Postpartum hemorrhage: new insights for definition and diagnosis.

The current definition of is inadequate for early recognition of this important cause of maternal death that is responsible for >80,000 deaths worldwide in 2015. A stronger definition of postpartum hemorrhage should include both blood loss and clinical signs of cardiovascular changes after delivery, which would help providers to identify postpartum hemorrhage more promptly and accurately. Along with the amount of blood loss, clinical signs, and specifically the shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) appear to aid in more accurate diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage.

Preoperative effects of mifepristone for dilation and evacuation after 19 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mifepristone as an adjunct to, or replacement for, osmotic dilators for cervical preparation in surgical abortion after 19 weeks of gestation. DESIGN: Site-stratified, double-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two tertiary care teaching hospitals. POPULATION: Women undergoing dilation and evacuation at 19-236/7 weeks of gestation from November 2013 through November 2015. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive (1) mifepristone alone (n = 27), (2) osmotic dilators with mifepristone (n = 27) or (3) osmotic dilators with placebo (n = 21) with all receiving pre-procedure misoprostol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, preoperative cervical dilation and complications. RESULTS: We enrolled 75 participants; mean gestation 21 weeks. Pre-procedure cervical dilation was ≥3 cm in 4, 52, and 57% of participants in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.005). Mifepristone with misoprostol for cervical preparation resulted in longer procedure times compared with osmotic dilators, with median total procedure times of (1) 18.5 (8-52), (2) 12 (7-25), and (3) 13 (6-26) minutes (P ≤ 0.005). Excluding time required for manual dilation, procedure times were similar: median times from dilation complete to evacuation complete were (1) 10.5 (4-23), (2) 8.5 (5-24), and (3) 10 (4-20) minutes (P = 0.10). Complications occurred in seven cases, six with trainees and one with an attending physician (P = 0.03), with difference by study group not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of osmotic dilators has the potential to decrease burden and opportunity cost of cervical preparation. The longer procedure time, related to manual dilation, is offset by decreasing dilator-related preoperative time and discomfort. Provider experience may impact risk when eliminating dilators. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to D&E has potential to reduce barriers to care.

Efficacy, safety, acceptability and affordability of cryotherapy: a review of current literature.

As a result of widespread screening and treatment programs, the incidence of cervical cancer has decreased by as much as 75% in the developed world. Commonly used treatment modalities for precancerous lesions include cone biopsy, the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP), laser ablation and cryotherapy. In recent years LEEP has replaced cryotherapy as a commonly provided outpatient procedure in many places; however increased awareness of the burden of cervical cancer in the developing world and increased awareness of long term consequences of LEEP ­ such as cervical insufficiency ­ have renewed interest in cryotherapy. We reviewed current literature addressing the technique, efficacy, safety and acceptability of cryotherapy, as well as special topics such as cost effectiveness, HIV, and low resource settings. Among studies we reviewed, cure rates ranged from 56.8-96.6% among prospective controlled trials and from 70-95.5% among observational studies. Cryotherapy has very low complication rates and serious complications requiring medical intervention or affecting future reproductive outcomes are extremely rare. Side effects including vaginal discharge and cramping are temporary, generally self-limited, and well tolerated after anticipatory patient counseling. When surveyed, women find cryotherapy highly acceptable. Compared to other treatment modalities, cryotherapy is very affordable and feasible to integrate into cervical cancer screening and treatment programs.

WITHDRAWN: Fighting for access: Research at the National Abortion Federation's 43rd Annual Meeting.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Misoprostol for the termination of pregnancy with a live fetus at 13 to 26 weeks.

A combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is the regimen of choice for termination of pregnancy between 13 to 26 weeks. In many countries, mifepristone is still not available, and misoprostol has to be used alone. Many misoprostol-alone regimens have been reported in the literature with apparently good results. Most of the trials were conducted in pregnancies between 13 and 22 weeks. For this gestational period, we recommend the regimen of 400 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 3 h up to 5 doses, as it appears to be effective without excessive side effects or complications. There is inadequate data to recommend a regimen for the gestational period of 23 to 26 weeks but it is advisable to reduce the dose and frequency of administration of misoprostol. Common side effects of misoprostol-induced termination of pregnancy include gastrointestinal side effects, abdominal cramps, bleeding, fever and chills. Complications may include infection or rarely rupture of uterus.

