Increasing COVID-19 vaccination in the United States: projected impact on cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by age and racial group.

OBJECTIVES: Minority populations in the United States face a disproportionate burden of illness from COVID-19 infection and have lower vaccination rates compared with other groups. This study estimated the equity implications of increased COVID-19 vaccination in the United States, with a focus on the number of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths avoided. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational real-world modeling study. METHODS: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were used to identify the remaining unvaccinated US population by county, age, and race as of October 22, 2021. The number of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths avoided were calculated based on case incidence and death data from the CDC, along with data on race- and age-specific hospitalization multipliers, under a scenario in which half of the remaining unvaccinated population per county, race, and age group obtained a full vaccine regimen. RESULTS: Vaccinating half of the remaining unvaccinated population in each age and race subgroup within counties would result in an estimated 22.09 million COVID-19 cases avoided, 1.38 million hospitalizations avoided, and 150,000 deaths avoided over 12 months. Some minority groups, particularly Black and Hispanic/Latino populations, were projected to experience substantial benefits from increased vaccination rates as they face both lower vaccination rates and worse outcomes if infected with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing COVID-19 vaccination in the United States not only benefits the population as a whole but also serves as a potentially useful lever to reduce the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 illness among minority populations.

Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers on renal and mortality outcomes in people with Type 2 diabetes and proteinuria.

AIM: To assess the impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on renal and mortality outcomes in people with Type 2 diabetes and proteinuria. METHODS: A literature search up to 6 June 2019 was performed. We included randomized trials of ≥100 participants with Type 2 diabetes and micro- or macroalbuminuria comparing an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker with placebo ± background anti-hypertensives or non-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker-containing anti-hypertensives, which included follow-up of ≥12 months. Endpoints included doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and progression and regression of proteinuria. A Hartung-Knapp random-effects model (between-study variance calculated using the Paule-Mandel estimator) producing a risk ratio with 95% confidence interval was employed. RESULTS: The use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker was not associated with a significant reduction in the risk of a doubling in serum creatinine (n = 7 trials, RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.50-1.21). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers reduced the risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease (n = 8, RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.75-0.83). No difference in all-cause (n = 11, RR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.89-1.08) or cardiovascular mortality (n = 6 trials, RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.92-1.28), nor the composite outcome of doubling in serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease or mortality (n = 3 trials, RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.72-1.06), was observed. Progression of proteinuria was decreased with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use vs. control (n = 10, RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.33-0.74). Regression of proteinuria was not improved with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (n = 11, RR = 1.55, 95% CI = 0.93-2.58). CONCLUSION: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may reduce the risk of end-stage renal disease and slow the progression of nephropathy, but they do not appear to decrease all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in people with Type 2 diabetes and proteinuria.

Incidence of hospital readmission in patients diagnosed with DVT and PE: clinical burden of recurrent events.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which comprises deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and represents a considerable economic burden to the US healthcare system. Although it is well established that patients with an initial VTE are at increased risk for recurrent VTE, limited data exist on the clinical burden of a secondary DVT or PE event. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to conduct an epidemiologic evaluation, from a hospital perspective, of patients with an initial DVT or PE who experienced a recurrent event postdischarge requiring hospital readmission. METHODS: Hospital claims containing DVT or PE as a primary diagnosis for hospitalisation during the period October 2009 to April 2013 were identified by retrospective analysis using the MarketScan database. The time to hospital readmission for DVT or PE was assessed using the MarketScan Treatment Pathways tool. RESULTS: Of 214,901 patient admissions identified with a diagnosis of DVT or PE at hospital admission, approximately 4% were subsequently readmitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of PE (8217) or DVT (9138). Of all readmitted patients with a diagnosis of DVT on initial admission, 66% were rehospitalised with a diagnosis of DVT, and 34% were rehospitalised with a diagnosis of PE. Of all readmitted patients with a diagnosis of PE on initial admission, 63% were rehospitalised with a diagnosis of PE and 37% with a diagnosis of DVT. Of all hospital readmissions with a diagnosis of PE or DVT, 62% and 58% occurred within the first 30 days following an initial PE or DVT event, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of DVT or PE is large, not only because of the initial hospitalisation event but also because of the high number of hospital readmissions, more than half of which occur within 30 days.

