Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 15(2): e0009159, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33606698

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have become widely used in low-resource settings for leptospirosis diagnostic. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the five commercially available RDTs to detect human IgM against Leptospira spp. in Thai population. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ninety-nine serum samples from Leptospirosis suspicious patients were tested with five RDTs, including Medical Science Public Health, Leptocheck-WB, SD bioline, TRUSTline, and J.Mitra. The case definition was based on MAT, qPCR, and culture results. Diagnostic accuracy was determined based on the first day of enrollment in an overall analysis and stratified according to days post-onset of fever. The five RDTs had overall sensitivity ranging from 1.8% to 75% and specificity ranging from 52.3% to 97.7%. Leptocheck-WB had high sensitivity of 75.0%. The sensitivity of five RDTs increased on days 4-6 post-onset of fever, while the specificity of all tests remained relatively stable at different days post-onset of fever. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The tested RDTs showed low sensitivity. Therefore, based on the present study, five commercially available RDTs might not be an appropriate test for acute leptospirosis screening in the Thai population.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Leptospirose/diagnóstico , Injúria Renal Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tailândia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa