Peroral endoscopic myotomy in a pregnant woman diagnosed with mitochondrial disease: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disease characterized by impairment of normal esophageal peristalsis and absence of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Sometimes is can be a part of some genetic disorders. One of the causes of gastrointestinal motility disorders, including achalasia, is mitochondrial defects. CASE SUMMARY: We report about a pregnant woman with a history of symptoms associated with inherited mitochondrial disease, which was confirmed by genetic tests, and who was treated via peroral endoscopic myotomy. CONCLUSION: Peroral endoscopic myotomy is possible treatment option for a pregnant woman with achalasia caused by mitochondrial disease.

Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Post-Transplantation Bendamustine in Patients with Refractory Acute Leukemia: A Dose-Ranging Study.

The prognosis of acute leukemia refractory to induction chemotherapy or immunotherapy is dismal. Salvage allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is widely used option for these patients, but only 10% to 15% of patients are cured by the procedure. Preclinical studies indicate that substitution of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide with bendamustine (PTB) in a prophylaxis regimen may be associated with an augmented graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reaction. The aim of this study was to establish the optimal dose of PTB and evaluate the antileukemic effect of HSCT with this type of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. In the prospective trial (NCT02799147), PTB was administered in doses of 140, 100, and 70 mg/m2 on days +3 and +4. Myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine and oral busulfan was provided to all patients. The first 12 patients received single-agent PTB, and subsequent patients received combination therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Inclusion criteria were acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) refractory to at least one induction course of chemotherapy or target therapy and ≥5% clonal blasts in the bone marrow. The study cohort comprised 22 patients with AML and 5 with ALL. Seven patients were enrolled in the 140 mg/m2 group (due to a stopping rule), and 10 each were enrolled in the 100 mg/m2 and 70 mg/m2 groups. Primary refractory disease was documented in 41% of the patients, and secondary refractory was documented in 59%. The median blast count in the bone marrow at the start of the conditioning was 18% (range, 6% to 97%). Transplantation was performed with a matched sibling donor in 5 patients, a matched or mismatched unrelated donor in 15, and a haploidentical donor in 7. Engraftment was documented in 93% of the patients, including 89% with complete remission and 63% without measurable residual disease. After PTB prophylaxis, we observed an unusual complication, a cytokine release syndrome (CRS), in 70% of the patients, including grade 3 to 5 CRS in 44%. The most frequent clinical symptoms included high fever in 67% of patients, abnormal liver function tests in 67%, pancreatitis in 63%, skin vasculitis in 56%, enterocolitis in 48%, inflammation of oral mucosa in 37%, disseminated intravascular coagulation in 37%, and central nervous system toxicity in 26%. The development of CRS was associated with use of an HLA-mismatched donor (75% versus 20%; P = .0043). Classic acute GVHD was documented in 44% of the patients. Grade II-IV acute GVHD was associated with grade 3 to 5 CRS (67% versus 25%; P = .031). Moderate and severe chronic GVHD in the 100-day survivors were more often observed after single-agent PTB than after the combination immunosuppression (100% versus 18%; P = .002). A relatively low relapse rate was observed for this patient population. Three-year overall survival was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13% to 46%), and event-free survival was 29% (95% CI, 13% to 46%). Nonrelapse mortality was 46% (95% CI, 25% to 64%), and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 26% (95% CI, 11% to 44%). No relapses were documented after day +100. There were no statistically significant differences among the dose groups (P = .3481); however, survival was higher in the 100 mg/kg group. Survival was higher in patients with AML compared with those with ALL (35% versus 0%; P = .0157). PTB represents a promising option to augment the GVL effect in refractory AML; however, the high CRS-associated mortality necessitates additional studies to reduce the risk of this complication. Thus, routine clinical application of PTB cannot be currently recommended. Combination immunosuppression with tacrolimus and MMF partially ameliorates these complications, at least in the setting of HLA-matched allografts. Biological mechanisms of CRS and GVL after PTB require further elucidation.

Submucosal Tunneling Muscle Biopsy for Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Case Report.

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic technique can be useful in obtaining esophageal muscle specimens in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Here, we describe the case of a patient with systemic sclerosis. Histological verification of the esophageal involvement in the pathological process was required for the treatment. There were no intra- and post- operational complications.

Splenectomy following JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor therapy in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is the only treatment option with curative potential in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety of splenectomy before alloHSCT in MF patients who failed to achieve significant spleen response after ruxolitinib therapy. METHODS: Splenectomy was performed in 12 patients for alloHSCT with myelofibrosis-primary (6 patients), post-polycythemia vera (3 patients). or postessential thrombocythemia (3 patients) between 2016 and 2018. The patients were prospectively included in the study if persistence of splenomegaly ≥ 25 cm was documented after at least 3 months of ruxolitinib therapy. In eight patients subsequent alloHSCT was performed. RESULTS: Median length of hospital stay was 11 (8-30) days, median follow-up after splenectomy was 20.0 (0.6-31.1) months. No deaths were documented, perioperative morbidity was 50%. Three patients experienced portal vein thrombosis and one experienced splenic vein thrombosis. One patient developed pancreonecrosis and subdiaphragmatic abscess. Mean leukocyte count was significantly higher 1 month after splenectomy than before, 10.7 ±â€¯1.7 versus 6.9 ±â€¯2.3 × 109/L (p = 0.03). Platelets rate significantly elevated starting Day + 7 after splenectomy (p = 0.01). Median time between splenectomy and alloHSCT was 2.6 (0.17-4.5) months. All patients achieved engraftment. In early posttransplant period no cases of severe sepsis, intraabdominal infections were documented. One patient died after alloHSCT due to thrombotic microangiopathy. Seven patients are alive in disease complete remission. No relapses after alloHSCT were observed. Two-year overall survival in the whole group is 90% (95%CI 98-43%). CONCLUSION: Splenectomy before alloHSCT might be a promising option in patients who failed to achieve significant spleen response after ruxolitinib therapy.