RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency care at a primary health care (PHC) level must be strengthened to reduce overall mortality and morbidity in any country. Developing recommendations for improvement in this area should take into consideration the context and nuances of the current emergency care system and primary health care context. Contribution to policy from the experts in the cross-cutting fields of PHC and emergency care is lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of emergency care in primary health settings and develop consensus-based recommendations for the strengthening of emergency care at this level. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi technique, data were collected from various data sources to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of emergency care at PHC level, from which recommendation statements were developed. These recommendations were proposed to a panel of experts using a Delphi survey to build consensus on 14 recommendations to strengthen emergency care at PHC level. RESULTS: Ten experts were recruited to participate (n = 10) with a response rate of 90% in round II and 80% in round III of Delphi. Recommendations broadly addressed the areas of education and training in emergency care, the role and placement of various actors, leadership in emergency care and the development of a national plan for emergency care. Consensus was reached in round II for 97.61% of the statements and after modification based on open-ended comments, 98.21% consensus was reached in round III. CONCLUSION: Strengthening emergency care at primary and subsequent levels of health care requires a coordinated effort and mandate from authority in order to effect real change.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Humanos , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Atenção à Saúde , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Primary health care (PHC) focuses on health promotion and disease prevention; however, acute episodes and emergencies still occur at this level of care. The World Health Organization (WHO) proposes strengthening emergency care at a PHC level as a way of lessening the burden of disease on the overall health system. It is not known how health care practitioners at the PHC level experience management of emergencies. AIM: To explore and describe the experiences of PHC practitioners dealing with emergencies at PHC facilities in Gauteng, South Africa. SETTING: The study was conducted in the District Health Services of Gauteng province in South Africa, including clinics, community health care centres and district hospitals. METHODS: Using a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposively selected sample of professional nurses and doctors from various levels of the district health care system. Data were transcribed and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Various themes were identified related to the individual confidence and competence of the PHC practitioner, the team approach, the process of role and task allocation and the need for training. CONCLUSION: The study provided a voice for the needs of health care practitioners dealing with emergencies at the PHC level. The designing of a targeted and contextually appropriate approach to emergency care training of health care practitioners in the PHC setting that improves team dynamics and team performance, is recommended.Contribution: The insights of PHC practitioners dealing with emergencies contribute contextual relevance to any strategic improvement of care at this level.
Assuntos
Emergências , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , África do Sul , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
Background: Nurses from the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care unit (ICU) must interact during the handover procedure. Factors such as unit boundaries, the interaction between different specialities, patient acuities, and treatment adjustments generate specific negotiating and teamwork problems during the transition of patients from ED to ICU. Objective: This study aimed to describe the opinions of nurses regarding the effectiveness of handover practices between nurses in the ED and ICU in a major academic hospital in Gauteng province, South Africa. Method: An analytical cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected using a 16-item handover evaluation tool. It comprises two sections (1) biographical details and (2) 16 statements about handover quality divided into five constructs, namely information transfer, shared understanding, working atmosphere, overall handover quality, and circumstances of handover. Data analysis was done utilising descriptive and non-parametric statistics. Results: The majority (51.8%; n = 115) of the handovers occurred during the day. Out of 171 nurses, there were specialist practice emergency (19.2%; n = 33) and intensive care (28.0%; n = 48) nurses. There was statistical significance in information transfer between the ED and ICU nurses. (Me = 4.0, p < 0.05), compared to ICU nurses (Me = 3.0). Nurse specialist and non-specialist nurses' handovers differed statistically significantly on 12 of the 16 items on the rating scale, compared to 10 for non-specialist nurses' handovers. Conclusion: The study showed that ED and ICU nurses have significantly different requirements and expectations for handover procedures. In addition to completed documentation, subtle interpretations of the information provided and received also impact the need. The ED and ICU nurses would need to agree on the contents of a structured handover framework because different specialities and departments have varied expectations to achieve an effective handover.
RESUMO
Introduction: Acute deterioration refers to a patient who has become physiologically unstable requiring acute care. Family presence during resuscitation efforts has been widely supported by literature. Nurses are often the primary contact for the families of patients in the emergency centre, playing an important role in facilitating family presence during acute care. To describe nurses' attitudes regarding family presence during the management of acutely deteriorating patients in the emergency centre. Methods: A descriptive quantitative study was conducted in the emergency centres of three public hospitals in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. A total sample of professional nurses (n = 57) were recruited, to complete the Emergency Department Family Presence (EDFP) survey. Statements about the negative effects of family presence during acute care of a deteriorating patient were presented and respondents were required to agree or disagree. Data were analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: The majority of the nurses agreed with the items in the EDFP survey agreeing that present relatives may misinterpret activities of health care professionals (92.8%) which can result in complaints about the quality of care (91.1%). Nurses with more years of experience (11-21 years) were more likely to disagree with the statements on family presence having negative effects on patient care than nurses with fewer years of experience (0-10 years) (OR:6.92; 95%CI: 1.29-37.28). Discussion: Nurses have the perception that family presence has a largely negative effect on patients, patient care and the families present during acute care. The contextual application of the practice of family presence during acute deterioration in an African setting needs investigation and the need for continued professional education on family centred care is emphasised. Alternative methods of facilitating family presence during the COVID-19 Pandemic must be considered as we advocate for the self determination of families and patients.
RESUMO
Background: The 72nd World Health Assembly has recognised that emergency care at primary health care level is vital for reducing overall mortality and disability. The system of emergency care at this level is affected by various external factors. Little is known about these factors and how they shape the experiences of health care practitioners dealing with medical emergencies in Primary Health Care (PHC) settings. The objective of the study was to explore the experiences of health care practitioners in dealing with emergencies in PHC facilities in the Gauteng province of South Africa. Methods: A qualitative formative evaluation approach was used. Data were collected using semi structured interviews and analysed using qualitative content analysis to describe the experiences of health care practitioners dealing with emergencies at a primary health care level. Participants included health care practitioners from various levels of the district health system. Results: Major themes that emerged explored challenges faced by health care practitioners, the referral system and influential policy such as the ideal clinic movement.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Families are not prepared for traumatic injuries of loved ones. Emergency nurses have the important role of caring for patients and families in this time of crisis. Family needs in the critical care setting have been explored using the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI), however little is known about family needs in the emergency department. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the needs of family members accompanying injured patients into the emergency department, and if these needs were met. METHODS: A quantitative, descriptive, study was conducted in a level 1 trauma facility in Johannesburg, South Africa. The population included families of patients admitted to the emergency department, sampling 100 participants. The instrument, based on the CCFNI, was validated in a pilot study in Melbourne, Australia and re-evaluated using the Cronbach Alpha validity test to ensure internal consistency.Five themes were explored: 'meaning', 'proximity', 'communication', 'comfort' and 'support' and data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended questions were analysed using content analysis. Permission from the Human Research Ethics Committee was granted and participants were ensured confidentiality and the option for counselling if required. RESULTS: Themes ranked highly important were 'meaning' and 'communication'. Satisfaction was highest for 'meaning'. Low satisfaction levels for 'communication' were found. Issues regarding prolonged time spent in the emergency department and discrimination were raised. CONCLUSION: These findings have a negative impact on the family's satisfaction with care and it is recommended that the nurse's role in family care be further explored and emphasised.