RESUMO
We describe 36 patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) with transformation (SMZL-T), including 15 from a series of 84 patients with SMZL diagnosed at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (HCB) and 21 diagnosed with SMZL-T in other centres. In the HCB cohort, the cumulative incidence of transformation at 5 years was 15%. Predictors for transformation were cytopenias, hypoalbuminaemia, complex karyotype (CK) and both the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi (ILL) and simplified Haemoglobin, Platelet count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and extrahilar Lymphadenopathy (HPLL)/ABC scores (P < 0·05). The only independent predictor for transformation in multivariate analysis was CK [hazard ratio (HR) 4·025, P = 0·05]. Patients with SMZL-T had a significantly higher risk of death than the remainder (HR 3·89, P < 0·001). Of the 36 patients with SMZL-T, one developed Hodgkin lymphoma and 35 a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 71% with a non-germinal centre phenotype. The main features were B symptoms, lymphadenopathy, and high serum LDH. CK was observed in 12/22 (55%) SMZL-T and fluorescence in situ hybridisation detected abnormalities of MYC proto-oncogene, basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor (MYC), B-cell leukaemia/lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and/or BCL6 in six of 14 (43%). In all, 21 patients received immunochemotherapy, six chemotherapy, one radiotherapy and three splenectomy. The complete response (CR) rate was 61% and the median survival from transformation was 4·92 years. Predictors for a worse survival in multivariate analysis were high-risk International Prognostic Index (HR 5·294, P = 0·016) and lack of CR (HR 2·67, P < 0·001).
Assuntos
Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/diagnóstico , Baço/patologia , Neoplasias Esplênicas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Transformação Celular Neoplásica , Análise Citogenética , Gerenciamento Clínico , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Imunofenotipagem , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Incidência , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/epidemiologia , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/etiologia , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Esplênicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esplênicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esplênicas/metabolismoRESUMO
Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC)-based clonality assessment is a powerful method of diagnosis and follow-up in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and multiple myeloma (MM). However, the relevance of intraclonal heterogeneity in immunophenotypic studies remains poorly understood. The main objective of this work was to characterize the different immunophenotypic subclones in MGUS and MM patients and to investigate their correlation with disease stages. An 8-color MFC protocol with 17 markers was used to identify the subclones within the neoplastic compartment of 56 MGUS subjects, 151 newly diagnosed MM patients, 30 MM subjects in complete remission with detectable minimal residual disease, and 36 relapsed/refractory MM patients. Two or more clusters were observed in > 85% of MGUS subjects, 75% of stage I MM patients, and < 15% in stage III. Likewise, a significant correlation between the dominant subclone size, secondary cytogenetic features, and changes in the expression of CD27, CD44, and CD81 was detected. The loss of intraclonal equilibrium may be an important factor related with kinetics and risk of progression not well considered to date in MFC studies. The MFC strategy used in this work can provide useful biomarkers in MGUS and MM.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Aberrações Cromossômicas , Humanos , Receptores de Hialuronatos/metabolismo , Imunofenotipagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/metabolismo , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paraproteinemias/metabolismo , Paraproteinemias/patologia , Tetraspanina 28/metabolismo , Membro 7 da Superfamília de Receptores de Fatores de Necrose Tumoral/metabolismoRESUMO
We report data from a prospective, observational study (ZAGAL) evaluating miglustat 100mg three times daily orally. in treatment-naïve patients and patients with type 1 Gaucher Disease (GD1) switched from previous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Clinical evolution, changes in organ size, blood counts, disease biomarkers, bone marrow infiltration (S-MRI), bone mineral density by broadband ultrasound densitometry (BMD), safety and tolerability annual reports were analysed. Between May 2004 and April 2016, 63 patients received miglustat therapy; 20 (32%) untreated and 43 (68%) switched. At the time of this report 39 patients (14 [36%] treatment-naïve; 25 [64%] switch) remain on miglustat. With over 12-year follow-up, hematologic counts, liver and spleen volumes remained stable. In total, 80% of patients achieved current GD1 therapeutic goals. Plasma chitotriosidase activity and CCL-18/PARC concentration showed a trend towards a slight increase. Reductions on S-MRI (p=0.042) with an increase in BMD (p<0.01) were registered. Gastrointestinal disturbances were reported in 25/63 (40%), causing miglustat suspension in 11/63 (17.5%) cases. Thirty-eight patients (60%) experienced a fine hand tremor and two a reversible peripheral neuropathy. Overall, miglustat was effective as a long-term therapy in mild to moderate naïve and ERT stabilized patients. No unexpected safety signals were identified during 12-years follow-up.
