RESUMO
Debate regarding vaccinating high-risk infants with penta- and hexavalent vaccines persists, despite their good immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile in healthy full-term infants. We report the findings of a systematic literature search that aimed to present data on the immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, safety, impact, compliance and completion of penta- and hexavalent vaccination in high-risk infants, including premature newborns. Data from the 14 studies included in the review showed that the immunogenicity and the safety profile of penta- and hexavalent vaccines in preterm infants was generally similar to those seen in full-term infants, with the exception of an increase in cardiorespiratory adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia and desaturation following vaccination in preterm infants. Despite recommendations of vaccinating preterm infants according to their actual age, and the relatively high completion rate of the primary immunization schedule, vaccination was often delayed, increasing the vulnerability of this high-risk population to vaccine-preventable diseases.
Combined vaccines such as penta- and hexavalent vaccines against multiple childhood diseases are widely used in healthy babies born at term. However, it is still debated whether these vaccines act the same way in babies considered to be high-risk: babies born prematurely at <34 weeks of pregnancy, those with a birthweight of <1500 g or babies with chronic diseases. We did a systematic literature search to find studies on such high-risk babies vaccinated with penta- or hexavalent vaccines; we focused on their antibody levels following vaccination, side effects, and protection from the diseases against which they were vaccinated. We also analyzed whether they were vaccinated on time and with all the doses recommended for healthy full-term babies. We found 14 studies that included premature babies. The results of these studies suggest that premature babies' immune systems respond to penta- and hexavalent vaccines in largely the same way as those of full-term babies; side effects of penta- and hexavalent vaccines are also mostly similar to those seen in full-term babies. However, side effects like pauses in breathing, slow heart rate or low blood oxygen levels seem to be more common in preterm babies; for safety, these babies should be monitored closely after vaccination. Preterm babies are often vaccinated with a delay compared to the recommended schedule. No studies reported data on protection from the diseases covered by penta- and hexavalent vaccinations in preterm babies. More research is needed on penta- and hexavalent vaccination of other high-risk babies besides those born prematurely.
Assuntos
Doenças do Recém-Nascido , Rubiaceae , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Vacinas Combinadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Esquemas de ImunizaçãoRESUMO
The hexavalent vaccines DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib and DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib are routinely used for primary immunization of infants against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B virus, poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b. A recent publication showed that after primary immunization with these vaccines, the odds ratios of adverse reactions (ARs) were significantly lower for DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib than for DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib. Our aim is to understand the impact of the various reactogenicity profiles at country level by comparing the ARs induced by one dose of DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib versus DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib in the primary infant immunization course. A mathematical projection tool was developed to simulate vaccination of infants with both vaccines in six countries: Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Jordan, Spain, and the Netherlands. Proportions of three local and five systemic ARs of interest for both vaccines were based on findings from a previous meta-analysis of ARs in infants. The absolute risk reductions calculated ranged from 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8%-3.2%) for "Swelling at the injection site, any grade" to 10.0% (95% CI: 9.5%-10.5%) for "Fever, any grade." The difference in occurrence of the AR "Fever, any grade" between vaccines in 2020 ranged from over 7,000 in Austria to over 62,000 in France. Over 5 years, this would amount to a reduction of over 150,000 ARs in Austria and over 1.4 million ARs in France when using DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib instead of DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib. In conclusion, the estimated numbers of ARs following hexavalent vaccination in six countries showed that vaccination of infants with DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib could lead to fewer ARs than vaccination with DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib.
Vaccination of infants against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b is often performed with combined vaccines against these six diseases. In many countries, these are the first vaccinations received by infants, and potential adverse reactions could affect compliance with future vaccinations. A previous study examined two of the combined vaccines, DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib and DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib, and showed that local adverse reactions at the injection site (pain, redness, and swelling) and general adverse reactions (fever, drowsiness, irritability, persistent crying, and lack of appetite) were less common after vaccination with DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib than with DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib.To understand the impact of this finding at a population level, we compared the adverse reactions caused by the hypothetical administration of the two vaccines under similar conditions. We simulated the vaccination of infants with both vaccines in six countries: Austria, the Czech Republic, France, Jordan, Spain, and the Netherlands.The simulation showed that the DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine could reduce cases of swelling at the injection site by 3% and fever by 10%. For the year 2020, the resulting reduction in the estimated number of fever occurrences would have ranged from over 7,000 in Austria to over 62,000 in France. In total, adverse reactions avoided could hypothetically have ranged from 30,781 in Austria to 269,025 in France. Over 5 years, this could have avoided an estimated number of adverse reactions of over 150,000 in Austria to over 1.4 million in France. In conclusion, such a switch of vaccine could substantially reduce adverse reactions.
