Children's Oncology Group KidsCare smartphone application for parents of children with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Parents of children with cancer must learn and retain crucial information necessary to provide safe care for their child. Smartphone applications (apps) provide a significant opportunity to meet the informational needs of these parents. We aimed to develop, refine, and evaluate a smartphone app, informed by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) expert consensus recommendations, to support the informational needs of parents of children with cancer. PROCEDURE: We employed a user-centered iterative mixed-methods approach in two phases (prototype development/refinement and pilot testing). We engaged parents and clinicians in evaluating the app via qualitative interviews and standardized tools that measured app quality (Mobile Application Rating Scale [MARS]), usability (System Usability Scale [SUS]), and acceptability (System Acceptability Scale [SAS]). We evaluated early usage patterns after public release. RESULTS: Thirty-two parents and 17 clinicians participated. Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) scores for app quality, usability, and acceptability were: MARS: 4.5 ± 0.7 on a 5-point scale; SUS: 86.7 ± 23.8 on a 100-point scale; and SAS: superior (61%); similar (28%); inferior (11%) to written materials. Qualitative findings largely confirmed the quantitative data. Downloads of the app during the first year following public release have exceeded 5000. CONCLUSIONS: The COG KidsCare app prototype was found to be of high quality and received high usability and acceptability ratings. Further testing is needed to determine app effectiveness in improving parental knowledge regarding care of children with cancer.

A Structured Discharge Education Intervention for Parents of Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Oncology Patients.

Background: Parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer require specialized knowledge and skills in order to safely care for their children at home. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) developed expert consensus recommendations to guide new diagnosis education; however, these recommendations have not been empirically tested. Methods: We used a sequential two-cohort study design to test a nurse-led Structured Discharge Teaching Intervention (SDTI) that operationalizes the COG expert recommendations in the setting of a tertiary children's hospital. Outcomes included parent Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS); Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale (QDTS); Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty (PDCD); Nurse Satisfaction; and post-discharge unplanned healthcare utilization. Results: The process for discharge education changed significantly before and after implementation of the SDTI, with significantly fewer instances of one-day discharge teaching, and higher involvement of staff nurses in teaching. Overall, parental RHDS, QDTS, and PDCD scores were similar in the unintervened and intervened cohorts. Almost 60% of patients had unplanned healthcare encounters during the first 30 days following their initial hospital discharge. Overall nurse satisfaction with the quality and process of discharge education significantly increased post-intervention. Discussion: Although the structure for and process of delivering discharge education changed significantly with implementation of the SDTI, parent RHDS and QDTS scores remained uniformly high and PDCD scores and non-preventable unplanned healthcare utilization remained similar, while nurse satisfaction with the quality and process of discharge education significantly improved, suggesting that further testing of the SDTI across diverse pediatric oncology settings is warranted.

Reduction of Central-line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Unit through Simulation Education.

Introduction: Critically ill neonates and those with complex medical conditions frequently require the use of central venous lines. Unfortunately, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) result in significant morbidity and mortality, and the cost and increased length of stay burden the healthcare system. Previous studies have demonstrated that standardized care bundles can decrease CLABSI rates, but achieving sustained improvement has proven difficult. Methods: All patients admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit between 2014 and 2020 who had a CVL were included in this study. First, we recorded all CLABSI events and total CVL days according to defined criteria. Then, in late 2016, we instituted simulation-based nursing training for CVL care. Results: Job Instruction Sheets were initially introduced to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit nursing staff simultaneously with one-on-one teaching sessions between instructors and bedside nurses. Intermittent performance audits and re-education for identified deficiencies did not improve the CLABSI rate per 1000 line days. After instituting simulation-based CVL training in 2016, there was a decreased rate of CLABSI events per 1000 line days sustained over time (x = 0.692). Conclusions: Standardized care bundles and Hospital-acquired Condition interactor audits were insufficient to reduce the CLABSI rate. However, combining care bundles and education with simulation-based training significantly decreased CLABSI rates. One-on-one intensive training and continued ongoing monitoring were critical to producing a sustained reduction. This experience demonstrates that supervised, interactive education combined with simulation can significantly impact patient outcomes.