Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve: Insights From Intracoronary Imaging and Physiological Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the epicardial and microvascular substrates associated with discordances between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) values. BACKGROUND: Discordances between FFR and CFR remain poorly characterized. METHODS: FFR, hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), and intravascular ultrasound were performed as indexes of epicardial function and CFR and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) as measures of microvascular function in 94 patients with moderate coronary stenosis. Maximal plaque burden (PBmax), HSR, and HMR were calculated in 4 quadrants based on values of FFR ≤0.80 and CFR ≤2.0 as follows: concordant normal (preserved FFR and CFR), concordant abnormal (low FFR and CFR), discordant low FFR and preserved CFR, and discordant preserved FFR and low CFR. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (68%) had concordant FFR and CFR findings, and 30 patients (32%) had discordant FFR and CFR. Compared with patients with preserved FFR and CFR, those with low FFR and CFR had higher PBmax (p = 0.003), higher HSR (p < 0.001), and similar HMR. Among patients with preserved FFR, those with reduced CFR had similar PBmax and HSR but a trend toward higher HMR (p = 0.058) compared with patients with preserved CFR. Among patients with reduced FFR, those with preserved CFR had lower PBmax (p = 0.004), a trend toward lower HSR (p = 0.065), and lower HMR (p = 0.03) compared with patients with reduced CFR. Furthermore, compared with patients with preserved FFR and low CFR, those with low FFR and preserved CFR had higher HSR (p = 0.022) but lower HMR (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate coronary stenosis, preserved FFR and low CFR is associated with increased microvascular resistance, while low FFR and preserved CFR has modest epicardial stenosis and preserved microvascular function.

Vasomotor Function Comparative Assessment at 1 and 2 Years Following Implantation of the Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold and the Xience V Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent in Porcine Coronary Arteries: Insights From In Vivo Angiography, Ex Vivo Assessment, and Gene Analysis at the Stented/Scaffolded Segments and the Proximal and Distal Edges.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare in vivo the restoration of vasomotor function following Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) and metallic Xience V (XV) (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) stent implantations in porcine coronary arteries at 1 and 2 years. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting metallic coronary stents induce sustained vasomotor dysfunction, and preliminary observations from arteries with bioresorbable scaffolds have indicated partially restored vasoreactivity. METHODS: A total of 15 Absorb BVS (3.0 × 18.0 mm) and 14 XV (3.0 × 18.0 mm or 3.0 × 12.0 mm) stents were randomly implanted in the main coronaries of 12 nonatherosclerotic swine. The effect of implant on vasomotor performance (constrictive and expansive) was measured in the stented/scaffolded segments and the 5-mm proximal and distal adjacent segments in vivo by angiography assessing mean luminal diameter changes following infusion of vasoactive agents at 1 year (n = 6) and 2 years (n = 6) as well as ex vivo at 2 years using a tissue chamber apparatus. Endothelial cell function and smooth muscle cell phenotype gene marker levels were evaluated with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The scaffolded Absorb BVS segments showed fully restored constrictive response compared with XV implanted vessels at 1 year: -24.30 ± 14.31% versus -1.79 ± 6.57% (p < 0.004) and at 2 years: -28.13 ± 14.60% versus -3.90 ± 6.44% (p < 0.004). The early restoration of vasomotor function within the scaffolded segments reached a peak at 1 year and did not significantly change up to 2 years. The vasoactive responses of Absorb BVS-implanted vessels within the scaffolded segments were similar to those observed within the proximal and distal edge segments at both time points. Conversely, the stented XV segments demonstrated significantly impaired constrictive response compared with the distal XV edges at 1 year: -1.79 ± 6.57% versus -21.89 ± 7.17% (p < 0.0002) and at 2 years: -3.90 ± 6.44% versus -21.93 ± 15.60% (p < 0.03). Ex vivo assessment of contraction induced by PGF2α and relaxation induced by substance P of isolated BVS segments compared with XV-treated segments generated greater contraction force of 3.94 ± 0.97 g versus 1.83 ± 1.03 g (p < 0.05), and endothelial-dependent relaxation reached 35.91 ± 24.74% versus 1.20 ± 3.79% (p < 0.01). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction gene analysis at 2 years demonstrated increased Connexin 43 messenger ribonucleic acid levels of Absorb BVS-treated vessels compared with XV-treated vessels: 1.92 ± 0.23 versus 0.77 ± 12 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Absorb BVS-implanted coronary arteries demonstrate early functional restoration of the scaffolded and adjacent segments at 1 year, which is preserved up to 2 years.

Biocorrodible metals for coronary revascularization: Lessons from PROGRESS-AMS, BIOSOLVE-I, and BIOSOLVE-II.

The impetus for developing drug-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) has been driven by the need for elastic and transient platforms instead of stiff and permanent metallic implants in diseased coronary anatomies. This endeavor would prevent acute recoil or occlusion, allow sealing of post-procedural dissections following acute barotrauma, provide inhibition of in-segment restenosis through efficient drug-elution and would further prepare the vessel to enter a reparative phase following scaffold resorption. Biocorrodible metallic platforms have been introduced as alternatives to bioresorbable polymeric scaffolds for the treatment of significant atherosclerosis and in view of the body of evidence derived from recent clinical trials we elaborate on the clinical safety and efficacy of these devices in interventional cardiology.