Improving equity of services for sexually transmitted infections through community pharmacies: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists have the potential to improve care for marginalized populations. Stigmatized and racialized groups may not find traditional health services accessible in other settings. Research focused on health care access for these populations is fundamental in understanding how to improve health equity. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aimed to determine how health equity is addressed within services offered through community pharmacies for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). METHODS: This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. A comprehensive search strategy was developed with an academic librarian to capture studies containing search terms related to each of the following 3 topics: STIs, pharmacy, and underserved groups. PubMed and Embase were both searched up to July 2023 and search results were uploaded to the screening software Covidence. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Articles were included if they reported evaluation of a pharmacy-based sexual health service and addressed health equity in service design or implementation. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles were identified that described services implemented for underserved groups. Four populations were identified: injection drug users, men who have sex with men, racial minorities, and those with low socioeconomic status. Equity was addressed through 2 mechanisms: location-based implementation of services in areas of high target population density or through specific targeting of marginalized populations in recruitment and promotion. All studies involved interventions for the prevention or testing services rather than assessment and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Equity is not being readily addressed in pharmacy-based services for STIs yet evidence exists that considering equity in the design and implementation of services may improve reach to underserved populations.

A Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Improve Management of Bacteriuria in Hospitalized Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions improve management of bacteriuria in hospitalized adults. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Clinical Trials Registries via Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception through May 2021. Reference lists of included studies were searched, and Scopus was used to retrieve articles that cited included references. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized and nonrandomized trials, controlled before-after studies, interrupted time-series studies, and repeated measures studies evaluating AMS interventions for hospitalized adult inpatients with bacteriuria were included. Risk of bias was assessed independently by 3 team members and compared. Results were summarized descriptively. DATA SYNTHESIS: The search yielded 5509 articles, of which 13 met inclusion criteria. Most common interventions included education (N = 8) and audit and feedback (N = 5) alone or in combination with other interventions. Where assessed, resource and antimicrobial use primarily decreased and appropriateness of antimicrobial use improved; however, impact on guideline adherence was variable. All studies were rated as having unclear or serious risk of bias. This review summarizes and assesses the quality of evidence for AMS interventions to improve the management of bacteriuria. Results provide guidance to both AMS teams and researchers aiming to develop and/or evaluate AMS interventions for management of bacteriuria. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated benefit of AMS interventions on management of bacteriuria. However, most studies had some risk of bias, and an overall effect across studies is unclear due to heterogeneity in outcome measures.

A Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To improve antimicrobial utilization, development and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in the emergency department (ED) has been recommended. The primary objective of this review was to characterize antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the ED and to identify interventions that improve patient outcomes or process of care and/or reduce consequences of antimicrobial use. METHODS: This study was completed as a systematic review. The following databases were searched from inception through November, 2016: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after studies, interrupted time series studies, and repeated-measures studies evaluating AMS interventions in the ED were included in the review. Studies published in languages other than English were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 43 studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified from our search. Patient or provider education and guideline or clinical pathway implementation were the most commonly reported interventions. Few studies reported on audit and feedback, and no study evaluated preauthorization. Impact of interventions showed variable results. Where identified, benefits of AMS interventions primarily included improvement in delivery of care or a decrease in antimicrobial utilization; however, most studies were rated as having unclear or high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: AMS interventions in the ED may improve patient care. However, the optimal combination of interventions is unclear. Additional studies with more rigorous design evaluating core components of AMS programs, including prospective audit and feedback are needed.

Describing student performance: a comparison among clinical preceptors across cultural contexts.

CONTEXT: Health professional student evaluation during experiential training is notably subjective and assessor judgements may be affected by socio-cultural influences. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to explore how clinical preceptors in pharmacy conceptualise varying levels of student performance and to identify any contextual differences that may exist across different countries. METHODS: The qualitative research design employed semi-structured interviews. A sample of 20 clinical preceptors for post-baccalaureate Doctor of Pharmacy programmes in Canada and the Middle East gave personal accounts of how students they had supervised fell below, met or exceeded their expectations. Discussions were analysed following constructivist grounded theory principles. RESULTS: Seven major themes encompassing how clinical pharmacy preceptors categorise levels of student performance and behaviour were identified: knowledge; team interaction; motivation; skills; patient care; communication, and professionalism. Expectations were outlined using both positive and negative descriptions. Pharmacists typically described supervisory experiences representing a series of these categories, but arrived at concluding judgements in a holistic fashion: if valued traits of motivation and positive attitude were present, overall favourable impressions of a student could be maintained despite observations of a few deficiencies. Some prioritised dimensions could not be mapped to defined existing educational outcomes. There was no difference in thresholds for how student performance was distinguished by participants in the two regions. CONCLUSIONS: The present research findings are congruent with current literature related to the constructs used by clinical supervisors in health professional student workplace-based assessment and provide additional insight into cross-national perspectives in pharmacy. As previously determined in social work and medicine, further study of how evaluation instruments and associated processes can integrate these judgements should be pursued in this discipline.