Training for cervical cancer prevention programs in low-resource settings: focus on visual inspection with acetic acid and cryotherapy.

The modern approach to cervical cancer prevention, characterized by use of cytology and multiple visits for diagnosis and treatment, has frequently proven challenging and unworkable in low-resource settings. Because of this, the Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention (ACCP) has made it a priority to investigate and assess alternative approaches, particularly the use of visual screening methods, such as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine (VILI), for precancer and cancer detection and the use of cryotherapy as a precancer treatment method. As a result of ACCP experience in providing training to nurses and doctors in these techniques, it is now widely agreed that training should be competency based, combining both didactic and hands-on approaches, and should be done in a clinical setting that resembles the service-delivery conditions at the program site. This article reviews ACCP experiences and perceptions about the essentials of training in visual inspection and cryotherapy and presents some lessons learned with regard to training in these techniques in low-resource settings.

Digital camera assessment for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in rural El Salvador.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of digital photography for primary cervical cancer screening in a low-resource setting in El Salvador. METHODS: Three independent examiners performed Pap test, visual inspection, digital camera assessment and colposcopy on each subject. RESULTS: Lesions were detected in 99 of 504 patients (20%) by visual inspection, 72/504 (14%) by DART and 90/504 (18%) by colposcopic impression. Seven of 504 patients (1.3%) had CIN on histology. Pap detected 2 of 7 subjects (29% sensitivity) (C.I. 4%, 56%), visual inspection detected 5 of 7 (71% sensitivity, C.I. 34%, 95%), digital assessment detected 6 of 7 (86% sensitivity C. I. 45%, 99%), and colposcopic impression detected 5 of 7 (71% sensitivity, C.I. 34%, 95%). CONCLUSION: This small pilot trial demonstrates the potential value and feasibility of performing digital camera assessment of the reproductive tract on women in a developing country setting.

Prospective comparison of Dilapan and laminaria for pretreatment of the cervix in second-trimester induction abortion.

Fifty-four women presenting for second-trimester induction abortion received either Dilapan synthetic dilators or laminaria for pretreatment of the cervix before induction abortion using intra-amniotic prostaglandin (PG) F2 alpha. The two groups were similar with respect to age, parity, previous abortion, and gestational age. Neither group experienced any unusual complications. The same protocol for intraamniotic PGF2 alpha (40 mg) was used in all patients except for three with histories of asthma, in whom PGE2 vaginal suppositories (20 mg) were used as the induction agent. For the Dilapan group, an average of three devices was used, compared with an average of six in the laminaria group. The mean (+/- SEM) induction-abortion time for Dilapan patients was 10.9 +/- 1.3 hours, compared with 16.1 +/- 1.4 hours in the laminaria group, a statistically significant difference (P less than .05). When nulliparous women were examined separately, the mean times were 11.0 +/- 1.7 for Dilapan and 16.5 +/- 1.6 for laminaria, a medically relevant and statistically significant difference (P less than .05). Dilapan appears to be an effective alternative to laminaria that results in shorter induction-abortion intervals.

Letter from Africa.

A day in obstetric-gynecologic practice in Kenya involves uterine rupture and other conditions resulting from inadequate care and facilities for labor, as well as infected abortions. Technology and equipment taken for granted in America either don't exist or don't work. Although practice is primitive in many ways, some of the concerns of doctors are the same as in developed countries.

Randomized trial of Dilapan and Laminaria as cervical ripening agents before induction of labor.

A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Dilapan cervical dilators and Laminaria japonicum as cervical ripening agents before induction of labor at term. Patients with Bishop scores of 4 or less and a fetal or maternal indication for induction at 34 or more weeks' gestation were eligible for the study. The outcome variables of interest were Bishop score upon removal of the devices, number of devices used, induction-to-delivery time, and induction-to-complete dilatation time. In the Dilapan group, an average of 4.3 devices per patient was used, compared with 9.7 devices in the laminaria group (P less than .01). Among patients who eventually achieved complete dilatation, the mean (+/- SD) time for the Dilapan group was 10.8 +/- 6.1 hours, compared with 14.7 +/- 9.2 hours with laminaria. For women undergoing induction of labor at term with an unripe cervix, Dilapan appeared to be a preferable alternative to Laminaria japonicum because its use may result in a shorter induction-to-delivery interval with fewer devices required to obtain significant cervical ripening.

