Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Complex Ankle Fractures: Intra-articular Findings and 1-Year Follow-Up.

Especially after complex ankle fractures, patients regularly suffer from residual symptoms, presumably due to occult intra-articular injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-articular lesions, identify fractures specifically at risk for these, and assess the results after arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation of complex ankle fractures after 1 year. The primary outcome was the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score. Secondary outcome parameters were the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), Tegner activity scale, arthroscopic findings, functional assessment, and complications. Thirty-two patients (56% female) were enrolled. Chondral lesions were detected in 91%. Full-thickness lesions treated by microfracturing were observed in 0% of unimalleolar, 43% of bimalleolar, and 40% of trimalleolar fractures. After 1 year, the median (interquartile range) AOFAS was 94 (9) and OMAS was 90 (10) for all patients. When analyzing factors possibly influencing the outcome, age, sex, smoking, grading for surgical procedures according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists, fracture type (uni-, bi-, or trimalleolar), severity of chondral lesions graded according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (grade <4 versus grade 4), and syndesmotic instability had no significant influence on the outcome. The only variable significantly influencing the AOFAS (p = .004) and OMAS (p < .001) was body mass index (BMI; rs = -0.522 and -0.606, respectively), with a higher BMI resulting in inferior outcome scores. Complications were observed in 3 patients, 2 with superficial skin necrosis at the posterolateral incision and 1 nonunion of the medial malleolus. Taken together, these data show that intra-articular injuries were common in ankle fractures. Bi- and trimalleolar fractures were particularly at risk for full-thickness lesions. A higher BMI tended to result in inferior outcome scores. Arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation led to good to excellent results in all but 1 patient.

Using self-drilling screws in volar plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fractures: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic extensor tendon irritation is a frequent complication in volar plate osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures. It is typically caused by dorsal screw protrusion and overdrilling of the dorsal cortex. The use of self-drilling locking screws (SDLS) could overcome both causes. The practical applicability of SDLS depends on two prerequisites: (1) the feasibility of preoperative distal screw length determination, and (2) sufficient primary biomechanical stability of SDLS compared to standard locking screws (SLS). METHODS: We first assessed the feasibility of preoperative screw length determination (1): Distal radius width, depth and distal screw lengths were measured in 38 human radii. Correlations between distal radius width and depth were assessed, a cluster analysis (Ward's method and squared Euclidean distance) for distal radius width conducted, and intra-cluster screw lengths analyzed (ANOVA). The biomechanical performance of SDLS (2) was assessed by comparison to SLS in a distal radius fracture model (AO-23 A3). 75 % distal screw length was chosen for both groups to simulate a worst-case scenario. Uniaxial compression tests were conducted to measure stiffness, elastic limit, maximum force and residual tilt. Statistics comprised of independent sample t-tests and a Bonferroni correction (p < 0.0125). RESULTS: (1) Distal radius width and depth showed a high correlation (R (2) = 0.79; p < 0.001). Three distal radius width clusters could be identified: small <34 mm; medium 34-36.9 mm; large >36.9 mm. ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc analysis revealed significantly different volar-dorsal depths (p < 0.05) for nearly all screws. (2) To assess biomechanical stability nine specimens were tested each; no significant differences were found between the SDLS and SLS groups. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study demonstrates that (1) distal radius width can be used as a predictor for distal screw length and (2) that SDLS provides mechanical stability equivalent to SLS. These results highlight the feasibility of applying SDLS screws in volar plate osteosynthesis at least in extraarticular fractures.

Ankle dorsiflexion: what is normal? Development of a decision pathway for diagnosing impaired ankle dorsiflexion and M. gastrocnemius tightness.

INTRODUCTION: Impaired ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) is known to increase forefoot pressure, which is associated to various pathologies affecting the foot and ankle. M. gastrocnemius tightness (MGT) is its most common cause. Up to date we are missing a standardized examination procedure, norm values, and a valid decision pathway to diagnose impaired ADF and MGT. The aim of this study was to define norm values for ADF using a standardized examination procedure. These were used to define a decision pathway to diagnose impaired ADF and MGT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 64 young, asymptomatic subjects were examined. Based on a standardized examination procedure, bilateral ADF, both with the knee extended and flexed, non-weight bearing and weight bearing, was assessed by three investigators. Inter-rater test reliability and norm values for ADF were calculated. Side differences were analyzed. ADF differences between the knee extended and flexed were calculated. RESULTS: The standardized examination procedure revealed high ICC values (0.876-0.915). ADF values with the knee extended for the left/right limb were 22.7° ± 5.9° [95 % CI 21.2°-24.3°]/23.4° ± 6.5° [95 % CI 21.7°-25.1°] non-weight bearing and 33.3° ± 5.5° [95 % CI 31.9°-34.7°]/33.6° ± 5.6° [95 % CI 32.1°-35.0°] weight bearing. Physiological side differences with the knee extended were <6° (95 % CI). Knee flexion resulted in an approximate ADF increase of 10°. CONCLUSIONS: Based on an extensive systematic approach, physiological values for ADF were assessed in a large asymptomatic population. This allowed the definition of a decision pathway to diagnose impaired ADF and MGT. Patients presenting with pathologies associated with impaired ADF should be examined according to the herein presented examination protocol. This systematic approach provides a consistent definition of impaired ADF and MGT, which is the prerequisite to study the effectiveness of treatment strategies for MGT.

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the prospective, longitudinal outcome after arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AORIF) and to compare the results with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in complex ankle fractures. METHODS: Acute, closed, bimalleolar equivalent, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fractures were included. The AORIF cohort was enrolled prospectively. The ORIF group was identified from a retrospective database. The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The only difference was the additional arthroscopy in the AORIF cohort. The patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) following AORIF was assessed at 1 and 4 years of follow-up using the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Tegner activity scale (TAS). The AORIF cohort was propensity score matched (nearest-neighbor matching) to the ORIF database. The OMAS and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) were compared between the resulting groups. Nonparametric statistics were applied; values are presented as median (interquartile range). Twenty-six AORIF patients had a prospective 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: No significant differences (1 year vs 4 years) were identified for the OMAS (90 [10] vs 90 [11]) and TAS (4 [2] vs 5 [2]). The severity of the cartilage lesions (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade <4 vs ICRS of 4) had no significant influence on the PROMs. Twenty-five patients per cohort (AORIF vs ORIF) were matched. The OMAS (90 [13] vs 75 [40]; P = .008) and FAAM Activities of Daily Living (ADL; 96 [11] vs 88 [30]; P = .034) revealed significantly better outcomes for AORIF. More patients in the AORIF cohort returned to sport (96% vs 77%; P = .035), with a higher FAAM Sports score (88 [37] vs 56 [47]; P = .008). CONCLUSION: AORIF for complex ankle fractures led to consistently good to excellent results. The propensity score-matched analysis revealed a significantly better outcome 4 years after surgery for AORIF compared with ORIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.