Prior myocardial infarction and presence of upper gastrointestinal conditions among patients with venous thromboembolism: prevalence, associated comorbidities and burden.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a serious, life-threatening condition that often complicates treatment of individuals who are already ill and increases in risk with age. The comorbidity burden of VTE can complicate treatment; therefore, treatment should be influenced by the presence of comorbidities (Kearon 2012). The prevalence of common conditions in the VTE population is, therefore, an important subject of research. Prevalence of two common comorbid burdens, prior myocardial infarction (MI) and upper gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, was studied among survey respondents who reported DVT or PE. METHODS: Responses to the 2010 wave of the National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), a self-administered, internet-based questionnaire from a nationwide, demographically representative sample of adults, were evaluated. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among the 814 participants reporting a history of VTE, 9·7% (n = 60) of the DVT subpopulation and 13·2% (n = 39) of the PE subpopulation also reported prior MI. In respondents with prior MI, cardiovascular, urological, and pain comorbidities were each reported as additional comorbidities by at least two thirds of respondents in both the PE and DVT subpopulations, with cardiovascular and urological conditions reported significantly (P < 0·05) more often than among respondents with no prior MI. Among the respondents reporting VTE, 48·9% (n = 302) of the subpopulation reporting DVT and 52·2% (n = 154) of those reporting PE also reported upper GI comorbidities. Cardiovascular and pain conditions in the respondents reporting upper GI comorbidities were each reported by more than three quarters of VTE patients in both the DVT and PE subpopulations and were significantly more common (P < 0·05) than among their counterparts without upper GI comorbidities. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The results of the NHWS indicate that VTE patients who have either of two common comorbid burdens, prior MI and concomitant upper GI conditions, also showed high levels of additional, concurrent comorbidities and generally poor health status. Clinicians must be aware of the total comorbidity profile of their patients who have experienced VTE in order to best manage them and prescribe appropriate therapy.

Risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in venous thromboembolism patients.

BACKGROUND: Although risk factors for MI have been described in the general population, there is a lack of data on the assessment of risk factors associated with MI in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with MI in VTE patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Health insurance claims between January 2004 and September 2008 from the Ingenix IMPACT database were analyzed. Patients aged ≥18 years were identified as of the date of their first VTE diagnosis with ≥1 year of continuous insurance coverage before the index VTE. The risk of MI for VTE patients with 1, 2, and ≥3 major risk factors as identified by published guidelines was calculated. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to identify the most predictive risk factors associated with MI. RESULTS: A total of 177,885 VTE patients were identified; 4412 (2.5%) developed an MI during a mean follow-up period of 1.3 years. Previous MI, age (≥65 years), and coronary artery disease were the most predictive risk factors of MI with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) of 5.47 (5.01-5.97), 1.78 (1.66-1.91), and 1.60 (1.48-1.74), respectively. Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for VTE patients with 1, 2, and ≥3 major risk factors relative to no major risk factor were 2.34 (1.94-2.81), 3.21 (2.67-3.85), and 6.93 (5.85-8.22), respectively. LIMITATIONS: These included possible inaccuracies or omissions in diagnoses, classification bias such as the identification of false-positive MI events, and the likely undercoding of some risk factors such as social issues. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional major cardiovascular risk factors are also predictive of MI in VTE patients. Having multiple major risk factors significantly increases the probability of developing MI events in VTE patients.

In-hospital risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding and associated costs for patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Benefits of anti-coagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) may be offset by increased risk of bleeding. The aim was to assess in-hospital risk of VTE and bleeding after THA/TKA and quantify any increased costs. METHODS: Healthcare claims from the Premier Perspective(TM) Comparative Hospital Database (January 2000-September 2008) were selected for subjects ≥ 18 years with ≥ 1 diagnosis code for THA/TKA. VTE was defined as ≥ 1 code for deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Bleeding was classified as major/non-major. Incremental in-hospital costs associated with VTE and bleeding were calculated as cost differences between inpatients with VTE or bleeding matched 1:1 with inpatients without VTE or bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 820,197 inpatient stays were identified: 8042 had a VTE event and 7401 a bleeding event (2740 major bleeding). The risks of VTE, any bleeding, and major bleeding were 0.98, 0.90, and 0.33/100 inpatient stays, respectively. Mean incremental in-hospital costs per inpatient were $2663 for VTE, $2028 for bleeding, and $3198 for major bleeding. LIMITATIONS: These included possible inaccuracies or omissions in procedures, diagnoses, or costs of claims data; no information on the amount of blood transfused or decreases in the hemoglobin level to evaluate bleeding event severity; and potential biases due to the observational design of the study. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital risk and incremental all-cause costs with THA/TKA were higher for VTE than for bleeding. Despite higher costs, major bleeding occurred less frequently than VTE, suggesting a favorable benefit/risk profile for VTE prophylaxis in THA/TKA.