Assessment of the cervix after acetic acid wash: inter-rater agreement using photographs.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the inter-rater agreement on the assessment of cervical photographs after acetic acid wash, using visual inspection with acetic acid categories. METHODS: Three raters individually assessed 144 photographs as negative, positive, or suspicious for cancer. The inter-rater agreement was analyzed using the unweighted and weighted kappa coefficient. To explore the reasons for concordancy and discordancy, photographs were compared on histologic evidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and on testing for oncogenic types of human papillomavirus. RESULTS: Overall raw agreement among the three raters was 66.7% (96 of 144) with a kappa of 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.48, 0.66). Pair-wise agreement using unweighted and weighted kappa was moderate to substantial: 0.54-0.60 and 0.56-0.63, respectively. There was concordance on negative in 25.7% (37 of 144) and on positive or suspicious for cancer in 41.0% (59 of 144). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or III was not present on biopsy if photographs were concordant-negative, and the human papillomavirus test was less likely to be positive (relative risk 0.3; 95% confidence interval 0.2, 0.6) in concordant-negatives compared with concordant-positives, including suspicious for cancer. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or III was more common in photographs that were concordant-positive, including suspicious for cancer, compared with discordants (relative risk 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5, 7.6). CONCLUSION: Based on photographs of the cervix taken after acetic acid wash, the level of agreement among raters using visual inspection with acetic acid categories was moderate to substantial, consistent with other commonly used tests.

Training for Norplant implant removal: assessment of learning curves and competency.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the learning curves and rapidity with which clinicians become competent in implant removal using two Norplant removal techniques. METHODS: Twenty-four physicians, none of whom were experienced in the use of Norplant implants, were randomly assigned to learn either the "U" removal technique or the standard technique. The physicians in the two groups received identical training in all other respects. Each physician then performed ten supervised removals. Removal times, procedure problem rates, and the number of procedures performed by the clinicians before they were judged "competent" were assessed for both groups. RESULTS: Data from 240 removals were analyzed. Mean removal times were 38% faster in the "U" group than in the standard group. None of the "U" group procedures took longer than 20 minutes, compared with 11% of removals in the standard group (P < .001). The mean number of cases required before the provider consistently performed all steps adequately was significantly (P < .02) higher in the standard group (5.8 cases) than in the "U" group (3.9 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Using competency-based training methods, the "U" removal technique was learned easily by inexperienced clinicians. It appears to offer significant improvements in speed and achievement of proficiency over the standard technique recommended by the manufacturer. Large-scale programs should consider using competency-based training and the "U" technique as the removal method of choice when providing training in implant removal.

Comparison of adolescent and adult experiences with Norplant levonorgestrel contraceptive implants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare acceptability, tolerance of side effects, and continuation rates among adolescent and adult Norplant accepters. METHODS: An 18-month observational study was conducted of 136 adolescents and 542 adults who received Norplant at the Francis Scott Key Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland. Data were collected from the following: a self-administered history form completed at the preinsertion visit, a self-administered follow-up form completed at routine follow-up visits, problem-visit chart review, and telephone contact for patients noncompliant with follow-up appointments. RESULTS: The adolescents ranged in age from 13-18 years (mean 16.4), and adults ranged in age from 19-46 (mean 24.7). The mean parity among teenagers was 1.4; among adults, 3.2. Thirty-nine percent of teenagers and 64% of adults had had one or more therapeutic abortions. Forty percent of adolescents and 47% of adults reported at least one contraceptive failure in the past. Both adolescent and adult Norplant accepters made few telephone calls or problem visits because of complaints or side effects. Compliance with routine annual follow-up was poor for adolescents (24 of 136, 18%) and adults (72 of 542, 13%). Follow-up of noncompliant patients revealed low rates of implant removal. Fifteen adolescents (11%) and 60 adults (11%) had Norplant removed. The most common reasons for removal included irregular bleeding, weight gain, headaches, and desire for pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Implant acceptability, continuation, and tolerance of side effects were high and comparable among adolescent and adult accepters. Initial implant users were primarily adolescents or adults who had experienced problems with other forms of reversible contraception. Adherence to scheduled follow-up appointments was poor, regardless of age.

Successful use of oral contraceptives.

