Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.

Bone mineral content (BMC, g) using DEXA (Lunar DPX) was measured on known hydroxyapatite samples in a water bath in the presence of uniform and nonuniform covering of fat-equivalent materials. Selective placement of paraffin over bone had a greater effect than lard in reducing apparent BMC, and polycarbonate plastic had a lesser effect. Measured BMC was 100.1 +/- 1.1% of actual hydroxyapatite weight when (1) fat over bone was about twice the mass of hydroxyapatite, and (2) the surrounding soft tissue was 15-30% fat. There was a linear relationship between observed and expected BMC, area (cm2), and bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) measured on an aluminum phantom using either the Lunar DPX or the Hologic QDR-1000. The measured area with the two densitometers was identical, but BMC differed. For both an anthropomorphic phantom and human subjects, use of a constant-threshold (0.2 g/cm2) edge-detection algorithm excluded less low-density bone from the transverse processes than the standard DPX edge-detection algorithm. Differences in edge detection could influence the results obtained with phantoms and in vivo and make system intercomparison difficult.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition.

Bone mineral density (BMD) and soft-tissue composition of the total body and major subregions were measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Total body scans were made in 12 young adults (6 male, 6 female) on five occasions at both a medium speed (20 min) and a fast speed (10 min). There were no significant differences in mean results or in precision errors between the two speeds. The precision errors (1 SD) for total body BMD, percent fat in soft tissue (% Fat), fat mass, and lean tissue mass were less than 0.01 g/cm2, 1.4%, 1.0 kg, and 0.8 kg, respectively. These results corresponded to a relative error of 0.8% for total body BMD and 1.5% for lean body mass. Regional BMD and soft-tissue values (arms, legs, trunk) were determined with slightly higher precision errors. Skeletal mineral was 5.8 +/- 0.5% of lean tissue mass (r = 0.96, p less than 0.001). DEXA provides precise composition analysis with a low radiation exposure (less than 0.1 microGy).

DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I: Methodology.

Bone mineral content and bone mineral density (BMC in g and BMD in g/cm2) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). DEXA scans in the lateral decubitus position required about 12 minutes for the L2-L4 sequence at 0.75 mA (dose 5 mrem) and 4 minutes at 4.75 mA (7 mrem). The former scans were done with the Lunar DPX densitometer and the latter with the Lunar DPX-L. One test of the algorithms used for measurement is the equality of BMC in both AP and lateral projections. BMC in the lateral projection averaged about 1% lower than in the AP projection in phantoms and for L2 + L3 in 8 subjects, but the difference was not significant. Additional tests were done on the effects of tissue thickness and position from the tabletop. There was little or no influence of tissue thickness from 18 to 30 cm on BMD results, but there was a small influence of thickness below 18 cm (0.01 g/cm2; P = 0.01) and of distance from the tabletop at extremes of positioning (0.02 g/cm2; P = 0.06). The precision in vivo was similar for both 4- and 12-minute scans; the standard deviation of repeat measurements was about 0.02 g/cm2, which was about 2% relative to the mean BMD for a region within the vertebral body. The latter region included half the BMC of the body, or 24% of the entire vertebra. Results of 4-minute scans on the DPX and 12-minute scans on the DPX-L in 9 subjects were highly correlated (r = 0.98; P less than 0.001).