of IVIG superiority on platelet count remains unclear.

Antigenic burden and serum IgG concentrations influence rituximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

AIMS: Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, which is approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed at assessing the influence of CD19+ cell counts as target-antigen amount, and of immunoglobulin G (IgG) serum concentrations on rituximab pharmacokinetics in RA patients. METHODS: In a cohort of 64 RA patients who had received repetitive courses of rituximab, the influence of CD19+ cell count, IgG serum concentration, body surface area, sex and disease activity score in 28 joints on rituximab pharmacokinetic parameters was assessed using a population pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: A two-compartment model, with first-order distribution and elimination best described the data. The volume of distribution of central compartment and clearance of rituximab were estimated at 4.7 l and 0.56 l day-1 , respectively. Distribution and elimination half-lives were 0.9 days and 17.3 days, respectively. As expected, the central volume of distribution increased with body surface area (P = 0.012) and was higher in male than in female (P = 0.004). We found that the elimination rate constant (k10 ) increased with CD19+ count (P = 0.00022) and IgG concentration (P = 7.4 × 10-8 ), and that k10 decreased with time (P = 0.00015), partly explained by a change in target-antigen amount. CONCLUSIONS: The association between CD19+ count and k10 may be explained by target-mediated drug disposition, while the association between IgG serum concentration and k10 may be explained by a saturation of the neonatal Fc receptor at high IgG concentrations, resulting in decreased recycling of rituximab.

Biopharmaceuticals: Reference Products and Biosimilars to Treat Inflammatory Diseases.

Biopharmaceuticals are primarily therapeutic proteins developed to perform specific functions by acting on the disease pathophysiology. Compared with low-molecular chemically synthesized drugs, production of biopharmaceuticals is much more complex and routes of administration and pharmacokinetics differ. Biopharmaceuticals are blockbusters in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, such as psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, rheumatic diseases, and inflammatory bowel diseases, and the introduction of these drugs has revolutionized treatment. Disadvantages include their high costs and the fact that they can evoke antidrug antibodies leading to decreased efficacy. Treatment can be optimized through the development of dosing algorithms and cost can be reduced by biosimilars, after a comparable biological activity, safety, and efficacy have been demonstrated.

Rationale for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biopharmaceuticals in Inflammatory Diseases.

Biopharmaceuticals bring together a number of specific characteristics as compared with other drugs. However, as it is done for most drugs, an individual adjustment of their dose may be necessary. Similar to "chemical" drugs, biopharmaceuticals used in immunoinflammatory diseases have a rather narrow therapeutic range, lack good early clinical or biological marker of response, have variable pharmacokinetics, and their serum concentrations are most often related with response. Monoclonal antibodies have additional specific sources of pharmacokinetic variability. Low concentrations may increase the risks of immunization, plasmapheresis may increase their elimination, and subcutaneous formulations may be associated with decreased adherence. For all these reasons, pharmacokinetic therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful. However, few randomized controlled therapeutic drug monitoring studies have been published. For monoclonal antibodies, a precise definition of the therapeutic concentrations is challenging because of the interindividual variability in their concentration-effect relationship.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biopharmaceuticals May Benefit From Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling.

Biopharmaceuticals, especially monoclonal antibodies, have been increasingly used to treat several chronic inflammatory diseases. Due to the complexity of their pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationship, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been used to optimize their dosing regimen. Up to date, several decisional algorithms have been developed to provide tools for monoclonal antibodies' therapeutic drug monitoring. However, these algorithms are unable to determine the individual optimal dosing scheme. The aim of this article is to deal with population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling. Allowing the quantification of the variability of the dose-concentration-response relationship, population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling may be a valuable tool to determine the optimal dosing scheme. Based on population modeling, Bayesian estimators may be developed to optimize dosing schemes for each patient using limited sampling strategies. These estimators may allow accurate dosing adjustment for each patient individually.