Through the Lens of Societal Norms and Experiences: Students' Conceptualization of Patient Case Data When Diversity is Apparent.

OBJECTIVE: There are increasing calls to improve the representation of diversity within case-based learning materials, yet it is unclear how students interpret the inclusion of diversity data when synthesizing case information. The objective of this study was to determine factors that influence students' interpretation of written case data for visualization of a patient case. METHODS: This was a qualitative study using interviews. Entry-to-practice pharmacy students from Dalhousie University in Canada were recruited to review 6 cases, each with varying representations of diversity (eg, race, sexual orientation, gender, relationship status, disability, or none). Students were prompted to state how they visualized the case patient and what factors influenced their perceptions. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted to interpret themes. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 18 students. Students relied on 5 factors when interpreting case data in the presence of diversity. In addition to the case data itself, these included personal experience (relating to themselves or personal relationships), professional experience (through work or school), population stereotypes, and perceived societal norms. CONCLUSION: This study found that students rely on their personal and professional experiences, perceptions, and social conditioning when interpreting the presence of diversity within learning materials. Findings support the notion that educators should deliberately and conscientiously expose students to a broad representation of diverse populations to increase students' knowledge and understanding of populations, and to create intentional time and space to challenge existing stereotypes that contribute to the inequities in health care.

A qualitative study evaluating barriers and enablers to improving antimicrobial use for the management of bacteriuria in hospitalized adults.

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore barriers and enablers to improving the management of bacteriuria in hospitalized adults. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Nova Scotia, Canada. Participants: Nurses, physicians, and pharmacists involved in the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of bacteriuria in hospitalized patients. Methods: Focus groups (FGs) were completed between May and July 2019. FG discussions were facilitated using an interview guide that consisted of open-ended questions coded to the theoretical domains framework (TDF) v2. Discussions were transcribed verbatim then independently coded to the TDFv2 by two members of the research team and compared. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Thirty-three healthcare providers from five hospitals participated (15 pharmacists, 11 nurses, and 7 physicians). The use of antibiotics for the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) was the main issue identified. Subthemes that related to management of ASB included: "diagnostic uncertainty," difficulty "ignoring positive urine cultures," "organizational challenges," and "how people learn." Barriers and/or enablers to improving the management of bacteriuria were mapped to 12 theoretical domains within these subthemes. Barriers and enablers identified by participants that were most extensively discussed related to the domains of environmental context and resources, belief about capabilities, social/professional role and identity, and social influences. Conclusions: Healthcare providers highlighted barriers and recognized enablers that may improve delivery of care to patients with bacteriuria. A wide range of barriers at the individual and organization level to address diagnostic challenges and improve workload should be considered to improve management of bacteriuria.

Development of Quality Indicators to Evaluate the Appropriateness of Empiric Antimicrobial Use in Pediatric Patients.

Background: Use of quality indicators is one strategy recommended to assess antimicrobial prescribing for pediatric inpatients. Objective: To achieve consensus from infectious diseases clinicians on quality indicators that characterize appropriate empiric antimicrobial use for the management of infectious syndromes in pediatric inpatients. Methods: This study was completed using the Delphi technique. The research team developed an initial list of quality indicators, informed by a literature search. A multidisciplinary group of health care providers with expertise in infectious diseases was invited to participate. The list was disseminated to this panel of experts using Opinio survey software. The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a 9-point Likert scale in relation to the following criterion: "The importance of each item in determining appropriateness considering benefit or harm at the individual or population level". Consensus was defined as at least 75% agreement and a median score of 7 or higher. Results: Twelve of 31 invited experts completed at least 1 round of the survey, and 10 completed all rounds. Consensus was achieved on 28 of 31 proposed indicators after 3 rounds. Indicators with consensus were categorized under "empiric choice" (n = 12 indicators), "dose" (n = 5), "duration" (n = 2), "administration" (n = 4), "diagnosis" (n = 2), and "documentation" (n = 3). Six of the indicators for which consensus was achieved were rephrased by the experts. Conclusions: Consensus was achieved on quality indicators to assess the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial use in pediatric patients. Clinicians and researchers can use these consensus-based indicators to assess adherence to best practice.

