Application an internet facilitation in a community-based cervical cancer screening project.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of an internet-facilitated community model for cervical cancer screening using self-collected HPV testing as primary screening. METHOD: A population-based cervical cancer screening program was conducted in the suburb of Shenzhen, China, from September 2014 to July 2017. Women with 25-60 years of age and no pregnancy were eligible for participation. Participants could register for screening by logging in a website by themselves or with the aids of local community workers. A unique barcode was issued to each applicant upon successful registration. After registration, women could get sampling kits from community screening site/study clinic, collect vaginal samples privately or in group, and provide their sample for Hr-HPV tests on Cobas4800 and SeqHPV assays. Testing reports were checkable through personal account for all participant and phone calls were given to all women positive of Hr-HPV. Participants positive of both or either the 2 assays were identified as the positives. The positives could return the study clinic for triage or search medical care in other clinics. Colposcopy directed or ramdom biopsies were performed on all positives who returned to the study clinics. RESULTS: A total of 10,792 community women registered for screening, among whom, 10,010 provided their vaginal samples for tests. 99.5% of the participants were confirmed to have correct personal identifiable information and samples, and 98.9% of them got HPV testing results from both or either assays. No adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: When self-collected HPV testing is used as the primary testing, the internet-based data platform facilitates the screening in registration, data collection, and data tracking, and increases the screening coverage. Internet-facilitated community model is promising to cervical cancer control and applicable in regions with variety of resources.

[Performance of vaginal self-sampling high-risk HPV genotyping as primary and combining cytology or viral load as secondary in cervical cancer screening].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) genotyping with vaginal self-sampling in primary screening and combining cytology or viral load for HR-HPV positive as secondary screening strategies. Methods: The data referring to HR-HPV genotyping of self-collected sample with mass array matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), HR-HPV viral load of physician-collected sample with hybrid capture Ⅱ (HC-Ⅱ), liquid-based cytology and histology of 8 556 women were from Shenzhen cervical cancer screening trial Ⅱ (SHENCCAST-Ⅱ) conducted between April 2009 and April 2010. The data were reanalyzed to determine the sensitivity and specificity to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of grade 2 or worse (CIN Ⅱ+), CIN of grade 3 or worse (CIN Ⅲ+) when HR-HPV genotyping combining with colposcopy as primary screening strategy based on varied HR-HPV subtype (strategy 1, including 5 sub-strategies: 1a: HPV 16/18 positive; 1b: HPV 16/18/58 positive; 1c: HPV 16/18/58/31/33 positive; 1d: HPV 16/18/58/31/33/52 positive; 1e: any HR-HPV positive). The data were also compared to determine the efficacy of cytology (strategy 2, including 5 sub-strategies: 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, 2e) or HR-HPV viral load (strategy 3, including 4 sub-strategies: 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d) of physician-collected sample as a triage with HR-HPV genotyping for self-sampling HR-HPV positives. Results: (1) The HR-HPV positive rate was 13.77% (1 178/8 556) in the self-collected samples of 8 556 pregnant women. Of them,the prevalences of HPV 16/18, HPV 16/18/58, HPV 16/18/58/31/33 and HPV 16/18/58/31/33/52 were 3.16% (270/8 556), 5.14% (440/8 556), 6.66% (570/8 556) and 9.81% (839/8 556), respectively. The HR-HPV viral load ≥10 relative light units/control (RLU/CO) was 8.87%(759/ 8 556), while cytological results ≥atypical squamous cell of undetermined signification (ASCUS) were 12.05% (1 031/8 556). (2) The strategy 1e had the highest sensitivities for CIN Ⅱ+, CIN Ⅲ+ which were 92.70% and 94.33%,respectively,among 14 sub-strategies,while the lowest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). Meanwhile,the required colposcopy referral rates were much higher than other 13 sub-strategies (13.77%). The other 4 sub-strategies of strategy 1 (1a, 1b, 1c, 1d), strategy 1a had the highest specificities for CIN Ⅱ+ and CIN Ⅲ+ (97.92%, 97.69%, respectively), while 1d had the highest sensitivities for CIN Ⅱ+ and CIN Ⅲ+ (88.41%, 92.20%, respectively). (3) Both strategies of referring self-sampling HPV 16/18 positives for immediate colposcopy followed by triage physician-collected sample cytology (≥ASCUS) or viral load (≥10 RLU/CO) for non-HPV 16/18 positives had significantly higher sensitivity and specificity for CIN Ⅱ, CIN Ⅲ+, as well as lower referral rates (strategy 2a and 3a). Additionally, based on these two secondary screening strategies, cumulatively using the other four HR-HPV (HPV 58, 31, 33 and 52) positives as triage for immediate colposcopy showed an enhanced sensitivity. Conclusions: Primary HR-HPV cervical cancer screening strategy based on self-sampling with triage of cytology (≥ASCUS) or viral load (≥10 RUL/CO) provides a good balance among sensitivity, specificity for CIN Ⅱ+ and CIN Ⅲ+ and the number of tests required, referral rates. The efficacy of HR-HPV genotyping combining cytology or viral load secondary screening strategies will have a spiral escalation when HPV 58, 31, 33, 52 are included.