Remote ischemic conditioning and cardioprotection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) represents an innovative cardioprotective method that has been investigated in numerous clinical studies providing miscellaneous results. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess RIC-induced effects on myocardial injury biomarkers and clinical outcomes in clinical situations at risk of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion damage. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized clinical trials testing any RIC protocol versus a control in a situation or procedure at risk of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion damage, including coronary angioplasty and cardiac or major vascular surgery. Data were collected from publications reporting biological markers of myocardial injury or clinical events, including major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction incidence, and repeat revascularization. Standardized mean difference (SMD) (continuous outcomes) and odds ratios (OR) (dichotomous outcomes) were compared between groups. Heterogeneity was investigated by means of meta-analysis regression. A total of 53 articles (44 studies) were identified by the search, with 5,317 patients included in the systematic meta-analysis. RIC significantly reduced troponin area under curve (AUC) (SMD -0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): [-0.36, -0.18]; p < 0.01) and troponin peak (SMD: -0.22, 95% CI: [-0.30, -0.15]; p < 0.01). The same reduction was observed with creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) AUC and peak. Long-term MACCE and all-cause mortality were significantly lower in the RIC group (OR: 0.42, 95% CI [0.28, 0.64]; p < 0.01 vs. OR: 0.27, 95% CI [0.13, 0.58]; p < 0.01, respectively), as was myocardial infarction incidence (OR: 0.54, 95% CI [0.40, 0.73]; p < 0.01). We observed no difference regarding repeat revascularization. RIC appears to be an effective method for reducing ischemia/reperfusion myocardial injury, and our findings suggest that it may reduce long-term clinical events.

Information and communication on risks related to medications and proper use of medications for healthcare professionals and the general public: precautionary principle, risk management, communication during and in the absence of crisis situations.

Recent drug crises have highlighted the complexity, benefits and risks of medication communication. The difficulty of this communication is due to the diversity of the sources of information and the target audience, the credibility of spokespersons, the difficulty to communicate on scientific uncertainties and the precautionary principle, which is influenced by variable perceptions and tolerances of the risk. Globally, there is a lack of training in risk management with a tendency of modern society to refuse even the slightest risk. Communication on medications is subject to regulatory or legal requirements, often uses tools and messages that are not adapted to the target audience and is often based on a poor knowledge of communication techniques. In order to improve this situation, the available information must be coordinated by reinforcing the unique medication information website and by coordinating communication between authorities by means of a single spokesperson. A particular effort must be made in the field of training in the proper use and risk of medications for both the general population and patients but also for healthcare professionals, by setting up a unified academic on-line teaching platform for continuing medical education on medications and their proper use.

Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate in patients treated for interstitial lung disease (EVER-ILD study).

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used to treat interstitial lung disease (ILD), but mycophenolate (MPA) pharmacokinetics was not reported for this use. This ancillary study of the EVER-ILD protocol aimed at describing the pharmacokinetic variability of MPA using population modelling in ILD. METHODS: Concentrations of MPA were measured during an 8-h course for 27 ILD patients treated with 1000 mg MMF b.i.d. Absorption, distribution and elimination of MPA were described using population compartment models with first-order transfer and elimination rate constants, while accounting for both absorption peaks using gamma absorption models. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of MPA was best described using a two-compartment model and two gamma absorption models, model performances of this model were still similar to those of a one gamma absorption model. This pharmacokinetics seemed to be notably influenced by body weight, renal function and inflammatory status. The distribubtion value area under the concentration curve between two administrations of MMF was AUC12 = 52.5 mg.h/L in median (interquartile range: 42.2-58.0 mg.h/L). CONCLUSION: This is the first study reporting MPA pharmacokinetics in ILD. This pharmacokinetics appears to be similar to other indications and should be further investigated in future studies.

Rationale and design of the French cohort of acute myocarditis diagnosed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MyocarditIRM).