Contexte: L'utilisation d'indicateurs de qualité est l'une des stratégies recommandées pour évaluer la prescription d'antimicrobiens aux patients pédiatriques hospitalisés. Objectif: Parvenir à un consensus, entre les cliniciens des maladies infectieuses, portant sur les indicateurs de qualité qui caractérisent l'utilisation empirique appropriée des antimicrobiens pour la prise en charge des syndromes infectieux chez les patients pédiatriques hospitalisés. Méthodes: Cette étude a été réalisée à l'aide de la technique Delphi. L'équipe de recherche a dressé une liste initiale d'indicateurs de qualité éclairée par une recherche documentaire. Un groupe multidisciplinaire de prestataires de soins de santé ayant une expertise dans le domaine des maladies infectieuses a été invité à participer. La liste a été diffusée à ce panel d'experts à l'aide du logiciel d'enquête Opinio. Les experts ont été invités à noter les indicateurs sur une échelle de Likert de 9 points par rapport au critère suivant : « L'importance de chaque élément pour déterminer la pertinence compte tenu du bienfait ou du dommage à l'échelle individuelle ou de la population ¼. Le consensus était défini comme « Un accord d'au moins 75 % et un score médian d'au moins 7 ¼. Résultats: Douze des 31 experts invités ont terminé au moins 1 cycle de l'enquête et 10 les ont tous terminés. Un consensus a été atteint pour 28 des 31 indicateurs proposés après 3 cycles. Les indicateurs qui ont atteint le consensus ont été classés en « choix empirique ¼ (n = 12 indicateurs), « dose ¼ (n = 5), « durée ¼ (n = 2), « administration ¼ (n = 4), « diagnostic ¼ (n = 2) et « documentation ¼ (n = 3). Six indicateurs faisant consensus ont été reformulés par les experts. Conclusions: Un consensus a été atteint pour les indicateurs de qualité visant à évaluer l'utilisation empirique appropriée des antimicrobiens chez les patients pédiatriques. Les cliniciens et les chercheurs peuvent utiliser ces indicateurs basés sur le consensus pour évaluer le respect des meilleures pratiques.

Evaluating the impact of incorporating clinical practice guidelines for the management of infectious diseases into an electronic application (e-app).

OBJECTIVES: To improve dissemination and accessibility of guidelines to healthcare providers at our institution, guidance for infectious syndromes was incorporated into an electronic application (e-app). The objective of this study was to compare empiric antimicrobial prescribing before and after implementation of the e-app. DESIGN: This study was a before-and-after trial. SETTING: A tertiary-care, public hospital in Halifax, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: This study included pediatric patients admitted to hospital who were empirically prescribed an antibiotic for an infectious syndrome listed in the e-app. METHODS: Data were collected from medical records. Prescribing was independently assessed considering patient-specific characteristics using a standardized checklist by 2 members of the research team. Assessments of antimicrobial prescribing were compared, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Empiric antimicrobial prescribing before and after implementation of the e-app was compared using interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: In total, 237 patients were included in the preimplementation arm and 243 patients were included in the postimplementation arm. Pneumonia (23.8%), appendicitis (19.2%), and sepsis (15.2%) were the most common indications for antimicrobial use. Empiric antimicrobial use was considered optimal in 195 (81.9%) of 238 patients before implementation compared to 226 (93.0%) 243 patients after implementation. An immediate 15.5% improvement (P = .019) in optimal antimicrobial prescribing was observed following the implementation of the e-app. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric antimicrobial prescribing for pediatric patients with infectious syndromes improved after implementation of an e-app for dissemination of clinical practice guidelines. The use of e-apps may also be an effective strategy to improve antimicrobial use in other patient populations.

