Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antibiotic Drugs in Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy or Intermittent Hemodialysis: A Critical Review.

PURPOSE: Antibiotics are frequently used in patients receiving intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT). Continuous renal replacement may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the ability to achieve PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could help evaluate drug exposure and guide antibiotic dosage adjustment. The present review describes recent TDM data on antibiotic exposure and PK/PD target attainment (TA) in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT, proposing practical guidelines for performing TDM. METHODS: Studies on antibiotic TDM performed in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT published between 2000 and 2020 were searched and assessed. The authors focused on studies that reported data on PK/PD TA. TDM recommendations were based on clinically relevant PK/PD relationships and previously published guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 2383 reports were retrieved. After excluding nonrelevant publications, 139 articles were selected. Overall, 107 studies reported PK/PD TA for 24 agents. Data were available for various intermittent and continuous RRT techniques. The study design, TDM practice, and definition of PK/PD targets were inconsistent across studies. Drug exposure and TA rates were highly variable. TDM seems to be necessary to control drug exposure in patients receiving intermittent and continuous RRT techniques, especially for antibiotics with narrow therapeutic margins and in critically ill patients. Practical recommendations can provide insights on relevant PK/PD targets, sampling, and timing of TDM for various antibiotic classes. CONCLUSIONS: Highly variable antibiotic exposure and TA have been reported in patients receiving intermittent or continuous RRT. TDM for aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, glycopeptides, linezolid, and colistin is recommended in patients receiving RRT and suggested for daptomycin, fluoroquinolones, and tigecycline in critically ill patients on RRT.

The Effect of Renal Replacement Therapy and Antibiotic Dose on Antibiotic Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients: Data From the Multinational Sampling Antibiotics in Renal Replacement Therapy Study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing of antibiotics in critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains unclear. In this study, we describe the variability in RRT techniques and antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients receiving RRT and relate observed trough antibiotic concentrations to optimal targets. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, multinational, pharmacokinetic study in 29 intensive care units from 14 countries. We collected demographic, clinical, and RRT data. We measured trough antibiotic concentrations of meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin and related them to high- and low-target trough concentrations. RESULTS: We studied 381 patients and obtained 508 trough antibiotic concentrations. There was wide variability (4-8-fold) in antibiotic dosing regimens, RRT prescription, and estimated endogenous renal function. The overall median estimated total renal clearance (eTRCL) was 50 mL/minute (interquartile range [IQR], 35-65) and higher eTRCL was associated with lower trough concentrations for all antibiotics (P < .05). The median (IQR) trough concentration for meropenem was 12.1 mg/L (7.9-18.8), piperacillin was 78.6 mg/L (49.5-127.3), tazobactam was 9.5 mg/L (6.3-14.2), and vancomycin was 14.3 mg/L (11.6-21.8). Trough concentrations failed to meet optimal higher limits in 26%, 36%, and 72% and optimal lower limits in 4%, 4%, and 55% of patients for meropenem, piperacillin, and vancomycin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients treated with RRT, antibiotic dosing regimens, RRT prescription, and eTRCL varied markedly and resulted in highly variable antibiotic concentrations that failed to meet therapeutic targets in many patients.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Dosage Individualization of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Study.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report on a case of a 59-year-old man hospitalized in the intensive care unit because of severe SARS-COV-2 infection (COVID-19). BACKGROUND: The patient had several comorbidities, including liver cirrhosis. He developed ventilation-associated bacterial pneumonia for which he was administered cefepime at an initial dose of 2 g/8 hours. Therapeutic drug monitoring was performed, showing overexposure with an initial trough concentration of >60 mg/L. METHODS: Analysis of pharmacokinetic data and model-based dose adjustment was performed using BestDose software. RESULTS: The patient had unexpected pharmacokinetic parameter values. Serum creatinine was only moderately increased, whereas measured creatinine clearance based on urine collection showed impaired renal function. Bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration was also considered in the dosing decisions. After dose reduction to 0.5 g/8 hours, the cefepime trough concentration progressively declined and reached the target values by the end of the therapy. A post-hoc analysis provided a different interpretation of drug overexposure. CONCLUSION: This case report illustrates how physiological, microbiological, and drug concentration data can be used for model-based dosage individualization of cefepime in intensive care unit patients.