Typical failure rates for oral contraceptives remain much higher than ideal failure rates. Patients can cite the pill's perceived risks more readily than its benefits, and many women use oral contraceptives inconsistently or discontinue them entirely without a medical reason. Successful use of oral contraceptives mandates that we rethink our roles as providers. Medical barriers, such as mandatory pelvic examinations, impede clients' access to services and require reevaluation. Efforts must also focus on thorough, individualized counseling. Because compliance poses difficulties for many women and noncompliance results in reduced efficacy, counseling must address content points relevant to proper, consistent use. Additionally, as unexpected side effects often cause frustration and method discontinuation, counseling should anticipate their occurrence. Adolescents present additional challenges. However, with careful attention to concerns relevant to teenage women and consideration of obstacles to compliance, oral contraceptives can indeed be used successfully in this group. Regardless of age, all clients should receive information regarding emergency contraception, and instructions for pill use should be individualized to meet the needs of each patient.

Laparoscopic sterilization in the supine position using the Ramathibodi uterine manipulator.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the usefulness of the Ramathibodi uterine manipulator (AMZURA Enterprises, Freeport, NY) in performing laparoscopic sterilization procedures in the supine position under local anesthesia. DESIGN: Descriptive prospective study. SETTING: Ambulatory surgical unit of university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Women presenting for elective sterilization and weighing < 110 kg. INTERVENTION: The Ramathibodi uterine manipulator was used to provide uterine manipulation in 85 cases of laparoscopic sterilization, all performed in the supine position as local anesthesia-sedation sterilization operations. Because such procedures are becoming more common worldwide, we propose the acronym "LASSO" (Local Anesthesia-Sedation Sterilization Operation) for this class of operations. Although commonly used in minilaparotomy procedures, use of this uterine manipulation device in laparoscopic procedures has not been published previously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Successful tubal occlusion. RESULTS: Among the 85 cases reported here there were no failures to manipulate the uterus successfully, to identify the tubes, and to occlude them. CONCLUSIONS: The simplicity of the Ramathibodi uterine manipulator provided several advantages over other means of uterine manipulation, notably [1] constant easy-to-learn maneuvers, [2] no tenaculum or balloon requirement, [3] the procedure could be performed in the supine position, and [4] there are no working parts, screws, or springs that could be lost or broken by operating room staff. Our experience with this device leads us to recommend it to colleagues as an inexpensive, safe, and effective alternative to currently available instruments for providing uterine elevation during laparoscopic sterilization procedures.

PIP: The utility of the Ramathibodi uterine manipulator in performing laparoscopic sterilization procedures in the supine position under local anesthesia was explored in a descriptive prospective study of 85 women who presented to the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (Baltimore, Maryland, US) for elective outpatient sterilization. Although commonly used in minilaparotomy procedures, experience with this device in laparoscopic procedures has not been reported previously. In the Hopkins series, there were no failures to manipulate the uterus, identify the tubes, and occlude them. Among the advantages of this method are constant easy-to-learn maneuvers, lack of tenaculum or balloon requirements, capacity to perform the procedure in the supine position, and an absence of working parts, screws, or springs that could be lost or broken. Local anesthesia-sedation sterilization procedures are likely to become increasingly common in patient-oriented, cost-conscious health care environments. The acronym LASSO (Local Anesthesia-Sedation Sterilization Operation) is proposed for this class of operations.

Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant implant users. Part I. Changes in cervical mucus.

