RESUMO
Background: Phase II trials are designed to assess the efficacy/toxicity ratio of experimental treatments and select those worth being tested in phase III trials. Although crucial limitations were identified when concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) phase III trials characteristics were assessed, features of cCRT phase II trials have never been reported. The objective was to describe features of all cCRT phase II trials. Methods and material: Requests were performed in the Medline database (via PubMed). The latest update was performed in April 2016, using the following MESH terms: 'clinical trials: phase II as topic', 'chemoradiotherapy'. Results: Four hundred and fifty-eight cCRT phase II trials were identified. They were mainly multicenter (51.5%), single arm studies (77.7%) published after 2011 (55.0%). The median number of included patients was 52. Primary endpoints were mainly response rate (20.5%), pathological complete response (14.4%) and overall survival (12.6%). The primary endpoint was not defined in 22% of studies. Tumors were mostly lung (23.1%), head and neck (20.3%), colorectal (16.6%) and esophagogastric cancer (14.6%) treated at a locally advanced setting (81.7%). 55.2% of trials used 3D-conformal radiotherapy and 9.1% intensity-modulated radiotherapy, mainly with normo-fractionation (82.0% of the 573 arms with radiotherapy). Radiation technique was not reported in 19.9% of studies. Associated anticancer drugs (563 arms) were mainly conventional chemotherapies (559 arms): cisplatin (46.2%) and 5-fluorouracil (28.3%). Non cytotoxic agents (targeted therapies, immunotherapies) were tested in 97 arms (17%). With a median follow-up of 31 months, acute grades 3-5 were reported in 98.5% of studies and late toxicities in 44.5%. Follow-up was not reported in 17% of studies. Conclusions: cCRT phase II trials featured severe limitations, with outdated radiation techniques, insufficient reporting of crucial data and a small number of included patients. This certainly limited the impact of conclusions and hindered the development of successful phase III trials.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Neoplasias/terapia , Terapias em Estudo/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Radioterapia Conformacional/efeitos adversos , Terapias em Estudo/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Molecular targeted therapies (TT) are the cornerstone of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment. There is a paucity of data on the safety of the radiotherapy (RT)-TT association in a sequential or a concomitant setting. The aim of the present study is to retrospectively assess the safety of the RT-TT association. From 2006 to 2014, data from 84 consecutive patients treated with RT and TT for metastatic RCC were retrospectively collected. RT-TT sequential and concomitant associations were, respectively, defined by a time interval of more than five TT half-lives and less than or equal to five TT half-lives between the last TT administration and RT initiation. Toxicities in the fields of RT were assessed systematically. As many patients received several TT and RT courses, 136 RT-TT associations were analyzed, with 66 sequential and 70 concomitant schemes. RT was mainly delivered on bone (75%) and brain metastases (14.7%). TT were tyrosine kinase inhibitors (73.5%), mTOR inhibitors (19.8%), and monoclonal antibodies (6.7%). With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, whatever the sequence, no grade≥4 toxicity was reported. Two grade 3 toxicities were reported with sequential (3%) and concomitant (2.9%) RT-TT, respectively. Sequential or concomitant RT-TT associations in metastatic RCC do not seem to cause major toxicity.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Several studies have demonstrated that daily physical activity (PA) prevents the development of breast cancer. Our objective was to examine the relationship between PA and clinical and biological tumor characteristics in breast cancer patients in order to determine the impact of energy expenditure (EE) on tumor prognosis. METHODS: We pooled data from two prospective studies, including a total of 121 breast cancer patients. The measure of PA was done using the self-completion Population Physical Activity Questionnaire, which was answered by each patient. RESULTS: Ten patients harbored triple negative (TN) tumors. The mean body mass index (BMI) in the general population and in patients with TN tumors was 24.3 and 25.6, respectively. The mean daily EE (DEE) was 10,266 kJ×24 h(-1) in the general population and 11,212 kJ×24 h(-1) in patients with TN tumors. In the whole population, there was an inverse statistical correlation between BMI and DEE, rest, low PA, and high PA (p=0.0002, p=0.003, p<0001, and p=0.03, respectively). There was a positive correlation between negative estrogen receptor status and intensive PA (p=0.041) and DEE (p=0.007). For TN tumors, there was no significant correlation between BMI and categories of EE. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle (weight regulation, PA) should be adapted and personalized according to biological, clinical, and epidemiological characteristics of the tumors.
Assuntos
Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study was conducted to: (1) provide more modern data on real-life local management of metastatic rectal cancer; (2) compare therapeutic strategies; and (3) identify prognostic factors of local failure, overall survival and progression-free survival. METHODS: Data about efficacy and acute toxicity were collected. Patients were diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer between 2004 and 2015, and were treated at least with radiotherapy. Local failure, overall survival and progression-free survival were correlated with patient, tumour and treatment characteristics using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Data of 148 consecutive patients with metastatic rectal cancer were analysed. Median follow-up was 19 months. Median overall survival was 16 months. All patients received local radiotherapy, with a median equivalent 2 Gy per fraction dose of 47.7 Gy. Rectal surgery was performed in 97 patients (65.6%). The majority of patients (86/97, 88.7%) received pre-operative chemoradiation. In multivariate analysis, rectal surgery was found to be the only independent predictor of increased overall survival (24.6 vs 7.1 months, p <0.001). Of the patients undergoing surgical treatment, 22.8% presented with significant complications that required a delay of systemic treatment. Grade 3-4 acute radiation therapy-related toxicities were observed in 6.1% of patients, mainly gastrointestinal toxicities (5.4%). CONCLUSION: Rectal surgery was a key predictive factor of increased progression-free survival and overall survival in patients receiving at least local radiotherapy. In our series of real-life patients, local surgery and radiation seemed as well tolerated as reported in selected phase III non-metastatic rectal cancer patients. These data suggested that local management could be beneficial for metastatic rectal cancer patients.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Neoplasias Retais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The management of patients undergoing immunosuppressive agents is really challenging. Based on precaution principle, it seems mandatory to stop immunosuppressive (or immunomodulating) agents during radiation. Yet, it is impossible in grafted patients. It is possible in patients with autoimmune disease, but in this case, the autoimmune disease might modify patient's radio-sensitivity. We provide a short review about the safety of radiotherapy in grafted/auto-immune patients. The literature is limited with data coming from outdated case-report or case-control studies. It seems that radiotherapy is feasible in grafted patients, but special dose-constraints limitations must probably be considered for the transplant and the other organs at risk. There is very little data about the safety of radiotherapy, when associated with immunomodulating agents. The most studied drug is the methotrexate but only its prescription as a chemotherapy (high doses for a short period of time) was reported. When used as an immunomodulator, it should probably be stopped 4 months before and after radiation. Apart from rheumatoid arthritis, it seems that collagen vascular diseases and especially systemic scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematous feature increased radio-sensitivity with increased severe late toxicities. Transplanted patients and collagen vascular disease patients should be informed that there is very little data about safety of radiation in their case.
Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Transplantados , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/radioterapia , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Transplantes/efeitos da radiação , Suspensão de TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a poor prognosis despite a multi modal treatment that includes normofractionated radiotherapy. So, various hypofractionated alternatives to normofractionated RT have been tested to improve such prognosis. There is need of systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the literature properly and maybe generalised the use of hypofractionation. The aim of this study was first, to perform a meta-analysis of all controlled trials testing the impact of hypofractionation on survival without age restriction and secondly, to analyse data from all non-comparative trials testing the impact of hypofractionation, radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic RT in first line. MATERIALS/METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify all publications testing the impact of hypofractionation in glioblastoma between 1985 and March 2020. Combined hazard ratio from comparative studies was calculated for overall survival. The impact of study design, age and use of adjuvant temozolomide was explored by stratification. Meta-regressions were performed to determine the impact of prognostic factors. RESULTS: 2283 publications were identified. Eleven comparative trials were included. No impact on overall survival was evidenced (HR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.89-1.28) without age restriction. The analysis of non-comparative literature revealed heterogeneous outcomes with limited quality of reporting. Concurrent chemotherapy, completion of surgery, immobilization device, isodose of prescription, and prescribed dose (depending on tumour volume) were poorly described. However, results on survival are encouraging and were correlated with the percentage of resected patients and with patients age but not with median dose. CONCLUSIONS: Because few trials were randomized and because the limited quality of reporting, it is difficult to define the place of hypofactionation in glioblastoma. In first line, hypofractionation resulted in comparable survival outcome with the benefit of a shortened duration. The method used to assess hypofractionation needs to be improved.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Humanos , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Radiocirurgia/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In most clinical trials, gold fiducial markers are implanted in the prostate to tune the table position before each radiation beam. Yet, it is unclear if a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) should be performed before each beam to monitor a possible variation of the organs at risk (OARs) fullness, especially in case of recto-prostatic spacer implantation. The present study aimed at assessing the inter- and intra-fraction movements of prostate, bladder and rectum in patients implanted with a hyaluronic acid spacer and undergoing prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Data about consecutive patients undergoing prostate SBRT were prospectively collected between 2015 and 2019. Inter-and intra-fraction prostate displacements and volume variation of organs at risk (OARs) were assessed with CBCTs. RESULTS: Eight patients were included. They underwent prostate SBRT (37.5Gy, 5 fractions of 7.5Gy) guided by prostate gold fiducial markers. Inter-fraction variation of the bladder volume was insignificant. Intra-fraction mean increase of the bladder volume was modest (29 cc) but significant (p < 0.001). Both inter- and intra-fraction variations of the rectum volume were insignificant but for one patient. He had no rectal toxicity. The magnitude of table displacement necessary to match the prostate gold fiducial marker frequently exceeded the CTV/PTV margins (0.4 cm) before the first (35%) and the second arc (15%). Inter- and intra-fraction bladder and rectum volume variations did not correlate with prostate displacement. CONCLUSION: Major prostate position variations were reported. In-room kV fiducial imaging before each arc seems mandatory. Intra-fraction imaging of the OARs appears unnecessary. We suggest that only one CBCT is needed before the first arc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02361515, February 11th, 2015.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Marcadores Fiduciais , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Órgãos em Risco/diagnóstico por imagem , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Posicionamento do Paciente , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Radiocirurgia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Concerns have been raised about potential toxic interactions when colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and chemoradiation are concurrently performed. In 2006, the ASCO guidelines advised against their concomitant use. Nevertheless, with the development of modern radiotherapy techniques and supportive care, the therapeutic index of combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and CSFs is worth reassessing. Recent clinical trials testing chemoradiation in lung cancer let investigators free to decide the use of concomitant CSFs or not. No abnormal infield event was reported after the use of modern radiotherapy techniques and concomitant chemotherapy regimens. These elements call for further investigation to set new recommendations in favour of the association of chemoradiation and CSFs. Moreover, radiotherapy could induce anticancer systemic effects mediated by the immune system in vitro and in vivo. With combined CSFs, this effect was reinforced in preclinical and clinical trials introducing innovative radioimmunotherapy models. So far, the association of radiation with CSFs has not been combined with immunotherapy. However, it might play a major role in triggering an immune response against cancer cells, leading to abscopal effects. The present article reassesses the therapeutic index of the combination CSFs-chemoradiation through an updated review on its safety and efficacy. It also provides a special focus on radioimmunotherapy.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos/efeitos adversos , Animais , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Camundongos , Radioimunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/terapiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Although Multidisciplinary Team Management (MDT) is integrated in most international head and neck cancer treatment guidelines, its applications and proceedings were rarely described. The present study explores a 6-year real-life experience in a French Comprehensive Cancer Care Center. METHODS: Patients, tumor and meeting characteristics of all consecutive cases discussed in head and neck MDT meetings between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2015, 1849 cases (accounting for 1786 patients) were discussed in 138 MDT meetings. Median age was 62 (range: 15-96). When reported (nâ¯=â¯310, 16.8%), performance status was ≥2 in 36.1% of patients. Tumors were mainly squamous cell carcinomas (nâ¯=â¯1664, 91.5%) of the larynx/hypo-pharynx (nâ¯=â¯630, 34.4%), oropharynx (nâ¯=â¯518; 28.3%) and oral cavity (nâ¯=â¯339; 18.5%). Tumors were diagnosed at a locally (nâ¯=â¯358, 25%), locally advanced (nâ¯=â¯946, 66%) or metastatic setting (nâ¯=â¯53, 3.7%). Mean number of discussed patients per MDT meeting was 16 (range: 3-32). Most patients were discussed once (nâ¯=â¯1663, 97%). Most patients (nâ¯=â¯969, 52%) underwent treatment before MDT meetings: mainly surgery (nâ¯=â¯709, 73.2%). The mean time between MDT meeting and first radiation course was 21â¯days (range: 1-116). DISCUSSION: Optimal multimodal treatment management is based on MDT meetings and results from the interaction and coordination of surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists. In the present series, most patients were discussed once despite the number of expected recurrences, suggesting that the management of tumor progression was not discussed in head and neck MDT meetings. Furthermore, most patients had surgery before MDT meeting, pointing out that MDT role and place still needs to be improved. Finally, the present population significantly differed from patients included in phase III clinical trials, with more advanced age and poorer condition. It calls for the necessity of a high-quality head and neck MDT meeting since evidence-based recommendations should be adapted to patient's frailties.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/epidemiologia , Seguro/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the safety of the association of radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (mMM). METHODS: A retrospective analysis included consecutive patients treated with palliative RT, and at least one line of systemic therapy for mMM between 2001 and 2016. Treatments were defined as sequential or concomitant when RT and the systemic drug were administered, respectively, at more or less than five half-lives from each other. RESULTS: 92 patients were included. They had 110 palliative RT treatments. RT was delivered with a "conventional" chemotherapy (mainly fotemustine and/or dacarbazine) and a "modern" systemic therapy (BRAF inhibitors, association of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, immunotherapy), respectively, in 88 (80%) and 22 (20%) cases. Systemic treatments and RT were mainly concurrently performed (n = 61, 55.5%). Regarding acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity, no difference was reported between sequential and concomitant groups either in the whole cohort (p = 1) or in the subgroup of patients receiving "modern" systemic therapies (p = 1). Acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities only occurred with vemurafenib. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced more severe infield adverse events than other associations (p = 0.001) with two deaths. CONCLUSION: In our series, compared to sequential administration, concomitant association of systemic anticancer drugs and palliative RT did not increase toxicity in mMM patients. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced severe infield toxicities. Prospective studies are needed to better characterize the toxicity of each association.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Melanoma/secundário , Melanoma/terapia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Humanos , Melanoma/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Innovation in radiotherapy should meet multiple challenges, both technically, biologically, clinically and socially. Scientific, technological and biological advances have resulted in major changes in the implementation, indications, and therapeutic index of radiotherapy over the last century. Based on technical innovations (conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulation, CBCT, stereotactic body radiotherapy and MRI embedded system) and knowledge in cancer biology ("oxygen effect", "checkpoints", targeted therapies, molecular profiles and immunotherapy) highlighted in recent decades, the news in radiotherapy is rich and varied. The 2018 news are particularly focused in the role of hypofractionation in prostate cancer, the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic patients, the possibility of de-intensify treatment in HPV-related oropharynx cancer, and the combination of short-term androgen deprivation to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy. The present manuscript reviews the 2018 latest advances.
Assuntos
Radioterapia/tendências , Humanos , Hipofracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Radioterapia/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite screening campaigns, cervical cancers remain among the most prevalent malignancies and carry significant mortality, especially in developing countries. Most studies report outcomes of patients receiving the usual standard of care. It is possible that these selected patients may not correctly represent patients in a real-world setting, which may be a limitation in interpreting outcomes. This study was undertaken to identify prognostic factors, management strategies and outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancers (LACC) treated in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Medical files of all consecutive patients treated with curative intent for LACC in a French Cancer Care Center between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were identified. Performance status was ≥ 2 in 10.6%. Median age at diagnosis was 63.0. Based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification, tumours were classified as follows: 10.6% IB2, 22.3% IIA, 51.0% IIB, 4.3% IIIA and 11.7% IIIB. Pelvic lymph nodes were involved in 34.0% of cases. Radiotherapy was delivered for all patients. Radiotherapy technique was intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy in 39.4% of cases. A concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy was delivered in 68.1% of patients. Brachytherapy was performed in 77.7% of cases. The recommended standard care (concurrent chemoradiotherapy with at least five chemotherapy cycles during radiotherapy, followed by brachytherapy) was delivered in 43.6%. The median overall treatment time was 56 days. Complete tumour sterilisation was achieved in 55.2% of cases. Mean follow-up was 54.3 months. Local recurrence rate was 18.1%. Five-year overall survival was 61.9% (95% Confident Interval (CI) = 52.3-73.2) and five-year disease-specific survival was 68.5% (95% CI = 59.2-79.2). Poor performance status, lymph nodes metastasis and absence of concurrent chemotherapy were identified as poor prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 50% of patients received the standard care. Because LACC patients and disease are heterogeneous, treatment tailoring appears to be common in current clinical practice. However, guidelines for tailoring management are not currently available. More data about real-world settings are required in order to to optimise clinical trials' aims and designs, and make them translatable in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: retrospectively registered.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidadeRESUMO
We have just celebrated the 50th anniversary of cisplatin cytotoxic potential discovery. It is time to take stock and it seems mainly positive. This drug, that revolutionized the treatment of many cancer types, continues to be the most widely prescribed chemotherapy. Despite significant toxicities, resistance mechanisms associated with treatment failures, and unresolved questions about its mechanism of action, the use of this cytotoxic agent remains unwavering. The interest concerning this "old" invincible drug has not yet abated. Indeed many research axes are in the news. New platinum salts agents are tested, new cisplatin formulations are developed to target tumor cells more efficiently, and new combinations are established to increase the cytotoxic potency of cisplatin or overcome the resistance mechanisms.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/história , Cisplatino/história , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/química , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Adutos de DNA , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , História do Século XX , História do Século XXIRESUMO
In the past few years, metastatic renal cell carcinoma prognosis was improved by the development of molecular targeted therapies (TTs). At the metastatic stage, the tolerance to treatment is a major concern, not only because of the challenge of the efficacy/toxicity ratio improvement but also because of the importance of an optimal adherence to oral treatments. The present case series relates the issues of dealing with uncommon and sometimes never described side effects of sunitinib and sorafenib. The first case report deals with grade 3 vomiting during hemodialysis with concurrent administration of sunitinib. The second case is an iterative gout attack induced by sunitinib. The third case presents a grade 3 scalp dysesthesia with sorafenib. The fourth case includes an astonishing efficacy of metronomic (ie, low doses during a long period of time) bevacizumab in monotherapy. Multidisciplinary management and systematic reporting of unexpected efficacies and toxicities are needed to better understand TTs real therapeutic index. Although TTs revolutionized metastatic renal cell cancer prognosis, they also brought about previously unknown side effects. Identification and management of these off-target effects may be tricky, and therefore, comedication must be wisely chosen. As the physiopathology of these side effects is still unclear, multidisciplinary management and systematic reporting of toxicities are essential.
RESUMO
Radiation-induced fibrosis is widely considered as a common but forsaken phenomenon that can lead to clinical sequela and possibly vital impairments. Lysophosphatidic acid is a bioactive lipid involved in fibrosis and probably in radiation-induced fibrosis as suggested in recent studies. Lysophosphatidic acid is also a well-described pro-oncogenic factor, involved in carcinogenesis processes (proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, invasion, migration). The present review highlights and summarizes the links between lysophosphatidic acid and radiation-induced fibrosis, lysophosphatidic acid and radioresistance, and proposes lysophosphatidic acid as a potential central actor of the radiotherapy therapeutic index. Besides, we hypothesize that following radiotherapy, the newly formed tumour micro-environment, with increased extracellular matrix and increased lysophosphatidic acid levels, is a favourable ground to metastasis development. Lysophosphatidic acid could therefore be an exciting therapeutic target, minimizing radio-toxicities and radio-resistance effects.
Assuntos
Transformação Celular Neoplásica/induzido quimicamente , Fibrose/etiologia , Lisofosfolipídeos/efeitos adversos , Animais , Biomarcadores , Fibrose/metabolismo , Fibrose/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/etiologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Tolerância a Radiação/efeitos dos fármacos , Radiação Ionizante , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Transdução de Sinais , Índice TerapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the first cases of salvage radiotherapy (RT) using the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) targeted on choline positron emission tomography (PET) uptake in a local recurrent prostate cancer, after a radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Four patients received salvage irradiation for biochemical relapse that occurred after the initial radical prostatectomy. The relapse occurred from 10 months to 6 years with PSA levels ranging from 2.35 to 4.86 ng ml(-1). For each patient, an (18)F-choline PET-CT showed a focal choline uptake in prostatic fossa, with standardized uptake value calculated on the basis of predicted lean body mass (SUL) max of 3.3-6.8. No involved lymph node or distant metastases were diagnosed. IMRT doses were of 62.7 Gy (1.9 Gy/fraction, 33 fractions), with a SIB of 69.3 Gy (2.1 Gy/fraction, 33 fractions) to a PET-guided target volume. RESULTS: Acute toxicities were limited. We observed no gastrointestinal toxicity ≥grade 2 and only one grade 2 genitourinary toxicity. At 1-month follow-up evaluation, no complication and a decrease in PSA level (6.8-43.8% of the pre-therapeutic level) were reported. After 4 months, a decrease in PSA level was obtained for all the patients, ranging from 30% to 70%. At a median follow-up of 15 months, PSA level was controlled for all the patients, but one of them experienced a distant lymph node recurrence. CONCLUSION: Salvage irradiation to the prostate bed with SIB guided by PET-CT is feasible, with biological efficacy and no major acute toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: IMRT with PET-oriented SIB for salvage treatment of prostate cancer is possible, without major acute toxicity.