Assuntos
Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Humanos , Lactente , Vírus da Hepatite B , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado , Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Vacinas Combinadas , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Esquemas de ImunizaçãoRESUMO
In India, the high neonatal and infant mortality rate is due in part to an increasing number of preterm and low birth weight (LBW) infants. Given the immaturity of immune system, these infants are at an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality from vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). In this narrative review, we screened the scientific literature for data on the risk of VPDs, vaccination delay and factors related to it in Indian preterm and LBW infants. Although routine childhood vaccinations are recommended regardless of gestational age or birth weight, vaccination is often delayed. It exposes these infants to a higher risk of infections, their associated complications, and death. After-birth complications, lack of awareness of recommendations, vaccine efficacy and effectiveness and concerns related to safety are some of the common barriers to vaccination. Awareness campaigns might help substantiate the need for (and value of) vaccination in preterm and LBW infants.
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYWhat is the context?In India, the high neonatal mortality rate is due in part to an increasing number of pretern and low birth weight intants.Affected infants have a poorly developed inmune system and are more susceptible to contracting vaccine-preventable diseases.The Indian Academy of Pediatrics recommends vaccination according to the same schedule used for full term infants, following chronological (not gestational) age.Delays in vaccinations increase the risk of preventable infections.What is new?Our review of the scientific literature shows that, in India:infections have more serious conseuences in preterm and low birth weight infantsdelays to vaccinate affected infants are common, mostly due to safety and effectiveness concerns from parents and healthcare pracitionrs.What is the impact?Improving mternal nutritional status and immunization, and perinatal care could help reduce the number of preterm and low birth weight infants.Combining maternal immunization with vaccination of affected infants can confer safe and effective protection.Awareness campaigns for parents and healthcare practitioners could address the issue of vaccination delay in pretern and low birth weight infants in India.
Assuntos
Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Humanos , Imunização , Índia/epidemiologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Vacinação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) combination vaccines are a cornerstone of infant vaccinations worldwide. DTP vaccine acceptance could be impacted by sub-optimal relationships between parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs). This survey, conducted in France and India between 14/2/2020 and 26/3/2020, aimed to understand perspectives and expectations of parents and HCPs toward DTP vaccination. Participants were parents (parents/guardians of ≤3-year-old children; France: n = 1002, India: n = 1021) and HCPs (general practitioners/pediatricians initiating DTP vaccination; France: n = 300; India: n = 300) who chose to take part. A representative sample of parents was achieved via quotas and random iterative weighting to match key demographics of the target population. In India, only parents from socio-economic classes A/B/C and private HCPs were included. Whilst DTP vaccine acceptance was high among parents in France (85%) and India (98%), French HCPs overestimated parental acceptance (99% thought parents were very/fairly accepting). The proportions of parents reporting that the HCP is someone they trust versus the proportions of HCPs wanting to be seen as trusted were discrepant in France (76% versus 90%) but not India (83% versus 85%). Some surveyed parents indicated that, ideally, they would like some input in vaccine brand decisions alongside HCPs, an opinion shared by some HCPs. In France, short-term experience post-vaccination was more important to parents than HCPs, for whom long-term protection was more important. In India, these aspects were equally important to both. Increased awareness of parents' priorities and concerns regarding DTP vaccination can support HCPs in their discussions with parents and help build trust, which may impact vaccine acceptance.
Assuntos
Difteria , Tétano , Coqueluche , Pré-Escolar , Atenção à Saúde , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Humanos , Lactente , Motivação , Pais , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Coqueluche/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Three hexavalent vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) are licensed in Europe: Infanrix hexa (DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib), Hexyon (DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib) and Vaxelis (DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in various electronic databases to identify published peer-reviewed head-to-head studies comparing any licensed hexavalent vaccine to another. RESULTS: Predefined inclusion criteria were met by 12 articles. Individual studies concluded that the 3 hexavalent vaccines have acceptable safety profiles although some significant differences were observed in their reactogenicity profiles. The immunogenicity of DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib and DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib was non-inferior versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib. Some differences in immune responses to common antigens were observed, but their clinical relevance was not established. Anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) from pertussis and anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) from Hib antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV and anti-pertussis toxin (PT) from pertussis antibody concentrations lower in DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccinees. Anti-PT and post-primary anti-PRP antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV, anti-FHA, anti-pertactin from pertussis and post-booster anti-PRP antibody concentrations lower in DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib recipients. Slightly lower immune responses towards most vaccine antigens were observed with 2 + 1 versus 3 + 1 schedules post-primary vaccination, suggesting that 2 + 1 schedules should only be considered in countries with very high vaccination coverage. CONCLUSION: Although the licensed hexavalent vaccines are generally considered similar, analyses of immunogenicity data from head-to-head trials highlighted differences that could be related to differences in composition and formulation. In addition, the demonstrated non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the more recent vaccines versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib does not allow a full bridging to similar efficacy, effectiveness and safety. The availability of DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib over > 20 years allowed to collect a wealth of data on its long-term immunogenicity, safety and effectiveness in clinical and post-marketing studies, and makes it a key pillar of pediatric immunization.