Assuntos
1-Desoxinojirimicina/análogos & derivados , Doença de Gaucher/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Glicosídeo Hidrolases/uso terapêutico , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/administração & dosagem , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/efeitos adversos , 1-Desoxinojirimicina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Doença de Gaucher/sangue , Doença de Gaucher/patologia , Inibidores de Glicosídeo Hidrolases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Glicosídeo Hidrolases/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Fígado/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Prospectivos , Baço/efeitos dos fármacos , Baço/patologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (MEL200) is the standard conditioning regimen administered to newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Few alternatives have been explored in order to improve the antimyeloma activity of this conditioning. We compare i.v. busulfan (BU) 9.6 mg/kg and MEL 140 mg/m(2) (MEL140) versus MEL200 mg/m(2) as a conditioning regimen before ASCT for newly diagnosed patients with MM. For this purpose, 51 patients receiving i.v. BU plus MEL were compared to 102 patients receiving MEL200 mg/m(2) in a 1:2 matched control analysis. Matching criteria included age, clinical stage at diagnosis, and response to induction therapy. No differences in the overall and complete response (CR) rates were observed after ASCT between both groups. After a median follow-up of 63 and 50 months in control and BU plus MEL groups, progression-free survival (PFS) was 24 and 33 months, respectively (P = .10). Most frequent toxicities included mucositis and febrile neutropenia in both groups. No case of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was observed. Transplant-related mortality was 4% and 2% in BU plus MEL and control groups, respectively. ASCT conditioned with i.v. BU plus MEL may be considered an effective and well-tolerated alternative to a MEL-only approach as a conditioning regimen for patients with MM who are candidates for ASCT.
Assuntos
Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Mieloma Múltiplo , Agonistas Mieloablativos/administração & dosagem , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Bussulfano/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalan/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Agonistas Mieloablativos/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
The genetic mechanisms associated with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) transformation are not well defined. We studied 41 patients with SMZL that eventually underwent large B-cell lymphoma transformation. Tumor material was obtained either only at diagnosis (9 patients), at diagnosis and transformation (18 patients), and only at transformation (14 patients). Samples were categorized in 2 groups: (1) at diagnosis (SMZL, n = 27 samples), and (2) at transformation (SMZL-T, n = 32 samples). Using copy number arrays and a next-generation sequencing custom panel, we identified that the main genomic alterations in SMZL-T involved TNFAIP3, KMT2D, TP53, ARID1A, KLF2, 1q gains, and losses of 9p21.3 (CDKN2A/B) and 7q31-q32. Compared with SMZL, SMZL-T had higher genomic complexity, and higher incidence of TNFAIP3 and TP53 alterations, 9p21.3 (CDKN2A/B) losses, and 6p gains. SMZL and SMZL-T clones arose by divergent evolution from a common altered precursor cell that acquired different genetic alterations in virtually all evaluable cases (92%, 12 of 13 cases). Using whole-genome sequencing of diagnostic and transformation samples in 1 patient, we observed that the SMZL-T sample carried more genomic aberrations than the diagnostic sample, identified a translocation t(14;19)(q32;q13) present in both samples, and detected a focal B2M deletion due to chromothripsis acquired at transformation. Survival analysis showed that KLF2 mutations, complex karyotype, and International Prognostic Index score at transformation were predictive of a shorter survival from transformation (P = .001; P = .042; and P = .007; respectively). In summary, SMZL-T are characterized by higher genomic complexity than SMZL, and characteristic genomic alterations that could represent key players in the transformation event.
