Curative Intent Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma - 844 Cases Treated in a General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center.

Background: The objective of this study is to assess the outcome of the patients treated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center. Methods: This retrospective study includes 844 patients diagnosed with HCC and surgically treated with curative intent methods. Curative intent treatment is mainly based on surgery, consisting of liver resection (LR), liver transplantation (LT). Tumor ablation could become the choice of treatment in HCC cases not manageable for surgery (LT or LR). 518 patients underwent LR, 162 patients benefited from LT and in 164 patients radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed. 615 patients (73%) presented liver cirrhosis. Results: Mordidity rates of patient treated for HCC was 30% and mortality was 4,3% for the entire study population. Five year overall survival rate was 39 % with statistically significant differences between transplanted, resected, or ablated patients (p 0.05) with better results in case of LT followed by LR and RFA. Conclusions: In HCC patients without liver cirrhosis, liver resection is the treatment of choice. For early HCC occurred on cirrhosis, LT offers the best outcome in terms of overall and disease free survival. RFA colud be a curative method for HCC patients not amenable for LT of LR.

Analysis of molecular determinants of PRL-3.

In order to analyse whether a C-terminal polybasic sequence represents a nuclear localization signal (NLS) we obtained several truncated and mutant forms of protein of regerating liver (PRL)-3 and evaluated their subcellular localization as compared to the wild-type form. Our results invalidate the hypothesis that this is an NLS. We also analysed the influence of the C- and N-terminal residues on the phosphatase activity of PRL-3. Our results provide in vitro evidence that the C-terminal CAAX motif, besides directing the protein farnesylation, plays an additional regulatory role by inhibiting the catalytic efficiency of PRL-3. Taking into account the results we obtained, as well as reported data, we propose a hypothetical molecular mechanism for the nucleocytoplasmic localization and transfer of PRL-3.

[Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer]. / Tratamentul chirurgical al metastazelor hepatice ale cancerului colo-rectal.

We analyze our experience over a 10-year period in the surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Between 01.01.1995 and 08.31.2005 189 liver resections were performed in 171 patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (16 re-resections - 2 in the same patient and a "two-stage" liver resection in 2 patients). In our series there were 83 patients with synchronous liver metastases (69 simultaneous resections, 12 delayed resections and 2 "two-stage" liver resection were performed) and 88 metachronous liver metastases. Almost all types of liver resections have been performed. The morbidity and mortality rates were 17.4% and 4.7%, respectively. Median survival was 28.5 months and actuarial survival at 1-, 3- and 5-year was 78.7%, 40.4% and 32.7%, respectively. Between January 2002 and August 2005 hyperthermic ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases has been performed in 6 patients; in other 5 patients with multiple bilobar liver metastases liver resection was associated with radiofrequency ablation and one patient underwent only radiofrequency ablation for recurrent liver metastasis. In conclusion, although the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases is multimodal (resection, ablation, chemotherapy and radiation therapy), liver resection is the only potential curative treatment. The quality and volume of remnant liver parenchyma is the only limitation of liver resection. The morbidity, mortality and survival rates after simultaneous liver and colorectal resection are similar with those achieved by delayed resection. Postoperative outcome of patients with major hepatic resection is correlated with the surgical team experience. The long-term survival was increased using the new multimodal treatment schemes.

[Current treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Analysis of a series of 123 cases over a 5-year period]. / Tratamentul multimodal al carcinomului hepatocelular. Analiza unei experiente clinice de 123 de cazuri în 5 ani.

We analyze a 123-cases experience over a 5-year period in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver resection, transplantation and hyperthermic ablation of the tumor were used according to the indication and patient selection. Systemic chemotherapy followed resection in 18 cases and hyperthermic ablation in 5 cases. Chemo-embolisation was performed in patients to be transplanted and in other two patients with tumor destruction. A number of 86 liver resections were performed in 84 patients (2 re- resections in 1 patient, subsequently transplanted) - 43 on normal liver and 41 on cirrhotic liver. Postoperative mortality was 4.7% in non-cirrhotic and 4.9% in cirrhotic patients. Survival in non-cirrhotic patients was 77% at 1 year, 65% at 2 years, and constant - 45% at 3 and 4 years, whereas in cirrhotic patients it was 60%, 56%, 56% and 36% (Kaplan-Meyer actuarial survival rates). Nine patients underwent liver transplantation (4 OLTs, 3 living donor LT, 1 split LT and 1 "domino" LT); postoperative mortality was 11% (1 patient). At present five patients are alive and well. One patient died by peritoneal carcinomatosis at 10 months; another patient died at 6 months by severe cholestatic recurrent C virus hepatitis and one patient was discharged with permanent severe neurologic disturbances. In 31 patients hyperthermic ablation of the tumor was used with zero mortality. Actuarial survival rates were 75% at one year and 67% at 2 years. In conclusion, in non-cirrhotic patients with HCC resection is the treatment of choice. In cirrhotic patients limited resections should be preferred and liver transplantation is the best solution in selected cases; local ablative methods may be used for some unresectable tumors. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has to be determined in future comparative studies.