Assuntos
Difteria , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Hepatite B , Tétano , Criança , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Vacinas CombinadasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data concerning the prevalence of major depression in PD patients in Belgium is very scarce. METHODS: A total of 1086 patients with idiopathic Parkinsons disease were included in the analysis. The neurological evaluation of the patients was made by the Hoehn and Yahr Staging of Parkinsons disease, the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living. The psychiatric evaluation was based on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: Based on the MINI questionnaire, the overall proportion of PD patients presenting a current major depressive episode was 15.6%. Interestingly, 30% of all patients included had a history of mood disorder and 46% received either an anxiolytic, an antidepressant or an atypical neuroleptic or a combination of them. The characterisation of the profile of depressed parkinsonian patients shows very few patient's parameters (demographics or motor symptoms) to be associated with a higher risk for major depression. CONCLUSIONS: The PARKIDEP survey confirms a high prevalence of major depression in PD patients in Belgium. A careful follow up of PD patients with a poor functionality, a history of mood disorder or with a complaint of depression or anxiety during the "off" state would help towards a better treatment of the Parkinson's disease associated depression and should improve the quality of life of PD patients.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Bélgica/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/etiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Neurológico , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia , Prevalência , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
In tick-borne encephalitis (TBE)-endemic regions, long-term vaccination programs are efficient in preventing the disease. A booster dose of a polygeline-free inactivated TBE vaccine (Encepur Adults, GSK), administered approximately 3 years post-primary vaccination according to 1 of 3 licensed vaccination schedules in adults and adolescents, resulted in antibody persistence for 10 years post-boosting. We used different power-law models (PLMs) to predict long-term persistence of anti-TBE virus neutralization test (NT) antibody titers over a period of 20 years post-booster dose, based on individual antibody NT titers measured for 10 years post-booster vaccination. The PLMs were fitted on pooled data for all vaccine schedules. A mean NT titer of 261 (95% prediction interval: 22-3096), considerably above the accepted threshold of protection (NT titers ≥10), was predicted 20 years post-booster vaccination with TBE vaccine. Our modeled data suggest that the intervals of booster doses could be increased without compromising protection against TBE.
Assuntos
Vírus da Encefalite Transmitidos por Carrapatos , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos , Vacinas Virais , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Encefalite Transmitida por Carrapatos/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Substantial heterogeneity has been reported in efficacy against high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) irrespective of HPV type in phase III results for bivalent and quadrivalent human papillomavirus virus (HPV) vaccines (AS04-HPV and qHPV). Real-world data recently confirmed a very high overall impact of AS04-HPV, supporting the validity of the observed heterogeneity. To explore the reasons for heterogeneous efficacy, we assessed vaccine impact on high-grade lesions not caused by vaccine types. RESEARCH METHODS: We extracted case counts of CIN lesions containing (1) at least one vaccine HPV type, (2) at least one vaccine HPV type and a high-risk non-vaccine type (co-infections) and (3) no vaccine types (non-vaccine or no high-risk HPV types). Based on these, Phase III cross-protective efficacies were estimated with exclusion (3) and with inclusion (2 and 3) of co-infections. RESULTS: Cross-protective efficacy of AS04-HPV against CIN3 lesions ranges from 81.3% (95%CI: 34.7;96.5) (excluding co-infections) to 88.5% (95%CI:62.4;97.8) (including co-infections). For qHPV the efficacy ranges from -58.7% (95%CI: -180.5;8.5) (excluding co-infections) to 13.1% (95%CI: -39.0;45.9) (including co-infections). CONCLUSIONS: Heterogenous overall efficacy against CIN3 between AS04-HPV and qHPV is driven by differential efficacy against lesions that do not contain vaccine types, which may be related to the impact of different adjuvants on the immune response.
Assuntos
Papillomaviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Early toxicity screening of new drugs is performed to select candidates for development. Many cell models are used to assess basic cytotoxicity and to show a good correlation with acute toxicity. However, their correlation with chronic in vivo exposure is inadequate. The new hepatoma cell line (HBG BC2) possesses the capacities of being reversibly differentiated in vitro, and of maintaining a relatively higher metabolic rate when in the differentiated phase (3 weeks) as compared to Hep G2 cells. MTT reduction was used to evaluate the toxicity of propranolol, perhexiline, aspirin and paracetamol, after both single and repeated treatments (three times a week for 2 weeks). Under conditions of repeated treatment, cytotoxicity was observed at lower doses when compared with single administration. Moreover, the first non-toxic doses were in the same range as plasma concentrations measured in humans during therapeutic use. Our results suggest that the new human hepatoma HBG BC2 cell line may be of interest for the evaluation of cell toxicity under repeated treatment conditions.