[Clinical value of p16INK4a immunocytochemistry in cervical cancer screening].

Objective: To evaluate the value of p16INK4a detected by p16INK4a immunostaining as a new generation of cervical cytology for primary screening and secondary screening in population-based cervical cancer screening, and in improving cytological diagnosis. Methods: Between 2016 and 2018, 5 747 non-pregnant women aged 25-65 years with sexual history were recruited and underwent cervical cancer screening via high-risk (HR)-HPV/liquid-based cytological test (LCT) test in Shenzhen and surrounding areas. All slides were immuno-stained using p16INK4a technology, among them, 902 cases were offered p16INK4a detection during primary screening, and the remaining 4 845 cases were called-back by the virtue of abnormal HR-HPV and LCT results for p16INK4a staining. Participants with complete LCT examination, HR-HPV test, p16INK4a staining and histopathological examination results were included in this study. The performance of p16INK4a in primary and secondary screening, and in assisting cytology to detect high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL, including cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) Ⅱ or Ⅲ] or worse [HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+] were analyzed. Results: (1) One-thousand and ninety-seven cases with complete data of p16INK4a and histology were included. Pathological diagnosis: 995 cases of normal cervix, 37 cases of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 64 cases of HSIL and one case of cervical cancer were found. Among them, 65 cases of HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ and 34 cases of HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+ were detected. The positive rate of p16INK4a in HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ was higher than that in CINⅠ or normal pathology (89.2% vs 10.2%; P<0.01). (2) p16INK4a as primary screening for HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+ was equally sensitive to primary HR-HPV screening (89.2% vs 95.4%, 94.1% vs 94.1%; P>0.05), but more specific than HR-HPV screening (89.8% vs 82.5%, 87.7% vs 80.2%; P<0.05). p16INK4a was equally sensitive and similarly specific to cytology (≥LSIL; P>0.05). (3) The specificity of LCT adjunctive p16INK4a for detecting HSIL (CIN Ⅱ)+ or HSIL (CIN Ⅲ)+ were higher than that of LCT alone or adjunctive HR-HPV (P<0.01), while the sensitivity were similar (P>0.05). (4) p16INK4a staining as secondary screening: p16INK4a was significantly more specific (94.1% vs 89.7%, 91.9% vs 87.4%; P<0.01) and comparably sensitive (84.6% vs 90.8%, 88.2% vs 91.2%; P>0.05) to cytology for triaging primary HR-HPV screening. HPV 16/18 to colposcopy and triage other HR-HPV with p16INK4a was equally sensitive (88.2% vs 94.1%; P=0.500) and more specific (88.3% vs 83.0%; P<0.01) than HPV 16/18 to colposcopy and triage other HR-HPV with LCT≥ atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and the referral rate decreased (14.0% vs 19.4%; P=0.005). Conclusions: For primary screening, p16INK4a is equally specific to cytology and equally sensitive to HR-HPV screening. p16INK4a alone could be an efficient triage after primary HR-HPV screening. In addition, p16INK4a immunostaining could be used as an ancillary tool to cervical cytological diagnosis, and improves its accuracy in cervical cancer screening.

Colposcopy.