Assuntos
Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Neoplasias Esplênicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Esplênicas/genética , Neoplasias Esplênicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esplênicas/patologia , Mutação , Translocação Genética , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/genética , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/genéticaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has evolved rapidly over the recent years. In younger patients, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is still considered the standard of care, but the availability of new effective drugs with novel mechanisms of action in the last decade has resulted in a new scenario that has caused the role of transplantation itself to be currently undergoing scrutiny. RECENT FINDINGS: Maintaining the response of first-line therapy is an important objective in multiple myeloma, where despite intensive therapy followed by ASCT the majority of patients will relapse. In this field, the recent results of different consolidation and maintenance therapies after transplant are very encouraging. These strategies have come to stay and will play an essential role in the next future to improve the prognosis of young patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Finally, new conditioning regimens will also be tested in the forthcoming years in an attempt to further improve posttransplant responses. SUMMARY: Multiple myeloma ASCT must be integrated within a more global therapeutic approach including new and more effective induction, consolidation, and maintenance approaches. Efforts aimed in the development of more effective and less toxic preparative regimens to further augment disease control are also warranted.
Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Quimioterapia de Consolidação , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Salvação , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in patients diagnosed with acute leukemias (AL) is an uncommon complication with poor prognosis. The indication and the schedules of prophylaxis and treatment of CNS involvement in AL are not homogenous among countries and within the same country. The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to analyze and report the practice of CNS prophylaxis and treatment in patients with AL in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study conducted from June 2005 to June 2006. Adult patients (> or = 18 yr.) diagnosed with AL who received CNS prophylaxis or treatment were consecutively included through online registration. RESULTS: 265 patients from 32 hospitals were included. Mean (standard deviation) age was 44 (16) yr. and 133 (50%) were males. For acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients (n = 158), CNS therapy was given to 12 cases (10 at diagnosis and 2 at relapse) and consisted of triple intrathecal therapy (TIT, methotrexate, cytarabine and hydrocortisone) in 11 and liposomal depot cytarabine in one. CNS prophylaxis (n = 146) consisted of TIT in 135 cases, intrathecal methotrexate in 7, intrathecal cytarabine in 2 and intrathecal liposomal depot cytarabine in 2. No cranial irradiation either for prophylaxis or therapy was given in any case. In acute myeloblastic leukemia patients (n = 107), CNS therapy was administered to 17 cases (9 at diagnosis and 8 at relapse). Intrathecal therapy consisted of TIT in 11, intrathecal liposomal depot cytarabine in 5 and intrathecal cytarabine in one. One patient also received craniospinal irradiation. CNS prophylaxis (n = 90) consisted of TIT in 68 cases and intrathecal methotrexate in 22. CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the patterns of CNS prophylaxis and therapy for AL are homogeneous. TIT was the most frequent schedule for CNS prophylaxis and therapy. The lack of use of cranial or craniospinal irradiation and the administration of new drugs (i.e.: liposomal depot cytarabine) for CNS therapy and prophylaxis is of note.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/prevenção & controle , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/administração & dosagem , Injeções Espinhais , Lipossomos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , EspanhaRESUMO
We analyzed the incidence, etiology, risk factors and outcomes of 49 episodes of pneumonia that developed in 326 adult patients undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) from January 1990 to December 2005. The median time for the onset of pneumonia after transplantation was 11 days (range 0-148). Empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with pneumonia consisted of piperacillin-tazobactam (20 cases, 49%), third-generation cephalosporin (11 cases, 27%) and carbapenem (8 cases, 19%). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher risk of pneumonia could be predicted for patients with myeloma (P = 0.006) and for patients with an absolute neutrophil count <0.5 x 10(9)/L >7 days (P = 0.008). Cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality at 6 months was 51% versus 8% for patients with or without pneumonia, respectively (P = 0.001). Pneumonia after ASCT is a severe complication more commonly observed in patients with myeloma and with prolonged duration of neutropenia.