Developing Research-Informed Guidance on Preparing Pharmacy Students to Care for Diverse Populations.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop research-informed guidance on how to better prepare students for working with diverse populations through exposure to diversity representation within case-based learning materials. METHODS: This was a qualitative interpretive phenomenological study using audio-recorded semi-structured interviews for data collection. Interviews were conducted virtually with 15 recent program alumni from Dalhousie University and 15 members from underrepresented communities in Nova Scotia, Canada. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and framework analysis was used to code and categorize data. Themes were interpreted from categorized data and a conceptual model was developed based on the results. RESULTS: The conceptual model highlighted that awareness of diversity and health equity paired with practice and application of learning were perceived to be important for preparing graduates for practice. It was found that awareness could be best achieved through exposure to diversity within cases. To effectively expose students, programs must deliberately identify diverse populations to include, seek perspectives and engagement from those populations when writing cases, ensure conscientious representation of diversity without reinforcing stereotypes, and provide resources for discussion and further learning. CONCLUSION: Through the development of a conceptual model, this study provided research-informed guidance representing diversity within case-based learning materials. Findings support the notion that representation of diversity must be deliberate, conscientious, and collaborative with those offering diverse perspectives and lived experiences.

Barriers and Facilitators Related to Delivery of Hospital Pharmacy Services to Women, Children, and Their Families during a Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

Background: When the COVID-19 pandemic was declared in March 2020, health care professionals were challenged to adapt quickly and efficiently to change their work practices. However, an evidence-informed approach has not yet been used to systematically gather data on barriers and facilitators related to delivery of hospital pharmacy services in Canada. Objectives: The primary objective was to identify and describe barriers and facilitators related to the delivery of hospital pharmacy services to women, children, and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary objective was to provide recommendations for improvement in delivery of pharmacy services to enhance patient care during pandemics. Methods: This qualitative study involved semistructured virtual interviews with pharmacists who worked in direct or nondirect patient care throughout the pandemic (since March 2020) at women's and/or children's hospitals in Canada. Individual interviews were completed virtually using conferencing software. An interview guide mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework version 2 (TDFV2) was used to facilitate the interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim by the principal investigator. Transcribed interviews were coded, mapped to the TDFV2, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Interviews were completed with 21 pharmacists in 7 provinces across Canada. Barriers and facilitators coded to the TDFV2 were grouped into 4 main themes: communication and collaboration, adaptability, health and well-being, and preparedness. Conclusions: Participants highlighted a significant number of barriers that they experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic; overall, however, participants reported that they felt prepared for subsequent waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and future pandemics.

Contexte: Lors de la déclaration de la pandémie de COVID-19 en mars 2020, les professionnels de la santé ont été mis au défi de s'adapter rapidement et efficacement à la situation en changeant leurs pratiques professionnelles. Cependant, une approche fondée sur des données probantes pour recueillir systématiquement des données sur les obstacles à la prestation des services de pharmacie hospitalière au Canada et les éléments facilitant celle-ci n'a pas encore été utilisée de manière systématique. Objectifs: L'objectif principal consistait à identifier et à décrire les obstacles à la prestation de services de pharmacie hospitalière aux femmes, aux enfants et à leur famille et les éléments facilitant celle-ci pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. L'objectif secondaire consistait, quant à lui, à fournir des recommandations pour améliorer la prestation de services de pharmacie afin d'améliorer les soins aux patients pendant une pandémie. Méthodes: Cette étude qualitative comprenait des entrevues virtuelles semi-structurées avec des pharmaciens ayant travaillé dans le domaine des soins directs ou non directs aux patients tout au long de la pandémie (depuis mars 2020) dans des hôpitaux pour femmes et/ou enfants au Canada. Les entretiens individuels ont été réalisés virtuellement à l'aide d'un logiciel de conférence. Un guide d'entretien adapté de la 2e version du cadre des domaines théoriques (TDFV2) [Theoretical Domains Framework] a été utilisé pour faciliter les entretiens. Ceux-ci ont été enregistrés sur bande audio et retranscrits textuellement par le chercheur principal. Les entretiens ainsi retranscrits ont été codés, reportés sur le TDFV2 et analysés par thème. Résultats: Des entrevues ont été réalisées auprès de 21 pharmaciens dans 7 provinces du Canada. Les obstacles et les éléments facilitateurs codés selon le TDFV2 ont été regroupés en 4 grands thèmes: communication et collaboration; adaptabilité; santé et bien-être; et état de préparation. Conclusions: Les participants ont mentionné un nombre important d'obstacles qu'ils ont rencontrés pendant la pandémie de COVID-19; dans l'ensemble, cependant, les participants ont déclaré qu'ils se sentaient préparés aux vagues ultérieures de la pandémie de COVID-19 et aux futures pandémies.