Though in the 1980s, colposcopically-directed biopsy excluded over 90% of CIN 3 and cancer (CIN 3+), recent reviews found sensitivity of colposcopically-directed biopsy for CIN 3+ of 50-65%. Studies from China showed that the sensitivity of colposcopically-directed biopsy for CIN 3+ is higher for large CIN 3+ than for small CIN 3+ and higher for associated high-grade cervical cytology than for low-grade cervical cytology. Colposcopically-directed biopsy excluded over 90% of CIN 3+ in the 1980s because colposcopy clinics in the 1980s evaluated women with high-grade cytology that had large CIN 3+; it no longer excludes CIN 3+ well because current colposcopy clinics evaluate women with low-grade cytology that have small CIN 3+. When colposcopically-directed biopsy is used to exclude CIN 3+ our understanding of the natural history of CIN is skewed, errors occur in defining appropriate screening practice, and inaccurate diagnosis results in incorrect treatment. The impression that CIN is more common on the anterior lip of the cervix is an artifact introduced by the inaccuracy of colposcopy. An unjustified enthusiasm for screening with acetic acid aided visual inspection (VIA) occurred when the sensitivity of VIA for CIN 3+ was inflated by screening studies using colposcopically-directed biopsy as the gold-standard for CIN 3+. To limit the harm of inaccurate diagnosis associated with colposcopically-directed biopsy, at colposcopy we advise random biopsies at the squamocolumnar junction in cervical quadrants without visible lesions and, unless the woman is pregnant, endocervical curettage (ECC). As the diagnosis of CIN 3+ solely by ECC is uncommon in women under age 25, the ECC may be omitted in women under age 25 years. If multiple cervical biopsies are performed, to limit discomfort, a bronchoscopy biopsy instrument which obtains 2-mm biopsies should be used.

Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Among Chinese Han and Mongols Minority Women in Inner Mongolia, China: Reflected by Self-Collected Samples in CHIMUST.

Background: The disparities of hr-HPV infection among races/ethnicities have not been fully discussed. This study aimed to investigate the difference of hr-HPV infection between Chinese Han and Mongols minority women in Inner Mongolia. Methods: Genotyping and histopathology data of Chinese Han and Mongols minority women in Inner Mongolia from Chinese Multi-Center Screening Trial were used to analyze the hr-HPV prevalence, and type-specific distribution in abnormal pathology results. Results: The hr-HPV infection rates of Han women was 15.9% while of Mongols was 21.6% (P < 0.001). The most prevalent genotypes in Han women were ranked as HPV-16,-52,-18/-58,-31/-39, and-59 while in Mongols were-16,-31,-58,-18 and-52. When analyzing the age-specific of hr-HPV infection, two peaks were found at age of 40-44 (20.5%) and 55-59 (23.5%) years in Han women while three peaks were observed at age of 30-34 (22.1%), 45-49 (22.9%), and 55-59 (31.8%) years, respectively, in Mongols. HPV-16 accounting for 62.5 and 53.8% of the CINII+ in Han and Mongols, respectively. Conclusion: The prevalence of hr-HPV was significantly different between the Han and Mongols minority women in Inner Mongolia, races/ethnicities background should be taken into consideration for the refinement of cervical cancer screening strategies and vaccine implementation in China.

Comparison of cycle threshold values of the Cobas HPV test and viral loads of the BMRT HPV test in cervical cancer screening.

Objective: To validate the HPV viral loads that are reflected by the cycle threshold values of Cobas4800 as the viral load indicators by verifying the consistency of the viral loads per unit (10,000 cells) from the BMRT assay. Methods: The analysis is based on data from the Chinese Multi-Center Screening Trial (CHIMUST). The cases included in the analysis are all positive for physician-collected hrHPV on SeqHPV and/or Cobas4800 or negative for hrHPV but abnormal in cytology (≥LSIL), and some cases selected by nested case-control randomization from those negative for physician-collected hrHPV and cytology. With HPV testing results and relevant Ct values from Cobas4800 available, we tested the entire sample set with the BMRT HPV testing assay and analyzed their agreement with Cobas4800, followed by a comparison of the CtV from Cobas4800 and viral loads (lg) from BMRT by lesion grade. Results: We included 4,485 women (mean age: 45.4 years) in the study, and 4,290 had complete data. The consistency of genotypes from Cobas4800 and BMRT for hrHPV, HPV-16, HPV-18, and 12-HPV pools was 94.9% (4070/4290, Kappa = 0.827), 99.1% (4251/4290, Kappa = 0.842), 99.6% (4,273/4,290, Kappa = 0.777), and 95.3% (4,089/4,290, Kappa = 0.821), respectively. Further analysis shows that any inconsistency between the two assays is likely among samples with comparatively lower viral loads. When analyzing per lesions of CIN2+ and CIN3+, the CtV from Cobas4800 and VL (lg) from BMRT are highly correlated inversely and follow the linear regression for HPV16 and 12-HPV pool (Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient (r): In CIN3+, r HPV16 = -0.641, P < 0.001; r 12-HPVpool = -0.343, P = 0.109; In CIN2+, r HPV16 = -0.754, P < 0.001; r 12-HPVpool = -0.429, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The CtV from Cobas4800 and the viral loads (lg) of per unit cells from the BMRT are well correlated for lesion grading when tested on physician-collected samples. Cobas-CtV is worthy of further study for clinical application.

Evaluation of an isothermal amplification HPV detection assay for primary cervical cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to evaluate independently the performance of a new isothermal amplification assay for cervical cancer screening compared to two previously validated PCR-based assays and histologic endpoints. METHODS: This is a sub-study from the Chinese multi-center screening trial (CHIMUST). The self-collected and clinician-collected specimens stored in PreservCyt at - 4 °C from 6042 women with complete data were tested with the AmpFire assay. These specimens had been previously tested with Cobas and SeqHPV assays. In the primary study all patients with an abnormal test were referred to colposcopy where all had directed and/or random biopsies plus ECC. No additional patients were called back based on the AmpFire results. RESULTS: 6042/6619 women had complete data (mean age 44.1). There were 57 cases of CIN 2, 35 cases of CIN 3 and 2 cancers. The sensitivity for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were similar among the three assays (both direct and self-collected). For the specificities in all categories (CIN2+/CIN3+ and self and direct collection), isothermal amplification assay was either equal to or more specific than Cobas but consistently less specific than SeqHPV. CONCLUSION: The AmpFire HPV assay showed similar sensitivity to Cobas and SeqHPV for CIN2+ and CIN3+ on both self and clinician-collections (P>0.05), with good specificity. The speed, low cost, and simplicity of this assay will make it particularly suited for low and middle resource settings. Its accuracy with self-collection makes it applicable for mass screening programs.

Lysophosphatidic acid downregulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, which are negatively involved in lysophosphatidic acid-induced cell invasion.

Ovarian cancer is a highly metastatic disease. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) levels are elevated in ascites from ovarian cancer patients, but its potential role in ovarian cancer metastasis has just begun to be revealed. In this work, we show that LPA stimulates invasion of primary ovarian cancer cells, but not ovarian epithelial or borderline ovarian tumor cells, although these benign cells indeed respond to LPA in cell migration. We have found that LPA downregulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). TIMP2 and TIMP3 play functional role in LPA-induced invasion as negative regulators. G(i) protein, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), cytosolic phospholipase A(2) and urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA) are required for LPA-induced cells invasion. TIMP3 may affect two independent downstream targets, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and p38 MAPK. In vivo, LPA stimulates tumor metastasis in an orthotopic ovarian tumor model, which can be inhibited by a PI3K inhibitor, LY294002. In summary, LPA is likely a key component for promoting ovarian metastasis in vivo. LPA downregulates TIMP3, which may have targets other than metalloproteinases. Our in vivo metastasis mouse model is useful for studying the efficacy of therapeutic regimes of ovarian cancer.

Phase I trial of intraperitoneal recombinant interleukin-2/lymphokine-activated killer cells in patients with ovarian cancer.

Ten patients with ovarian cancer refractory to conventional therapy were treated with intraperitoneal (i.p.) recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAK). The 28-day protocol consisted of 6 priming i.p. rIL-2 infusions on days 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Leukapheresis was performed for mononuclear cell collection on days 15, 16, 17, and 18 and lymphokine-activated killer cells were given i.p. with the rIL-2 on days 19 and 21. Three additional i.p. rIL-2 infusions were given on days 23, 25, and 27. Three dose levels of rIL-2 were tested: 5 X 10(5), 2 X 10(6), and 8 X 10(6) units/m2 body surface area. The dose-limiting toxicity was abdominal pain secondary to ascites accumulation with significant weight gain. Other toxic effects included decreased performance status, fever, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and anemia. Peripheral lymphocytosis and eosinophilia were seen at all dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose is 8 X 10(6) units/m2/dose. Peripheral and peritoneal IL-2 levels were measured with a bioassay using an IL-2-dependent cell line. At the highest dose level, serum IL-2 was greater than 10 units/ml for 18 h. After the first infusion, a 2-log dilution of the i.p. IL-2 was measured in the serum. In the postleukapheresis i.p. IL-2-dosing period less IL-2 was detected in the serum than in the earlier i.p. IL-2-priming period. The induction and persistence of LAK activity were studied. Peritoneal LAK activity was detected as early as 4 days after the first i.p. infusion, by day 11 in all evaluable patients, and persisted for the 6-day interval between priming IL-2 and LAK/IL-2 infusion. Peritoneal lytic activity persisted until day 28 in 5 tested patients. These peritoneal cells retained lytic activity 48 h in culture medium without rIL-2 present. Peritoneal LAK activity correlated with the percentage of mononuclear cells and the percentage of CD56-positive mononuclear cells in the peritoneum. The yield of peripheral lymphocytes after the six i.p. priming doses of rIL-2 correlated with the dose level of rIL-2 infused. Peripheral blood LAK activity showed a minimal, however progressive, increase during the treatment protocol. LAK activity could be enhanced if rIL-2 was present during the 4-h assay. These studies indicate that i.p. rIL-2 infusion induced durable regional LAK activity and primes peripheral blood cells for LAK activity if exposed briefly to additional IL-2.

Paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions: experience of the gynecologic oncology program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center.

PURPOSE: : This study expands the existing limited data as to whether patients developing clinically significant paclitaxel-induced hypersensitivity reactions can continue to be treated with this important antineoplastic agent and how such retreatment might be undertaken. PATIENTS AND METHODS: More than 450 patients received paclitaxel, either as a single agent or in a combination regimen, for a female pelvic malignancy in the Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center from January 1995 through December 1998. RESULTS: Of the more than 450 patients, 44 (approximately 9%) developed at least one episode of a clinically relevant hypersensitivity reaction to the cytotoxic drug. All 43 individuals (plus an additional four patients referred to our center after having previously experienced a severe paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reaction at another institution) who were retreated with paclitaxel were ultimately able to receive the agent. Five patients required treatment with a standardized desensitization regimen, developed by our group, to successfully receive paclitaxel. DISCUSSION: On the basis of this large single-institution study of paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions, we conclude that with appropriate precautions essentially all individuals experiencing these reactions can be safely treated with this agent.

Paclitaxel administration to gynecologic cancer patients with major cardiac risk factors.

PURPOSE: To examine the safety of administering paclitaxel to patients with preexisting significant cardiac risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of gynecologic cancer patients with major cardiac risk factors who had been treated with paclitaxel (single-agent or combination regimen with cisplatin or carboplatin) at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation from 1993 through February 1998 were examined to determine the acute toxicity of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were found who met these criteria, of whom none were found to have suffered a worsening of cardiac function following treatment with paclitaxel. A single patient developed a severe paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reaction, but no cardiac sequela. CONCLUSION: This series suggests that paclitaxel can be safely administered as a single agent or in a combination regimen with a platinum agent to some patients with significant cardiac risk factors, such as those associated with ischemic heart disease. However, since few patients had baseline severe conduction defects before paclitaxel treatment, the safety of this drug in this clinical setting remains to be determined.

Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and docetaxel in the treatment of cancers of the ovary and fallopian tube and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum.

PURPOSE: Standard chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer currently includes a platinum agent (usually carboplatin) and paclitaxel. Because docetaxel is an active agent in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, it is relevant to evaluate both the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of carboplatin and docetaxel in this clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center conducted a phase II trial of carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 6) and docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)), delivered every 3 weeks for six courses, in patients with ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum who had either received no prior chemotherapy or had experienced a treatment-free interval of greater than 2 years before developing disease recurrence. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age, 57 years; range, 44 to 81 years) entered the trial (47 had had no prior chemotherapy). Our toxicity findings included the following: grade 4 neutropenia (64% of patients); hypersensitivity reactions (34%, none requiring discontinuation of therapy); peripheral neuropathy (6%). We had objective responses for 32 of 42 (81%) assessable patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and docetaxel is highly active in ovarian cancer, with the major toxicity being bone marrow suppression. Hypersensitivity reactions are frequent but do not prevent continuation of treatment. With the dose and schedule employed in this trial, neurotoxicity is uncommon. Defining a role for this regimen in routine clinical practice will require the conduct of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Clinical features of hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin.

PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical features of carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reactions. PATIENTS: Patients with gynecologic malignancies treated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from June 1995 through July 1998 who experienced a carboplatin-associated hypersensitivity reaction were the subjects of this evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 205 patients treated with carboplatin during this time period, 24 (12%) developed a carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction. The median number of platinum (carboplatin plus cisplatin) courses for the first episode was eight (range, six to 21). Only three patients (13%) developed this toxicity during their initial chemotherapy regimen, with the remainder experiencing a reaction during their second (n = 15) or third (n = 6) carboplatin treatment program for recurrent disease. Thirteen patients (54%) developed at least moderately severe symptoms (diffuse erythroderma, tachycardia, chest tightness, wheezing, facial swelling, dyspnea, hypertension, or hypotension). In approximately one half of patients, the reaction developed after more than 50% of the carboplatin had been infused. Only one of three patients was successfully treated with the agent upon rechallenge. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions develop in patients who have been extensively pretreated with the agent. The clinical features are highly variable, but they are sufficiently different from those noted after the administration of paclitaxel that it should not be difficult to distinguish between reactions to the two agents. As carboplatin is increasingly used as initial and second-line chemotherapy of ovarian cancer and other malignancies, it can be anticipated that hypersensitivity reactions to the drug will become a more common and difficult clinical management issue.

Ninety-six-hour infusional paclitaxel as salvage therapy of ovarian cancer patients previously failing treatment with 3-hour or 24-hour paclitaxel infusion regimens.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that prolonged infusion of paclitaxel (96 hours) might overcome resistance to shorter infusion schedules (3 or 24 hours) in ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 30 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (24 patients), primary carcinoma of the peritoneum (four patients), or fallopian tube cancer (two patients) who previously had received paclitaxel administered on either a 3-hour or 24-hour schedule were treated with the agent delivered as a 96-hour infusion (30 to 35 mg/m2/d x 4 days) on an every 3-week program. RESULTS: Although the regimen generally was well tolerated, no objective responses were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with ovarian cancer who have shown resistance to shorter paclitaxel infusion schedules, ninety-six hour infusional paclitaxel is an inactive treatment strategy. This makes it less likely that protracted infusion of paclitaxel will improve outcome when used as part of primary therapy of ovarian cancer. An ongoing randomized study will answer that question.

Carboplatin skin testing: a skin-testing protocol for predicting hypersensitivity to carboplatin chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: A high incidence of moderate to severe hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) is noted in patients who have been treated with multiple courses of carboplatin. Presently, there is no reliable way to predict which patients may be at risk for this potentially severe adverse reaction. We developed a skin-test protocol to identify patients at high risk for HR to carboplatin chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing more than seven courses of carboplatin received a 0.02-mL intradermal injection of an undiluted aliquot of their planned carboplatin infusion 1 hour before each course of the agent. A positive skin test was prospectively defined as that resulting in a wheel of at least 5 mm with a surrounding flare. We recently reported a 27% incidence of HRs in patients receiving more than seven courses of carboplatin. These patients served as historical controls for the current study. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma receiving carboplatin were skin tested. Thirteen of 47 patients (28%) manifested a positive skin test at a median of nine total courses of carboplatin (range, eight to 17 courses). This rate of skin-test positivity was not significantly different from the incidence of documented HR reported in a historical control group (P =.89), suggesting comparable populations. A negative skin test accurately predicted the absence of HR in 166 of 168 courses of chemotherapy. Only two of 47 patients (4%) experienced a HR after a negative skin test. Thus, administering carboplatin only to patients with a negative skin test may result in a significant reduction in HRs relative to historical controls (P =.002). CONCLUSION: An easily performed skin test appears to predict patients in whom carboplatin may be safely administered. Treatment modifications based on the results of skin testing may reduce the incidence of HRs in patients receiving repeated courses of carboplatin.

Phase I trial of paclitaxel plus megestrol acetate in patients with paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.