Assuntos
Febre/etiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Pneumonia/etiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/fisiopatologia , Hematopoese , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/mortalidade , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Pneumonia/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
The RUNX1 (alias AML1) gene is involved in several patterns of chromosomal translocations and rearrangements associated with human acute leukemia. Often, multiple signals for AML1 have been observed in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) due to frequent polysomy of chromosome 21 in this leukemia. Additionally, high-level amplification of AML1, in the absence of polysomy of chromosome 21, has been reported in childhood ALL. We report two new cases of childhood ALL, without a ETV6/RUNX1 (alias TEL/AML1) rearrangement, showing high-level amplification of the AML1 gene detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization analysis. The first case was an 11-year-old girl with 7-12 signals for AML1 in nearly 84% of the cells, and the loss of a TEL allele. In the second patient, a 6-year-old girl, multiple copies of the AML1 gene were also observed in 99% of the cells, although no deletion of TEL was found. The similarity in the clinicobiologic features of all the cases with this abnormality points to an emerging molecular cytogenetic subgroup of B-cell precursor ALL and suggests a possible dosage effect of AML1 in the pathogenesis of leukemia.
Assuntos
Subunidade alfa 2 de Fator de Ligação ao Core/genética , Amplificação de Genes , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ FluorescenteRESUMO
A bortezomib-containing regimen followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered the standard of care for front-line therapy in younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). We analyzed the results of ASCT with an intravenous busulfan 9.6 mg/kg and melphalan 140 mg/m2 (ivBUMEL) preparative regimen in 47 patients with newly diagnosed MM who had received bortezomib-based combinations as pre-transplant induction. The overall response rate and complete response after transplant were 100% and 49%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 24.5 months, median overall survival and progression-free survival have not been reached. Mucositis and febrile neutropenia were the most frequent toxicities observed. No case of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was observed and there was no transplant-related mortality. These results suggest that front-line induction therapy with a bortezomib-based combination followed by ASCT with ivBUMEL is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for transplant eligible patients with MM.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Bortezomib/efeitos adversos , Bussulfano/administração & dosagem , Bussulfano/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Neutropenia Febril/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Melfalan/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosite/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We evaluated the toxicity and outcome of a conditioning regimen comprising intravenous (iv) busulfan (BU) and melphalan (MEL) in 55 patients (median age, 61 years; range, 34-71) with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). In 49 patients, this was the first ASCT. At transplant, 3 patients were in complete response (CR), 8 in near CR (nCR) and 30 in partial response (PR). The conditioning regimen comprised ivBU (3.2 mg/kg in a single daily dose, days -5 to -3) and MEL (140 mg/m(2), day -2). Mucositis was the most frequent non-hematopoietic toxicity (47 patients). No patient developed sinusoidal occlusive syndrome. Febrile events were observed in 46 patients and were the cause of death in two (3.6%) transplant-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 15 months, 27 patients achieved CR/nCR (11 CR) and 21 a PR. The one-year actuarial overall and progression-free survival rates are 96% and 87%, respectively. This ivBU-containing regimen is associated with an acceptable toxicity and a high-response rate.
