Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obes Surg ; 14 Suppl 1: S33-9, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15479588

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Implantable Gastric Stimulator (IGS(R)), a pacemaker-like device, has been found to be safe and effective to induce and maintain weight loss. The LOSS (Laparoscopic Obesity Stimulation Survey) is a prospective non-randomized trial which enrolled 69 patients involving 11 investigator centers in 5 European Countries. In 19 patients, ghrelin was analyzed. METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2003, 69 patients (F/M 49/20), mean age 41 years (18-65) underwent IGS implantation. Mean BMI was 41 (35-57), mean weight 115.0 kg (65-160) and mean excess weight (EW) 52 kg (13-89). The IGS was actived 30 days after implantation. In a subset of 19 patients studied further, 0, 6, and 12 months appetite and satiety score were evaluated and 0 and 6 months ghrelin profile was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard error %EWL was: 8.6+/-1.8 at 1 month, 15.8+/-2.3 at 3 months, 17.8+/-2.6 at 6 months, 21.0+/-3.5 at 10 months, and 21.0+/-5.0 at 15 months. There were no intraoperative surgical or long-term complications. 7 intra-operative gastric penetrations occurred, observed by gastroscopy, without sequelae. 1 patient required a reoperation to remove a retained lead needle. In the subset of 19 patients, appetite was reduced and post-prandial and inter-prandial satiety was increased after IGS implantation. In the 19 patients, despite weight reduction, ghrelin did not increase. CONCLUSION: IGS can be implanted laparoscopically with minimal perioperative complications. Appetite is reduced and satiety is increased after the implantation. Ghrelin levels could be one of the mechanisms explaining weight loss and weight maintenance in IGS patients. If weight loss is maintained, IGS could be considered a good option for selected patients.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Hormônios Peptídicos/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Apetite , Eletrodos Implantados , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Grelina , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , Resposta de Saciedade , Estômago/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
2.
Obes Surg ; 24(2): 284-91, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24163189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after bariatric surgery remains controversial. The aim of this multicentre, open-label, pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different doses of the LMWH parnaparin administered to patients undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive 4,250 IU/day (group A) or 6,400 IU/day (group B) of parnaparin s.c. for 7-11 days. Bilateral colour Doppler ultrasound of the lower limb was performed before surgery and at the end of the treatment period. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism and death from any cause during treatment. The primary safety endpoint was major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients underwent randomization; 8 subjects were excluded following the safety analysis. One hundred thirty-one patients [106 females; mean age, 40.3 years (standard deviation (SD) ±9.6); mean body mass index (BMI), 44.6 kg/m(2) (SD ±5.4)] were assigned to group A and 119 patients [93 females; mean age, 41.5 years (SD ±9.9); mean BMI, 44.2 kg/m(2) (SD ±5.4)] were assigned to group B. The rate of the primary efficacy outcome was 1.5% (two cases; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.2-6.0%) in group A as compared with 0.8% (one case; 95% CI, 0.4-5.3%) in group B (p = ns). The composite incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 6.1% (eight cases; 95% CI, 2.9-12.1%) in group A and 5.0% (six cases; 95% CI, 2.1-11.1%) in group B (p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: A parnaparin dose of 4,250 IU/day seems suitable for VTE prevention in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/administração & dosagem , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos Piloto , Pré-Medicação , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa