Comparison in detection of prodromal Parkinson's disease patients using original and updated MDS research criteria in two independent cohorts.

INTRODUCTION: MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinson's disease (pPD) were published in 2015 and updated in 2019. We aimed to determine the difference in pPD patient detection rates in two cohorts recruited via gastrointestinal symptoms (PARCAS study) and the presence of a probable REM sleep behaviour disorder (PDBIOM study) using the original and updated criteria. METHODS: We evaluated all risk and prodromal markers, except genetic testing, plasma urate and physical inactivity, in both cohorts and DaT scan, diabetes mellitus type II and cognitive deficit in the PARCAS cohort. Thresholds of 50% probability for possible pPD and 80% for probable pPD were used. RESULTS: PPD status as identified by the original/updated criteria showed differences for probable pPD (n = 8/9; original/updated criteria) and possible pPD (n = 9/13) in the PARCAS cohort (total n = 158), as well as for probable pPD (n = 19/21) and possible pPD (n = 6/3) in the PDBIOM cohort (total n = 48). A high concordance rate was found between the two criteria sets (p < 0.001 for all groups). CONCLUSION: All probable pPD cases remained in the same category after evaluation with both criteria; three possible pPD cases based on the original criteria exceeded the threshold for probable pPD based on the updated criteria, and five possible new pPD cases were detected, with only one shift in the opposite direction. The updated MDS pPD research criteria tend to identify more patients as positive, yet their accuracy needs to be determined in prospective studies.

Narcolepsy in Slovakia - Epidemiology, clinical and polysomnographic features, comorbid diagnoses: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: An increase in the incidence of narcolepsy after the pandemic influenza with the H1N1 vaccination in 2009 resulted in an interest in narcolepsy epidemiology. The aim of the study was to examine the incidence and prevalence rates of narcolepsy and to describe the associated characteristics in Slovakia. METHODS: Epidemiology data were calculated for each year from 2000 to 2017 based on records found in specialized centres. In sum, 61 narcoleptic patients were diagnosed, of which 51 (84%) had narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). Clinical data and results of polysomnography (PSG), Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-typing, hypocretin (HCRT)-1 levels and body mass index (BMI) were summarised and evaluated for NT1 and narcolepsy type2 (NT2). Later, 244 sex and age matched controls were chosen to evaluate the comorbid diagnoses. RESULTS: The prevalence of narcolepsy in 2017 in Slovakia was 10.47 (CI 95% 8.26-14) cases/million inhabitants, and the mean incidence rate (2000-2017) was 0.57 (CI 95% 0.4-0.74) cases/million inhabitants. Narcoleptic patients were comorbid with arterial hypertension (17%), ischemic heart disease (8%), dyslipidaemia (18%), diabetes mellitus type 2 (10%), cardiac arrhythmia/atrial fibrillation (5%), autoimmune disorders (20%), allergy (11%), malignancy (3%), headache (15%) and mental disorders (20%). Patients with narcolepsy showed double the excess prevalence in mental disorders (OR 2.15, p < 0.05), and dyslipidaemia (OR 2.22, p < 0.05). The presence of autoimmune disorders and allergy showed a mild increase in the narcolepsy group (OR 1.46, resp. 1.63). Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) was the most frequent autoimmune disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Narcolepsy is a rare disorder in Slovakia. From the phenotype, genetic characteristics and comorbidities the disorder does not vary from other European countries.