Effect of morbid obesity, gastric banding and gastric bypass on esophageal symptoms, mucosa and function.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are commonly associated diseases. Bariatric surgery has been shown to have various impacts on esophageal function and GERD. Our aim was to evaluate changes in symptoms, endoscopic findings, bolus passage and esophageal function in patients after primary gastric bypass surgery as compared to patients converted from gastric banding to gastric bypass. METHODS: Obese patients scheduled for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (naïve-to-bypass) and patients who previously underwent gastric banding and were considered for conversion from gastric banding to gastric bypass (band-to-bypass) were included. Patients rated esophageal and epigastric symptoms (100 point VAS) and underwent upper endoscopy, impedance-manometry, and modified "timed barium swallow" before/after surgery. RESULTS: Data from 66 naïve-to-bypass patients (51/66, 77 % females, mean age 41.2 ± 11.1 years) and 68 band-to-bypass patients (53/68, 78 % females, mean age 43.8 ± 10.0 years) were available for analysis. Esophageal symptoms, esophagitis, esophageal motility abnormalities and impaired esophageal bolus transit were more common in patients that underwent gastric banding compared to those that underwent gastric bypass. The majority of symptoms, lesions and abnormalities induced by gastric banding were decreased by conversion to gastric bypass. Esophagitis was present in 28/68 (41 %) and 13/47 (28 %) patients in the band-to-bypass group, pre- versus postoperatively, respectively, (p < 0.05). The percentage of swallows with normal bolus transit increased following transformation from gastric band to gastric bypass (57.9 ± 4.1 and 83.6 ± 3.4 %, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: From an esophageal perspective, gastric bypass surgery induces less motility disorders and esophageal symptoms and should be therefore favored over gastric banding in difficult to treat obese patients at risk of repeated bariatric surgery.

A novel distal very long Roux-en Y gastric bypass (DVLRYGB) as a primary bariatric procedure--complication rates, weight loss, and nutritional/metabolic changes in the first 355 patients.

Proximal Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) representing the most frequently performed bariatric procedure yields a weight loss failure rate of around 20 %. In order to reduce failure rates, we established a novel distal RYGB variant characterized by a very long alimentary (Roux) limb and a short common channel. Up to 5 years, follow-up data (complication rates, weight loss, nutritional/metabolic changes) of the first 355 patients (mean ± SD preoperative age, 41.4 ± 10.8 years; BMI, 48.5 ± 11.5 kg/m(2)) who underwent the novel Distal Very Long Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass (DVLRYGB) were analysed. Overall follow-up rate was 98.9 %, mean follow-up time 1.6 ± 1.4 years. Limb lengths were as follows: common channel 76 ± 7 cm, biliopancreatic limb 79 ± 14 cm, and alimentary (Roux) limb 604 ± 99 cm. The operation was performed laparoscopically in 95.2 % of the cases. Thirty-day mortality was zero; major and minor complication rate was 4.5 % and 10.4 %, respectively. Average excess weight loss (EWL) was >74 % 3, 4, and 5 years after the operation and failure rate defined by an EWL < 50 % remained < 6 %. Annually blood measurements revealed a relatively low incidence rate of severe nutritional deficiencies, but mild anaemia and hypoproteinemia were frequently observed. Laparoscopic revision with a proximalization of the lower anastomosis was required in 4 (1.1 %) patients. Data indicate that our DVLRYGB leads to excellent weight loss results. Furthermore, within the setting of a structured multidisciplinary follow-up program, the incidence of severe malnutrition states was relatively low.

C-reactive protein 2 days after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery reliably indicates leaks and moderately predicts morbidity.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is a useful predictor of early post-operative complications, particularly of intestinal leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery. METHODS: The present study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database with 809 patients who underwent LRYGB from 2002 until 2011. For 410 of these patients, at least one CRP measurement within the first seven post-operative days was available. The diagnostic value was determined by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Forty-nine of 410 patients (12.0 %; 95 % confidence intervals [95 % CI], 9.2-15.5 %) developed surgery-related complications. Leaks occurred in 17 patients (4.1 %; 95 % CI, 2.6-6.5 %) at a median of 5 days after surgery. CRP levels 2 days after surgery showed the highest diagnostic value for post-operative complications (AUC, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.60-0.89). Sensitivity was 0.53 (95 % CI, 0.31-0.74) and specificity was 0.91 (95 % CI, 0.79-0.96) on day 2 (cutoff level, 229 mg/l). The sensitivity for intestinal leaks was 1.00 (95 % CI, 0.51-1.00). CONCLUSION: CRP on post-operative day 2 is a valuable predictor of post-operative complications, in particular intestinal leaks. Radiological imaging studies for intestinal leaks could be restricted to patients with CRP values exceeding 229 mg/l.

Is routine cholecystectomy justified in severely obese patients undergoing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure? A comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risks and benefits of concurrent prophylactic cholecystectomy (CPC) during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: From December 2000 to November 2006, CPC during LRYGB was only performed in the presence of gallbladder pathology (n = 140). Beginning in December 2006, CPC was performed during all LRYGB procedures (n = 134). Exclusion criteria were open bypass procedure, previous bariatric surgery other than gastric banding, and previous cholecystectomy (CCE) or necessary concurrent CCE due to gallbladder pathology. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 26 (18.6%; 95% CI, 12.9-25.9%) of 140 patients without CPC subsequently required a CCE, leading to a gallbladder disease-free survival rate at 5 years of 77.4% (95% CI, 67.3-87.6%). Multivariate analysis identified a distal LRYGB and excess weight loss of >75% at 2 years to be significant risk factors for the development of biliary complications while a preoperative BMI > 50 m(2)/kg was protective. In the second series, prophylactic CCE was not associated with prolonged hospitalization or operative time. The postoperative complications were not related to the CPC. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate that a substantial number of patients develop gallbladder complications after LRYGB. Furthermore, CPC can safely be performed during LRYGB. Based on these findings, CPC should be considered a reasonable approach in severely obese patients undergoing LRYGB.