RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on long term outcomes in heart transplant recipients from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive donors are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present a series of nine patients who underwent heart transplants from COVID-19 PCR-positive donors between November 2021 to August 2022 with mean follow-up of 12.12 ± 3 months. All the recipients received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and had at least 6 months follow-up. Eight recipients had acceptable long-term outcomes; one patient died during index admission from primary graft dysfunction. Details regarding donor and recipient characteristics, management and outcomes are provided. Two patients developed deep vein thrombosis, and one patient underwent pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction. Among the surviving eight patients, none developed COVID-19 infection during follow-up period. There was no significant difference in outcome parameters when compared to patients who received hearts from donors who tested negative for COVID-19 during the same time period at our center. CONCLUSION: Keeping in mind the significant waitlist mortality in patients awaiting heart transplantation, COVID-19-positive donors should be considered for heart transplantation to help expand the donor pool and potentially reduce waitlist mortality.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Coração , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Doadores de Tecidos , MorteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We sought to describe and compare outcomes among advanced patients with heart failure (not candidates for orthotopic heart transplant/left ventricular assist device) on long-term milrinone or dobutamine, which are not well-studied in the contemporary era. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included adults with refractory stage D heart failure who were not candidates for orthotopic heart transplant or left ventricular assist device and discharged on palliative dobutamine or milrinone. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. A 6-month predictor of survival analysis was conducted. A total of 248 patients (133 on milrinone, 115 on dobutamine) were included. There were no differences in baseline comorbidities between milrinone and dobutamine cohorts, except for the prevalence of chronic kidney disease, which was higher in the dobutamine group. On discharge, the proportion of patients on beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid antagonists was higher in milrinone group. Overall, the 1-year mortality rate was 70%. The dobutamine cohort had a significantly higher 1-year mortality rate (84% vs 58%, P <0.001). The type of inotrope did not predict survival at 6 months when adjusted for discharge medications and comorbidities. Beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor continued at discharge predicted survival at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year mortality from palliative inotropes remains high. Compared with dobutamine, use of milrinone was associated with improved survival owing to better optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy, primarily beta-blocker therapy.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Milrinona , Adulto , Humanos , Milrinona/uso terapêutico , Dobutamina/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding epidemiology, temporal trends, and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and end-stage renal disease (chronic kidney disease stage V on hemodialysis). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the United States Renal Data System database from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2019. We analyzed trends of CS, percutaneous mechanical support (intraaortic balloon pump, percutaneous ventricular assist device [Impella and Tandemheart], and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) utilization, index mortality, 30-day mortality, and 1-year all-cause mortality in end-stage renal disease patients. RESULTS: A total of 43 825 end-stage renal disease patients were hospitalized with CS (median age, 67.8 years [IQR, 59.4-75.8] and 59.1% men). From 2006 to 2019, the incidence of CS increased from 275 to 578 per 100 000 patients (Ptrend<0.001). The index mortality rate declined from 54.1% in 2006 to 40.8% in 2019 (Ptrend=0.44), and the 1-year all-cause mortality decreased from 63% in 2006 to 61.8% in 2018 (Ptrend=0.73), but neither trend was statistically significant. There was a significantly decreased utilization of intra-aortic balloon pumps from 17 832 to 7992 (Ptrend<0.001), increased utilization of percutaneous ventricular assist device from 137 to 5201 (Ptrend<0.001) and increase in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use from 69 to 904 per 100 000 patients (Ptrend<0.001). After adjusting for covariates, there was no significant difference in index mortality between CS patients requiring percutaneous mechanical support versus those not requiring percutaneous mechanical support (odds ratio, 0.97 [CI, 0.91-1.02]; P=0.22). On multivariable regression analysis, older age, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and time on dialysis were independent predictors of higher index mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CS in end-stage renal disease patients has doubled without significant change in the trend of index mortality despite the use of percutaneous mechanical support.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Falência Renal Crônica , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogênico/epidemiologia , Choque Cardiogênico/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Balão Intra-Aórtico/efeitos adversos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) is the most common form of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, occurring mostly over age of 60 years (mean age of 80 years). Mean survival without treatment is 3.6 years, making early detection imperative. We report an unusual case of a 58-year-old patient with ATTRwt cardiomyopathy requiring heart transplantation. CASE SUMMARY: A 58-year-old male presented with progressive fatigue, shortness of breath, weight gain, leg swelling, orthopnoea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea for several months. Approximately ten months before this clinical presentation, the patient had first received a diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF) of 15% to 20%. The patient was started on appropriate guideline-directed medical therapy with only mild improvement in his EF. Upon further investigation, echocardiogram, technetium pyrophosphate scan (Tc PYP), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) suggested a diagnosis of amyloidosis, and ATTRwt was subsequently confirmed with native heart tissue biopsy, congo red staining, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and genetic testing. The patient was successfully treated with heart transplantation and is doing well post-transplant. CONCLUSION: Wild-type ATTR amyloidosis should be kept on differentials in all patients (even less than 60 years old) with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, especially in the setting of increased ventricular wall thickness and other classic echocardiogram, cMRI, and Tc PYP findings. Early diagnosis and management can be consequential in improving patient outcomes.
RESUMO
Importance: The management of coronary disease epitomizes the call to better engage patients in shared medical decision-making. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the foundation of diagnosis, risk stratification, and subsequent therapy; however, MPI reports are currently interpretable by specialists but not patients. Objective: To design and test a patient-centered report for stress MPI test results. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study of outpatients who underwent an MPI stress test and clinicians used a mixed methods approach. Phase 1 (December 2018 to July 2019) used qualitative methods to design a patient-centered reporting tool, with 5 focus groups with 36 patients and 2 focus groups with 27 clinicians. Phase 2 (June to September 2019) consisted of pilot testing the reporting tool with feedback from a structured survey given to patients who received MPI reports before and after implementing the tool. Main Outcomes and Measures: Key themes around patient experiences with the current MPI reporting and their desire for a more useful report were identified, which led to a sample reporting tool after serial iterations with feedback. Differences in patient knowledge and engagement were assessed between patients before and after implementation of the new reporting tool using χ2 tests. Results: From patient focus groups (26 patients; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [9.6] years, 9 [35%] women), 3 themes on the inadequacies of current MPI reporting were identified: (1) inconsistent delivery of results, (2) use of medical jargon, and (3) unclear posttest course. We identified 5 themes for a more patient-centered MPI report: desire for written information, discussion of the report with medical personnel, presentation of results in simple language with use of visual graphics, comparisons with normal results, and personalized risk estimates. In a pilot survey with 123 patients split into a pre-implementation group (69 patients; mean [SD] age, 68.2 [8.5] years; 27 [51%] women) and a postimplementation group (54 patients; mean [SD] age, 66.4 [8.7] years; 30 [56%] women), the patient-centered report led to more patients reading the entire report (45 [83%] vs 46 [67%]; P = .04) and improved knowledge of future risk of cardiac events (41 [76%] vs 20 [29%]; P < .001). There was also a numerically higher percentage of patients who found the report easy to read (45 [83%] vs 44 [68%]; P = .05) and understand (42 [78%] vs 43 [66%]; P = .16), although these results were not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: This study identified key elements of a patient-centered report design for stress MPI test results, which improved patient engagement and knowledge. These preliminary data support further implementation and study of a more patient-centered MPI report.