[Personalized psychotherapy of posttraumatic stress disorder : Overview on the selection of treatment methods and techniques using statistical procedures]. / Personalisierte Psychotherapie der posttraumatischen Belastungsstörung : Übersicht zur Auswahl von Behandlungsmethoden und -techniken mittels statistischer Verfahren.

BACKGROUND: A relevant heterogeneity of treatment effects in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is discussed with respect to the debate about the necessity of phase-based treatment and in light of the new diagnosis of complex PTSD and has recently been proven; however, there has been little personalization in the treatment of PTSD. This article presents the current state of research on the personalized selection of specific psychotherapeutic methods for the treatment of PTSD based on patient characteristics using statistical methods. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed (including Medline), Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, PsycINFO and PSYNDEX databases to identify clinical trials and reviews examining personalized treatment for PTSD. RESULTS: A total of 13 relevant publications were identified, of which 5 articles were predictor analyses in samples without control conditions and 7 articles showed analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) with a post hoc comparison of treatment effects in optimally and nonoptimally assigned patients. In addition, one article was a systematic review on the treatment of patients with comorbid borderline personality order and PTSD. DISCUSSION: The available manuscripts indicate the importance and benefits of personalized treatment in PTSD. The relevant predictor variables identified for personalization should be used as a suggestion to investigate them in future prospective studies.

Two Sides of the Same Coin in Female Borderline Personality Disorder: Self-Reported Guilt and Shame and Their Neurofunctional Correlates.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) report to be especially prone to social emotions like shame and guilt. At the same time, these emotions seem to play an important role in BPD pathology. The present study aimed to deepen the knowledge about the processes behind shame and guilt in patients with BPD. METHODS: Twenty patients with BPD and twenty healthy controls (HCs) took part in an experiment that induced shame and guilt by imagining scenarios during scanning using functional brain imaging. Participants also filled out self-report questionnaires and took part in diagnostic interviews. RESULTS: BPD patients reported more proneness to guilt but not to shame than the HCs. There was no difference in the self-reported intensity rating of experimentally induced emotions between the groups. Between-group contrast of neural signals in the shame condition revealed a stronger activation of cingulate and fusiform gyrus for the BPD patients compared to the controls, and a more pronounced activation in the lingual gyrus and cuneus for the HCs. In the guilt condition, activation in the caudate nucleus, the fusiform gyrus, and the posterior cingulate cortex was stronger in BPD patients, while HC showed stronger activations in cuneus, lingual gyrus, and fronto-temporal regions. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the neuro-functional processes between BPD patients and HC were found, even though the two groups did not differ in their self-report of subjective proneness to guilt and emotional intensity of shame and guilt during the experiment. While the HCs may be engaged more by the emotional scenarios themselves, the BPD patients may be more occupied with cognitive regulatory and self-referential processing.