Amikacin Initial Dose in Critically Ill Patients: a Nonparametric Approach To Optimize A Priori Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainments in Individual Patients.

Amikacin is commonly used for probabilistic antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients with sepsis. Its narrow therapeutic margin makes it challenging to determine the right individual dose that ensures the highest efficacy target attainment rate (TAR) in this setting. This study aims to develop a new initial dosing approach for amikacin by optimizing the a priori TAR in this population. A population pharmacokinetic model was built with a learning data set from critically ill patients who received amikacin. It was then used to design an initial dosing approach maximizing a priori TAR for a target ratio of ≥8 for the peak concentration to the MIC (Cmax/MIC) or of ≥75 for the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h to the MIC (AUC0-24/MIC). In the 166 patients included, 53% had amikacin Cmax of ≥64 mg/liter with a median dose of 23.4 mg/kg. A two-compartment model with creatinine clearance and body surface area as covariates best described the data and showed good predictive performance. Our dosing approach was successful in optimizing TAR for Cmax/MIC, with a rate of 92.9% versus 67.9% using a 30-mg/kg regimen, based on an external subset of data and assuming a MIC of 8 mg/liter. Mean optimal doses were higher (3.5 ± 0.5 g) than with the 30-mg/kg regimen (2.1 ± 0.3 g). Suggested doses varied with the MIC, the target index, and desired TAR threshold. A dosing algorithm based on the method is proposed for a large range of patient covariates. Clinical studies are necessary to confirm efficacy and safety of this optimized dosing approach.

Lung Pharmacokinetics of Tobramycin by Intravenous and Nebulized Dosing in a Mechanically Ventilated Healthy Ovine Model.

BACKGROUND: Nebulized antibiotics may be used to treat ventilator-associated pneumonia. In previous pharmacokinetic studies, lung interstitial space fluid concentrations have never been reported. The aim of the study was to compare intravenous and nebulized tobramycin concentrations in the lung interstitial space fluid, epithelial lining fluid, and plasma in mechanically ventilated sheep with healthy lungs. METHODS: Ten anesthetized and mechanically ventilated healthy ewes underwent surgical insertion of microdialysis catheters in upper and lower lobes of both lungs and the jugular vein. Five ewes were given intravenous tobramycin 400 mg, and five were given nebulized tobramycin 400 mg. Microdialysis samples were collected every 20 min for 8 h. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed at 1 and 6 h. RESULTS: The peak lung interstitial space fluid concentrations were lower with intravenous tobramycin 20.2 mg/l (interquartile range, 12 mg/l, 26.2 mg/l) versus the nebulized route 48.3 mg/l (interquartile range, 8.7 mg/l, 513 mg/l), P = 0.002. For nebulized tobramycin, the median epithelial lining fluid concentrations were higher than the interstitial space fluid concentrations at 1 h (1,637; interquartile range, 650, 1,781, vs. 16 mg/l, interquartile range, 7, 86, P < 0.001) and 6 h (48, interquartile range, 17, 93, vs. 4 mg/l, interquartile range, 2, 9, P < 0.001). For intravenous tobramycin, the median epithelial lining fluid concentrations were lower than the interstitial space fluid concentrations at 1 h (0.19, interquartile range, 0.11, 0.31, vs. 18.5 mg/l, interquartile range, 9.8, 23.4, P < 0.001) and 6 h (0.34, interquartile range, 0.2, 0.48, vs. 3.2 mg/l, interquartile range, 0.9, 4.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with intravenous tobramycin, nebulized tobramycin achieved higher lung interstitial fluid and epithelial lining fluid concentrations without increasing systemic concentrations.

Stability of clozapine tablets repackaged in dose administration aids using repackaging machines.