OBJECTIVE: To provide scientific data regarding the changes in cervical mucus within the first hours to days after Norplant implant insertion and to estimate when the cervical mucus is hostile enough to suggest a contraceptive effect. DESIGN: Multicenter, clinical descriptive study. SETTING: Family planning clinics. PATIENT(S): Forty-two women who were between days 8 and 13 of their menstrual cycle and who had requested Norplant implants were admitted to the study. INTERVENTION(S): Cervical mucus and blood samples were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cervical mucus scores, sperm penetration distances, and serum levels of progesterone, estradiol, and levonorgestrel. RESULT(S): The median cervical mucus score observed at baseline was 6 ("fair"), indicating that the mucus was already somewhat hostile before insertion of the Norplant implants. The median scores declined to 5 at 12 and 24 hours and continued to decrease through day 7 to 2 ("poor"), a score that is judged as hostile to sperm penetration. Overall, 73% of all subjects had a poor cervical mucus score by 3 days after insertion; at 7 days after insertion, 90% exhibited poor mucus and none had a good score. There was a substantial drop in the overall median distance traveled by the vanguard sperm after 12 hours for each cervical mucus score grouping. The distance traveled decreased rapidly between 12 and 24 hours to < 0.5 cm in subjects with fair and poor mucus, and by day 3, 91% of the subjects exhibited poor sperm penetration. CONCLUSION(S): On the basis of our findings, deterioration of the quality of the cervical mucus and sperm penetration is evident by 24 hours after insertion, although not to a level that would suggest adequate protection until 72 hours after insertion. Therefore, we are confident in recommending that backup methods of contraception (e.g, condoms) need not be used for more than 3 days after insertion, even when the implants are inserted close to ovulation. These findings provide policy makers, clinic managers, and clinicians with important information about how they can improve client access to Norplant implants.

PIP: To provide clinicians with evidence as to when the cervical mucus is hostile enough in new Norplant implant acceptors to indicate a contraceptive effect, 42 women requesting Norplant from clinical sites in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Baltimore, Maryland (US), in 1994-95 were enrolled in a clinical descriptive study. At baseline, when all women were between days 8 and 13 of their menstrual cycle, the median cervical mucus score was 6 ("fair") out of a possible maximum of 12. This score declined to 5 at 12 and 24 hours and continued to decrease through day 7, when it reached 2--a level judged hostile to sperm penetration. Overall, 73% of women had a "poor" cervical mucus score by day 3 and 90% were in this category by day 7. There were substantial drops in the overall median distance travelled by the vanguard sperm and in the percentage of subjects demonstrating poor sperm penetration after 12 hours for each cervical mucus score grouping. 91% of women had poor sperm penetration by day 3 and 93% by day 7. These findings suggest that backup contraceptive protection for the entire cycle after Norplant insertion--a standard recommendation--is not necessary given the profound effect of levonorgestrel on cervical mucus shortly after insertion, even in the event of possible ovulation.

Ulnar nerve injury associated with removal of Norplant implants.

Improperly placed Norplant implants pose a risk to neurovascular structures at the time of removal. Appropriate attention to insertion and removal should minimize the chance of injury. However, when injuries do occur, a logical and systematic approach to evaluation of the injury can help predict the outcome and establish a plan of care for the patient.

PIP: Due to the placement of the Norplant contraceptive implant system with respect to the neurovascular bundle of the arm, ulnar nerve injury is a possible complication of implant removal. Presented in this article is a case of ulnar nerve injury with subsequent neuropathy related to removal of improperly placed implants. The patient, a 23-year-old US woman, requested Norplant removal after 3.5 years of complication-free use. Before removal, the implants were noted to lie directly over the most anterior aspect of the triceps muscle, with the lower end of the implants lying about 5 cm from the medial condyle of the elbow. The patient returned to the facility 4 days after uneventful Norplant removal with persistent pain, definite weakness of the ulnar innervated muscles of the right hand, and numbness over the hypothenar eminence and fourth and fifth digits. Clinical neurologic evaluation was consistent with an ulnar nerve injury with diminished motor and sensory amplitude. Repeat studies at 6 weeks demonstrated improved motor response. Potential insertion-related injuries can best be prevented by choosing the appropriate placement site on the medial surface of the arm and by exaggerated tenting of the skin to help assure superficial subdermal placement and avoid deep structures. Before removal, identification of the path of the ulnar nerve and the relationship of the implants to the brachial groove is recommended, especially in thinner women. If pain, paresthesia, or anesthesia persists 4-6 weeks after an injury, repeat nerve conduction studies should be ordered to help outline a rehabilitation plan.

Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population.

Norplant, the five-year subdermal contraceptive system, is the first implantable contraceptive method approved for general use in the United States. We describe the preliminary experiences of 246 U.S. women who accepted Norplant between April, 1991 and September, 1991. Norplant was well accepted among this diverse general population. Intensive counselling about side effects, especially menstrual changes, is crucial for patient satisfaction. Although 48% of acceptors experienced menstrual cycle changes and 70% experienced at least one side effect, phone calls and unscheduled visits for problems were infrequent. Adequate counselling about side effects obviates the need for a routine follow-up visit one month after insertion.

