Schizophrenia: Developmental Variability Interacts with Risk Factors to Cause the Disorder: Nonspecific Variability-Enhancing Factors Combine with Specific Risk Factors to Cause Schizophrenia.

A new etiological model is proposed for schizophrenia that combines variability-enhancing nonspecific factors acting during development with more specific risk factors. This model is better suited than the current etiological models of schizophrenia, based on the risk factors paradigm, for predicting and/or explaining several important findings about schizophrenia: high co-morbidity rates, low specificity of many risk factors, and persistence in the population of the associated genetic polymorphisms. Compared with similar models, e.g., de-canalization, common psychopathology factor, sexual-selection, or differential sensitivity to the environment, this proposal is more general and integrative. Recently developed research methods have proven the existence of genetic and environmental factors that enhance developmental variability. Applying such methods to newly collected or already available data can allow for testing the hypotheses upon which this model is built. If validated, this model may change the understanding of the etiology of schizophrenia, the research models, and preventionbrk paradigms.

Deficits in prefrontal metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 are associated with functional alterations during emotional processing in bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Elucidating biological mechanisms contributing to bipolar disorder (BD) is key to improved diagnosis and treatment development. With converging evidence implicating the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) in the pathology of BD, here, we therefore test the hypothesis that recently identified deficits in mGlu5 are associated with functional brain differences during emotion processing in BD. METHODS: Positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]FPEB was used to measure mGlu5 receptor availability and functional imaging (fMRI) was performed while participants completed an emotion processing task. Data were analyzed from 62 individuals (33 ± 12 years, 45 % female) who completed both PET and fMRI, including individuals with BD (n = 18), major depressive disorder (MDD: n = 20), and psychiatrically healthy comparisons (HC: n = 25). RESULTS: Consistent with some prior reports, the BD group displayed greater activation during fear processing relative to MDD and HC, notably in right lateralized frontal and parietal brain regions. In BD, (but not MDD or HC) lower prefrontal mGlu5 availability was associated with greater activation in bilateral pre/postcentral gyri and cuneus during fear processing. Furthermore, greater prefrontal mGlu5-related brain activity in BD was associated with difficulties in psychomotor function (r≥0.904, p≤0.005) and attention (r≥0.809, p≤0.028). LIMITATIONS: The modest sample size is the primary limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in prefrontal mGlu5 in BD were linked to increased cortical activation during fear processing, which in turn was associated with impulsivity and attentional difficulties. These data further implicate an mGlu5-related mechanism unique to BD. More generally these data suggest integrating PET and fMRI can provide novel mechanistic insights.