BACKGROUND: The use of dose administration aids in automated ward dispensing devices requires the repackaging of medications, which may impact their stability compared with the original manufacturer's packaging. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the physical and chemical stability of clozapine tablets for up to 84 days after repackaging. METHODS: A total of 900 tablets of clozapine 100 mg (Viatris) were repackaged and stored under five different conditions to conduct physical and chemical stability tests on days 0, 28, 56 and 84. The results were compared with control tablets in their original packaging. Visual inspections of tablet appearance were performed. Physical tests included assessments of mass uniformity, friability and resistance to crushing, following the standards of the European Pharmacopoeia 11th edition. The chemical stability was determined using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem-mass spectrometry detection (UHPLC-MS/MS) to measure clozapine concentration, N-desmethyl-clozapine, and monitor clozapine degradation to detect formation of any degradation products other than N-desmethyl-clozapine. RESULTS: Visual examination showed changes in the appearance of tablets only in those stored under UV light. Mass uniformity met standards for all tablets over 84 days. None passed the friability test due to tablet cracking after tumbling. A gradual deterioration in tablet hardness was observed with the resistance to crushing test. In terms of chemical stability, N-desmethyl-clozapine was undetected in any of the tablets stored under all conditions, and the mean concentration of clozapine remained within the target range over 84 days. CONCLUSION: N-desmethyl-clozapine was not detected and clozapine concentrations remained stable under all storage conditions. The tablets were compliant with the mass uniformity test in each condition. However, the tablets were cracked in the friability test and gradual deterioration in tablet hardness was observed. In the light of these results, the Vinatier Hospital pharmacy has chosen to establish a shelf life for clozapine tablets of 84 days.

Pharmacokinetic variability of beta-lactams in critically ill patients: A narrative review.

The use of antibacterial drugs is very common in critically ill patients and beta-lactam agents are widely used in this context. Critically ill patients show several characteristics (e.g., sepsis, renal impairment or conversely augmented renal clearance, renal replacement therapy) that may alter beta-lactam pharmacokinetics (PK) in comparison with non-critically ill patients. This narrative literature review aims to identify recent studies quantifying the variability of beta-lactams volume of distribution and clearance and to determine its main determinants. Seventy studies published between 2000 and 2018 were retained. Data on volume of distribution and clearance variability were reported for 5 penicillins, 3 beta-lactamase inhibitors, 6 cephalosporins and 4 carbapenems. Data confirm specific changes in PK parameters and important variability of beta-lactam PK in critically ill patients. Renal function, body weight and use of renal replacement therapy are the principal factors influencing PK parameters described in this population. Few studies have directly compared beta-lactam PK in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients. Conclusions are also limited by small study size and sparse PK data in several studies. These results suggest approaches to assess this PK variability in clinical practice. Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring seems to be the best way to deal with this issue.

Determinants of amikacin first peak concentration in critically ill patients.

Amikacin antimicrobial effect has been correlated with the ratio of the peak concentration (Cmax ) to the minimum inhibitory concentration. A target Cmax ≥ 60-80 mg/L has been suggested. It has been shown that such target is not achieved in a large proportion of critically ill patients in intensive care units. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the determinants of Cmax ≥ 80 mg/L on the first peak in 339 critically ill patients treated by amikacin. The influence of available variables on Cmax target attainment was analyzed using a classification and regression tree (CART) and logistic regression. Mean Cmax in the 339 patients was 73.0 ± 23.9 mg/L, with a target attainment rate (TAR, Cmax ≥ 80 mg/L) of 37.5%. In CART analysis, the strongest predictor of amikacin target peak attainment was dose per kilogram of lean body weight (dose/LBW). TAR was 60.1% in patients with dose/LBW ≥ 37.8 vs. 19.9% in patients with lower dose/LBW (OR = 6.0 (95% CI: 3.6-10.2)). Renal function was a secondary predictor of Cmax . Logistic regression analysis identified dose per kilogram of ideal body weight (OR = 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09-1.17)) and creatinine clearance (OR = 0.993 (95% CI: 0.988-0.998)) as predictors of target peak achievement. Based on our results, an amikacin dose ≥ 37.8 mg/kg of LBW should be used to optimize the attainment of Cmax ≥ 80 mg/L after the first dose in critically ill patients. An even higher dose may be necessary in patients with normal renal function.