Deep pericardial traction suture versus vacuum-assisted apical suction to expose the posterior wall of the heart in off-pump coronary artery bypass: a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Displacement of the heart to expose the posterior vessels during off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may cause hemodynamic instability. Deep pericardial traction suture (DPTS) and vacuum-assisted apical suction (VAS) with the Starfish positioning device help to provide good exposure without relevant hemodynamic changes. Our aim was to compare these two methods in patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 20 patients undergoing multivessel OPCAB to the use of VAS or DPTS. The Octopus device was used in both groups to stabilize the target vessel. Hemodynamic parameters, including venous oxygen content (SvO(2)), cardiac index (CI), central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), were measured before grafting (baseline), after heart positioning, and during performance of peripheral anastomoses. RESULTS: Perioperative data for the two groups were similar. During exposure of the lateral wall, there were fewer hemodynamic changes in the DPTS group (increase in CVP) than in the VAS group (increases in CVP, PAP, and PCWP); the CVP was significantly higher in the DPTS group (P < .05). During exposure of the posterior wall, significant hemodynamic changes occurred only in the DPTS group (increase in PCWP). Values for all other parameters were similar, including anastomosis time, graft flow, postoperative myocardial enzymes, and inotropic support. CONCLUSIONS: Heart positioning during OPCAB with either VAS or DPTS is a safe and effective maneuver for exposure of coronary arteries. In our study, the use of the VAS device produced less hemodynamic impairment during exposure of the lateral and posterior walls.

Novel treatment with rituximab of oropharyngeal posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after heart transplantation.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders are severe complications that arise after solid organ transplantation, which are often related to Epstein- Barr virus. Reports are anecdotal, and a standardized therapy does not exist. We report a case of a 36-year-old man who developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder of the oropharynx 1 year after receiving a heart transplant. A short review of the literature is presented, after which a new therapeutic approach that combines antiviral therapy, monoclonal antibodies, and a sirolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression regimen with reduced target trough levels of tacrolimus is introduced. The patient achieved complete remission and was free from recurrence 18 months after the therapy was initiated.

Heterotopic rat heart transplantation: severe loss of glutathione in 8-hour ischemic hearts.

BACKGROUND: Tissue damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed during ischemia/reperfusion seems to be an important risk factor in the failure of transplanted hearts. Although endogenous anti-oxidants protect the myocardium against free radical attack under physiologic conditions, their capacity may become limited during severe oxidative stress. Thus, we investigated the effect of 8-hour cold ischemia on the myocardial anti-oxidative defense system in a heterotopic rat heart transplantation model. METHODS: Lewis rat hearts were subjected to 30 or 480 minutes of 4 degrees C cold ischemia in Bretschneider cardioplegic solution with or without transplantation and reperfusion (30 or 240 minutes) into F344 recipients. Activity levels of superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase (GST), and concentrations of glutathione (GSH), glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and lipid hydroperoxides (LOOH) were analyzed in heart homogenates. For histology, cross-sections of the ventricles were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. RESULTS: Except for GST, enzyme activities and GSSG concentration increased and the glutathione redox ratio (GSH/GSH + 2GSSG) significantly decreased in 480-minute ischemic hearts compared with those with 30-minute ischemia. Reperfusion dramatically decreased both GSH and GSSG and increased LOOH formation but without severe histopathologic findings in the transplants. Applying a tree-structured classifier technique, GSH and LOOH were identified as significant features indicative of transplantation-induced oxidative stress. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study severe loss of glutathione and formation of LOOH indicated transplantation-induced oxidative stress in the rat heart; therefore, alterations of these parameters may hint at relevant deficits in the myocardial anti-oxidative defense and may also predict subsequent tissue damage.