Hydropneumatic anal dilation in conservative treatment of chronic anal fissure: clinical outcomes and randomized comparison with topical nitroglycerin.

BACKGROUND: The surgical approach in chronic anal fissures (CAF) may, occasionally result in anal incontinence. The aim of this investigation was to study feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of hydropneumatic anal dilation (HAD) in conservative treatment of CAF and to compare it with local nitroglycerin (GTN) treatment. METHODS: Efficacy of HAD was evaluated in 109 patients (65 male, 44 female; mean age, 53.3 years), following anal dilation using Microvasive Rigiflex instrument (Otw 40 mm). Thereafter, 36 patients were randomly divided into two groups to undergo treatment with 0.25% GTN or HAD. RESULTS: Recovery rate with HAD was 79.8% after 10 days and 94.5% after 30 days. An immediate (within 24 hours) drop was observed in the level of pain; no significant complications or recurrence were reported within 2 years. Healing rate was 94.5% following HAD vs. 38.9% after GTN. CONCLUSION: HAD should be considered a new safe option in CAF treatment.

Perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum and ileocecal junction in humans.

Previous manometric studies of the ileocolonic junction were performed without assessing the precise spatial relationship between recording sensors and ileocolonic junction. In the present study, the motor activity of the ileocolonic junction was recorded using manometric sensors localized under direct colonoscopic control in 11 patients (4 men, 7 women; mean age, 55 years) referred for hematochezia with normal stool frequency. No medications were administered before and during endoscopy. A perfused catheter (OD 1.7 mm, with three side holes 4 mm apart and marked by evenly spaced black rings in the distal 6 cm) was passed through the biopsy channel of the endoscope and advanced through the ileocolonic junction and 6 cm into the ileum. The catheter was then withdrawn into the cecum by 1-cm steps, and motor activity was recorded for 4-6 minutes at each station. A single catheter taped to the endoscope continuously recorded cecal pressure. An ileocecal pressure gradient could not be identified in the majority of subjects; individual values ranged from -8 to +4 mm Hg, and gradients were maintained over the entire length of the ileum. In the distal ileum, tonic and phasic pressure waves were detected. Tonic variations were present for 70.1% of the recording time, either alone (44%) or together with phasic waves (56%). Phasic waves were present for 10.3% of the recording time and, according to their duration, were subdivided into those compatible with the rate of ileal slow waves and prolonged waves not compatible with the rate of ileal slow waves. Regular phasic waves could be either isolated or in clusters; prolonged waves were always isolated. A similar proportion of regular (27.9%) and prolonged (31.2%) phasic waves propagated aborally along the ileum or from ileum to cecum. Clusters presented an average of 8.7 +/- 0.6 peaks/min, and 44% of them propagated aborally. The manometric characteristics did not vary between the segments 5-3 cm and 2-0 cm proximal to the ileocecal junction. In conclusion, a powerful ileocecal sphincter was not detected at the human ileocecal junction, and motor activity of the distal ileum was characterized by tonic changes and rapid phasic contractions.

Perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum and ileocecal junction: technique, normal patterns, and comparison with transileostomy manometry.

The technique of perendoscopic manometry was used to study the motor patterns of the ileocecal junction and distal ileum. An expert endoscopist cannulated the distal ileum of 20 unsedated subjects in 260 +/- 252 (mean +/- SD) seconds, causing no discomfort beyond that of an ordinary colonoscopic examination. No sphincter-like motor activity was detected at the ileocecal junction, and four distinct motility patterns were identified in the distal ileum: (1) tone variations, (2) slow phasic contractions, (3) regular rapid phasic contractions, and (4) prolonged rapid phasic contractions. Previous appendectomy and insertion of the colonoscope into the distal ileum to position the manometric catheter did not affect the manometric recordings. Perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum was compared with transileostomy manometry in 9 subjects. Perendoscopic and transileostomy manometric recordings showed the same motor patterns except for a longer occurrence of tone variations with perendoscopic manometry. In conclusion, this study shows that perendoscopic manometry of the distal ileum and ileocecal junction is feasible; recorded motor patterns are not affected.