PIP: Between April and October 1991 in Baltimore, Maryland, family planning providers tried to follow 246 13-42 year old women at a clinic at the Francis Scott Key (FSK) Medical Center for 3 months who accepted the levonorgestrel-releasing implant Norplant to evaluate its acceptability and effectiveness among a high-risk population. 56% of the women were Black and 41% White. 69% were single. Most were interval gynecologic patients (109), but many were postabortion patients (97). The providers could only follow 108 women. Reasons for unscheduled visits were insertion site tenderness, amenorrhea, and removal. At 1 month, 70 % had at least 1 side effect. 48% had irregular bleeding 1-2 months after insertion. Other side effects included headache (49%), acne (24%), weight gain (22%), increased appetite (19%), and dizziness (18.5%). The 24-hour telephone hotline had only received 38 problem calls, all of which were from FSK Norplant patients. More than 50% of the calls were about menstruation concerns. Reasons for removal included pressure to receive Norplant, increased acne, headaches and prolonged bleeding, and postinsertion site problems. 1 woman became pregnant, but it occurred before insertion. She underwent an abortion and continued to use Norplant. 78% of the women considered Norplant to be excellent and 14% considered it to be good. 95% would recommend it to others. 69% reported convenience to be the best thing about Norplant and 22% said it was pregnancy prevention. Worst things were irregular bleeding (26%) and progestin-related side effects (e.g., headaches and weight gain) (19%). 35% did not consider anything to be bad about Norplant. 64% had at least some apprehension before insertion, the major reasons being fear of needles (48%) and of pain (37%). Prior to insertion, just 37% were worried about potential side effects. The providers thought that the routine follow-up visit at 1 month was not cost-effective and provided no specific clinical benefit. They advocated adequate counseling about side effects to take the place of the follow-up visit.

Contraceptive outcomes among post-partum and post-abortal adolescents.

Between January 1992 and January 1993, there were 280 teens (ages 13-18) who either delivered a baby or terminated a pregnancy at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. Of these, 92 chose to contracept with Norplant implants, and 188 chose another method including "no" method. In July 1993, telephone interviews were conducted with 37 of those who chose Norplant implants and 41 of the non-Norplant implants users. After 1 year, 47% of oral contraceptive (COC) users had discontinued the method compared to only 16% of Norplant implants users (P < 0.03). Reasons for discontinuation centered on side effects for both groups but with some COC and condom users, discontinuing use due to "forgetfulness" or failure (pregnancy). Among the COC group (which was the most common choice after Norplant implant), 25% of the adolescents had experienced a subsequent unplanned pregnancy compared to 0% of the Norplant implant group (P < 0.01). Norplant implants were clearly an acceptable and effective contraceptive for these post-partum and post-abortal teens, who articulated a high motivation to avoid a subsequent unplanned pregnancy. However, it is clearly not the only method teens will choose to use, and more attention must be paid to adequate counseling of those choosing another method.

Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant implant users. II. Effect on the ovarian function in the first cycle of use.

The objective of this study was to time the onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant implant users, when the capsules were inserted beyond the first 7 days of the cycle, based on the immediate effect on the ovarian activity. A total of 42 healthy women requesting Norplant implant contraception were enrolled at clinics in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and in Baltimore, Maryland. Implants were inserted on days 8-13 of the menstrual cycle. Blood samples for estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), luteinizing hormone (LH) (in a subset of 12 women), and levonogestrel (LNG) assay, were taken at 0 h and at 6, 12, 24, 72, and 168 h postinsertion. Ovulation, as defined by P > 2.5 ng/mL, occurred in 40% of subjects. A short lasting, frequently blunted, LH peak occurred within 12 h postinsertion, in all these subjects. The remaining subjects had anovulatory cycles with two distinct E2 profiles: continuously increasing E2 levels to a high mean of 414.3 pg/mL (28%), or no sustained increase in E2 (32%). Most cycles (86%) in which Norplant was inserted with high E2 levels (> 175 pg/mL) were ovulatory, whereas none were ovulatory with low E2 (< 100 pg/mL) at insertion. Based on the endocrine effects of Norplant implant insertion in the midadvanced follicular phase, in which ovulation will either occur within 48 h of insertion or will be impaired, additional contraceptive protection is necessary only for 3 days.