Relationships between study habits, burnout, and general surgery resident performance on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination.

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is used by programs to evaluate the knowledge and readiness of trainees to sit for the general surgery qualifying examination. It is often used as a tool for resident promotion and may be used by fellowship programs to evaluate candidates. Burnout has been associated with job performance and satisfaction; however, its presence and effects on surgical trainees' performance are not well studied. We sought to understand factors including burnout and study habits that may contribute to performance on the ABSITE examination. METHODS: Anonymous electronic surveys were distributed to all residents at 10 surgical residency programs (n = 326). Questions included demographics as well as study habits, career interests, residency characteristics, and burnout scores using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, which assesses burnout because of both exhaustion and disengagement. These surveys were then linked to the individual's 2016 ABSITE and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 and 2 scores provided by the programs to determine factors associated with successful ABSITE performance. RESULTS: In total, 48% (n = 157) of the residents completed the survey. Of those completing the survey, 48 (31%) scored in the highest ABSITE quartile (≥75th percentile) and 109 (69%) scored less than the 75th percentile. In univariate analyses, those in the highest ABSITE quartile had significantly higher USMLE step 1 and step 2 scores (P < 0.001), significantly lower burnout scores (disengagement, P < 0.01; exhaustion, P < 0.04), and held opinions that the ABSITE was important for improving their surgical knowledge (P < 0.01). They also read more frequently to prepare for the ABSITE (P < 0.001), had more disciplined study habits (P < 0.001), were more likely to study at the hospital or other public settings (e.g., library, coffee shop compared with at home; P < 0.04), and used active rather than passive study strategies (P < 0.04). Gender, marital status, having children, and debt burden had no correlation with examination success. Backward stepwise multiple regression analysis identified the following independent predictors of ABSITE scores: study location (P < 0.0001), frequency of reading (P = 0.0001), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory exhaustion (P = 0.02), and USMLE step 1 and 2 scores (P = 0.007 and 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Residents who perform higher on the ABSITE have a regular study schedule throughout the year, report less burnout because of exhaustion, study away from home, and have shown success in prior standardized tests. Further study is needed to determine the effects of burnout on clinical duties, career advancement, and satisfaction.

Mobile spaced education for surgery rotation improves National Board of Medical Examiners scores.

BACKGROUND: Use of mobile devices for medical education is increasing. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of a spaced education-based app study program in a third year medical school surgery rotation and examine its effects on National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) examination performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case-based questions were created and distributed to students on a voluntary basis via a mobile app. Questions were repeated in a spaced based manner until mastered. Students completed surveys regarding study habits and app use. NBME examination scores and prior academic measures were obtained. Users of the app were compared to non-users of the app and the previous years' class. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two students were offered the app; 121 (80%) used it. App users had a final NBME score of 77.5% compared with 68.8% (P < 0.01) in non-users, although their prior academic achievement was better. Categorizing them by their academic achievement and intensity of app use demonstrated significantly higher scores in regular users of the app as compared with casual and non-users in mid (78 versus 75 versus 71.2%, P < 0.01) and low-achieving students (71.4 versus 70 versus 64.6, P < 0.01), but not high-achieving students (85.3 versus 81.1 versus 79.7, P = 0.09). Stepwise linear regression modeling revealed intensity of app use accounted for 6% of the variance in NBME scores. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the app-based program was an effective tool associated with higher scores on standardized tests in lower level achieving students.

Money matters: a resident curriculum for financial management.

BACKGROUND: A 2005 survey reported 87% of surgery program directors believed practice management training should occur during residency. However, only 8% of program directors believed residents received adequate training in practice management [1]. In addition to the gap in practice financial management knowledge, we recognized the need for training in personal finance among residents. A literature review and needs assessment led to the development of a novel curriculum for surgery residents combining principles of practice management and personal finance. METHODS: An 18-h curriculum was administered over the 2012 academic year to 28 post graduate year 1-5 surgery residents and faculty. A self-assessment survey was given at the onset and conclusion of the curriculum [2]. Pre-tests and post-tests were given to objectively evaluate each twice monthly session's content. Self-perception of learning, interest, and acquired knowledge were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS: Initial self-assessment data revealed high interest in practice management and personal finance principles but a deficiency in knowledge of and exposure to these topics. Throughout the curriculum, interest increased. Residents believed their knowledge of these topics increased after completing the curriculum, and objective data revealed various impacts on knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Although surgery residents receive less exposure to these topics than residents in other specialties, their need to know is no less. We developed, implemented, and evaluated a curriculum that bridged this gap in surgery education. After the curriculum, residents reported an increase in interest, knowledge, and responsible behavior relating to personal and practice financial management.