Increased expression of P-glycoprotein has been proposed as one important mechanism for inherent or acquired drug resistance of malignant disease to cytotoxic chemotherapy. In experimental systems, hormonal agents, including megestrol acetate (MA), have been shown to be capable of reversing P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance to natural products, including paclitaxel. Because paclitaxel is one of the most active cytotoxic agents in ovarian cancer (OC), we sought to determine whether retreating patients with well-defined paclitaxel-resistant OC with a combination of paclitaxel and MA would result in clinically relevant reversal of that resistant state. In this Phase I trial, 44 patients with OC or primary peritoneal carcinoma received paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m2 over 3 h) plus an oral loading dose (800-9600 mg over 24 h) and subsequent maintenance dose (800-3200 mg/day x 3 days) of micronized MA. Both the loading dose and maintenance therapy were delivered in four equal daily doses. Therapy was repeated every 21 days, assuming recovery from the toxicity of the prior course. There were no intrapatient dose escalations. The major toxicity of the regimen was peripheral neuropathy (32% of patients; 11% grade 2-3), although four individuals developed major venous blood clots and one suffered a stroke. Four patients exhibited biological evidence of antineoplastic effects, although only one patient experienced improvement in clinically relevant symptoms. Although pharmacokinetic studies were not performed as a component of this study, prior evaluation of MA pharmacokinetics and in vitro data examining the concentrations of the agent required to reverse P-glycoprotein-mediated paclitaxel resistance suggest that the majority of our patient population achieved levels of MA theoretically capable of producing this desired effect. We conclude that the level of activity and toxicity pattern observed in this trial, associated with the combination of paclitaxel and MA, does not provide strong support for further exploration of the regimen as a treatment strategy to overcome paclitaxel resistance in OC.

Treatment of gynecologic cancers in pregnancy.

Gynecologic cancers are among the most common malignancies in reproductive-age women. Approximately 3% of women diagnosed with a malignancy of the reproductive tract will have a coexisting pregnancy. A pregnant woman with a gynecologic malignancy presents a significant challenge for the clinician for many reasons. Considerable diagnostic delay is common due to confusion of symptomatology with the physiologic changes associated with the pregnant state. The diagnostic options available for a patient suspected of having an invasive gynecologic malignancy may also be compromised by the pregnancy. In addition, difficult medical, ethical, and religious issues arise when the treatment of these malignancies is incompatible with continuation of the pregnancy. Unfortunately, a relatively limited experience with reproductive tract cancers in pregnancy has prevented the development of universally accepted management algorithms for many of the complex issues regarding their treatment. A literature review of diagnostic and treatment strategies for cervical, ovarian, endometrial, and vulvar carcinoma complicated by pregnancy is presented.

Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies: the Cleveland Clinic experience.

To examine the toxicity profile and antineoplastic activity of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 4 to 7.5) plus 3-hour infusional paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (135 or 175 mg/m2) in women with advanced gynecologic malignancies, we retrospectively reviewed the experience of the Gynecologic Cancer Program at The Cleveland Clinic with this combination chemotherapy regimen. To date, 92 patients (median age, 67 years) have received a total of 460 courses (median number per patient, six) of this two-drug combination. The initial paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m2 and the carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve was > or = 5 in 72% and 73% of patients, respectively. The major toxicity was neutropenia (grade 4 in 9% of patients), resulting in two febrile episodes and a single septic death. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy were noted in one and two patients, respectively. Twelve patients (13%) experienced at least one episode of paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity, but all were able to continue with the treatment program. Of the 62 patients with ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma with carbohydrate antigen-125 levels > or = 60 U/mL before the initiation of chemotherapy, 74% exhibited a > or = 90% decline in the tumor marker following treatment. We conclude that the combination of carboplatin and 3-hour infusional paclitaxel can be administered in the outpatient setting with a highly acceptable toxicity profile and with major activity in patients with ovarian cancer and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum.

Continuous subcutaneous administration of mesna to prevent ifosfamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis.

Hemorrhagic cystitis is a major potential toxicity of ifosfamide that can be prevented by administering mesna along with the cytotoxic agent. Mesna is generally administered by the intravenous route, although experience with oral delivery of the drug has increased. The continuous subcutaneous administration of mesna has the advantage of not requiring intravenous access. In addition, subcutaneous delivery of the neutralizing agent will not be associated with the risk of inadequate urinary mesna concentrations, such as in a patient taking oral mesna who experiences severe ifosfamide-induced emesis and is unable to absorb the drug. Limited clinical experience with continuous subcutaneous mesna administration suggests it is a safe, practical, and economic method of drug delivery that permits ifosfamide to be administered successfully in the outpatient setting.

Recurrence in noninvasive endometrial carcinoma. Relationship to uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

In a series of 227 consecutive operable clinical stage I endometrial carcinomas, there were 28 recurrences. In seven of these cases, no myometrial or vascular invasion was demonstrable. Recurrence in these seven noninvasive cases was strongly associated with papillary serous carcinoma, even when present only focally or manifested by typical cytological features in the absence of well-formed papillae. An association with foci of clear cell carcinoma was also seen, as was direct evidence in two cases of synchronous ovarian serous carcinoma, one in situ.