Health Care Providers' Perceptions of Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship at Acute Care Hospitals in Nova Scotia.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial use is the major factor in the development of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship has been recommended as a strategy to improve antimicrobial use. OBJECTIVE: To learn about health care providers' perceptions of current antimicrobial use and stewardship, including barriers and facilitators to improving antimicrobial use at acute care hospitals in Nova Scotia. METHODS: This qualitative research study was conducted at acute care hospitals in Nova Scotia using focus groups and semistructured interviews. Health care providers (nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, pharmacy students, and physicians) were invited to participate. Focus groups and interviews were conducted at each participant's place of employment. Interviews and focus groups were facilitated with an interview guide, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were independently coded by 2 investigators and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 9 focus groups and 3 individual interviews were conducted between June and August 2017. Fifty-four health care professionals and trainees (24 pharmacists and pharmacy students, 14 physicians, and 16 nurses and nurse practitioners) from 5 hospitals participated. The following themes were identified: current practices, prescribing influences, access to information, collaboration and communication, resources, and antimicrobial stewardship. Within each theme, barriers and facilitators to improving antimicrobial use were identified as subthemes. CONCLUSION: Participants identified current barriers to appropriate use of antimicrobials and suggested facilitators that might improve the use of these drugs. The results of this study could be used by antimicrobial stewardship teams and decision-makers to improve antimicrobial use and stewardship initiatives throughout Nova Scotia, and may be applicable to hospitals outside the province.

CONTEXTE: L'utilisation des antimicrobiens est le principal facteur de développement de la résistance à cette classe de médicaments. La gestion des antimicrobiens a été recommandée comme stratégie visant à améliorer leur utilisation. OBJECTIF: Découvrir la perception des fournisseurs de soins de santé au sujet de l'utilisation et de la gestion actuelles des antimicrobiens, y compris les obstacles et les moyens destinés à favoriser l'amélioration de leur utilisation dans des hôpitaux de soins actifs en Nouvelle-Écosse. MÉTHODES: Cette recherche qualitative a été menée dans des hôpitaux de soins actifs en Nouvelle-Écosse à l'aide de groupes de discussion et d'entretiens semi-structurés. Les fournisseurs de soins de santé (infirmières, infirmières praticiennes, pharmaciens, étudiants en pharmacie et médecins) ont été invités à y participer. Les groupes de discussion et les entretiens ont été menés sur chaque lieu de travail des participants. Ils ont été facilités grâce à un guide d'entretien. Ils ont aussi été enregistrés (audio) et retranscrits textuellement. Les transcriptions ont été codées de façon indépendante par deux enquêteurs et étudiées à l'aide d'une analyse thématique. RÉSULTATS: Neuf groupes de discussion et trois entretiens individuels ont été menés entre juin et août 2017. Cinquante-quatre professionnels et stagiaires de la santé (24 pharmaciens et étudiants en pharmacie, 14 médecins, 16 infirmières et infirmières praticiennes) provenant de cinq hôpitaux y ont participé. Les thèmes suivants ont été soumis à la discussion : pratiques actuelles, influences en matière de prescription, accès aux informations, collaboration et communication, ressources et gestion des antimicrobiens. Chaque thème comportait deux sous-thèmes abordant les obstacles et les mesures favorisant l'amélioration de l'utilisation des antimicrobiens. CONCLUSION: Les participants ont relevé les obstacles actuels nuisant à une bonne utilisation des antimicrobiens et ont proposé des moyens pour améliorer l'utilisation de ces médicaments. Les résultats de cette étude pourraient être utilisés par les équipes de gestion des antimicrobiens ainsi que par les décideurs qui doivent favoriser l'amélioration de l'utilisation des antimicrobiens et les initiatives relatives à leur gestion partout en Nouvelle-Écosse. Ils sont aussi applicables aux hôpitaux extérieurs à la province.