Assuntos
Bussulfano/farmacologia , Melfalan/farmacologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/cirurgia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Movimento Celular , Separação Celular , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/citologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Taxa de Sobrevida , Transplante HomólogoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in patients diagnosed with acute leukemias(AL) is an uncommon complication with poor prognosis. The indication and the schedules of prophylaxisand treatment of CNS involvement in AL are not homogenous among countries and within the same country.The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to analyze and report the practice of CNS prophylaxis andtreatment in patients with AL in Spain.PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study conducted from June 2005 to June 2006. Adult patients ( 18 yr.)diagnosed with AL who received CNS prophylaxis or treatment were consecutively included through online registration.RESULTS: 265 patients from 32 hospitals were included. Mean (standard deviation) age was 44 (16) yr. and133 (50%) were males. For acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients (n = 158), CNS therapy was given to 12cases (10 at diagnosis and 2 at relapse) and consisted of triple intrathecal therapy (TIT, methotrexate, cytarabineand hydrocortisone) in 11 and liposomal depot cytarabine in one. CNS prophylaxis (n = 146) consistedof TIT in 135 cases, intrathecal methotrexate in 7, intrathecal cytarabine in 2 and intrathecal liposomal depotcytarabine in 2. No cranial irradiation either for prophylaxis or therapy was given in any case. In acute myeloblasticleukemia patients (n = 107), CNS therapy was administered to 17 cases (9 at diagnosis and 8 at relapse).Intrathecal therapy consisted of TIT in 11, intrathecal liposomal depot cytarabine in 5 and intrathecalcytarabine in one. One patient also received craniospinal irradiation. CNS prophylaxis (n = 90) consisted ofTIT in 68 cases and intrathecal methotrexate in 22.CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the patterns of CNS prophylaxis and therapy for AL are homogeneous. TIT was the mostfrequent schedule for CNS prophylaxis and therapy. The lack of use of cranial or craniospinal irradiation andthe administration of new drugs (i.e.: liposomal depot cytarabine) for CNS therapy and prophylaxis is of note
FUNDAMENTO Y OBJETIVO: La infiltración del sistema nervioso central (SNC) en pacientes diagnosticados de leucemiaaguda (LA) es una complicación infrecuente que comporta un mal pronóstico. La indicación y las pautasde profilaxis y tratamiento de la infiltración neuromeníngea en la LA no son homogéneas en los diferentes países,y tampoco en los diferentes centros de un mismo país. El objetivo de este estudio longitudinal y prospectivoha sido describir la práctica real de profilaxis y tratamiento de la infiltración neuromeníngea en pacientescon LA en España.PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo llevado a cabo desde junio de 2005 a junio de 2006.Se incluyó, mediante registro electrónico, a los pacientes adultos (edad 18 años) diagnosticados de LA querecibieron profilaxis o tratamiento de la infiltración del SNC.RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a un total de 265 pacientes procedentes de 32 hospitales. La media (desviación estándar)de edad fue de 44 (16) años y 133 (50%) eran varones. Entre los 158 pacientes con leucemia linfoblásticaaguda, 12 (10 en el momento del diagnóstico y 2 en recaída) recibieron tratamiento del SNC por infiltraciónneuromeníngea, que consistió en tratamiento intratecal triple (TIT: metotrexato, citarabina e hidrocortisona)en 11 casos y citarabina liposómica de liberación lenta por vía intratecal en uno. La profilaxis del SNC administradaen los 146 pacientes restantes incluyó TIT en 135 casos, metotrexato intratecal en 7, citarabina intratecalen 2 y citarabina liposómica de liberación lenta por vía intratecal en 2. No se administró radioterapiacraneal ni craneoespinal a ningún paciente. Entre los 107 pacientes con leucemia mieloblástica aguda, 17tenían infiltración del SNC (9 en el momento del diagnóstico y 8 en la recaída). El tratamiento intratecal consistióen TIT en 11 casos, citarabina liposómica de liberación lenta en 5 y citarabina intratecal en uno. Unpaciente recibió además radioterapia craneoespinal. La profilaxis del SNC en los 90 pacientes restantes incluyóTIT en 68 casos y metotrexato intratecal en 22.CONCLUSIONES: En España las pautas de profilaxis y tratamiento de la infiltración neuromeníngea en pacientescon LA son homogéneas. El TIT fue el esquema usado con mayor frecuencia tanto para la profilaxis como parael tratamiento del SNC. Llama la atención la escasa utilización de la radioterapia holocraneal o craneoespinal,así como la administración de nuevos fármacos, como la citarabina liposómica de liberación lenta, en el tratamientoy la profilaxis de la meningosis leucémica