BACKGROUND: Acute myocarditis usually presents as chest pain with rising troponin and normal coronary arteries. Despite frequent favourable evolution at the acute phase, it is associated with heart failure and ventricular rhythm disorders, and is considered the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young, apparently healthy, adults. There are no specific recommendations for acute myocarditis diagnosis and management, only expert consensus, given the lack of large databases. AIM: The main objective is to describe the contemporary presentation of acute myocarditis, its management and in-hospital outcomes. Secondary objectives are to investigate survival and event-free survival for up to 10years of follow-up, the determinants of prognosis, the modalities of treatment and follow-up and the gaps between expert consensus and real-life management. METHODS: MyocarditIRM is a prospective multicentre cohort that enrolled 803 consecutive patients with acute myocarditis in 49 participating centres in France between 01 May 2016 and 28 February 2019. The diagnosis of acute myocarditis was acknowledged by cardiac magnetic resonance, using the Lake Louise Criteria. Exclusion criteria were age<18years, lack of health coverage, contraindication to cardiac magnetic resonance and refusal to participate. Detailed information was collected prospectively, starting at admission. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (diagnosis and follow-up) is analysed centrally by the certified core laboratory IHU ICAN. Ten years of follow-up for each patient is ensured by linking with the French National Health Database, and includes information on death, hospital admissions, major clinical events and drug consumption. CONCLUSION: This prospective cohort with long-term follow-up represents the largest database on acute myocarditis worldwide, and will improve knowledge about its presentation, management and outcomes.

Are concomitant treatments confounding factors in randomized controlled trials on intensive blood-glucose control in type 2 diabetes? a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Open-label, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are subject to observer bias. If patient management is conducted without blinding, a difference between groups may be explained by other factors than study treatment. One factor may come from taking concomitant treatments with an efficacy on the studied outcomes. In type 2 diabetes, some antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs are effective against diabetic complications. We wanted to determine if these concomitant treatments were correctly reported in articles of RCTs on type 2 diabetes and if they might have influenced the outcome. METHODS: We performed a systematic review using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (from January 1950 to July 2010). Open-label RCTs assessing the effectiveness of intensive blood-glucose control in type 2 diabetes were included. We chose five therapeutic classes with proven efficacy against diabetes complications: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRAs), fibrates, statins, and aspirin. Differences between concomitant treatments were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of eight open-label RCTs were included, but only three (37.5%) of them published concomitant treatments. In two studies (ACCORD and ADVANCE), a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups for aspirin (p = 0.02) and ACEIs (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Few concomitant treatments were published in this sample of open-label RCTs. We cannot completely eliminate an observer bias for these studies. This bias probably influenced the results to an extent that has yet to be determined.

Blood pressure management and long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation: a holistic view over a 35-year period.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is a burden for most kidney transplant recipients. Whether respect of hypertension guidelines results in better outcomes is unknown. METHODS: In this multicenter study, office blood pressure at 12 months following transplantation (i.e., after > 20 outpatient visits), and survival were assessed over 35 years among 2004 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who received a first kidney graft from 1985 to 2019 (follow-up: 26,232 patient-years). RESULTS: Antihypertensive medications were used in 1763/2004 (88.0%) patients. Renin-angiotensin-system blockers were used in 35.6% (47.1% when proteinuria was > 0.5 g/day) and calcium-channel blockers were used in 6.0% of patients. Combined treatment including renin-angiotensin-system-blockers, calcium-channel blockers and diuretics was used in 15.4% of patients receiving ≥ 3 antihypertensive drugs. Blood pressure was controlled in 8.3%, 18.8% and 43.1%, respectively, depending on definition (BP < 120/80, < 130/80, < 140/90 mmHg, respectively) and has not improved since the year 2001. Two-thirds of patients with uncontrolled blood pressure received < 3 antihypertensive classes. Low sodium intake < 2 g/day (vs ≥ 2) was not associated with better blood pressure control. Uncontrolled blood pressure was associated with lower patient survival (in multivariable analyses) and graft survival (in univariate analyses) vs controlled hypertension or normotension. Low sodium intake and major antihypertensive classes had no influence on patient and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological recommendations and sodium intake reduction are poorly respected, but even when respected, do not result in better blood pressure control, or patient or graft survival. Uncontrolled blood pressure, not the use of specific antihypertensive classes, is associated with reduced patient, and to a lesser extent, reduced graft survival, even using the 120/80 mmHg cut-off.

Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed that metformin decreases mortality compared to diet alone in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since then, it has been the first-line treatment in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. However, metformin-sulphonylurea bitherapy may increase mortality. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluated metformin efficacy (in studies of metformin versus diet alone, versus placebo, and versus no treatment; metformin as an add-on therapy; and metformin withdrawal) against cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database. Primary end points were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary end points included all myocardial infarctions, all strokes, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, leg amputations, and microvascular complications. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (13,110 patients) were retrieved; 9,560 patients were given metformin, and 3,550 patients were given conventional treatment or placebo. Metformin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes all-cause mortality, risk ratio (RR)=0.99 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.31), and cardiovascular mortality, RR=1.05 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.64). The secondary outcomes were also unaffected by metformin treatment: all myocardial infarctions, RR=0.90 (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.09); all strokes, RR=0.76 (95% CI: 0.51 to 1.14); heart failure, RR=1.03 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.59); peripheral vascular disease, RR=0.90 (95% CI: 0.46 to 1.78); leg amputations, RR=1.04 (95% CI: 0.44 to 2.44); and microvascular complications, RR=0.83 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.17). For all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, there was significant heterogeneity when including the UK Prospective Diabetes Study subgroups (I(2)=41% and 59%). There was significant interaction with sulphonylurea as a concomitant treatment for myocardial infarction (p=0.10 and 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although metformin is considered the gold standard, its benefit/risk ratio remains uncertain. We cannot exclude a 25% reduction or a 31% increase in all-cause mortality. We cannot exclude a 33% reduction or a 64% increase in cardiovascular mortality. Further studies are needed to clarify this situation.

Myocardial microvascular disease and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with end-stage renal disease: rationale and design of the MICROCARD study.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischaemia, a consequence of coronary artery disease, is a major cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The pathophysiology and clinical presentation of coronary artery disease in ESRD patients seem to differ from non-ESRD patients with higher implication of myocardial microvascular disease (MMD), higher mortality, fewer myocardial infarctions, less significant coronary stenosis and low efficacy of well-established drugs such as statin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. No study has investigated the presence of MMD and its clinical impact in ESRD patients. METHODS: We designed an observational prospective cohort study to investigate the prevalence of MMD and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in ESRD patients with a positive non-invasive test for myocardial ischaemia. Patients eligible for inclusion are those>18 years old receiving dialysis and/or undergoing investigation for kidney transplantation, who are referred to our renal clinic and meet all the inclusion criteria but none of the exclusion criteria. Patients with a positive test for myocardial ischaemia will be enrolled in the 'invasive group'. They will be further examined to detect simultaneously epicardial coronary stenosis by coronary angiography and MMD using pressure wire measurement of fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve followed by calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance. Patients with a negative test for myocardial ischaemia will be enrolled in a 'control group' designed to verify whether the invasive group is indeed at high risk for MACE. Both groups will be followed up for 2 years to compare the incidence of MACE. CONCLUSION: The MICROCARD study will phenotype MMD and will investigate its relation with the incidence of MACE in ESRD patients with myocardial ischaemia. Clinicaltrial.gov NCT01291771.

Farnesoid X receptor targeting for hepatitis C: study protocol for a proof-of-concept trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the modulation of farnesoid X receptor activity on the replication of hepatitis C virus in chronically infected patients. METHODS: This is a proof-of-concept trial that was approved by the ex-French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (ex-Afssaps [currently ANSM]) and an ethics committee. It has started in January 2010. This one-arm, open-label study examines the safety and efficacy of the oral administration of guggulsterone. The main outcome measure will be the assessment of blood viral loads. RESULTS: We planned to enrol 15 genotype 1-infected patients that failed a first-line therapy. CONCLUSION: We think guggulsterone might be an effective therapeutic option for HCV genotype 1 patients who do not respond well to first-line therapy.