Carcinosarcoma of the colon: a rare cause of colovesical fistula.

Carcinosarcomas are relatively rare tumors composed of both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. The most common sites involved by this tumor are the head and neck, respiratory tract, uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes. Within the gastrointestinal tract this tumor most often occurs in the esophagus, followed by the stomach. Carcinosarcomas are very aggressive tumors associated with a poor prognosis. The first case of carcinosarcoma of the colon was reported in 1986. The case reported here is the only one involving an associated colovesical fistula.

National Landscape of General Surgery Mock Oral Examination Practices: Survey of Residency Program Directors.

INTRODUCTION: Mock oral examinations (MOEs) are used within surgery residency programs to prepare trainees for the American Board of Surgery (ABS) Certifying Exam (CE), but little work exists to guide programs in terms of best practices for implementing a general surgery MOE program. This study, endorsed by the Association for Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) Research Committee, aimed to better understand the national scope of current practices for general surgery MOEs. METHODS: General surgery residency program directors (PDs) were invited via the APDS listserv to complete a 27-item survey about their perceptions of the importance and correlates of MOEs, how their exams are structured, implementation barriers, and recent revisions to their MOE program. RESULTS: Of 98 PDs responding to the survey, 94% (n = 92) responded about the characteristics of their formal MOE programs. The majority required upper level resident participation and held the exams 2 to 3 times annually; far fewer involved lower level residents. Most programs structure their MOEs to mimic the CE format with 3 exam rooms (76%), using premade questions (66%), presenting 4 scenarios per room (59%), and using two examiners per room (85%). Most PDs (88%) believed MOEs were very important or essential for surgery trainees, which correlated with their ratings of how important MOEs are to their Clinical Competency Committee for determining resident advancement (r = 0.32, p < 0.002). Common barriers for implementing MOEs were availability of examiners and scenarios. About half indicated making recent or ongoing revisions to improve their MOEs. Many PDs indicated interest in collaborating regionally or nationally on MOE initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: MOEs were largely regarded as a highly valuable tool by PDs to prepare trainees for the general surgery CE. The majority of programs in this study provide a testing experience as similar to the CE as possible, although some variability in the structure of MOEs was identified. PDs also reported significant implementation barriers and a desire for more MOE collaboration.

Are Surgical Milestone Assessments Predictive of In-Training Examination Scores?

OBJECTIVES: With the recent utilization of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education developmental milestones as part of resident evaluation, we sought to explore whether milestone-based ratings were associated with American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores. METHODS: Mid-year milestone ratings were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Accreditation Database System for years 2014, 2015, and 2016 for all postgraduate years 1-5 general surgery residents in our program and paired with ABSITE scores (n = 69) from January of the following year. Linear regression was used to assess predictor importance of milestones on both ABSITE percentage correct scores and ABSITE percentile scores. RESULTS: Minimal to small positive correlations were observed between milestones and ABSITE percentile scores (r = 0.09-0.25), while moderately large correlations were observed between milestones and percentage correct scores (r = 0.65-0.76). The Medical Knowledge 1 (MK1) milestone significantly predicted ABSITE percentage correct scores, and explained 60% of the variance (adjusted R2 = 0.603). MK1 also significantly predicted ABSITE percentile scores, although weaker in magnitude, with MK1 explaining 20% of the variance (adjusted R2 = 0.197). Postgraduate year level and other milestones were not influential predictors of ABSITE scores. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-year MK1 milestone rating was predictive of ABSITE scores and may serve as a useful marker for Clinical Competency Committees to identify residents who could benefit from additional support to prepare for the ABSITE, although given the small exploratory nature of this study, additional research is still needed.