Assuntos
Imagem Multimodal , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Idoso , Colina , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Radiochemotherapy is undergoing a complete expansion. Currently, possibilities of treatment combination are skyrocketting, with different anticancer and targeted molecules, different radiotherapy techniques, and dose escalation with each therapy. The development of a modern phase I radiochemotherapy trial becomes more and more complex and should be fully investigated. In the literature, there are no exhaustive reviews describing the necessity of their characteristics. The present article explores historical and current phase I clinical trials involving a combination of radiation therapy and anticancer therapies. Selected trials were identified by searching in PubMed databases. A total of 228 studies were identified in the last three decades, and a portrait of their characteristics is presented. As expected, most frequently studied malignancies were head and neck cancers, followed by non-small cell lung cancer and brain cancer. Toxicity is reported in more than 90% of the studies. Most studies were published since 2010, at the area of targeted therapies, but mainly concerned classical chemotherapies (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). The present review highlights some limits. Indeed, methodology seems not optimised and could be based on more accurate methods of dose-escalation. The present portrait of phase I radiochemotherapy trials suggests that radiochemotherapy notion must be reinvented and trials should be adapted to its complexity. Step by step method does not sound like an option anymore. Let us build the future of radiochemotherapy on past evidences.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Neoplasias/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/história , Quimiorradioterapia/tendências , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto/história , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/patologia , Doses de Radiação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite radiotherapy (RT) technical improvements, high salivary dysfunction rates are still reported in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of the present study was to report salivary glands dosimetry with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). METHODS: Dosimetry of consecutive patients receiving IMRT or VMAT for proven HNSCC between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Data of 609 patients were studied. Mean dose, mean maximum dose, and mean percentage of salivary gland volume receiving at least 26 Gy (V26) of the contralateral parotid were 24.50 Gy (range, 0-70.4 Gy), 39.08 Gy (range, 0.38-76.45 Gy), and 40.92% (range, 0% to 100%), respectively. Mean and maximum dose on contralateral submandibular gland were 48.18 Gy (range, 0.19-70.73 Gy), and 61.25 Gy (range, 0-75.8 Gy), respectively. CONCLUSION: Target volume coverage still has to be prioritized over organs at risk (OAR) sparing with new RT techniques. Submandibular glands are not sufficiently taken into account in guidelines. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1028-1034, 2016.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Glândulas Salivares/efeitos da radiação , Xerostomia/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Radiometria , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of anticancer treatment. However in spite of technical evolutions, important rates of failure and of toxicity are still reported. Although numerous pre-clinical data have been published, we address the subject of radiotherapy-stem cells interaction from the clinical efficacy and toxicity perspective. On one side, cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been recently evidenced in most of solid tumor primary locations and are thought to drive radio-resistance phenomena. It is particularly suggested in glioblastoma, where CSCs were showed to be housed in the subventricular zone (SVZ). In recent retrospective studies, the radiation dose to SVZ was identified as an independent factor significantly influencing overall survival. On the other side, healthy tissue stem cells radio-destruction has been recently suggested to cause two of the most quality of life-impacting side effects of radiotherapy, namely memory disorders after brain radiotherapy, and xerostomia after head and neck radiotherapy. Recent publications studying the impact of a radiation dose decrease on healthy brain and salivary stem cells niches suggested significantly reduced long term toxicities. Stem cells comprehension should be a high priority for radiation oncologists, as this particular cell population seems able to widely modulate the efficacy/toxicity ratio of radiotherapy in real life patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The score of the MASCC, by means of clinical criteria, estimates the risk of serious complications in patients with neutropenic fever induced by chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a cohort of patients hospitalized for a neutropenic fever and analyzed complications according to the criteria defined by the MASCC. RESULTS: Eighty-one neutropenic fevers in 71 patients were identified. Microbiological documentation was obtained in 33% of cases only. Fifty-eight patients (72%) presented with a MASCC score≥21 and were considered as low risk of complications. In the total population, 10 patients died during their hospitalizations for neutropenic fever, 7 in the high-risk group versus 3 in the low risk group, including 2 patients suffering from significant comorbidities not taken into account by MASCC score. Within the low risk group, presence of a metastatic disease and existence of 2 or more comorbidities were associated with a longer duration of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that the criteria of the MASCC are not always enough to thoroughly identify which patients were at risk of complications or could be treated through outpatient management. By better taking into account the comorbidities and tumoral stage, a better selection of the patients who are likely to receive an ambulatory treatment could be made. To date, hospitalization remains frequently necessary in neutropenic fevers, at least in its initial steps, and the place of the general practitioner remains to be better defined.