A case of an inverted appendiceal stump with dysplastic mucosa mimicking cecal polyp managed by a combined endoscopic laparoscopic approach.

Endoscopic finding of invaginated appendiceal stump mimicking polyp is very rare. We present a case of patient with appendiceal stump mimicking cecal polyp covered with dysplastic mucosa which makes it even more rare. Polypoid lesions involving the appendiceal area represent a specific diagnostic-therapeutic dilemma. In these situations simple colonoscopic polypectomy poses increased risk for perforation. In our case biopsy of the polypoid cecal lesion revealed dysplastic mucosa. Due to the non-lifting sign and increased risk of perforation from simple polypectomy, polyp was removed by cecal wedge resection using combined endoscopic laparoscopic approach. Histopathology of the specimen confirmed medium dysplastic epithelium covering lymphoid follicles specific for appendix. In our case, decision on the need to remove the polyp, based on biopsy histology, was quite clear; however, the question is what should we have done if the biopsy finding was negative? In such a situation, conservative approach with endoscopic follow-up of the polyp and regular biopsy specimen analysis, or a more active approach of polyp removal should be considered. This issue can be discussed, however, we do believe that decision on approaching such patients should be made individually, based on the patient's age, comorbidities, general condition and operative risk.

Inflammatory bowel disease and SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: current knowledge and recommendations.

In the last year, we are facing a pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 which causes a disease called COVID-19. In everyday practice, we encounter a number of issues related to IBD patients and COVID-19. So far, we have a lot of information regarding issues of IBD patients and COVID-19, but they are scattered across numerous scientific articles. In this review, we have made a synthesis of previous knowledge regarding the main issues such as IBD patients and risk of SARS-CoV-2infection/COVID-19, outcomes of IBD patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, treatment of IBD patients in the pandemic era, endoscopy in the pandemic era, vaccination, and patient's perception and well-being during the pandemic era. The main goal of our paper is to summarize current knowledge in this literature review.

Infliximab rescue therapy in a patient with acute severe ulcerative colitis and coronavirus disease 2019 followed by Escherichia coli 0157:H7 infection: a case report.

The management of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis and SARS-CoV-2 presents a clinical challenge. We report on the first case of a patient with acute severe ulcerative colitis and mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received rescue infliximab therapy, followed by a relapse caused by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7. The treatment challenges we faced were biologic therapy administration during active COVID-19, about which little was known at the time, and how to treat EHEC due to the risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Acute severe ulcerative colitis was treated with rescue infliximab therapy, and enteric infection with an antibiotic, both with satisfactory clinical response. The decision to induce biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease relapse in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients should be made on a case-to-case basis and should be driven by the dominant disease. Our patient tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, but actually had mild disease. At the same time, she had acute severe ulcerative colitis, so we started anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy despite serological tests and the recommendation to delay biological therapy administration for two-weeks. Second, due to severity of the first flare, COVID-19, and the patient's general condition, we opted for an antibiotic treatment of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 while monitoring the parameters of potential hemolytic uremic syndrome development.

Class side effects: decreased pressure in the lower oesophageal and the pyloric sphincters after the administration of dopamine antagonists, neuroleptics, anti-emetics, L-NAME, pentadecapeptide BPC 157 and L-arginine.

The ulcerogenic potential of dopamine antagonists and L-NAME in rats provides unresolved issues of anti-emetic neuroleptic application in both patients and experimental studies. Therefore, in a 1-week study, we examined the pressures within the lower oesophageal and the pyloric sphincters in rats [assessed manometrically (cm H2O)] after dopamine neuroleptics/prokinetics, L-NAME, L-arginine and stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 were administered alone and/or in combination. Medication (/kg) was given once daily intraperitoneally throughout the 7 days, with the last dose at 24 h before pressure assessment. Given as individual agents to healthy rats, all dopamine antagonists (central [haloperidol (6.25 mg, 16 mg, 25 mg), fluphenazine (5 mg), levomepromazine (50 mg), chlorpromazine (10 mg), quetiapine (10 mg), olanzapine (5 mg), clozapine (100 mg), sulpiride (160 mg), metoclopramide (25 mg)) and peripheral(domperidone (10 mg)], L-NAME (5 mg) and L-arginine (100 mg) decreased the pressure within both sphincters. As a common effect, this decreased pressure was rescued, dose-dependently, by BPC 157 (10 µg, 10 ng) (also note that L-arginine and L-NAME given together antagonized each other's responses). With haloperidol, L-NAME worsened both the lower oesophageal and the pyloric sphincter pressure, while L-arginine ameliorated lower oesophageal sphincter but not pyloric sphincter pressure, and antagonized L-NAME effect. With domperidone, L-arginine originally had no effect, while L-NAME worsened pyloric sphincter pressure. This effect was opposed by L-arginine. All these effects were further reversed towards a stronger beneficial effect, close to normal pressure values, by the addition of BPC 157. In addition, NO level was determined in plasma, sphincters and brain tissue. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were also assessed. Haloperidol increased NO levels (in both sphincters, the plasma and brain), consistently producing increased TBARS levels in the plasma, sphincters and brain tissues. These effects were all counteracted by BPC 157 administration. In conclusion, we revealed that BPC 157 counteracts the anti-emetic neuroleptic class side effect of decreased pressure in sphincters and the dopamine/NO-system/BPC 157 relationship.

Antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori to the outcome of 10-days vs. 7-days Moxifloxacin based therapy for the eradication: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic resistance decreases success of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication. Recently published results show low rate of resistance and better compliance with moxifloxacin based regiments. AIMS&METHODS: Whether 7 days moxifloxacin with lansoprasole and amoxycillin can be compared with 10 days moxifloxacin with lansoprasole and amoxycillin according to moxifloxacin resistance. Patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia who had culture and histology positive Hp infection (n = 150) were randomly assigned into two groups. The first group (n = 75) received moxifloxacin 400 mg/d during 7 days and the other (n = 75) received moxifloxacin 400 mg/d during 10 days. All patients received amoxycillin 1 g twice daily, lansoprasole 30 mg twice daily. All Hp cultures were tested for sensitivity to moxifloxacin. RESULTS: 138 patients (92%) completed the study, 68 in the first group and 70 in the second. Eradication rates were 84% (57/68) and 76% (57/75) in the 7 days moxifloxacin group and 90% and 84% in the second group (63/70, 63/75) according to the PP and ITT analysis; p = n.s. Among 129 patients (86% of study group), 6% of strains were primary resistant to moxifloxacin. Eradication of moxifloxacin sensitive/resistant strains was 98%/66%, p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: According to our results we recommend 7 days moxiflixacin based triple therapy.

What is the Right Therapeutic Approach to Biliary Choledochal Cyst?

We report a case of biliary cyst type II which, independently of its a priori benign nature, caused numerous complications such as recurrent cholangitis and pancreatitis, as well as subsequent hepatic fibrosis and the potential danger of choledochocele perforation. Although they are benign, biliary/choledochal cysts can cause numerous disorders such as cholestasis, leading to cholangitis and pancreatitis and biliary sepsis, and due to chronic inflammation of the biliary system even cholangiocarcinogenesis. Our findings showed that sometimes this type of biliary cyst (according to the available literature the rarest and most benign type), as well as type I cyst, should undergo timely radical excision. In our patient, timely choledochocele resection would have certainly contributed to the reduction of subsequent complications, as well as to obviating repeated invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures.

BPC 157 counteracts QTc prolongation induced by haloperidol, fluphenazine, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, sulpiride, and metoclopramide in rats.

AIM: Commonly, neuroleptics and prokinetics induce a prolonged QTc interval. In this study, stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 counteracts the prolongation of the QTc interval in Wistar rats that underwent daily administration of dopamine neuroleptics or prokinetics. Previously, in rats and mice, BPC 157 counteracted neuroleptic-induced catalepsy and gastric ulcers. MAIN METHODS: To counteract neuroleptic- or prokinetic-induced prolongation of the QTc interval, rats were given a BPC 157 regimen once daily over seven days (10µg, 10ng/kg ip) immediately after each administrations of haloperidol (0.625, 6.25, 12.5, and 25.0mg/kg ip), fluphenazine (0.5, 5.0mg/kg ip), clozapine (1.0, 10.0mg/kg ip), quetiapine (1.0, 10.0mg/kg ip), sulpiride (1.6, 16.0mg/kg ip), metoclopramide (2.5, 25.0mg/kg ip) or (1.0, 10.0mg/kg ip). Controls simultaneously received saline (5ml/kg ip). To assess the ECG presentation before and after neuroleptic/prokinetic medication, the assessment was at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30min (first administration) as well as at 30min, 60min and 24h (first administration and subsequent administrations) and the ECG recording started prior to drug administration. KEY FINDINGS: Since very early, a prolonged QTc interval has been continually noted with haloperidol, fluphenazine, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, sulpiride, and metoclopramide in rats as a central common effect not seen with domperidone. Consistent counteraction appears with the stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157. Thus, BPC 157 rapidly and permanently counteracts the QTc prolongation induced by neuroleptics and prokinetics. SIGNIFICANCE: Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 is suited for counteracting a prolonged QT interval.

Comparison of the efficacy of 250 mg and 500 mg clarithromycin used with lansoprazole and amoxicillin in eradication regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIMS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 250 mg and 500 mg clarithromycin used with lansoprazole and amoxicillin in eradication of H. pylori infection. 235 patients with H. pylori infections and non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly assigned to one of the following regimens: lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg (LAC250) and lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg (LAC500). All drugs were given twice daily for 7 days. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori with the CLO test. Gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomization and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy were used for histology and culture. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin and amoxicillin was determined with the E-test. RESULTS: 101 patients in the LAC250 mg group and 102 in the LAC500 group completed the study. On intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rates were 81% with LAC250 and 82% with LAC500 (p=0.88). On per-protocol analysis, eradication rates were 92% with LAC250 and 96% with LAC500 (p=0.23). Among the 203 patients (86% of the entire study group) for whom H. pylori antibiotic-sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance to clarithromycin was found in 9% and to amoxicillin in 0%. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 94%/38% for LAC250 (p < 0.001) and 93%/40% for LAC500 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The cure rates for the two regimens were similar, although adverse effects were more frequent with the LAC500 regimen, suggesting that 250 mg of clarithromycin b.d. may be sufficient in our patient population.